Off Topic

Russel Norman v China

59 replies · 1,664 views
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Even my mum thinks Norman is a twat, which means he really is a twat.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Buffon II wrote:
Even my mum thinks Norman is a twat, which means he really is a twat.


What does she say about John Key?
dairyflat2010-06-22 19:07:43
Profile pic. Should you be interested. Lakhsen, on the right, lost touch with him.
Mohammed, on the left, I'm still in touch with. He's now living in Agadez, Niger. More focused on his animals now as tourism has dried up. Is active with a co-op promoting local goods, leather work and bijouterie, into Europe. 
20/5/20

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
She doesn't mind him but doesn't really like him either. She wouldn't ever vote for him.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Cosimo wrote:
linds wrote:
Cosimo wrote:
 
Anyway, I hate left v right arguments. Peeps gotta work together for a common good, regardless of political spectrum. Dismissing people as either right wing or left helps nothing.

This statement is a contradiction though, working for the common good is not a right wing belief... at all, well in fundamental terms.


I doubt most serious right wingers would agree - most right wing political parties believe economic freedom, strong private property rights and strong legal authority etc are for the common good, and what the majority wants.

Had written up a big reply, but decided to delete.

But, I'll just say that I disagree with the statement, that people with right-wing fundamental beliefs believe in common good.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Well not all maybe, but we'll have to agree to disagree.
 
There seem to be a few on here - any opinions on this?
Cosimo2010-06-23 10:31:30
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The assumption that "right wing" suddenly means you don't care is a pretty sad case of ignorance. Especially in regards to economic policy.Michael2010-06-23 15:45:45
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Michael wrote:
The assumption that "right wing" suddenly means you don't care is a pretty sad case of ignorance. Especially in regards to economic policy.
 
You could just explain how right wing economic policy helps others, rather than saying stuff like 'pretty sad case of ignorance". This is what I mean about name calling that gets people nowhere. People aren't going to magically agree wth your arguments because you call them ignorant; in fact you'll just make them want to disagree with you.
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

To be fair,Linds didnt exactly explain his "they dont care" comment either. So Michael had no basis to answer back on


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Cosimo wrote:
Michael wrote:
The assumption that "right wing" suddenly means you don't care is a pretty sad case of ignorance. Especially in regards to economic policy.

You could just explain how right wing economic policy helps others, rather than saying stuff like 'pretty sad case of ignorance". This is what I mean about name calling that gets people nowhere. People aren't�going to magically�agree wth your arguments because you call them ignorant; in fact you'll just make them want to disagree with you.
What Tegal said...

But the point I'm making is that every right wing policy that say, Act comes out with, instantly becomes just "rich mans greed" so "<insert politician> and his cronies can get richer"

Its pretty clich�d and annoying. The "right wing" just happens to align with most economics - increasing efficiency (therefore growth and therefore everyones standard of living) In a political sense this is generally through loosening up legislation, tax breaks to increase production, etc etc. (trying not to write an economics exam)

This belief then sentences the person to be called "greedy" or "evil"Michael2010-06-23 17:53:59
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Economics is a very real thing, not edited to suit capitalists as some may believe, but a study that has gone on for centuries. Most right wing policies have this economic backing. I believe anyone in parliament who wishes to comment on growth / trade / inflation etc should have studied basic economics. Thing is very little people in our parliament has.

Sure they have advisers, but they just tell them what they want to hear. Look at the amount of MPs now days - so many have degrees in Political Science or Bachelor of Arts. Seriously?Michael2010-06-23 18:01:09
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Now off to some other threads to talk football. Because we all love football.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Football is just another evil way for someone to make money,sorry Michael.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Was recently reading in The Guardian an opinion piece about football being a tool of capitalists to prevent radical change from the masses, and that nobody who is serious about societal change believes in anything other than the abolition of the sport...

I'm guessing the author got picked last at lunchtime footy, and his missus cheated on him with John Terry.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Robb wrote:
Was recently reading in The Guardian an opinion piece about football being a tool of capitalists to prevent radical change from the masses, and that nobody who is serious about societal change believes in anything other than the abolition of the sport...




Did they use the phrase "opium of the masses" at any stage?
Profile pic. Should you be interested. Lakhsen, on the right, lost touch with him.
Mohammed, on the left, I'm still in touch with. He's now living in Agadez, Niger. More focused on his animals now as tourism has dried up. Is active with a co-op promoting local goods, leather work and bijouterie, into Europe. 
20/5/20

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Almost certainly IIRC
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Holiday anyone?

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Robb wrote:
Was recently reading in The Guardian an opinion piece about football being a tool of capitalists to prevent radical change from the masses, and that nobody who is serious about societal change believes in anything other than the abolition of the sport...

I'm guessing the author got picked last at lunchtime footy, and his missus cheated on him with John Terry.


How great would anarchistic football be? Everyone ganging up with their mates to make a massive team, or 22 blokes all playing for themselves (a bit like France vs England, really). You could have 5 balls and goals on the sidelines!
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bet someone would pick up the ball and run with it...

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
nice!
Junior822010-07-15 23:44:03

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Good piece, but I do have to ask one thing. As descendants of colony and empire, maybe we are in a position to advise other countries on the pitfalls of occupation and colonisation?
Permalink Permalink