Things that make you go hmmmm

Closed for new posts
Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years
Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years

Full report here: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results.htm

Looks like we have dropped in all three areas since 2009.  On par with Oz and slightly better than UK.


LG
Legend
5.9K
·
24K
·
about 17 years

3rd rate journalism.

Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years
Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years
Junior82 wrote:

Edumacashun.

NZ seems to be paralysed by a highly politicised primary school teaching profession that has a poor ability to teach science and maths with an intractable bias against comparing results between schools.

Now some universities are coming out and saying that NCEA "achieving" levels for science and maths in secondary schools do not prepare students for tertiary level courses, but this is disputed by secondary schools:  http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11164854

I wonder how much of this is "business as usual" - secondary students have always struggled to adapt from a highly structured teaching system to a self-motivated tertiary education system (i.e. developing an independent work ethic).  

Of more concern is this statement: "One submission to the TEC from Victoria University and Wellington Institute of Technology said students who received merit or excellence NCEA grades generally coped well with tertiary study. But most who got an "achieved" grade did not, and many would've had a "fail" grade under the old system."

Interesting choice of words - I thought labelling kids a "fail" was not appropriate anymore (the NZEI mantra)?



Three steps have been indentified to boost student performace:

  1. The Government has since "raised the bar" for teacher entry, put more emphasis on practical classroom skills and is spending $10.5 million to boost maths and science teaching.
  2. The Prime Minister's chief science adviser thinks teachers need to be better prepared for this complexity and the curriculum has to be presented in a way that engages children.
  3. Families and communities have to value science.

I think that NZ is basically going to be munted for a generation or two due to the last step.

Marquee
740
·
5.2K
·
about 17 years
Junior82 wrote:
Junior82 wrote:

Edumacashun.

NZ seems to be paralysed by a highly politicised primary school teaching profession that has a poor ability to teach science and maths with an intractable bias against comparing results between schools.

Now some universities are coming out and saying that NCEA "achieving" levels for science and maths in secondary schools do not prepare students for tertiary level courses, but this is disputed by secondary schools:  http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11164854

I wonder how much of this is "business as usual" - secondary students have always struggled to adapt from a highly structured teaching system to a self-motivated tertiary education system (i.e. developing an independent work ethic).  

Of more concern is this statement: "One submission to the TEC from Victoria University and Wellington Institute of Technology said students who received merit or excellence NCEA grades generally coped well with tertiary study. But most who got an "achieved" grade did not, and many would've had a "fail" grade under the old system."

Interesting choice of words - I thought labelling kids a "fail" was not appropriate anymore (the NZEI mantra)?



More on science, maths and the PISA report: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11168357

Three steps have been indentified to boost student performace:

  1. The Government has since "raised the bar" for teacher entry, put more emphasis on practical classroom skills and is spending $10.5 million to boost maths and science teaching.
  2. The Prime Minister's chief science adviser thinks teachers need to be better prepared for this complexity and the curriculum has to be presented in a way that engages children.
  3. Families and communities have to value science.


I think that NZ is basically going to be munted for a generation or two due to the last step.




What concerns me from what I've heard about teachers needing Masters now to teach is that this continued need to gain more and more qualifications to do the same job.

We are getting professionals more focused on gaining the right pieces of paper, or spending their time on their portfolios rather than actually doing the job - you know teaching kids.

Teaching is not the only profession which is heading this way and I think you will lose those gifted people who value the actual work they do rather than study/career advancement.


LG
Legend
5.9K
·
24K
·
about 17 years

I would have thought the Government might have spent some money on teaching teachers self defence. Kids can do what ever they like in a classroom these days without any consequences. Being suspended is a reward for them to hang out in the mall or on the streets these days.

Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years
ForteanTimes wrote:

What concerns me from what I've heard about teachers needing Masters now to teach is that this continued need to gain more and more qualifications to do the same job.

We are getting professionals more focused on gaining the right pieces of paper, or spending their time on their portfolios rather than actually doing the job - you know teaching kids.

Teaching is not the only profession which is heading this way and I think you will lose those gifted people who value the actual work they do rather than study/career advancement.


Not sure how I feel about the Masters thing.  But I would imagine that teaching like any other profession is getting more complex as our global society becomes increasingly complex and our information and understanding on "how to learn stuff effectively" increases.
I'd rather have a teacher that has the right bit of paper than one without.  I'm also making a huge and probably erroneous assumption that the teacher is motivated to teach kids (maybe even educate them) rather than pick up a pay cheque and attend a union meeting.
As for the gifted people who value the work they do - they need to be supported and encouraged to undertake further study if that is what is needed.  I would have thought that those that enjoy their career are always keen to learn more.

Legend
9.2K
·
15K
·
almost 17 years

as a person who trained to be a teacher when they introduced the degree in education as well as the teaching diploma you do not need a degrtee to teach a 10 year old math or how to write or spell etc. You need patience, laughter and the ability to guide kids to understand how things work.


You will never learn this in a university lecture theatre. The degree may be required if you were say teaching Chemistry to year 12/13s. (16/17 year olds) - but even then a masters degree in chem teaching in college - get real!

Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years
theprof wrote:

as a person who trained to be a teacher when they introduced the degree in education as well as the teaching diploma you do not need a degrtee to teach a 10 year old math or how to write or spell etc. You need patience, laughter and the ability to guide kids to understand how things work.


This seems to be the prevailing dogma in the education system and we wonder why kids struggle in maths and science?
Legend
9.2K
·
15K
·
almost 17 years

it's not difficult to teach algebra if you've passed it in school yourself - they teach you what the curriclum is in teacher's college and what you need to teach it. No degree in math at uni is going to help you teach a 10 year old how to work out this x+3=5, what is x

Marquee
740
·
5.2K
·
about 17 years
Junior82 wrote:
ForteanTimes wrote:

What concerns me from what I've heard about teachers needing Masters now to teach is that this continued need to gain more and more qualifications to do the same job.

We are getting professionals more focused on gaining the right pieces of paper, or spending their time on their portfolios rather than actually doing the job - you know teaching kids.

Teaching is not the only profession which is heading this way and I think you will lose those gifted people who value the actual work they do rather than study/career advancement.


Not sure how I feel about the Masters thing.  But I would imagine that teaching like any other profession is getting more complex as our global society becomes increasingly complex and our information and understanding on "how to learn stuff effectively" increases.

I'd rather have a teacher that has the right bit of paper than one without.  I'm also making a huge and probably erroneous assumption that the teacher is motivated to teach kids (maybe even educate them) rather than pick up a pay cheque and attend a union meeting.

As for the gifted people who value the work they do - they need to be supported and encouraged to undertake further study if that is what is needed.  I would have thought that those that enjoy their career are always keen to learn more.


Yes and no

My point is that if you remove people from actually doing their job because of time 'off the floor' then how are they good teachers?

Certain professions such as Teachers, Nurses, Doctors,  Police, etc need to learn their skills on the job. Actually doing the job dealing with people.

I am seeing so many folk come through my profession that are more than happy doing the training, study, professional development, rather than actually doing the job they came into.

It's horrible seeing my profession peopled by folk who in sit  in an office more worried about their portfolio, but never going and talking to the people they are supposed to support. 

The most tragic thing is they just don't care because it's only a paper exercise for these people. Thank god I'm getting close to the end of my career because I don't recognize these people coming in as they are idiots.

Professionalism sometimes is a fucking stupid thing. It destroys practical experience and you have a bunch of idiots dealing with some very challenging things.

It scares me how it's going to end up.

LG
Legend
5.9K
·
24K
·
about 17 years
theprof wrote:

it's not difficult to teach algebra if you've passed it in school yourself - they teach you what the curriclum is in teacher's college and what you need to teach it. No degree in math at uni is going to help you teach a 10 year old how to work out this x+3=5, what is x

 

If your stabbing device is bigger than mine, X is whatever the fuck you want it to be.

Starting XI
430
·
2.6K
·
almost 17 years

Just my $0.02 on the teaching thing. One of the real problems we have is this incessant desire to rank our kids all the time, through NCEA, National Standards, PISA etc etc. Not that I have a problem with that in itself, but teaching these days has become far more concerned with getting kids across the line on various assessment, and real learning is becoming a secondary and often forgotten objective. And no, I don't believe that making sure that little Johnny can remember the three things he need to know for the NCEA quiz tomorrow is good learning.

Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years

Sounds a lot like the old School Cert debate...


Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
over 17 years

School cert ftw. 

You used to have to learn everything, just in case it came up in the exam. 

Now internal assessment gives you half the marks, then you only need to learn the 3 achieved questions (and I literally remember teachers telling me to ignore trying to learn the excellence questions and focus on getting the achieved ones right) to get over the line. 

It may have changed since then however as that was 7-10 years ago. 

Starting XI
480
·
2.6K
·
about 17 years
theprof wrote:

it's not difficult to teach algebra if you've passed it in school yourself - they teach you what the curriclum is in teacher's college and what you need to teach it. No degree in math at uni is going to help you teach a 10 year old how to work out this x+3=5, what is x


X is the location that the treasure is buried
Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years
Kiwi Hatter wrote:
theprof wrote:

it's not difficult to teach algebra if you've passed it in school yourself - they teach you what the curriclum is in teacher's college and what you need to teach it. No degree in math at uni is going to help you teach a 10 year old how to work out this x+3=5, what is x


X is the location that the treasure is buried


Is that why no one can solve X?

Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years
Tegal wrote:

School cert ftw. 

You used to have to learn everything, just in case it came up in the exam. 

Now internal assessment gives you half the marks, then you only need to learn the 3 achieved questions (and I literally remember teachers telling me to ignore trying to learn the excellence questions and focus on getting the achieved ones right) to get over the line. 

It may have changed since then however as that was 7-10 years ago. 


Don't you think a mix of internal assessment (ooh err) and a national exam is better?
Sounds like you had teachers who weren't in it for the students.

LG
Legend
5.9K
·
24K
·
about 17 years

Don't forget, everyone is a winner too. No losers allowed. Its participating that counts.And no playing cowboys and Indians, no climbing trees and no tackle, it has to be touch.

Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
over 17 years
Junior82 wrote:
Tegal wrote:

School cert ftw. 

You used to have to learn everything, just in case it came up in the exam. 

Now internal assessment gives you half the marks, then you only need to learn the 3 achieved questions (and I literally remember teachers telling me to ignore trying to learn the excellence questions and focus on getting the achieved ones right) to get over the line. 

It may have changed since then however as that was 7-10 years ago. 


Don't you think a mix of internal assessment (ooh err) and a national exam is better?

Sounds like you had teachers who weren't in it for the students.


Actually yes, and it prepared you for university better. I did like that aspect of NCEA  (despite being better at exams than internal assessment). 

But the rest...I really hope they've changed it since I was there because it was a joke. 

Legend
2.7K
·
17K
·
over 17 years

I agree with you FT.

A good friend of mine is studying to become a teacher. She does this thing called 'placement' where she goes to a school to teach as part of her uni work. Its quite good i think because you get that experience you talk about at the same time as doing the 'professional' stuff at uni.

Legend
9.2K
·
15K
·
almost 17 years

the pacement thing is key to any teacher's development, practical teaching experience in a safe way is the only way for you to learn what actually works with kids.....

Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years
Buffon II wrote:

I agree with you FT.

A good friend of mine is studying to become a teacher. She does this thing called 'placement' where she goes to a school to teach as part of her uni work. Its quite good i think because you get that experience you talk about at the same time as doing the 'professional' stuff at uni.


Placement, practicals (practicum), clinical schoools etc.  These are all normal requirements for many professional degrees (teaching, engineering, medicine etc).
Re-visiting the qualifications thing - I am assuming that teachers get these before entering the workforce, but even if they don't, isn't it to the benefit of the pupils that they do undertake some form of "continuous professional development" throughout their career?  Teachers that go on the Royal Society Teachers Fellowships for a year generally pick up new skills and acquire new information/perspectives which help them when they return to the class room.
Finally, having now experienced reporting at both primary and secondary school levels I am very comfortable with the quality of the reporting back to me as a parent. Both use a mixture of quantitative (PATs, common tests) and qualitative assessment (overall teacher judgements and copious comments on strengths and areas to focus on for improvement).
If this is the National Standards approach then I am happy with what it delivers. 
Of course this could also be a reflection on the quality of the teachers...

First Team Squad
3
·
1.7K
·
almost 17 years

Turning 50 yesterday............

Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years

http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/south-pacific/9559523/Icebreaker-trying-to-free-NZ-expedition-stuck

Russians, Chinese, French and Australians... sounds like the little yellow digger all over again.

First Team Squad
3
·
1.7K
·
almost 17 years
Junior82 wrote:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/south-pacific/9559523/Icebreaker-trying-to-free-NZ-expedition-stuck

Russians, Chinese, French and Australians... sounds like the little yellow digger all over again.

An international incident will break out.

Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years

Between them they will keep Antartica as a wilderness area.

The Russians will exclude all gays, the Chinese will demand all flights seek pre-approval, the French will blow up any Greenpeace vessels and those that are left will be diverted by Oz to the Christmas Island immigration detention centre.


Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years

After 17 years we have replaced our top loading washing machine for a sexy front loader (Bosch) c/o the boxing day sales.

It arrived today but the cold water hose (metal) connection to the tap doesn't screw on at all.  So am using the old top loader hose (nylon connection) while I ask the store to sort it out (or I might have to end up getting a plumber in to charge me losts of money to put in a new tap or construct some sort of adaptor).


Marquee
740
·
5.2K
·
about 17 years
Junior82 wrote:

After 17 years we have replaced our top loading washing machine for a sexy front loader (Bosch) c/o the boxing day sales.

It arrived today but the cold water hose (metal) connection to the tap doesn't screw on at all.  So am using the old top loader hose (nylon connection) while I ask the store to sort it out (or I might have to end up getting a plumber in to charge me losts of money to put in a new tap or construct some sort of adaptor).


But if it's working why change anything? The old Nylon hose  connection that is.
Starting XI
70
·
3.1K
·
about 14 years
Tegal wrote:
Junior82 wrote:
Tegal wrote:

School cert ftw. 

You used to have to learn everything, just in case it came up in the exam. 

Now internal assessment gives you half the marks, then you only need to learn the 3 achieved questions (and I literally remember teachers telling me to ignore trying to learn the excellence questions and focus on getting the achieved ones right) to get over the line. 

It may have changed since then however as that was 7-10 years ago. 


Don't you think a mix of internal assessment (ooh err) and a national exam is better?

Sounds like you had teachers who weren't in it for the students.


Actually yes, and it prepared you for university better. I did like that aspect of NCEA  (despite being better at exams than internal assessment). 

But the rest...I really hope they've changed it since I was there because it was a joke. 


Late on this, but NCEA is a joke. Total joke. You can (And I have) pass with merit by August, and for slackers like myself, that's fine, and then you don't even have to turn up to the external exams if you wish. 
So basically, if you have any brains at all, you can pass all the internals, which you can do at home - and get second or third chances if you can't get it the first time, and then, bingo, you have your school qualification. 
Gooo School!


Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years
ForteanTimes wrote:
Junior82 wrote:

After 17 years we have replaced our top loading washing machine for a sexy front loader (Bosch) c/o the boxing day sales.

It arrived today but the cold water hose (metal) connection to the tap doesn't screw on at all.  So am using the old top loader hose (nylon connection) while I ask the store to sort it out (or I might have to end up getting a plumber in to charge me losts of money to put in a new tap or construct some sort of adaptor).


But if it's working why change anything? The old Nylon hose  connection that is.
True. Just a bit surprised that the new shiny advanced machine has a hose that doesn't hook up to a standard tap.
It has a fancy "auto stop" valve which might be useful. Dunno.
So am happy to use the hose and connections from old faithful until the store can sort it out.
Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years

N-Bomb. School cert, 6th form cert and Higher School cert were all jokes too.

Back in the day UE, Bursaries and Scholarships were the currency for employers, universities and professional degree schools (medicine, engineering etc) respectively.

Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years

PS. Have done our first wash including 3 yf tees.

Great seeing them tumble around in 40oC suds. It's more exciting than tv.


LG
Legend
5.9K
·
24K
·
about 17 years

You mean tvnz and your machine have something in common,  they keep on recycling the same stuff over and over.

Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years

Been watching a couple of washes now. The clothes don't follow a set pattern as they tumble through the wash cycle. Ergo each wash is unique and not a repeat event. unlike tv repeats.

Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years
Junior82 wrote:
ForteanTimes wrote:
Junior82 wrote:

After 17 years we have replaced our top loading washing machine for a sexy front loader (Bosch) c/o the boxing day sales.

It arrived today but the cold water hose (metal) connection to the tap doesn't screw on at all.  So am using the old top loader hose (nylon connection) while I ask the store to sort it out (or I might have to end up getting a plumber in to charge me losts of money to put in a new tap or construct some sort of adaptor).


But if it's working why change anything? The old Nylon hose  connection that is.

True. Just a bit surprised that the new shiny advanced machine has a hose that doesn't hook up to a standard tap.

It has a fancy "auto stop" valve which might be useful. Dunno.

So am happy to use the hose and connections from old faithful until the store can sort it out.


Plumbing tape! That's all it took. 95 c from Bunnings.
Marquee
880
·
7.3K
·
over 17 years

OzKiwi has drafted a letter of complaint to News Corp, which it has posted on its Facebook page. It has gathered more than 1000 signatures for a "massive class action" against the media giant, which would be launched if the group did not receive a retraction and apology, Mr Faulkner said.

I bet that they claimed those 1,000 signatures from New Zealander's by going down a dole office in Sydney for about an hour.

Closed for new posts

Things that make you go hmmmm

You need to be logged in to do that!