Regional Football - powered by Park Life

Chatham Cup / Kate Sheppard Cup Admin

8 replies · 509 views
09 May 08:34
The Chatham Cup and Kate Sheppard Cup are supposed to be pinnacle NZF competitions but every year there are
- teams not entering
- teams not prepared to travel and so defaulting
- unnecessary byes in Round 1

This year in the Chatham Cup
Four Lotto NRFL Men’s Championship clubs receive a bye North Shore United, Northern Rovers, Ngaruawahia United and Onehunga Mangere United when there could have been 4 less games in the Northern section in the Preliminary Round

Two Souther League sides receive a bye Nomads United and Christchurch United  when there could have been 2 less games in the Mainland section in the Preliminary Round

Four Southern Premiership teams receive a bye Queens Park, Mosgiel, AFC Northern and Otago University, when there was 1 game in the Southern section in the Preliminary Round so only 3 of those teams should have a bye.

Two games were defaulted
Western Rangers v FC Western
Wanganui Athletic v Waitara

In the Kate Sheppard Cup
Birkenhead United receive a bye when there were could have been one less preliminary round game in the north.

Wellington Phoenix Academy, Victoria University, Waterside Karori and Miramar Rangers receive a bye when there was 1 game in the Central section in the Preliminary Round so only 3 of those teams should have a byte.

One game was defaulted 
Whakatane v Ngunguru

Moturoa, NW United, Palmerston North United from the top tier
Melville, Central from the second tier did not enter.

I think the main cause of defaultls and not entering is travel, and perversely I think solution is to try and encourage more teams to enter so that if teams do get in a position to travel outside of their province, they at least have done so on the back of winning two games against their neighbours.

With teams not entering because of MoU then perhaps all the clubs in the MoU should be allowed to enter and the quid pro pro is that other clubs can enter reserve teams where they are mandated into a seperate competition.  (if you can come up with a suitable rule about eligibility)

I think the other solution is to be more open about the nature of the draw.  I think it helps with Tasman teams entering knowing that they aren't travelling to Christchurch unless they win some games.  Would you get more Taranaki, Manawatu, Hawkes Bay sides if they knew they were only travelling outside the region after winning two games.

Would it help if it was said at the beginning that 32 national league sides have direct entry to round 4, and that rounds before that are to find 32 teams to go up against them, and the draw would then have each 32 qualifier at home to a national league side.  

Should it be mandatory that teams in the top 3 or 4 divisions enter?

I think it is healthy that teams get a chance to play teams from different divisions above or below them, rather than playing the same 6,8,10 teams two or three times a year every year.
09 May 08:36
We used to have school teams enter and be competitive.

What happened there?

Three for me, and two for them.

09 May 20:27
I love the idea of National League teams entering at a later round and there being 32 “qualifiers”. I wouldn’t like to dictate that those qualifiers play at home though, it would still need to be an open draw within the region. 

You’re spot on with the Tasman region, they are absolutely the example and the essence of the cup. Having teams like Wakefield win their first match and now travel to Blenheim to play, with the winner then getting a match against Nelson Suburbs (probably) in their third game is a perfect solution. It’s so disappointing that the central teams seem to be struggling due to their extensive travel for CL2 (men’s) and CL (women’s), but isolating local derbies could be the solution. I also notice that there are very few Southern Federation teams entered (outside of the top two divisions). 

I’m not sure what the silver bullet is, but I think the goal needs to be higher participation and breaking down barriers to allow for that. 
09 May 20:27 · edited 09 May 20:29 · History
I personally don’t like schools entering. The school v club battle is hard enough without adding this to the mix 
12 May 11:47
School teams (as can the armed forces) can still enter but players can't be registered with a club, so it captures the case of provincial 1st XI playing in the local competition, but doesn't cater for those strong metropolitan 1st XI with players playing 1st team or reserve grade at local club who would make a good showing.

Also add to my original post, in R1 in the KS Cup, Papakura defaulted to Whakatane, no doubt due to the distance.  Whakatane into R2 on back of two home draws and two defaults.  At that rate every  16 years they'd make the semis!.  
12 May 12:17
Bigboot
I love the idea of National League teams entering at a later round and there being 32 “qualifiers”. I wouldn’t like to dictate that those qualifiers play at home though, it would still need to be an open draw within the region. 

You’re spot on with the Tasman region, they are absolutely the example and the essence of the cup. Having teams like Wakefield win their first match and now travel to Blenheim to play, with the winner then getting a match against Nelson Suburbs (probably) in their third game is a perfect solution. It’s so disappointing that the central teams seem to be struggling due to their extensive travel for CL2 (men’s) and CL (women’s), but isolating local derbies could be the solution. I also notice that there are very few Southern Federation teams entered (outside of the top two divisions). 

I’m not sure what the silver bullet is, but I think the goal needs to be higher participation and breaking down barriers to allow for that. 

I think for central region, most of the clubs below CL2 are content with the Federation Cup. So unless Central football was to somehow link entry to the federation cup to the Chatham cup. 
Would certainly be difficult with scheduling 
12 May 20:44
mraotxt2
Bigboot
I love the idea of National League teams entering at a later round and there being 32 “qualifiers”. I wouldn’t like to dictate that those qualifiers play at home though, it would still need to be an open draw within the region. 

You’re spot on with the Tasman region, they are absolutely the example and the essence of the cup. Having teams like Wakefield win their first match and now travel to Blenheim to play, with the winner then getting a match against Nelson Suburbs (probably) in their third game is a perfect solution. It’s so disappointing that the central teams seem to be struggling due to their extensive travel for CL2 (men’s) and CL (women’s), but isolating local derbies could be the solution. I also notice that there are very few Southern Federation teams entered (outside of the top two divisions). 

I’m not sure what the silver bullet is, but I think the goal needs to be higher participation and breaking down barriers to allow for that. 

I think for central region, most of the clubs below CL2 are content with the Federation Cup. So unless Central football was to somehow link entry to the federation cup to the Chatham cup. 
Would certainly be difficult with scheduling 
 This is what happens with the Australia / FFA Cup.  The state knockout competition serves as the qualifying for the Round of 32.  If a state  has two spots (WA/SA), those two teams as well as playing in the Australia Cup, play each other in the final of the state knockout.  For those states with four spots (NSW/Vic/Qld), those four teams as well as playing in the Australia Cup, are drawn again into semis of the state knockout.
12 May 22:56
reubee
mraotxt2
Bigboot
I love the idea of National League teams entering at a later round and there being 32 “qualifiers”. I wouldn’t like to dictate that those qualifiers play at home though, it would still need to be an open draw within the region. 

You’re spot on with the Tasman region, they are absolutely the example and the essence of the cup. Having teams like Wakefield win their first match and now travel to Blenheim to play, with the winner then getting a match against Nelson Suburbs (probably) in their third game is a perfect solution. It’s so disappointing that the central teams seem to be struggling due to their extensive travel for CL2 (men’s) and CL (women’s), but isolating local derbies could be the solution. I also notice that there are very few Southern Federation teams entered (outside of the top two divisions). 

I’m not sure what the silver bullet is, but I think the goal needs to be higher participation and breaking down barriers to allow for that. 

I think for central region, most of the clubs below CL2 are content with the Federation Cup. So unless Central football was to somehow link entry to the federation cup to the Chatham cup. 
Would certainly be difficult with scheduling 
 This is what happens with the Australia / FFA Cup.  The state knockout competition serves as the qualifying for the Round of 32.  If a state  has two spots (WA/SA), those two teams as well as playing in the Australia Cup, play each other in the final of the state knockout.  For those states with four spots (NSW/Vic/Qld), those four teams as well as playing in the Australia Cup, are drawn again into semis of the state knockout.

It would be great if something like that could be done. However I think time would be so limited as the competitions run concurrently and the added factor that some reserve sides enter the central fed cup. 
17 Jun 07:13
Always amazing during the "live" draw, how quickly they can replenish the bowls https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNyAl_qfC3g pay attention around the 4:00 mark.

Also Francis de Vries might need a lesson in how to stir the bowls.