Regional Football - powered by Park Life

Junior Coaching Courses Requirements

82 replies · 3,467 views
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Junior Coaching Courses Requirements
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I met Paul Greig a nice enough guy, he's the new Football Development Officer for Capital Football and he explained some of the initiatives that they are putting in place for the coming Junior season, some good in my opinion and some bloody crazy, first off, all junior coaches will now be called Game Day Co-ordinators, I'm not joking ! also there will be no points tables,because we don't want teams winning competitions and coaches will have to have a coaching qualification, I had previously heard of the coaching requirement and forwarded my coaching record to Capital Football, who refused me dispensation, my 30 years of coaching juniors at all levels, Club, Hutt Valley, Regional League, Rep teams and now JPL, has not given me the right tools to coach a side in the 11th grade next year, I must attend a 4 hour course, that of course is not cheap, and then my football credentials will be complete.
I was told by capital Football I had nothing to lose by taking the course, well they have something to lose and that's my continued involvement.
I personally have an aversion to courses and will reply to Capital Football and see if there new man will come and watch me run a training session with my team and will that suffice, if not I'll just hang up my boots and thats sad.

Laurie Sutherland
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
you talking about coaching for your club or for Feds?

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Laurie, if the course was free or paid for elsewhere would you attend it?
 
You may think that your coaching is good - but where do you think it compares to best practice for 11 & 12 years olds nationally, or internationally?  Aren't all coaches always learning and required to learn?
 
I sympathise with the cost issue - but if you are not doing it because you think you know everything there is to know then that to me is a bit more problematic...
 
james dean2011-07-12 21:10:54

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Agree JD.

There is nothing wrong with wanting coaches to be qualified.  Surely that is for the good of the game.  I certainly hope you don't think that you know everything there is to know about coaching kids.  Because even with 30 years experience, games/tactical/ coaching technique change and evolve over time.  I would have thought all coaches would want to find ways to improve their craft.

If it is a cost issue, then talk to your club.  Most clubs will pay for the fee. 

If it is a time factor, four hours is not overly demanding.
2ndBest2011-07-12 21:16:56
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Isn't wonderful that from 2012, there will be no leagues to play for and soccer lovers will have to enjoy and run around week in and week out doing the nice stuff? Good thing is that this will eliminate the agony and pain over teams that lose. Somehow through the Hole of Soccer, quality players will emerge and pop up like mushrooms and be competitive internationally. Reality is that this will mean the beginning of the stone age that this new initiative will bring. Isn't it nice that we will all live in a soccer world of no failures, no competition and all will be with the soccer for life. What a black hole that is emerging!
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
AngusBeef wrote:
Isn't wonderful that from 2012, there will be no leagues to play for and soccer lovers will have to enjoy and run around week in and week out doing the nice stuff? Good thing is that this will eliminate the agony and pain over teams that lose. Somehow through the Hole of Soccer, quality players will emerge and pop up like mushrooms and be competitive internationally. Reality is that this will mean the beginning of the stone age that this new initiative will bring. Isn't it nice that we will all live in a soccer world of no failures, no competition and all will be with the soccer for life. What a black hole that is emerging!

There isn't streaming or results in rugby until kids are 13ish.  Seems to work for them.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
2ndBest wrote:
AngusBeef wrote:
Isn't wonderful that from 2012, there will be no leagues to play for and soccer lovers will have to enjoy and run around week in and week out doing the nice stuff? Good thing is that this will eliminate the agony and pain over teams that lose. Somehow through the Hole of Soccer, quality players will emerge and pop up like mushrooms and be competitive internationally. Reality is that this will mean the beginning of the stone age that this new initiative will bring. Isn't it nice that we will all live in a soccer world of no failures, no competition and all will be with the soccer for life. What a black hole that is emerging!

There isn't streaming or results in rugby until kids are 13ish.  Seems to work for them.
There used to be, and that was when NZ won World Cups.

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Kick and chase is a big part of soccer and these should be very handy in drop kicks for our oval code. 
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The Coachiing requirements are for my Club feverish.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I have an aversion to courses, thats just me, courses of any kind, not just football, I am also getting on a bit, I use the better players in my squad to demonstrate drills at training and don't intend to put my ageing body on show at any coaching course.
I don't think I know everything, this season I have arranged for 2 All Whites to come up and run sessions for the team, Guys I have coached back in the day, and have arranged for other profile players in the coming weeks, I always watch and listen to other coaches and playersand have for 30 years.
I have no children or relations in my current side or any team I have coached for about 20 years, I do it because I love the game, I love the competition, I love the challenge and over the years had more than my share of success.
Sad way to finish up really.

Laurie Sutherland


Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Laurie, it is sad that you've chosen to bail simply because you've been required to gain a qualification. It is after all, for the benefit of the game and yourself. Yor're never too old too learn. If, as you say you are coaching for the love of the game and for the benefit of the kids you coach, then surely having this qualification will help them and you??? And besides it's four hours, with a bunch of like minded people....I reckon it would be awesome, and like others have said surely the clb would assit you with the fee?

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
AngusBeef wrote:
Kick and chase is a big part of soccer and these should be very handy in drop kicks for our oval code. 
You are a massive dick.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
lucious wrote:
I have an aversion to courses, thats just me, courses of any kind, not just football, I am also getting on a bit, I use the better players in my squad to demonstrate drills at training and don't intend to put my ageing body on show at any coaching course.

I've done the youth level one course, so perhaps I should run through it to help alleviate some fears.

 

It's four hours.  More than three hours of it is spent indoors covering various topics (needs of players at that age, what their physical attributes are etc). Most of it is led by the presenter, but there is some group work where attendees generate ideas on these topics.  Given your experience, I'd imagine there is plenty of knowledge you can share with the other coaches there.

 

The last bit gets each group to run a 5-10 minute mock drill.  There doesn't have to be a physical elements to it, so it shouldn't be an issue for your body.  it is not assessed.  The teacher sometimes offer feedback, but it is in no way critical.

 

Hope this helps.

 
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It is very important that Junior Coach's are both accredited and evaluated. This should be an ongoing process of peer review, education and self analysis. If it is upsetting to be challenged in such a way throw it back on your players... do you test them? If so why are you (or whoever) exempt?

Coach's should also be aware that they are there to facilitate the childrens enjoyment and development primarily. The Coach's 'rewards' are secondary.  This is not to mean the coach is a door-mat.

My understanding is that there is 11th Grade competition in 2012. However 9th and 10th will not exist as we presently know them. This will obviously create tension between players/parents in 9th Grade this season who want the Saturday Competitive Game element. Obviously Wellington may have a different level of pick-up/integration to Christchurch.

Whilst it's fair to say my understanding of the entire WOFPlan is only surface deep and that the work I've seen of it is very 1 club specific I've quite enjoyed what I have witnessed and can see clear progression in some players (ages 7-8). I am 100% already seeing higher parent/junior coaching involvement. If this means greater volunteer pick up for clubs then WOFPlan = a big win. Last night I attended a course/seminar that seriously questioned several of my 'tried and trued' coaching methods. How I assimilate/digest/ignore this information may well have impacts on my junior charges.

Btw as the Father of 4 football playing children I'd be uncomfortable  with their coach being beyond the point of extending their own education. I certainly hope the players trained by me also do not think it's top down driven mantra.

E's Flat Ah's Flat Too

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I guess one of the problems is that clubs might run their own coach education programmes - designed to fit with their model. Then to be made to sit through an external one that might be teaching something quite different..
 
 

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It's an interesting conundrum. Yes it is a very good idea to ensure coaches are trained, understand modern coaching methodologies and player centric forms of coaching but you also want recognise the fact that some coaches are vastly experienced and do know what they are doing. Perhaps one way around this is for an initial assessment of these type of coaches, once done they either can be awarded their qualification as they meet the criteria or if not then they need to go through the training regime. Extra work I know but it may stop some coaches leaving the game.
 
One thing I did speak to NZ Football about and by the looks of things they still haven't made a decision is assessment of prior knowledge in regards to the theory parts of the courses i.e. as part of my Uni course I studied coaching at a deeper level than any of the Football courses (including senior ones)  go into so I feel this should be acknowledged & I should be able to give a miss to some of the modules (not necessarily the football specific ones though).
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

probably don't mention those Uni courses to NZF - they will probably make them compulsory for coaching 8 year olds

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Feverish wrote:
I guess one of the problems is that clubs might run their own coach education programmes - designed to fit with their model. Then to be made to sit through an external one that might be teaching something quite different..
 
 
 
In this case I think the clubs need to take this into account and leverage off the NZ Football courses i.e use their internal coaching models as an adjunct to the formal NZ Football qualifications.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Feverish wrote:

probably don't mention those Uni courses to NZF - they will probably make them compulsory for coaching 8 year olds

 
Come on thats far to old, all 4 year olds need to be coached by PHD's only.
Teza2011-07-13 09:22:22
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
foal30 wrote:
It is very important that Junior Coach's are both accredited and evaluated. [/QUOTE]
It's means very little that a coach is accredited so it is in fact not important at all. I do agree though that it is important  that a coach is evaluated.
 
[QUOTE=2ndBest

I've done the youth level one course, so perhaps I should run through it to help alleviate some fears.

 

It's four hours.  More than three hours of it is spent indoors covering various topics (needs of players at that age, what their physical attributes are etc). Most of it is led by the presenter, but there is some group work where attendees generate ideas on these topics.  Given your experience, I'd imagine there is plenty of knowledge you can share with the other coaches there.

 

The last bit gets each group to run a 5-10 minute mock drill.  There doesn't have to be a physical elements to it, so it shouldn't be an issue for your body.  it is not assessed.  The teacher sometimes offer feedback, but it is in no way critical.

 

Hope this helps.

 
Waste of time spending 4 hours on theory unless they are going to spend twice as much time teaching you how to teach kids the technical aspects of the game. I can see why Laurie wouldnt want to do this course.

A dog with a bone :)

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
when given the choice does the customer;
A. go to the Doctor with no accreditation but who calls himself a Doctor
B. go to the Doctor with the PHD etc

I mention this because of the demand in this thread from certain pundits to see Professional Players at the end of the process.


E's Flat Ah's Flat Too

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
foal30 wrote:
when given the choice does the customer;
A. go to the Doctor with no accreditation but who calls himself a Doctor
B. go to the Doctor with the PHD etc

I mention this because of the demand in this thread from certain pundits to see Professional Players at the end of the process.


depends if you want a holistic approach to your football

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The other way for the theory modules to be presented would be via online learning and instructor led for the practical aspects. This would cut the cost of delivery and also allow the coaches to go at their own pace in regards to the learning, you would also reach a far larger number of people this way..
 
Triathlon NZ provide online learning for their Level 1 and 2 coaching courses.
Teza2011-07-13 09:56:18
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
lucious wrote:
first off, all junior coaches will now be called Game Day Co-ordinators, I'm not joking
 
Forgot to point out that this is correct.  Game day co-ordinators are only for 4-6 yo.  Above that, you can keep your coach title.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
nightz wrote:
Waste of time spending 4 hours on theory unless they are going to spend twice as much time teaching you how to teach kids the technical aspects of the game. I can see why Laurie wouldnt want to do this course.
That is what level 2 is for.  Surely it is best to learn techniques in how to coach kids, before teaching coaches techniques and tactics.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
2ndBest wrote:
AngusBeef wrote:
Isn't wonderful that from 2012, there will be no leagues to play for and soccer lovers will have to enjoy and run around week in and week out doing the nice stuff? Good thing is that this will eliminate the agony and pain over teams that lose. Somehow through the Hole of Soccer, quality players will emerge and pop up like mushrooms and be competitive internationally. Reality is that this will mean the beginning of the stone age that this new initiative will bring. Isn't it nice that we will all live in a soccer world of no failures, no competition and all will be with the soccer for life. What a black hole that is emerging!

There isn't streaming or results in rugby until kids are 13ish.  Seems to work for them.
 
In addition to this, while results tables aren't published, grading and mid season promotion/relegation ensures more even competition (like is currently the case), which is good for player development.  The changes also include longer playing time (eg. move from 25min halfs to 30min halfs in 11th/12th grade). Surely that is good for player development.  It is also important to note that it brings CF into line with other feds in NZ, and that no other Federation has a JPL/Promo type structure.
2ndBest2011-07-13 12:08:14
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
2ndBest - did you have anything to do with them not publishing results?

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Ha!  my teams in 2nd thank you very much.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
2ndbest is a small meat stuff. Why stop there? With teh stroke a pen, why not 1. stipulate coaches for kids soccer MUST obtain UEFA pro 3 licence, 2. players are told to kick the ball amongst themselves to increase the touches, 3. there will be no losses, 'cos there will be ALL winners.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
what's a small meat stuff?
 
Why stop there?  because it is a reasonable position. A UEFA pro 3 licence is not.  Pretty simple really.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
theprof wrote:
Laurie, it is sad that you've chosen to bail simply because you've been required to gain a qualification. It is after all, for the benefit of the game and yourself. Yor're never too old too learn. If, as you say you are coaching for the love of the game and for the benefit of the kids you coach, then surely having this qualification will help them and you??? And besides it's four hours, with a bunch of like minded people....I reckon it would be awesome, and like others have said surely the clb would assit you with the fee?


Its not only the course but also the lack of points in the competition, The Club has already offered to pay and I have turned them down, If you think it would be awesome well away you go, give me a ring after and I will tell you where a fairly handy team is that will need a new coach next year.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Sounds like you feel the point of coaching is to win leagues, rather than to develop players.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
2ndBest wrote:

Agree JD.There is nothing wrong with wanting coaches to be qualified.� Surely that is for the good of the game.� I certainly hope you don't think that you know everything there is to know about coaching kids.� Because even with 30 years experience, games/tactical/ coaching technique change and evolve over time.� I would have thought all coaches would want to find ways to improve their craft.If it is a cost issue, then talk to your club.� Most clubs will pay for the fee.� If it is a time factor, four hours is not overly demanding.



Its not a cost issue, the Club has offered to pay and I turned them down, Its simple, they demand I must do the course, I dont want to for reasons stated elsewhere on this thread, so I dont coach next year.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

nice, trust when my boy is at the age to walk/run/play footy I'll be lining up to take the team, if at that point I need to gain certain qualifications I'll go get them.

The lack of points in the compertition seems to be a separate issue to the one of coaching accreditation. Valid I guess, but a colleague of mine coaches his daughters team (8th grade I think) and they don't have competition points but each team keeps track of the scores etc. Personally at that age, I think kids need to understand winning and losing but at the end of the day don't need to be focussing on promotion/relegation etc.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
lucious wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

Agree JD.There is nothing wrong with wanting coaches to be qualified.  Surely that is for the good of the game.  I certainly hope you don't think that you know everything there is to know about coaching kids.  Because even with 30 years experience, games/tactical/ coaching technique change and evolve over time.  I would have thought all coaches would want to find ways to improve their craft.If it is a cost issue, then talk to your club.  Most clubs will pay for the fee.  If it is a time factor, four hours is not overly demanding.



Its not a cost issue, the Club has offered to pay and I turned them down, Its simple, they demand I must do the course, I dont want to for reasons stated elsewhere on this thread, so I dont coach next year.
 
reasons such as you don't like courses? that's not really a reason, just an excuse - surely there is something deeper underlying the fact that you aren't keen to coach anymore - did you fail lots of classes in school? have a bad experience?

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
theprof wrote:

nice, trust when my boy is at the age to walk/run/play footy I'll be lining up to take the team, if at that point I need to gain certain qualifications I'll go get them.

The lack of points in the compertition seems to be a separate issue to the one of coaching accreditation. Valid I guess, but a colleague of mine coaches his daughters team (8th grade I think) and they don't have competition points but each team keeps track of the scores etc. Personally at that age, I think kids need to understand winning and losing but at the end of the day don't need to be focussing on promotion/relegation etc.
 
Sad fact is that the removal of points and tables isn't to benefit the kids, it's to guide the thinking of the adults involved!  Not all of whom are as enlightened as others.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
theprof wrote:
lucious wrote:
2ndBest wrote:
Agree JD.There is nothing wrong with wanting coaches to be qualified.� Surely that is for the good of the game.� I certainly hope you don't think that you know everything there is to know about coaching kids.� Because even with 30 years experience, games/tactical/ coaching technique change and evolve over time.� I would have thought all coaches would want to find ways to improve their craft.If it is a cost issue, then talk to your club.� Most clubs will pay for the fee.� If it is a time factor, four hours is not overly demanding.
Its not a cost issue, the Club has offered to pay and I turned them down, Its simple, they demand I must do the course, I dont want to for reasons stated elsewhere on this thread, so I dont coach next year.

�

reasons such as you don't like courses? that's not really a reason, just an excuse - surely there is something deeper underlying the fact that you aren't keen to coach anymore - did you fail lots of classes in school? have a bad experience?
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
lucious wrote:
theprof wrote:
lucious wrote:
2ndBest wrote:
Agree JD.There is nothing wrong with wanting coaches to be qualified.� Surely that is for the good of the game.� I certainly hope you don't think that you know everything there is to know about coaching kids.� Because even with 30 years experience, games/tactical/ coaching technique change and evolve over time.� I would have thought all coaches would want to find ways to improve their craft.If it is a cost issue, then talk to your club.� Most clubs will pay for the fee.� If it is a time factor, four hours is not overly demanding.
Its not a cost issue, the Club has offered to pay and I turned them down, Its simple, they demand I must do the course, I dont want to for reasons stated elsewhere on this thread, so I dont coach next year.

�

reasons such as you don't like courses? that's not really a reason, just an excuse - surely there is something deeper underlying the fact that you aren't keen to coach anymore - did you fail lots of classes in school? have a bad experience?


Yep I've had a few bad experiences lets meet up and I will share one with you.
Permalink Permalink