Regional Football - powered by Park Life

Red Misting

206 replies · 6,604 views
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
stealthkiwi wrote:
I'm one of the older females on here and boxing (which i do with a permanatly broken knuckle) is my great passion... way more than football and I know loads of chicks who do martial arts or fight
 
Is that cos you Sheilas are sh*t at footy?

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
WARNING: SARCASM

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
lol your sarcasm and its BIG warning are wasted on me since I totally own to being sh*t at football and you all know I'm not the most passionate footy fan either since slept through all the early morning world cup matches cause raving comes first :P
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
stealthkiwi wrote:
lmsmith wrote:

Well, I'm not really in the business of hitting people because I'm terrified of violence, and have broken fingers before so I know how much it hurts! If I wasn't so pathetically scared, I probably would have.
 
I'm not trying to say that she WAS abusive, just that it's pretty unlikely that she a) would have admitted to it if she wasn't and b) that anyone (not to be sexist, but especially a girl - there are a few cultural restraints most of us feel apply to us in regards to physical violence) would hit someone unprovoked.
 
The other sport she plays is underwater hockey. She has represented New Zealand in the past.
 
But you are being incredibly sexist... and also are showing once again you haven't thouroughly read this thread. The two of us on here who both immediately stepped up and owned the fact we'd thrown punches before are both female. Netball - a female dominated sport is one of the more violent aggressive sports played in NZ and I shd know having played much less brusing inline hockey
 
I'm one of the older females on here and boxing (which i do with a permanatly broken knuckle) is my great passion... way more than football and I know loads of chicks who do martial arts or fight
 
I'm a female. And I've thrown a punch before. I've also deliberately flicked this girl we're talking about in the face because she pissed me off so much (not something I'm proud of).
 
I did martial arts for a couple of years too, but there IS NO comparison between boxing/martial arts and physically attacking another person - in boxing, the whole point is to hit. It's hardly the aim on the football field, and it's not a *normal* thing to happen - as evidenced by how much this news story has blown up.
 
The whole point is that there are very very few people out there who will throw a punch without provocation, especially girls because, in general, there is more societal pressure on us to avoid physical violence. That's not saying that girls don't hit people, it's saying that most members of society (sex excluded) avoid unprovoked violence.
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ard Righ wrote:
el grapadura wrote:
So does this mean you wouldn't have a problem with me smashing you in the face next time I see you since you've been calling me boxhead?


As a referee, you should understand the content of Law 12 around abusive language. Do you think it's OK for a player to run around on the pitch saying whatever they like for an entire game?

I have shouted at people, and talked my fair amount of crap to a lot of people, but not to the point of winding someone up enough to get decked.

This thread focuses a lot on the girl being hit, everyone seems to be fine glossing over the fact the girl was abusive.

If she'd been told to keep quiet, the issue of someone getting angry enough to knock her out is defused to begin with.

If you're going to talk about what's right on a football pitch, at least make sure you cover both sides of the story.


And this is the point - because reasonable people don't respond to verbal insults by blindsiding someone and knocking them out cold.

So you should really count yourself lucky you haven't come accross a psycho like the girl in question. Although if we're now accepting calculated physical violence in response to verbal insults, I may reconsider my approach of dealing with the entire issue.
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
lmsmith wrote:
el grapadura wrote:
So does this mean you wouldn't have a problem with me smashing you in the face next time I see you since you've been calling me boxhead?


The whole point is that if you provoke someone, you have to expect retaliation.



What farken world do you live in?

The smart person walks away. Most will simply trade verbals.

An idiot waits, blindsides, and then knocks someone out cold. Such a person does not belong on the football field. At least for a long, long time, so they can reflect on what a reasonable response is to a verbal insult.
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think we can agree on a few facts:

a) violence is not okay on the football pitch.
b) violence is really not okay if it happens off the football pitch because of something that happens on the football pitch (because of the premeditation factor).
c) bullying is not okay anywhere.
d) sledging is part of the game but should be policed before it turns into bullying.

I am remembering two incidents along these lines that happened to me:

1. A few months ago I dislocated my finger playing Gaelic footy. My first game back I was playing with them taped together. I was playing fullback, marking some scary looking lady who at one stage grabbed my taped fingers and twisted. Then mockingly asked how that felt. I ran up to her, looked her in the eyes and said "JUST GREAT, THANK YOU". Of course that chick should probably have been sent off, but the ref didn't see it so it was legal. I was very upset and surely doing what that girl did shouldn't have been part of the game. But note - I didn't wait until after the game and deck her. In fact, I went up and shook her hand, just to make it clear that her efforts to drive me nuts hadn't worked.

2. Another time I was playing soccer (in goal, as I do) against a very rough and rowdy team from south Auckland. They were deliberately trying to put me off while taking goal kicks by any means necessary, and it was working - they were getting under my skin. Eventually I decided that a response was necessary, preferably one that wouldn't get me sent off. While lining up a goalkick, and listening to them taunt me, I yelled back: YOUR MOTHER DRESSES YOU FUNNY. The opposition shut up, my own team cracked up laughing and the tension was relieved. That little statement became a running joke for the rest of the season.

The moral of the story? Hard-core sledging verging on bullying is something that should not happen on a sports field/pool/whatever. But there are other ways to react than king-hitting the offender after the game.

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
lmsmith wrote:
It's hardly the aim on the football field, and it's not a *normal* thing to happen - as evidenced by how much this news story has blown up.
 
 
This "news story" has blown up simply because one YFite was personally involved and mentioned it on here and the rest of us all wanted to put our two cents in as usual and The Doom Post sometimes has nothing better to do than get story ideas from our scintiallting forums and they guessed that the whole sordid fact the violence involved females *gasp* wd titilate and scandalise the nation...
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
lmsmith wrote:
el grapadura wrote:
So does this mean you wouldn't have a problem with me smashing you in the face next time I see you since you've been calling me boxhead?


The whole point is that if you provoke someone, you have to expect retaliation.



What farken world do you live in?

The smart person walks away. Most will simply trade verbals.

An idiot waits, blindsides, and then knocks someone out cold. Such a person does not belong on the football field. At least for a long, long time, so they can reflect on what a reasonable response is to a verbal insult.
 The whole point is 5 weeks is a disgrace for such thugish behaviour
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
lmsmith wrote:
Frankie Mac wrote:
There is a MASSIVE difference between two players having continued verbals during a game and bullying.� In fact, it is f**king stupid to even put the two in the same sentance.[/QUOTE]

The whole point is that what this girl was doing (ie sustained over the game) may constitute bullying. There's a difference between "continued verbals" and bullying, I agree - but I can almost guarantee, like in the other issues I've had with this girl, the "verbals" during the game wasn't limited to the game. The last person who hit her was provoked outside of games for A YEAR (ie when this girl saw her in the street) - then finally snapped in a game, but not before being called a 4 letter word that starts with S and has an L in it.

Also, to be clear, I'm the organiser of a sport, so I don't have a personal vendetta against this kid - I just happen to know her not because of her amazing sporting prowess, but the fact that she managed to piss off over 20 girls and a few boys who flatly refused to play with or against her (and various other issues since then). - I posted the link to the stuff article on FB, and this message says it all: "haha sorry dont wanna say this publicly "yeah but thats rona""


I find it very hard to believe that 1 comment during the second half would cause a keeper to, some 20-40 minutes later, decide to sucker punch a girl to the back of the head. Something MUST have been said after the game to provoke it - in which case, it wasn't really verbals during a game, was it? At that point it becomes bullying, which I argue should be nipped in the bud early.


Junior82 wrote:
[QUOTE=lmsmith] The whole point is that if you provoke someone, you have to expect retaliation.

Violence in sport is not okay - but neither is provocation. If you're playing at club level, you have to understand that you're expected to act like an adult. That means not making sexist comments or punching people.


I agree with your zero tolerance towards violence and bullying and your general sentiment.

However sledging/verbal sparring is part of a lot of sports these days - perhaps in part to out-psyche the opposition, maybe in part to get under the skin and provoke a reaction and subsequent punishment (e.g. zizou at the world cup).

In this case IMHO the keeper has got off very lightly - this is a serious assault - regardless of the level of provocation (but I agree if the sledging was very abusive then some warning and perhaps cautioning would be in order).

You say you have felt like decking the other player at times - why didn't you? The keeper needs to learn some self-restraint or take up another sport where that isn't so important.


I agree that it was serious assault - and I'm not saying it should be tolerated at all. I am saying that there had to be some serious provocation to get someone to the level where they would punch someone in the back of the head. It's not a one comment thing, then you punch her - something went on, and Rona needs to take some of the blame.

The reason I didn't hit her is because I'm an adult, and she's a child. And giving her formal warnings and banning her from an entire tournament for her behaviour was a much nicer victory for me than a broken hand and a girl with a bruised face and ego.

In this situation, there's a hell of a lot to the story that the club/media either don't know or aren't telling us. This girl is not a blameless victim in all of this, and absolutely should be held accountable for her behaviour.

Also, sidenote, I don't agree that all verbal sparring is okay - maybe because I come from a sport where you can't talk and play at the same time, but I really think there's a difference between competitive banter and threatening language. Referees need to ensure that they're keeping that sort of thing under control.

It's also about having pride in the uniform you're wearing. If Rona's team (the punchee) do nothing about the 'verbal sparring' or whatever you want to call it, they're condoning unsportsmanlike behaviour. They're effectively saying 'in our club, that's how things roll'. Do you want to play a club who thinks that's okay? I don't. I wouldn't want my children playing in that, or against them, either. Sport is about winning (and participation, if you want to buy into all that), but not winning at any cost.

Just imagine it was a mixed team, and a guy said that to a girl. The same standards MUST apply to women.


What. A. Load. Of. Bollocks.

Flowery, apologetic bullcrap that tries to deflect the responsibility from the player whilst not offering a shred of evidence of what actually happened other than I can almost guarantee/there must have been something said/I find it hard to believe.

This post smacks of 'she was asking for it and got what she deserved' defence in rape cases. And you call yourself an adult. You should be ashamed of yourself.el grapadura2011-05-19 11:29:58
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ard Righ wrote:
Feverish wrote:
Smarten up son[/QUOTE]

Was it:

Feverish wrote:
I reffed the game and there was no niggle apart from Lower Hutt abusing me about my reffing. Supposedly the Karori player sledged the goalie (called her a man or something- I didn't hear anything) so she walked up to her after the game and kapowed her.


or was it:

[QUOTE=Feverish] Sure Rona and Lisa exchanged comments for a period of no more than a minute in the second half. One of Lisa's comments was Do you even have any tits? - take your top off and show me.


At least get your story straight if you're going to comment to a newspaper about what happened, and complain about Capital Football changing the ban for the incident.

If you're the official for the game, and you've changed your story on what actually went on, do you expect Capital Football to get the ban right?


Can you not read?
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Feverish wrote:
The big talking point of the match was that Lower Hutt's keeper stayed on after TWICE punching an Upper Hutt player, in two separate incidents.


And I got sent for a "reckless" tackle. THERE'S NO JUSTICE.

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Doloras wrote:
I think we can agree on a few facts:

a) violence is not okay on the football pitch.
b) violence is really not okay if it happens off the football pitch because of something that happens on the football pitch (because of the premeditation factor).
c) bullying is not okay anywhere.
d) sledging is part of the game but should be policed before it turns into bullying.

I am remembering two incidents along these lines that happened to me:

1. A few months ago I dislocated my finger playing Gaelic footy. My first game back I was playing with them taped together. I was playing fullback, marking some scary looking lady who at one stage grabbed my taped fingers and twisted. Then mockingly asked how that felt. I ran up to her, looked her in the eyes and said "JUST GREAT, THANK YOU". Of course that chick should probably have been sent off, but the ref didn't see it so it was legal. I was very upset and surely doing what that girl did shouldn't have been part of the game. But note - I didn't wait until after the game and deck her. In fact, I went up and shook her hand, just to make it clear that her efforts to drive me nuts hadn't worked.

2. Another time I was playing soccer (in goal, as I do) against a very rough and rowdy team from south Auckland. They were deliberately trying to put me off while taking goal kicks by any means necessary, and it was working - they were getting under my skin. Eventually I decided that a response was necessary, preferably one that wouldn't get me sent off. While lining up a goalkick, and listening to them taunt me, I yelled back: YOUR MOTHER DRESSES YOU FUNNY. The opposition shut up, my own team cracked up laughing and the tension was relieved. That little statement became a running joke for the rest of the season.

The moral of the story? Hard-core sledging verging on bullying is something that should not happen on a sports field/pool/whatever. But there are other ways to react than king-hitting the offender after the game.
 
To re-iterate:
 
Violence is bad. M'kay?

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Doloras wrote:
The moral of the story? Hard-core sledging verging on bullying is something that should not happen on a sports field/pool/whatever. But there are other ways to react than king-hitting the offender after the game.


This simple point seems to have flown over many people's heads.
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Disclaimer: I wasn't there.

There is a lot of emotion in this debate.  Emotive terms like "bullying" are being thrown around.

My two cents are:

1. It is irrelevant that this is a women's game we're talking about. 

2. It is disappointing that Capital Football have issued an email about cracking down on violence one week, and the next week (almost) halved a ban for violence.  I think they could have taken to opportunity to grow a spine and make a stand.

3. I think the length of ban handed down originally was too short. 

4. I think it's surprising that Lower Hutt appealed the length of suspension.  It makes it seem that they endorse the player's behaviour, which I don't think they do, it's just an unfortunate appearance. It would have been interesting to hear from them in Sam's story yesterday.

5. It is also disappointing that there seems to be quite shoddy processes involved in the disciplinary system.  How you can hear submissions from one side but not the other and expect your decisions to be considered credible I do not know.  It's a mess, and neither side really knew what was going on in the process.  I suspect Capital Football didn't either, and were just making it up as best they could and hoping it would go away. 

6. Provocation is a reasonable thing to argue in cases of assault.  Generally our legal system accepts that smacking someone randomly is worse than smacking someone who has been winding you up. 

7. I think it's surprising and really disappointing that people are having a go at Greenie here.  Greenie was refereeing in a volunteer capacity.  Those are the referees who should be given the most protection by us, the football community, because they're people just like us.  Whether Greenie is your mate or not, nobody can possibly argue that he is in any way responsible for the king-hitting of a player in a game he was refereeing.  That is as illogical as it is offensive. 

8. Responsibility for the punch thrown cannot be disputed.  It lies squarely on the shoulders of the person who threw it.

Those are my personal opinions.


Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Junior82 wrote:
 
To re-iterate:
 
Violence is bad. M'kay?
 
except between two consenting adults when a 'safe' word has been agreed upon
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
stealthkiwi wrote:
except between two consenting adults when a 'safe' word has been agreed upon


Now you see, above in this thread someone said "sticks and stones", and I was tempted to reply with "... will break my bones but whips and chains excite me", but I wasn't going to bring down the tone of the conversation. Well done.
Doloras2011-05-19 11:41:09

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
well I was going to say except in a dungeon but everyone already seems to think i live in one lol... and not because I'm such a troll
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I remember the UH vs LH game where the Lisa threw 2 punches.  I also remember that after the game when the teams were shaking hands, one of the UH players said to Lisa "You F#cking Mongy B!tch", to which Lisa replied (wait for it...): "How did you know my Dad was in the Mongrel Mob?!"  Classic!  I don't know if it's a fact her Dad is in the Mongrel Mob, but it was evident she didn't take (much, if any) offence, because she didn't throw another punch!  Perhaps she was able to restrain herself this time?  Who knows.  Just sayin.
 
I don't think the ban is long enough, not because of most of the reasons most of you have stated, but more the fact that this is not the first time she's done it.  Admittedly, I don't think the incidents from the UH game were reported to CF, so fair enough that they can't bring that into consideration.
 
It's just a big shame that we have people like this in the game.  I know some players who wouldn't want to play against her given her history, and that's just sad for footballl.
 
Right, now I'll sit back and wait to be picked to pieces by you lot....
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
madness wrote:


Admittedly, I don't think the incidents from the UH game were reported to CF, so fair enough that they can't bring that into consideration


That was in a Central League game wasn't it? With a proper ref?
I'd find it very difficult to believe that CF were completely unaware of that incident, but then again they are a shambles much of the time so it's possible I guess.
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
That was in a Central League game wasn't it? With a proper ref?
I'd find it very difficult to believe that CF were completely unaware of that incident, but then again they are a shambles much of the time so it's possible I guess.
 
It sure was a CL game.  Muddy as pitch.
 
First incident - player running after ball towards keeper (Lisa), 50/50, UH player decided to pull out, but slid (upright) due to grounds, Lisa punched her.  I think (that is, in my opinion) that Lisa thought the player was trying to knock her over to get the ball?
 
Second incident - I don't remember this one too clearly, but I'm pretty sure same sort of thing, except UH player didn't even touch Lisa, but was punched for getting within range.
 
Once again, pulling this from memory, so exact details sketchy, but positive that 1) Lisa did throw 2 punches and 2) She wasn't provoked prior to the punches
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
And this is the point - because reasonable people don't respond to verbal insults by blindsiding someone and knocking them out cold.

So you should really count yourself lucky you haven't come accross a psycho like the girl in question. Although if we're now accepting calculated physical violence in response to verbal insults, I may reconsider my approach of dealing with the entire issue.


'Reasonable' people would expect there not to be that level of abuse to begin with on a football pitch.

But since the YF massive are OK with the odd sledge here or there, we'll let that issue go.

In regards to psychos, I've dealt with a number of them in my time. Don't get me wrong on that point.
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ard Righ wrote:
el grapadura wrote:
And this is the point - because reasonable people don't respond to verbal insults by blindsiding someone and knocking them out cold.

So you should really count yourself lucky you haven't come accross a psycho like the girl in question. Although if we're now accepting calculated physical violence in response to verbal insults, I may reconsider my approach of dealing with the entire issue.


'Reasonable' people would expect there not to be that level of abuse to begin with on a football pitch.

But since the YF massive are OK with the odd sledge here or there, we'll let that issue go.

In regards to psychos, I've dealt with a number of them in my time. Don't get me wrong on that point.


What level of abuse are you talking about? All we've heard is a couple of comments, which admittedly are hurtful, but nothing beyond thousands of comments that get said every weekend.

So a 'reasonable' person going out to compete on a football field will understand that the combination of adrenaline, physical exertion and the very nature of the competetive physical contest can lead to a discourse that would not be perceived as normal in a different context. And the 'reasonable' person will be equipped to deal with that in a way that doesn't involve waiting, blindising, and knocking the opponent out cold.
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Evald, are you even a man?

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tits oot for th' lads!
 
Junior822011-05-19 13:34:10

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Smithy wrote:
Evald, are you even a man?



Debatable.
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

el grapadura wrote:
lmsmith wrote:

I agree that it was serious assault - and I'm not saying it should be tolerated at all. I am saying that there had to be some serious provocation to get someone to the level where they would punch someone in the back of the head. It's not a one comment thing, then you punch her - something went on, and Rona needs to take some of the blame.

The reason I didn't hit her is because I'm an adult, and she's a child. And giving her formal warnings and banning her from an entire tournament for her behaviour was a much nicer victory for me than a broken hand and a girl with a bruised face and ego.

In this situation, there's a hell of a lot to the story that the club/media either don't know or aren't telling us. This girl is not a blameless victim in all of this, and absolutely should be held accountable for her behaviour.

Also, sidenote, I don't agree that all verbal sparring is okay - maybe because I come from a sport where you can't talk and play at the same time, but I really think there's a difference between competitive banter and threatening language. Referees need to ensure that they're keeping that sort of thing under control.

It's also about having pride in the uniform you're wearing. If Rona's team (the punchee) do nothing about the 'verbal sparring' or whatever you want to call it, they're condoning unsportsmanlike behaviour. They're effectively saying 'in our club, that's how things roll'. Do you want to play a club who thinks that's okay? I don't. I wouldn't want my children playing in that, or against them, either. Sport is about winning (and participation, if you want to buy into all that), but not winning at any cost.

Just imagine it was a mixed team, and a guy said that to a girl. The same standards MUST apply to women.


What. A. Load. Of. Bollocks.

Flowery, apologetic bullcrap that tries to deflect the responsibility from the player whilst not offering a shred of evidence of what actually happened other than I can almost guarantee/there must have been something said/I find it hard to believe.

This post smacks of 'she was asking for it and got what she deserved' defence in rape cases. And you call yourself an adult. You should be ashamed of yourself.
I dont think the lmsmith post was a load of bollocks. You are putting words into his mouth. I didn't read any deflection of responsibility at all and there is evidence that Rhona said offensive things...she has admitted that (although who started verbals is up in the air).
 
These are two seperate issues. No one is saying the physical violence is excusable or that it isn't much more serious. However what some people are saying is that verbal abuse, although not anywhere near as serious, should not be acceptable either. These games should be played in good spirits.
 
The other aspect is that LH GK has allegedly done this before but has not been factored in. If this is genuinely the third person she has punched during a game I think she should be banned for life. Rhona should lay a complaint with the police but at the same time look at her own behaviour. As should LH and WK.
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
rjmiller wrote:
The other aspect is that LH GK has�allegedly done this before but has not been factored in. If this is genuinely the third person she has punched during a game I think she should be banned for life. Rhona should lay a complaint with the police but at the same time look at her own behaviour. As should LH and WK.


Of course this is the third time she's done it, there's no debate about that.
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
rjmiller wrote:

el grapadura wrote:
lmsmith wrote:
I agree that it was serious assault - and I'm not saying it should be tolerated at all. I am saying that there had to be some serious provocation to get someone to the level where they would punch someone in the back of the head. It's not a one comment thing, then you punch her - something went on, and Rona needs to take some of the blame. The reason I didn't hit her is because I'm an adult, and she's a child. And giving her formal warnings and banning her from an entire tournament for her behaviour was a much nicer victory for me than a broken hand and a girl with a bruised face and ego. In this situation, there's a hell of a lot to the story that the club/media either don't know or aren't telling us. This girl is not a blameless victim in all of this, and absolutely should be held accountable for her behaviour. Also, sidenote, I don't agree that all verbal sparring is okay - maybe because I come from a sport where you can't talk and play at the same time, but I really think there's a difference between competitive banter and threatening language. Referees need to ensure that they're keeping that sort of thing under control. It's also about having pride in the uniform you're wearing. If Rona's team (the punchee) do nothing about the 'verbal sparring' or whatever you want to call it, they're condoning unsportsmanlike behaviour. They're effectively saying 'in our club, that's how things roll'. Do you want to play a club who thinks that's okay? I don't. I wouldn't want my children playing in that, or against them, either. Sport is about winning (and participation, if you want to buy into all that), but not winning at any cost. Just imagine it was a mixed team, and a guy said that to a girl. The same standards MUST apply to women.
What. A. Load. Of. Bollocks. Flowery, apologetic bullcrap that tries to deflect the responsibility from the player whilst not offering a shred of evidence of what actually happened other than I can almost guarantee/there must have been something said/I find it hard to believe. This post smacks of 'she was asking for it and got what she deserved' defence in rape cases. And you call yourself an adult. You should be ashamed of yourself.

I dont think the lmsmith post was a load of bollocks. You are putting words into his mouth.�I didn't read�any deflection of responsibility at all�and there is evidence that Rhona said offensive things...she has admitted that (although who started�verbals is up in the air).
�

These are two seperate issues.�No one is saying the�physical violence is excusable or that it isn't much more serious. However what some people are saying is that verbal abuse, although not anywhere near as serious, should not be acceptable either. These games should be played in good spirits.

�

The other aspect is that LH GK has�allegedly done this before but has not been factored in. If this is genuinely the third person she has punched during a game I think she should be banned for life. Rhona should lay a complaint with the police but at the same time look at her own behaviour. As should LH and WK.


So, saying that the punched girl is not a blameless victim, and needs to take some of the blame for the incident is not deflection of responsibility?

Because it's perfectly reasonable to expect to be blindsided and knocked out cold if you say something hurtful to someone, especially in the context of a competetive physical activity?
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
So, saying that the punched girl is not a blameless victim, and needs to take some of the blame for the incident is not deflection of responsibility?

Because it's perfectly reasonable to expect to be blindsided and knocked out cold if you say something hurtful to someone, especially in the context of a competetive physical activity?


Do you go to Courtney Place often? Seen the fights that break out between people on the footpath, because one person bumped into the other?

I've had two people run across the road to pick a fight with me because I waved my hand and they accused me of giving them the finger. Even though my hand was pointing at the ground.

You don't think if you give someone verbal abuse, that you're not expecting any reaction whatsoever?

I'm sure you're not that stupid.
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
She shouldn't be blamed for getting punched in the head. She should be blamed for contributing to a spiteful match played in an unsportsmanlike manner. If the referee heard her say "Do you even have any tits" that is supposed to be an immediate yellow card.
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ard Righ wrote:
el grapadura wrote:
So, saying that the punched girl is not a blameless victim, and needs to take some of the blame for the incident is not deflection of responsibility?

Because it's perfectly reasonable to expect to be blindsided and knocked out cold if you say something hurtful to someone, especially in the context of a competetive physical activity?


Do you go to Courtney Place often? Seen the fights that break out between people on the footpath, because one person bumped into the other?

I've had two people run across the road to pick a fight with me because I waved my hand and they accused me of giving them the finger. Even though my hand was pointing at the ground.

You don't think if you give someone verbal abuse, that you're not expecting any reaction whatsoever?

I'm sure you're not that stupid.


What the f**k has Courtney Place got to do with this? Don't remember ever playing there?

Who said anything about no reaction? The point is what is a REASONABLE reaction, but that seems to have flown way over your head.
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:

So, saying that the punched girl is not a blameless victim, and needs to take some of the blame for the incident is not deflection of responsibility?

Because it's perfectly reasonable to expect to be blindsided and knocked out cold if you say something hurtful to someone, especially in the context of a competetive physical activity?
 
You're missing my point entirely.
 

I�m not proposing deflection of responsibility, in fact, I�m proposing that all parties accept responsibility for their actions.

Lisa should be sanctioned for punching someone. Absolutely. Punching isn�t okay, punching is serious. � although, I do think people are looking too much into the fact that Rona was knocked out � that�s totally irrelevant, a punch is a punch, and even if she wasn�t knocked out, the penalty for one punch should be the same in football-land, even though you would potentially have different legal liability if it could be shown that your intent was to cause grievous bodily harm. It also wouldn't make a difference to me if Lisa had punched Rona square in the face, a punch is a punch is a punch - the fact that she chose to punch Rona in the back of the head indicates no more than cowardliness.

However, Rona also needs to take responsibility for her actions. Taunting, name calling and other crap should not be accepted as part of sport. That�s an absolute cop-out. You CAN play sport and demonstrate good sportsmanship despite adrenaline, nerves, excitement and all that other stuff. We should be setting a standard for sportspeople that this sort of thing isn�t okay. Violence in sport isn�t okay, whether it is physical or verbal.

Using the word �blame� doesn�t mean I think that the punch was justified. It simply means what the dictionary says it means; that is, Rona needs to take responsibility for the part that she played in this.  

Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ard Righ wrote:
el grapadura wrote:
So, saying that the punched girl is not a blameless victim, and needs to take some of the blame for the incident is not deflection of responsibility?

Because it's perfectly reasonable to expect to be blindsided and knocked out cold if you say something hurtful to someone, especially in the context of a competetive physical activity?


Do you go to Courtney Place often? Seen the fights that break out between people on the footpath, because one person bumped into the other?

I've had two people run across the road to pick a fight with me because I waved my hand and they accused me of giving them the finger. Even though my hand was pointing at the ground.

You don't think if you give someone verbal abuse, that you're not expecting any reaction whatsoever?

I'm sure you're not that stupid.
You should have quit a while back cos your posts are getting stoopider and stoopider

Founder

Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
rjmiller wrote:
She should be blamed for contributing to a spiteful match played in an unsportsmanlike manner. If the referee heard her say "Do you even have any tits" that is supposed to be an immediate yellow card.


I've played in quite a few spiteful and ill-tempered matches, where quite a few things were said (usually away from the ref's ear). And I've never seen anyone take a swing after such comments were made, let alone wait until after the final whistle.

Is it nice to be involved in such games? No. But some lines must not be crossed, and the great majority of people don't. But then again, some can do it 3 times in the space of 2 years, and only get a 5 week suspension. Thems the breaks I guess... el grapadura2011-05-19 14:23:16
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
rjmiller wrote:
She shouldn't be blamed for getting punched in the head. She should be blamed for contributing to a spiteful match played in an unsportsmanlike manner. If the referee heard her say "Do you even have any tits" that is supposed to be an immediate yellow card.
The referee was me and I didnt hear any insults. That quote is what I got told the goalie said to Rona. Gees this is hard work. I'm still wondering if am within a Lisa timeframe of postmatch pre-mediated violence that I can go and twat her for calling me a fkn cnut about twenty times.

Founder

Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
Ard Righ wrote:
el grapadura wrote:
So, saying that the punched girl is not a blameless victim, and needs to take some of the blame for the incident is not deflection of responsibility?

Because it's perfectly reasonable to expect to be blindsided and knocked out cold if you say something hurtful to someone, especially in the context of a competetive physical activity?


Do you go to Courtney Place often? Seen the fights that break out between people on the footpath, because one person bumped into the other?

I've had two people run across the road to pick a fight with me because I waved my hand and they accused me of giving them the finger. Even though my hand was pointing at the ground.

You don't think if you give someone verbal abuse, that you're not expecting any reaction whatsoever?

I'm sure you're not that stupid.


What the f**k has Courtney Place got to do with this? Don't remember ever playing there?

Who said anything about no reaction? The point is what is a REASONABLE reaction, but that seems to have flown way over your head.
 
You've missed the point. This isn't an argument about whether the punch was resonable. At least that's not mine or Ard Righ's point. The point is that if you give crap, you have to expect consequences. You have to take responsibility for what you've done.
 
No one here is arguing that the punch was resonable. That's a ridiculous thing to suggest. I'm simply saying that there are two sides to every story, and both sides need to take responsibility.
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
rjmiller wrote:
She should be blamed for contributing to a spiteful match played in an unsportsmanlike manner. If the referee heard her say "Do you even have any tits" that is supposed to be an immediate yellow card.


I've played in quite a few spiteful and ill-tempered matches, where quite a few things were said (usually away from the ref's ear). And I've never seen anyone take a swing after such comments were made, let alone wait until after the final whistle.

Is it nice to be involved in such games? No. But some lines must not be crossed, and the great majority of people don't. But then again, some can do it 3 times in the space of 2 years, and only get a 5 week suspension. Thems the breaks I guess...
 
  I would totally pay to see a photo of EG/2nd best/Feverish/HN/Smithy's faces as they were asked this question in the middle of a match
Permalink Permalink
almost 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
rjmiller wrote:
She should be blamed for contributing to a spiteful match played in an unsportsmanlike manner. If the referee heard her say "Do you even have any tits" that is supposed to be an immediate yellow card.


I've played in quite a few spiteful and ill-tempered matches, where quite a few things were said (usually away from the ref's ear). And I've never seen anyone take a swing after such comments were made, let alone wait until after the final whistle.

Is it nice to be involved in such games? No. But some lines must not be crossed, and the great majority of people don't. But then again, some can do it 3 times in the space of 2 years, and only get a 5 week suspension. Thems the breaks I guess...
I've already said that if Lisa has now punched 3 people during games she should be banned for life. I'm not in anyway justifying that.
Permalink Permalink