Auckland Pride - Make Auckland Great Again

7641 replies · 1,268,939 views
2 days ago · edited 2 days ago · History
20 Legend wrote:
 martinb wrote:
Is it 20Legend who made the point that the new club exemptions exist largely as a counter point to the homegrown and long service allowances? 

As well the club will still have the same owners, have access to the same conditioning and scouting assistance as part of the wider international football group, have a bunch of fans with high expectations and is one of the more attractive climates in Australia and NZ, with fewer earthquakes, no snakes, no crocs, hardly any jellyfish of note and no fire ants etc etc

It might get tougher. Or it might just be same same by different. 
Yes.

The "Auckland have had salary cap allowances" for the past two seasons is copium. You'll notice no clubs are moaning about it because there's actually some science behind how the allowance is chosen.

And people are conflating it with the salary clamp down this season. Auckland aren't losing players because they had a massive salary allowance that is ending, they're losing players because the entire league is getting clamped.

Which stands to reason that everyone will struggle.

(I'm not saying Auckland isn't going to find was it essentially a total rebuild tough, just that it's due to the overall salary cap reduction not some special Auckland sauce) 








100 per cent this.

I think we will find that every club will have two to three high earning quality players less than last year.

In Auckland’s case it will likely be Hall, May and Verstrate.

In Wellingtons case it will likely be Singh, Rufer and Payne.

All other clubs will be similar.

It could well be that no team fills their 5 import quota.

Those clubs that can find gold nuggets in their new imports at a lesser cost (thinking Eze this year), will likely flourish.









Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
2 days ago
AucklandPhoenix wrote:
 20 Legend wrote:
 martinb wrote:
Is it 20Legend who made the point that the new club exemptions exist largely as a counter point to the homegrown and long service allowances? 

As well the club will still have the same owners, have access to the same conditioning and scouting assistance as part of the wider international football group, have a bunch of fans with high expectations and is one of the more attractive climates in Australia and NZ, with fewer earthquakes, no snakes, no crocs, hardly any jellyfish of note and no fire ants etc etc

It might get tougher. Or it might just be same same by different. 
Yes.

The "Auckland have had salary cap allowances" for the past two seasons is copium. You'll notice no clubs are moaning about it because there's actually some science behind how the allowance is chosen.

And people are conflating it with the salary clamp down this season. Auckland aren't losing players because they had a massive salary allowance that is ending, they're losing players because the entire league is getting clamped.

Which stands to reason that everyone will struggle.

(I'm not saying Auckland isn't going to find was it essentially a total rebuild tough, just that it's due to the overall salary cap reduction not some special Auckland sauce) 








 
100 per cent this.

I think we will find that every club will have two to three high earning quality players less than last year.

In Auckland’s case it will likely be Hall, May and Verstrate.

In Wellingtons case it will likely be Singh, Rufer and Payne.

All other clubs will be similar.

It could well be that no team fills their 5 import quota.

Those clubs that can find gold nuggets in their new imports at a lesser cost (thinking Eze this year), will likely flourish.
Based on the rumoured new cap of $3m - if 'Nix spend around that, we are likely spending more than last season not less.
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
PK
2 days ago
Bullion wrote:
 AucklandPhoenix wrote:
 20 Legend wrote:
 martinb wrote:
Is it 20Legend who made the point that the new club exemptions exist largely as a counter point to the homegrown and long service allowances? 

As well the club will still have the same owners, have access to the same conditioning and scouting assistance as part of the wider international football group, have a bunch of fans with high expectations and is one of the more attractive climates in Australia and NZ, with fewer earthquakes, no snakes, no crocs, hardly any jellyfish of note and no fire ants etc etc

It might get tougher. Or it might just be same same by different. 
Yes.

The "Auckland have had salary cap allowances" for the past two seasons is copium. You'll notice no clubs are moaning about it because there's actually some science behind how the allowance is chosen.

And people are conflating it with the salary clamp down this season. Auckland aren't losing players because they had a massive salary allowance that is ending, they're losing players because the entire league is getting clamped.

Which stands to reason that everyone will struggle.

(I'm not saying Auckland isn't going to find was it essentially a total rebuild tough, just that it's due to the overall salary cap reduction not some special Auckland sauce) 








 
100 per cent this.

I think we will find that every club will have two to three high earning quality players less than last year.

In Auckland’s case it will likely be Hall, May and Verstrate.

In Wellingtons case it will likely be Singh, Rufer and Payne.

All other clubs will be similar.

It could well be that no team fills their 5 import quota.

Those clubs that can find gold nuggets in their new imports at a lesser cost (thinking Eze this year), will likely flourish.
Based on the rumoured new cap of $3m - if 'Nix spend around that, we are likely spending more than last season not less.
And if that is true, maybe the whole Auckland FC salary cap exemption and copium aspect has more legs than is first thought.
Permalink Permalink
1 day ago
Auckland's salary cap perks are balanced out by the loyalty exemptions in practice - but that assumes every club is spending the full cap, and making full use of the exemptions which isn't true - most clubs are strapped for cash, look how many players are teenagers these days. Pretty hard to make use of exemptions if you can't afford them, nor if you've not got the players to benefit from them.

Regardless of what the salary cap is, Auckland are paying it because they have Foley's endless pit of money. Same can't be said about most other clubs.
Annual finals disappointment enthusiast.

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Bullionco
about 17 hours ago
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1024645743582813

Commentary is Bayliss' goal vs Phoenix, but caption is for Head Coach ...
Permalink Permalink
about 5 hours ago · edited about 5 hours ago · History
So, current eleven under contract looks like.

Woud,

Elliot, Sakai, Nando, De Vries

Brimmer, Howieson, Bayliss 

Brook, Cosgrove, Rogerson

Seven kiwis in there and a solid eleven for the new coach to build upon.

With the son of the godfather on the bench.

Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
hepatitisob
about 5 hours ago · edited about 5 hours ago · History
AucklandPhoenix wrote:
So, current eleven under contract looks like.

Woud,

Elliot, Sakai, Nando, De Vries

Brimmer, Howieson, Bayliss 

Brook, Cosgrove, Rogerson

Seven kiwis in there and a solid eleven for the new coach to build upon.

With the son of the godfather on the bench.
This is genuinely not a bad outcome given the salary cap, particularly if Brimmer (who's still only 28) can rediscover his form. With the right coach this team would be handy.

I think you're right that Verstraete and Girdwood-Reich will follow Steve to Japan, but if we can keep one of them I think Auckland's in a very good place.
Permalink Permalink
about 2 hours ago
20 Legend wrote:
 AucklandPhoenix wrote:
So, current eleven under contract looks like.

Woud,

Elliot, Sakai, Nando, De Vries

Brimmer, Howieson, Bayliss 

Brook, Cosgrove, Rogerson

Seven kiwis in there and a solid eleven for the new coach to build upon.

With the son of the godfather on the bench.
This is genuinely not a bad outcome given the salary cap, particularly if Brimmer (who's still only 28) can rediscover his form. With the right coach this team would be handy.

I think you're right that Verstraete and Girdwood-Reich will follow Steve to Japan, but if we can keep one of them I think Auckland's in a very good place.
pretty sure JGR was a one year loan?  
Permalink Permalink
about 1 hour ago
AucklandPhoenix wrote:
So, current eleven under contract looks like.

Woud,

Elliot, Sakai, Nando, De Vries

Brimmer, Howieson, Bayliss 

Brook, Cosgrove, Rogerson

Seven kiwis in there and a solid eleven for the new coach to build upon.

With the son of the godfather on the bench.
Guessing the imports will be CB, CM, LW? AFC will still have a pretty strong team if they get no dud imports, the depth will definitely be a bit worse than previous seasons though.
Permalink Permalink
about 1 hour ago · edited about 1 hour ago · History
Yeah, definitely left wing (who has the ability to play striker when Cosgrove gets suspended) and a defensive centre midfielder (assuming Verstrate is off). I see the other day there were pictures of his wedding day on AFC socials, so maybe there is still hope there.

With salary cap pressures not so sure if they will fill all their import sports on another defender however. But they will likely need a decent first choice Australian centre back.

The rest of the squad will likely be scholarship players from the OFC team and a couple of over age players from the same team (I.e. Wynne)

Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink