Rest of A-League Transfer (Now with 99% RR - Love your work)

RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
35K
·
about 16 years

Rumour is Neill to Heart.

RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
35K
·
about 16 years

Ray Gatt @Gatty54

Neill camp was looking at Brisbane Roar because of ACL, but that has blown out the window after last night's result.Heart "good chance'' now

Maybe they missed the pens on purpose. Hardly the same player he was at Rovers anymore.

tradition and history
1.5K
·
9.9K
·
over 17 years

valeo wrote:

As if Neill will come back to the A-League



He did.
Starting XI
290
·
4.7K
·
over 17 years

 This sucks....again

It's thought that Football Federation Australia would be willing to help fund any club who brings Neill back to Australia, given the player's iconic stature in Australia after playing in two World Cups and making 89 appearances for the national team.


Marquee
260
·
5K
·
about 17 years

Lucas Neill signs with Sydney FC 


Thanks FFA for another $ydney signing.

Early retirement
3.2K
·
34K
·
over 17 years

It's a fucking joke.

Let's have a salary cap and instead of clubs rorting it, let's pay for them to breach it.  One rule for Sydney and another rule for everyone else.

Level playing field my fucking arse.  The FFA having so much money tied up in Del Piero they are now funding the rest of Sydney FC to make them strong enough to make the play-offs and the del Piero marketing dollars.

Why would anyone choose to fund any other A-League side when the Sydney sides are effectively FFA FC.

RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
35K
·
about 16 years

Hard News wrote:

It's a fucking joke.

Let's have a salary cap and instead of clubs rorting it, let's pay for them to breach it.  One rule for Sydney and another rule for everyone else.

Level playing field my fucking arse.  The FFA having so much money tied up in Del Piero they are now funding the rest of Sydney FC to make them strong enough to make the play-offs and the del Piero marketing dollars.

Why would anyone choose to fund any other A-League side when the Sydney sides are effectively FFA FC.

Was having a chat with a Sydney fan on twitter regarding Carle coming back. He reckons they have planned to keep enough cap space to have him as a non marquee player next season. I can't for the life of me see how, unless those on contract for next season barely take up the minimum spend for the salary cap.
Still Believin'
750
·
5.7K
·
over 17 years

Is Lucas Neill a bigger asset to the A-League than Carlos Hernandez?

Like fuck he is.

Where's our handout?


RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
35K
·
about 16 years

Seems Neill is on a guest stint.

Marquee
1.4K
·
5.3K
·
about 17 years

I have no idea about next season but it seems that Neill is a guest player for the remainder of this season. It also looks like guest players are available for finals if they play a minimum of 4 games before the final series.

RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
35K
·
about 16 years

Bullion wrote:

I have no idea about next season but it seems that Neill is a guest player for the remainder of this season. It also looks like guest players are available for finals if they play a minimum of 4 games before the final series.

They just need to be registered before the 4th last round of the season. Really seems a bit of a salary cap rort to try and make the finals.
Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
over 17 years

When you can have nearly over half of your starting side not counting toward the salary cap, it makes it a bit of a joke. Then you add FFA funding certain sides to bring players in and it becomes even more of a joke. 

RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
35K
·
about 16 years

Tegal wrote:

When you can have nearly over half of your starting side not counting toward the salary cap, it makes it a bit of a joke. Then you add FFA funding certain sides to bring players in and it becomes even more of a joke. 

Only 3 and have 150k uncapped to spread over your 3 youth players. But I do think the rules need to be reviewed. Not sure Guest stints are needed now.
tradition and history
1.5K
·
9.9K
·
over 17 years

 Lucas Neill to Sydney


http://espnfc.com/news/story/_/id/1342130/lucas-neill-completes-a-league-move?cc=3436

Sydney 'til they fold
31
·
1.8K
·
about 17 years


Oh &


 *A ‘Guest Player’ must play a minimum of four matches during the regular season before being eligible to play in the finals.



Listen here Fudgeface
3.7K
·
15K
·
over 14 years

So as long as Neill can avoid a three game ban for abusing the refs (he's playing for Sydney, so of course he'll abuse them), then he'll be eligible.

Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
over 17 years

It would be interesting if he got sent off for violent conduct. Would the FFA throw away their investment by giving him a fair ban?

Sydney 'til they fold
31
·
1.8K
·
about 17 years

terminator_x wrote:

Is Lucas Neill a bigger asset to the A-League than Carlos Hernandez?

Like fuck he is.




Have to disagree with you there.
The "soccer moms" in Oz get wet knickers when he's on the telly.
Ca-ching.


Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
over 17 years

Traitor wrote:

terminator_x wrote:

Is Lucas Neill a bigger asset to the A-League than Carlos Hernandez?

Like fuck he is.




Have to disagree with you there.
The "soccer moms" in Oz get wet knickers when he's on the telly.
Ca-ching.


They piss themselves laughing, watching him try play football?

Sydney 'til they fold
31
·
1.8K
·
about 17 years

Tegal wrote:

It would be interesting if he got sent off for violent conduct. Would the FFA throw away their investment by giving him a fair ban?


All you would need to do is send in an anonymous complaint like the previous example & you're set.


Sydney 'til they fold
31
·
1.8K
·
about 17 years

Tegal wrote:

Traitor wrote:

terminator_x wrote:

Is Lucas Neill a bigger asset to the A-League than Carlos Hernandez?

Like fuck he is.




Have to disagree with you there.
The "soccer moms" in Oz get wet knickers when he's on the telly.
Ca-ching.


They piss themselves laughing, watching him try play football?


Football? What football?


Appiah without the pace
6.8K
·
19K
·
about 17 years

If the FFA are gonna continually put money toward attracting players, I think the least they should do is announcement how much they are contributing.

Marquee
2.9K
·
7.4K
·
over 17 years

 is Neill the idiot who took down Gross in his own penaltly box when the Aussies played Italy at WC 2006?

One of the few times I enjoyed watching the boys take a dive and being rewarded for it (not so much when De Rossi went down and Italy got the equalizer vs NZ in 2010)

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
about 15 years

I have to say in some respects I don't have an issue with this from the angle of:

The owners of Sydney are prepared to invest in players to make it a better league. They will have spent well over the cap easily. It's not fundamentally right for fairness but there is an owner in Sydney that has fronted up and put his money where his mouth is and the FFA have come to the party somewhat.


Now we as a team have no real right to bitch or ask for handouts. What's the FFA going to say to us 'well your owners are not prepared to splash the cash on anyone to go outside of the cap with available exemptions to make the team better and a more marketable product so why should we?'

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

Jeff Vader wrote:

I have to say in some respects I don't have an issue with this from the angle of:

The owners of Sydney are prepared to invest in players to make it a better league. They will have spent well over the cap easily. It's not fundamentally right for fairness but there is an owner in Sydney that has fronted up and put his money where his mouth is and the FFA have come to the party somewhat.


Now we as a team have no real right to bitch or ask for handouts. What's the FFA going to say to us 'well your owners are not prepared to splash the cash on anyone to go outside of the cap with available exemptions to make the team better and a more marketable product so why should we?'

yeah, I think you have a point. Effectively the FFA doing this could be considered an incentive for other clubs to try and get bigger-name signings to increase the quality and profile of the competition.

whether they'd ever actually do it for us regardless of their reasoning is a whole different issue

EDIT: does kinda make a mockery of the salary cap concept though!
Marquee
5K
·
6.8K
·
almost 12 years

Jeff Vader wrote:

I have to say in some respects I don't have an issue with this from the angle of:

The owners of Sydney are prepared to invest in players to make it a better league. They will have spent well over the cap easily. It's not fundamentally right for fairness but there is an owner in Sydney that has fronted up and put his money where his mouth is and the FFA have come to the party somewhat.


Now we as a team have no real right to bitch or ask for handouts. What's the FFA going to say to us 'well your owners are not prepared to splash the cash on anyone to go outside of the cap with available exemptions to make the team better and a more marketable product so why should we?'

yeah, I think you have a point. Effectively the FFA doing this could be considered an incentive for other clubs to try and get bigger-name signings to increase the quality and profile of the competition.

whether they'd ever actually do it for us regardless of their reasoning is a whole different issue

EDIT: does kinda make a mockery of the salary cap concept though!


That's the key issue. Suppose a scenario in which Welnix were prepared to pay over the odds to attract Neill to Wellington: would FFA throw money into the hat for us? I feel 99% sure they wouldn't.

While I completely understand FFA's strategy of pumping money into the Sydney teams for the long term sake of the league it still makes a mockery of the basic principle of the level playing field which was the whole point of the salary cap in the first place.
Early retirement
3.2K
·
34K
·
over 17 years
Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
about 15 years

Yeah it's a complete load of bollocks. My question to the masses:

What noise is the Phoenix management making about it? I'll take odds on sweet fuck all 

#dropnuts

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

Jeff Vader wrote:

Yeah it's a complete load of bollocks. My question to the masses:

What noise is the Phoenix management making about it? I'll take odds on sweet fuck all 

#dropnuts

Quick, someone tell Gareth Morgan they saw Lucas Neill eating a fantail!!!
Marquee
2.1K
·
8.2K
·
over 17 years

2ndBest wrote:

If the FFA are gonna continually put money toward attracting players, I think the least they should do is announcement how much they are contributing.


I think this is a very reasonable point - it would be good if the fan groups of clubs not benefiting from this largesse could try and force this point through twitter etc

RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
35K
·
about 16 years

CCM were trying to sign a former Japanese international player but it broke down because they couldn't afford a transfer fee. Maybe they should have asked the FFA for help signing him.

So far only Sydney (Emmo, ADP and Neill) and Victory (Kewell) has had help. Maybe if they started helping the smaller market teams, it might not cause so much angst.

Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
over 17 years

Also WSW with Ono and the extra import slot. 

One in a million
4.4K
·
9.7K
·
over 17 years

If the FFA had helped us, we could have signed Ryan Nelsen

Early retirement
3.2K
·
34K
·
over 17 years

Tegal wrote:

Also WSW with Ono and the extra import slot. 



...and I don't thin Tinkler-toes is paying all of Heskey's salary either.
RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
35K
·
about 16 years

Hard News wrote:

Tegal wrote:

Also WSW with Ono and the extra import slot. 



...and I don't thin Tinkler-toes is paying all of Heskey's salary either.
Not sure he is paying many things these days.
RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
35K
·
about 16 years

THE career of benched Brisbane Roar loan signing Stef Nijland is in limbo with his Dutch club PSV Eindhoven unlikely to renew his contract.

Out of favour at the Roar after failing to make an impact since moving to the A-League in January, the 24-year-old playmaker is also on the outer in his homeland.

Reports from the Netherlands suggest PSV will not offer Nijland a new deal when his contract expires at the end of the season.

Brisbane have an option to sign Nijland for next season, but Roar coach Mike Mulvey will not make a decision until the end of his side's finals campaign.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport/football/roars-stef-nijland-caught-in-the-middle/story-fnec4zuc-1226611961937

"Nichols is also off contract, but Mulvey is happy to delay talks with the midfielder until the end of the season, despite interest from rival clubs, including Sydney FC."

Would have thought he would head to the Victory. And where is Sydney getting the space in the salary cap? They have Carle coming back under the cap already.

Listen here Fudgeface
3.7K
·
15K
·
over 14 years

And where is Sydney getting the space in the salary cap? They have Carle coming back under the cap already.


First Team Squad
1.3K
·
1.3K
·
over 13 years

patrick478 wrote:

And where is Sydney getting the space in the salary cap? They have Carle coming back under the cap already.



Maybe we should create some crop circles and the aliens will give us some marquee cash.
RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
35K
·
about 16 years

Being reported that Craig Goodwin is to have a trial with Reading.

RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
35K
·
about 16 years

So Colosimo back to Sydney? They are after another CB. Doesn't sound like Adam Griffiths will be retained.

Rest of A-League Transfer (Now with 99% RR - Love your work)

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up