Wellington Phoenix Men

2014/15 Transfer Speculation

3053 replies · 335,863 views
about 11 years ago

I would try to keep him. Money don't shoot goals. In the end it his decision, but he already waisted some years with bad moves.

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

He's not fat!


Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.


Phoenix fans. We have to win them over one fan at a time.

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Seriously let Burns go if someone wants to offer that much money for him. He is only playing in Wellington to get a bigger deal and move elsewhere. Yes, I'm a fan of him but he has still only had one stand out season. There are no guarantees he would be able to back it up next year. We will probably be looking for a striker in the off season anyway.

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago · edited about 11 years ago · History

We could replace him with Stein... ;-)

"Who ate all the pies"

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Burn(s) the Judas

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago
Where is all this talk of too old, he should take the money coming from. He is 26 ffs. Burns is an asset (government listen to this). Hold onto your assets, let them grow, provide you with a steady stream of income then sell them off for an inflated price because you have shown how good they can be. Keep Burns, two, three seasons, he is then 28-29, could hold an A-league grant final win and golden boot to his name (or more). China team doubles its offer. Do not sell your assets, realise that you made a huge mistake, and try and buy them back.
Be obscure clearly
Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Burns could turn out like Brockie for us.... football has too many unknowns.

The fact is, the owners want to turn a profit and a big fee will help them achieve this. As much as I would like to see Burns stay I am sure Weenix will look at the overall picture.

Given how much extra money they are also pumping into our reserve team and youth options, I'd take the money to make sure initatives like this can continue to be funded and promote NZ footballers.

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

EXALDEAR wrote:
Where is all this talk of too old, he should take the money coming from. He is 26 ffs. Burns is an asset (government listen to this). Hold onto your assets, let them grow, provide you with a steady stream of income then sell them off for an inflated price because you have shown how good they can be. Keep Burns, two, three seasons, he is then 28-29, could hold an A-league grant final win and golden boot to his name (or more). China team doubles its offer. Do not sell your assets, realise that you made a huge mistake, and try and buy them back.

In 18 months he goes for free though - he is a short term asset only. He is also an asset with a large opportunity cost because what ever we pay him is money we can't pay for someone else. If Burns is on low money then it might make sense to keep him at the club.

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

If you love them, set them free.

E + R + O

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Ryan54 wrote:

EXALDEAR wrote:
Where is all this talk of too old, he should take the money coming from. He is 26 ffs. Burns is an asset (government listen to this). Hold onto your assets, let them grow, provide you with a steady stream of income then sell them off for an inflated price because you have shown how good they can be. Keep Burns, two, three seasons, he is then 28-29, could hold an A-league grant final win and golden boot to his name (or more). China team doubles its offer. Do not sell your assets, realise that you made a huge mistake, and try and buy them back.

In 18 months he goes for free though - he is a short term asset only. He is also an asset with a large opportunity cost because what ever we pay him is money we can't pay for someone else. If Burns is on low money then it might make sense to keep him at the club.

If he chooses to leave. Why have we all of a sudden got this process in our head that all new players are short term rentals? Name a class player that has upped and fudgeed off on us. McKain and Smeltz would be the only two I think. Rojas and Kosta had not hit their stride with us before they get thrown out there.

We can offer him an upgraded contract if he performs..... Kenny is coming off at the end of the year and stories are he is on a dime and a bit. This is not as cut and dry as people think. Do you think Dome goes 'oh he has had an offer, thats it, he is off'.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

It's all just smoke and mirrors... Chinese agents plaguing the Ozzie team prior to their game

...of course I could be wrong

IMG_0660.jpeg 950.07 KB
Rise up, Wellington!
Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

At January 20, 2015 11:07am

Jeff Vader wrote:

I was quick off the mark on Boxall so will hold my tongue on Burns until something more concrete turns up.

That lasted a while.


Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.


Phoenix fans. We have to win them over one fan at a time.

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago · edited about 11 years ago · History

"So how big a transfer fee are we talking here Shenhua?"

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

Ryan54 wrote:

EXALDEAR wrote:
Where is all this talk of too old, he should take the money coming from. He is 26 ffs. Burns is an asset (government listen to this). Hold onto your assets, let them grow, provide you with a steady stream of income then sell them off for an inflated price because you have shown how good they can be. Keep Burns, two, three seasons, he is then 28-29, could hold an A-league grant final win and golden boot to his name (or more). China team doubles its offer. Do not sell your assets, realise that you made a huge mistake, and try and buy them back.

In 18 months he goes for free though - he is a short term asset only. He is also an asset with a large opportunity cost because what ever we pay him is money we can't pay for someone else. If Burns is on low money then it might make sense to keep him at the club.

If he chooses to leave. Why have we all of a sudden got this process in our head that all new players are short term rentals? Name a class player that has upped and fudgeed off on us. McKain and Smeltz would be the only two I think. Rojas and Kosta had not hit their stride with us before they get thrown out there.

We can offer him an upgraded contract if he performs..... Kenny is coming off at the end of the year and stories are he is on a dime and a bit. This is not as cut and dry as people think. Do you think Dome goes 'oh he has had an offer, thats it, he is off'.

Name a class player who has been offered $2.5m p.a. with a buy-out clause (assuming both are correct).

You're comparing kiwifruit with lychees.

He dribbles a lot and the opposition dont like it - you can see it all over their faces. (Ron Atkinson)
Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago
Junior82 wrote:

Good considerations but the flipside is that we are then a development club rather than a club that seriously contends for title honours?

Might only appeal to a certain subset of players and possibly not for other stakeholders (public, sponsors).

i don't think it is right to label us [or any other team] a development club if we are selling players to leagues and divisions above us. A big part of the equation is allowing players to play at the highest level they can, because a club has a knack of developing players or making canny transfer deals, doesn't mean they are not without any desire to win the respective competitions they play in.
Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Even halfway through the competition?

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Whitby boy wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

Ryan54 wrote:

EXALDEAR wrote:
Where is all this talk of too old, he should take the money coming from. He is 26 ffs. Burns is an asset (government listen to this). Hold onto your assets, let them grow, provide you with a steady stream of income then sell them off for an inflated price because you have shown how good they can be. Keep Burns, two, three seasons, he is then 28-29, could hold an A-league grant final win and golden boot to his name (or more). China team doubles its offer. Do not sell your assets, realise that you made a huge mistake, and try and buy them back.

In 18 months he goes for free though - he is a short term asset only. He is also an asset with a large opportunity cost because what ever we pay him is money we can't pay for someone else. If Burns is on low money then it might make sense to keep him at the club.

If he chooses to leave. Why have we all of a sudden got this process in our head that all new players are short term rentals? Name a class player that has upped and fudgeed off on us. McKain and Smeltz would be the only two I think. Rojas and Kosta had not hit their stride with us before they get thrown out there.

We can offer him an upgraded contract if he performs..... Kenny is coming off at the end of the year and stories are he is on a dime and a bit. This is not as cut and dry as people think. Do you think Dome goes 'oh he has had an offer, thats it, he is off'.

Name a class player who has been offered $2.5m p.a. with a buy-out clause (assuming both are correct).

You're comparing kiwifruit with lychees.

Oh that may well be true but then by the same token, it seems the offer is only valid in this window if we believe everything we read so if the Phoenix sell him, they are saying that they do not think that they are a legitimate title threat. Looking at the table, I beg to differ. To that end, I doubt they would sell him which would mean at the end of the year, when he does have a buy out, the offer would not be there...

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

bwtcf wrote:

At January 20, 2015 11:07am

Jeff Vader wrote:

I was quick off the mark on Boxall so will hold my tongue on Burns until something more concrete turns up.

That lasted a while.

Burns has not been confirmed to be leaving has he.........?

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Even Gareth Bale stuck around until the end.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

bwtcf wrote:

At January 20, 2015 11:07am

Jeff Vader wrote:

I was quick off the mark on Boxall so will hold my tongue on Burns until something more concrete turns up.

That lasted a while.

Burns has not been confirmed to be leaving has he.........?

No, my point exactly. You said you'd hold your tongue on Burns until something more concrete turns up. It hasn't turned up. And 25 hours later you're off...


Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.


Phoenix fans. We have to win them over one fan at a time.

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

bwtcf wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

bwtcf wrote:

At January 20, 2015 11:07am

Jeff Vader wrote:

I was quick off the mark on Boxall so will hold my tongue on Burns until something more concrete turns up.

That lasted a while.

Burns has not been confirmed to be leaving has he.........?

No, my point exactly. You said you'd hold your tongue on Burns until something more concrete turns up. It hasn't turned up. And 25 hours later you're off...

 Right, and have you seen a concrete story saying Burns has left? No? Probably why you don't see a post from me celebrating Burns' time at the Phoenix or wishing him farewell. Must have been a phantom post from me then....obviously.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Something to note also is that only a handful of Australian players who have gone to China, of which there have been many, have lasted longer than a season at their respective club. Chinese clubs go through foreigners at a fast rate; not exactly great security, though if you can get a big payday in that one season you are there it's probably worth it.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Put yourself in Nathan's shoes (if the rumours are correct). AU$2.5m net/year is a lot of money, which is more than he would earn here over 8-10yrs (probably even longer). This is what the club is setting up to be, getting youngsters into the academy developing them, getting experience at ASB, then HAL and hopefully a decent transfer fee that is 'too good to refuse' for the better talent. We still have ambitions to win things, it will just have to be when there is a mix of decent HAL pros mixed with undervalued (in terms of salary cap) youngsters coming through, there will be troughs when those youngsters that have grown past the HAL look to move overseas and the next youngster is not as good.

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Didn't Smeltz go to China for about a week and then realize that he didn't want to live there at all, and subsequently bailed out of his contract?

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:
Why have we all of a sudden got this process in our head that all new players are short term rentals?

All of a sudden? I've been remarking on this mentality for ages. "If they actually want to stay here, they must suck. If they're good, they must be on the first plane out." It's just negativity.


Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

EXALDEAR wrote:
Where is all this talk of too old, he should take the money coming from. He is 26 ffs. Burns is an asset (government listen to this). Hold onto your assets, let them grow, provide you with a steady stream of income then sell them off for an inflated price because you have shown how good they can be. Keep Burns, two, three seasons, he is then 28-29, could hold an A-league grant final win and golden boot to his name (or more). China team doubles its offer. Do not sell your assets, realise that you made a huge mistake, and try and buy them back.
You clearly have 0 clue about anything financial
Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

EXALDEAR wrote:
Where is all this talk of too old, he should take the money coming from. He is 26 ffs. Burns is an asset (government listen to this). Hold onto your assets, let them grow, provide you with a steady stream of income then sell them off for an inflated price because you have shown how good they can be. Keep Burns, two, three seasons, he is then 28-29, could hold an A-league grant final win and golden boot to his name (or more). China team doubles its offer. Do not sell your assets, realise that you made a huge mistake, and try and buy them back.
You clearly have 0 clue about anything financial
Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

Ryan54 wrote:

EXALDEAR wrote:
Where is all this talk of too old, he should take the money coming from. He is 26 ffs. Burns is an asset (government listen to this). Hold onto your assets, let them grow, provide you with a steady stream of income then sell them off for an inflated price because you have shown how good they can be. Keep Burns, two, three seasons, he is then 28-29, could hold an A-league grant final win and golden boot to his name (or more). China team doubles its offer. Do not sell your assets, realise that you made a huge mistake, and try and buy them back.

In 18 months he goes for free though - he is a short term asset only. He is also an asset with a large opportunity cost because what ever we pay him is money we can't pay for someone else. If Burns is on low money then it might make sense to keep him at the club.

If he chooses to leave. Why have we all of a sudden got this process in our head that all new players are short term rentals? Name a class player that has upped and fudgeed off on us. McKain and Smeltz would be the only two I think. Rojas and Kosta had not hit their stride with us before they get thrown out there.

We can offer him an upgraded contract if he performs..... Kenny is coming off at the end of the year and stories are he is on a dime and a bit. This is not as cut and dry as people think. Do you think Dome goes 'oh he has had an offer, thats it, he is off'.

Even if he chooses to stay in 18 months then he will want a lot more money if his career continues on this trajectory. He could even get marquee offers from elsewhere in Australia. My point is if you pay Burns 300k and he is really good then that could still be a bad signing if you could pay someone else 250k and do the same job. I'm sure the club will think long and hard about any offers but offers should be considered at the end of the season. We definitely shouldn't be selling him now.

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Didn't Smeltz go to China for about a week and then realize that he didn't want to live there at all, and subsequently bailed out of his contract?

Shanghai is not Shandong

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Bloody hell if someone offered me that money I'd be off. Possibly a once in a lifetime move.

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Junior82 wrote:

Didn't Smeltz go to China for about a week and then realize that he didn't want to live there at all, and subsequently bailed out of his contract?

Shanghai is not Shandong

Fair enough, I couldn't remember where Smeltz was.

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

It's like Auckland and Oamaru.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Junior82 wrote:

It's like Auckland and Oamaru.

Shanghai is like Oamaru? Quick, tell Burns before he signs!

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

What are their facilities like?

Am I HardNews in disguise?

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Junior82 wrote:

It's like Auckland and Oamaru.

Shanghai is like Oamaru? Quick, tell Burns before he signs!

One is a rural backwater with no internet and nothing to do. Oamaru is not much better.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

So, as Burn's agent pointed out - these things happen at a time in a tournament when China's due to play Aussie. Talk about timing!

Does anyone think the Chinese may just be playing games? It seems the agent isn't prepared to take it too seriously until after the tournament.

Permalink Permalink
about 11 years ago

Doloras wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:
Why have we all of a sudden got this process in our head that all new players are short term rentals?

All of a sudden? I've been remarking on this mentality for ages. "If they actually want to stay here, they must suck. If they're good, they must be on the first plane out." It's just negativity.

No, it's not. It's realism. Staying here doesn't mean you 'suck', but it certainly means that are probably aren't a player that can play at a high level. The good players don't last long; only ones that have already tried it in Europe and didn't make it (i.e. Archie Thompson)

a.haak

Permalink Permalink