Closed for new posts
Moar stars
2.1K
·
4.8K
·
about 12 years

so how much was he bragging of earning?

Are you asking for the figures?

Legend
7.4K
·
15K
·
almost 17 years

Ryan wrote:

Of course a young guy is going to be bragging about earning money, even the minimum wage of the A-League is big money if you're 22. When I got my first proper job outside of University I was ecstatic as well, even though it was bugger all.

That story about the board not wanting to sign him until late in the preseason to save a few grand doesn't seem to make much sense as he won't be on much.

I hope he signs, but then if he's bragging about money he has the potential to go off the rails and spend half his time in mermaids.

I'm sure if he goes to as much as a movie, buys or sells a TV, let alone has a drink in a bar it'll be all over the net and he'll never get a chance to live it down.

Hope he gets signed, is looked after, chooses the right advice to listen to and does well.

When we say 'dropped' NUFC we meaning to the bench?

TV
On probation
250
·
4.2K
·
over 13 years
I would take what nufc_nz says with a massive grain of salt. Has lied many times on here and this feels like another.
Lawyerish
1.9K
·
4.9K
·
over 13 years

nufc_nz wrote:

so how much was he bragging of earning?

Are you asking for the figures?

Yes please

Moar stars
2.1K
·
4.8K
·
about 12 years

Not lying. I have a mate who knows one if the guys he told. He gets 300 a week now. If on contract he gets 80k a year.

Seriously you can ban me if you find out otherwise.

Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

nufc_nz wrote:

Not lying. I have a mate who knows one if the guys he told. He gets 300 a week now. If on contract he gets 80k a year.

Seriously you can ban me if you find out otherwise.

bollocks.  Even as an injury replacement he would get the minimum contract of 50k ish or 1000 a week give 9r take. 

He was probably getting 300 at Wairarapa

LG
Legend
5.8K
·
23K
·
almost 17 years

Is there a minimum wage for professional footballers? Even with a salary cap, there has to be some sort of minimum.

Starting XI
1.6K
·
2.6K
·
almost 17 years

sthn.jeff wrote:

nufc_nz wrote:

Not lying. I have a mate who knows one if the guys he told. He gets 300 a week now. If on contract he gets 80k a year.

Seriously you can ban me if you find out otherwise.

bollocks.  Even as an injury replacement he would get the minimum contract of 50k ish or 1000 a week give 9r take. 

He was probably getting 300 at Wairarapa

So .... we can ban him now? ;)

Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

Lonegunmen wrote:

Is there a minimum wage for professional footballers? Even witg a salary cap, there has to be some sort of minimum.

minimum 55k Australian dollars so say 60k NZD
Marquee
4.4K
·
6.8K
·
almost 14 years

Assuming there is any merit to the above story, It is easier to teach a young useful / promising / footballer how to keep his mouth shut than it is to teach a well-behaved nice and ineffective player how to be a useful footballer that helps us to win games.  

A hairdryer treatment in private is a useful part of a young player's education if needed. They really good strikers often have an unruly streak or may even not be the easiest guys to be around all the time (Berisha, anyone?) but that is a good coach's job to keep them on a leash.

TV
On probation
250
·
4.2K
·
over 13 years
Argh we doing this? He lies. Ban FC
Marquee
300
·
5K
·
about 17 years

Is it time for his orchidectomy?

WeeNix
120
·
730
·
over 14 years

nufc_nz wrote:

Not lying. I have a mate who knows one if the guys he told. He gets 300 a week now. If on contract he gets 80k a year.

Seriously you can ban me if you find out otherwise.

See, I am in favour of banning for obviously generally offensive stuff.

Given how quiet this forum has been recently, I am definitely NOT in favour of banning somebody for stupid or bullshark posts. Part of the joy of reading comments here was the stupid or bullshark posts. There was a drive for a good while to only post from sycophants, and the tone of some posts has already been heavily challenged by a few who consider themselves the arbiters of all things Phoenix.

To them I say "Sod Off".

I am really quite a fan of free speech. I feel pretty sure many others are, too.

Marquee
7.4K
·
9.5K
·
over 13 years

I don't know if NUFC is lying or not,  I didn't even realise that he has a history of it. But you can't just be spreading false information.

Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

How would we claim our prize from NUFC if we ban him though.

Legend
3.6K
·
15K
·
about 17 years

I know he's a bit of a character, but why are we saying he's lying? What is his history of that exactly? 

It's usually pretty obvious when he's taking the p*ss, and this doesn't seem like one of those times. 

HZA
Marquee
630
·
5.9K
·
almost 15 years

It rubs the lotion on the skin

Moar stars
2.1K
·
4.8K
·
about 12 years

It's not false info. That's what I heard from people close to him. Yes the 300 might have been from ASB but the 80k and him telling people about it is rock solid.

Moar stars
2.1K
·
4.8K
·
about 12 years

TV wrote:
Argh we doing this? He lies. Ban FC

When I take the piss, I don't offer to be banned if I'm wrong. Calm down, son.

Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

I don't think he is lying. Just stoopid.

Marquee
420
·
6.3K
·
about 17 years

Grandadi wrote:

nufc_nz wrote:

Not lying. I have a mate who knows one if the guys he told. He gets 300 a week now. If on contract he gets 80k a year.

Seriously you can ban me if you find out otherwise.

See, I am in favour of banning for obviously generally offensive stuff.

Given how quiet this forum has been recently, I am definitely NOT in favour of banning somebody for stupid or bullshark posts. Part of the joy of reading comments here was the stupid or bullshark posts. There was a drive for a good while to only post from sycophants, and the tone of some posts has already been heavily challenged by a few who consider themselves the arbiters of all things Phoenix.

To them I say "Sod Off".

I am really quite a fan of free speech. I feel pretty sure many others are, too.

amen - you can always ignore the stupid posts if you want, but why not  let others enjoy them (except for actual offensive stuff, of course). Without the humour all we're left with is a pretty average football team in a pretty average competition. And without any angst we'll have about 7 people posting.

valeo
·
Legend
4.6K
·
18K
·
about 17 years

I think spreading unfounded bs about someone should be bannable

However, nufc's story is pretty believable. Who wouldn't be happy about that kinda pay rise? Good on him.

Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

valeo wrote:

I think spreading unfounded bs about someone should be bannable

However, nufc's story is pretty believable. Who wouldn't be happy about that kinda pay rise? Good on him.

Watson offers something, but very much plan B or C and what he offers is not particularly unique. Are Other Clubs lining up to snap him up ? I would doubt it. My view is keep him if we can not find anything that is definitely better but does he warrant a salary 50% higher than the minimum? I would not think so.  
Legend
3.6K
·
15K
·
about 17 years

80k seems a reasonable suggestion as to what he might be on if the minimum salary really is 60k.

Wouldn't there be match bonuses, performance bonuses, etc etc that would increase it further than 60?

Plus if he's bragging to mates then I'm pretty sure 70k plus would easily be rounded up to 80 hahahaha

Marquee
1.2K
·
5.5K
·
over 13 years

Perfectly legit transfer speculation, I reckon. Anything remotely believable on defenders NUFC?

Legend
7.4K
·
15K
·
almost 17 years

sthn.jeff wrote:

valeo wrote:

I think spreading unfounded bs about someone should be bannable

However, nufc's story is pretty believable. Who wouldn't be happy about that kinda pay rise? Good on him.

Watson offers something, but very much plan B or C and what he offers is not particularly unique. Are Other Clubs lining up to snap him up ? I would doubt it. My view is keep him if we can not find anything that is definitely better but does he warrant a salary 50% higher than the minimum? I would not think so.  

a facepalm gif!

Watson would be an import for other clubs. Likewise we aren't rushing to sign Santalab or Joey whoever it was.

Do you think on the last game he should be paid less than Powell? Less than Lia? Than Fenton? Than Doyle?

For me he was one of the few things that made the game worth watching.

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
almost 15 years

I do question this slightly.

One would assume that Ridenton, Rufer, McGarry and Rogerson are on the minimum wage - I would hazard that Danaskos would be much the same. So why would Watson get more than them when he has come in as an injury replacement?

Starting XI
4.1K
·
3.7K
·
about 10 years

Jeff Vader wrote:

I do question this slightly.

One would assume that Ridenton, Rufer, McGarry and Rogerson are on the minimum wage - I would hazard that Danaskos would be much the same. So why would Watson get more than them when he has come in as an injury replacement?

Maybe he's Ernies nephew and Ernies sister called in a favor?

(I have no idea who decides paychecks for players)

Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

martinb wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

valeo wrote:

I think spreading unfounded bs about someone should be bannable

However, nufc's story is pretty believable. Who wouldn't be happy about that kinda pay rise? Good on him.

Watson offers something, but very much plan B or C and what he offers is not particularly unique. Are Other Clubs lining up to snap him up ? I would doubt it. My view is keep him if we can not find anything that is definitely better but does he warrant a salary 50% higher than the minimum? I would not think so.  

a facepalm gif!

Watson would be an import for other clubs. Likewise we aren't rushing to sign Santalab or Joey whoever it was.

Do you think on the last game he should be paid less than Powell? Less than Lia? Than Fenton? Than Doyle?

For me he was one of the few things that made the game worth watching.

Riiiiigggghhht.

So  you would base your salary payments on a twenty minute period. On that basis Powell would be on about 2m a year based on his WSW performance.

And surely the fact he is an import elsewhere gives us the club even more bargaining power

valeo
·
Legend
4.6K
·
18K
·
about 17 years

I think Watson has done quite well overall - I thought his best performance was against MV but he has also slotted a few well taken goals.

A good plan B for sure, and one that could be come a Plan A by the end of the season depending on how we're going.

One in a million
4.2K
·
9.6K
·
about 17 years

We should call it plan W i reckon, just so opposing teams don't understand it.

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

sthn.jeff wrote:

martinb wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

valeo wrote:

I think spreading unfounded bs about someone should be bannable

However, nufc's story is pretty believable. Who wouldn't be happy about that kinda pay rise? Good on him.

Watson offers something, but very much plan B or C and what he offers is not particularly unique. Are Other Clubs lining up to snap him up ? I would doubt it. My view is keep him if we can not find anything that is definitely better but does he warrant a salary 50% higher than the minimum? I would not think so.  

a facepalm gif!

Watson would be an import for other clubs. Likewise we aren't rushing to sign Santalab or Joey whoever it was.

Do you think on the last game he should be paid less than Powell? Less than Lia? Than Fenton? Than Doyle?

For me he was one of the few things that made the game worth watching.

Riiiiigggghhht.

So  you would base your salary payments on a twenty minute period. On that basis Powell would be on about 2m a year based on his WSW performance.

And surely the fact he is an import elsewhere gives us the club even more bargaining power

I always love the 'he did really well when he came on' argument. It's All White counterpart is we played really well in the last 20/30/2nd half, take your pick.

What such arguments tend to completely overlook is the state/context of the game - coming on for the last 20 minutes when the opposition has already won the game and are already thinking about next week and play-offs afterwards is a bit different to being able to make a difference when the game is there to be won or lost.

Moar stars
2.1K
·
4.8K
·
about 12 years

Jeff Vader wrote:

I do question this slightly.

One would assume that Ridenton, Rufer, McGarry and Rogerson are on the minimum wage - I would hazard that Danaskos would be much the same. So why would Watson get more than them when he has come in as an injury replacement?

That is what he said to people. Of course he could be exaggerating. I'm just reporting what i'm hearing from folk close to HW.

Marquee
420
·
6.3K
·
about 17 years

doing well when you come on still has to be better than not doing well... you want players to have some kind of positive impact. Unlike, say, Appiah.

Marquee
420
·
6.3K
·
about 17 years

I agree though that it is about consistency, which is why easily beating a good side once every so often doesn't really mean shark

valeo
·
Legend
4.6K
·
18K
·
about 17 years

el grapadura wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

martinb wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

valeo wrote:

I think spreading unfounded bs about someone should be bannable

However, nufc's story is pretty believable. Who wouldn't be happy about that kinda pay rise? Good on him.

Watson offers something, but very much plan B or C and what he offers is not particularly unique. Are Other Clubs lining up to snap him up ? I would doubt it. My view is keep him if we can not find anything that is definitely better but does he warrant a salary 50% higher than the minimum? I would not think so.  

a facepalm gif!

Watson would be an import for other clubs. Likewise we aren't rushing to sign Santalab or Joey whoever it was.

Do you think on the last game he should be paid less than Powell? Less than Lia? Than Fenton? Than Doyle?

For me he was one of the few things that made the game worth watching.

Riiiiigggghhht.

So  you would base your salary payments on a twenty minute period. On that basis Powell would be on about 2m a year based on his WSW performance.

And surely the fact he is an import elsewhere gives us the club even more bargaining power

I always love the 'he did really well when he came on' argument. It's All White counterpart is we played really well in the last 20/30/2nd half, take your pick.

What such arguments tend to completely overlook is the state/context of the game - coming on for the last 20 minutes when the opposition has already won the game and are already thinking about next week and play-offs afterwards is a bit different to being able to make a difference when the game is there to be won or lost.

That is ignoring the fact that overall HW has played pretty well when he has started too.

Legend
7.4K
·
15K
·
almost 17 years

el grapadura wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

martinb wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

valeo wrote:

I think spreading unfounded bs about someone should be bannable

However, nufc's story is pretty believable. Who wouldn't be happy about that kinda pay rise? Good on him.

Watson offers something, but very much plan B or C and what he offers is not particularly unique. Are Other Clubs lining up to snap him up ? I would doubt it. My view is keep him if we can not find anything that is definitely better but does he warrant a salary 50% higher than the minimum? I would not think so.  

a facepalm gif!

Watson would be an import for other clubs. Likewise we aren't rushing to sign Santalab or Joey whoever it was.

Do you think on the last game he should be paid less than Powell? Less than Lia? Than Fenton? Than Doyle?

For me he was one of the few things that made the game worth watching.

Riiiiigggghhht.

So  you would base your salary payments on a twenty minute period. On that basis Powell would be on about 2m a year based on his WSW performance.

And surely the fact he is an import elsewhere gives us the club even more bargaining power

I always love the 'he did really well when he came on' argument. It's All White counterpart is we played really well in the last 20/30/2nd half, take your pick.

What such arguments tend to completely overlook is the state/context of the game - coming on for the last 20 minutes when the opposition has already won the game and are already thinking about next week and play-offs afterwards is a bit different to being able to make a difference when the game is there to be won or lost.

Except that wasn't my argument at all. 

But more *yawn* forum authorities and straw men

It also holds much more water than he did sweet f all when he was on, must be great.

1- Watson wouldn't be looked at by other clubs, because he would be competing against the likes of Fornaroli and Berisha for a spot. That doesn't seem like much of an argument to try and screw down his salary to the absolute minimum allowable- I was comparing what he brings to Fenton, Lia, Doyle, Powell and Lia- using for sake of argument the most recent performance. Professional athletes give up other opportunities, have a short career and risk serious injury in their job.

2- Watson offered a lot more on the park on this and on other occasions, and he has caused defences trouble when he's been on across several games. Before the game has been won or lost. 

If the game is totally f-ing miserable and few players are showing anything, I'm allowed to point out that one or two players did well and I enjoyed watching. 

Not sure what is worse at the moment the forum or the team tbh.

Marquee
420
·
6.3K
·
about 17 years

also, Powell only really had that one excellent game, which if he hadn't played, he would be surely on the outer.

Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

martinb wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

martinb wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

valeo wrote:

I think spreading unfounded bs about someone should be bannable

However, nufc's story is pretty believable. Who wouldn't be happy about that kinda pay rise? Good on him.

Watson offers something, but very much plan B or C and what he offers is not particularly unique. Are Other Clubs lining up to snap him up ? I would doubt it. My view is keep him if we can not find anything that is definitely better but does he warrant a salary 50% higher than the minimum? I would not think so.  

a facepalm gif!

Watson would be an import for other clubs. Likewise we aren't rushing to sign Santalab or Joey whoever it was.

Do you think on the last game he should be paid less than Powell? Less than Lia? Than Fenton? Than Doyle?

For me he was one of the few things that made the game worth watching.

Riiiiigggghhht.

So  you would base your salary payments on a twenty minute period. On that basis Powell would be on about 2m a year based on his WSW performance.

And surely the fact he is an import elsewhere gives us the club even more bargaining power

I always love the 'he did really well when he came on' argument. It's All White counterpart is we played really well in the last 20/30/2nd half, take your pick.

What such arguments tend to completely overlook is the state/context of the game - coming on for the last 20 minutes when the opposition has already won the game and are already thinking about next week and play-offs afterwards is a bit different to being able to make a difference when the game is there to be won or lost.

Except that wasn't my argument at all. 

But more *yawn* forum authorities and straw men

It also holds much more water than he did sweet f all when he was on, must be great.

1- Watson wouldn't be looked at by other clubs, because he would be competing against the likes of Fornaroli and Berisha for a spot. That doesn't seem like much of an argument to try and screw down his salary to the absolute minimum allowable- I was comparing what he brings to Fenton, Lia, Doyle, Powell and Lia- using for sake of argument the most recent performance. Professional athletes give up other opportunities, have a short career and risk serious injury in their job.

2- Watson offered a lot more on the park on this and on other occasions, and he has caused defences trouble when he 's been on across several games. Before the game has been won or lost. 

If the game is totally f-ing miserable and few players are showing anything, I'm allowed to point out that one or two players did well and I enjoyed watching. 

Not sure what is worse at the moment the forum or the team tbh.

  I would not want you negotiating salaries for any company I run. As harsh as it is it is all about supply and demand in the real world. If his services are not in demand of course that places a different slant on salary negotiations
Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

sthn.jeff wrote:

martinb wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

martinb wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

valeo wrote:

I think spreading unfounded bs about someone should be bannable

However, nufc's story is pretty believable. Who wouldn't be happy about that kinda pay rise? Good on him.

Watson offers something, but very much plan B or C and what he offers is not particularly unique. Are Other Clubs lining up to snap him up ? I would doubt it. My view is keep him if we can not find anything that is definitely better but does he warrant a salary 50% higher than the minimum? I would not think so.  

a facepalm gif!

Watson would be an import for other clubs. Likewise we aren't rushing to sign Santalab or Joey whoever it was.

Do you think on the last game he should be paid less than Powell? Less than Lia? Than Fenton? Than Doyle?

For me he was one of the few things that made the game worth watching.

Riiiiigggghhht.

So  you would base your salary payments on a twenty minute period. On that basis Powell would be on about 2m a year based on his WSW performance.

And surely the fact he is an import elsewhere gives us the club even more bargaining power

I always love the 'he did really well when he came on' argument. It's All White counterpart is we played really well in the last 20/30/2nd half, take your pick.

What such arguments tend to completely overlook is the state/context of the game - coming on for the last 20 minutes when the opposition has already won the game and are already thinking about next week and play-offs afterwards is a bit different to being able to make a difference when the game is there to be won or lost.

Except that wasn't my argument at all. 

But more *yawn* forum authorities and straw men

It also holds much more water than he did sweet f all when he was on, must be great.

1- Watson wouldn't be looked at by other clubs, because he would be competing against the likes of Fornaroli and Berisha for a spot. That doesn't seem like much of an argument to try and screw down his salary to the absolute minimum allowable- I was comparing what he brings to Fenton, Lia, Doyle, Powell and Lia- using for sake of argument the most recent performance. Professional athletes give up other opportunities, have a short career and risk serious injury in their job.

2- Watson offered a lot more on the park on this and on other occasions, and he has caused defences trouble when he 's been on across several games. Before the game has been won or lost. 

If the game is totally f-ing miserable and few players are showing anything, I'm allowed to point out that one or two players did well and I enjoyed watching. 

Not sure what is worse at the moment the forum or the team tbh.

  I would not want you negotiating salaries for any company I run. As harsh as it is it is all about supply and demand in the real world. If his services are not in demand of course that places a different slant on salary negotiations

Otherwise he has the option of taking up  things outside of football

Closed for new posts