Crowds - The thread of Australian whining

Phoenix Academy
660
·
450
·
over 11 years

Since when has the spelling of croud changed to croud?

 

Now I find the system wont let me spell it correctly

Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
over 15 years

A bit after shark became shark

Marquee
3.3K
·
5.1K
·
about 13 years

Walsall Boy wrote:

Since when has the spelling of croud changed to croud?

Now I find the system wont let me spell it correctly

Was changed after the Hutt Wreck game when croud was misspelled on the screen at the game.

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years

Yakcall wrote:

Walsall Boy wrote:

Since when has the spelling of croud changed to croud?

Now I find the system wont let me spell it correctly

Was changed after the Hutt Wreck game when croud was misspelled on the screen at the game.

Starting XI
550
·
2.4K
·
over 14 years
Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
over 15 years

Royz wrote:

Cro\/\/ds.

shIt?

3rd XI
140
·
2.4K
·
over 14 years

You can say shark still ? wow

3rd XI
140
·
2.4K
·
over 14 years

chefmivec wrote:

You can say shark still ? wow

damn . how'd you do that?
Marquee
1.2K
·
8.2K
·
almost 17 years
Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
over 15 years

chefmivec wrote:

chefmivec wrote:

You can say shark still ? wow

damn . how'd you do that?

Press the "quote" button and you'll be directed to a reply box with the original posts coded into it.

Simples.

Heaven knows I'm miserable now
280
·
5.2K
·
almost 16 years

SurgeQld wrote:

The Domeinator on the wireless saying he hopes/expects 30k... I'm generally optimistic with things - but not THAT optimistic!

It's worrying that Dome is so out of touch with such things. 30k at 7pm on a Sunday?! LOL.

Heaven knows I'm miserable now
280
·
5.2K
·
almost 16 years

Tegal wrote:

based on observation (rather than any stats) this round of playoffs is generally poorly attended throughout the league. 

It should really just be top 4.

3rd v 4th, winner plays second, winner of that plays first in the final. 

Tegal
·
Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
about 17 years

Steve-O wrote:

Tegal wrote:

based on observation (rather than any stats) this round of playoffs is generally poorly attended throughout the league. 

It should really just be top 4.

3rd v 4th, winner plays second, winner of that plays first in the final. 

But then first doesn't play for 3 weeks. 

It'd also mean a lot of teams are out of finals contention fairly early on. 

Heaven knows I'm miserable now
280
·
5.2K
·
almost 16 years

True, but games don't necessarily have to be spread over 3 weeks. Perhaps have 1 or 2 midweek games.

Also, top 6 qualifying in a 10 team league is fairly ridiculous really.

I view the issue is no relegation to keep things exciting at the other end of the table.

LG
Legend
5.8K
·
24K
·
almost 17 years

Steve-O, I know it is income for Foxtel but I have wondered why don't they just take the top 4 teams at the end of the season and do a 1V3 & 2V4 semi then a grand final and save all the other crap. They have a cup competition now that they could kick start later in the season so that final is also near the end of the season instead of a 3rd of the way in.

Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

You have been off line for a while Steve-O. I have missed your infectious enthusiasm.

Tegal
·
Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
about 17 years

lose a couple of games and he's back.

Legend
3.6K
·
15K
·
about 17 years

where were you when we were good

the hipster fan's lament

Starting XI
510
·
2.1K
·
about 15 years

Tegal wrote:

Steve-O wrote:

Tegal wrote:

based on observation (rather than any stats) this round of playoffs is generally poorly attended throughout the league. 

It should really just be top 4.

3rd v 4th, winner plays second, winner of that plays first in the final. 

But then first doesn't play for 3 weeks. 

It'd also mean a lot of teams are out of finals contention fairly early on. 

Yeah I think it's the second point there. Top 6, although it has it's faults, keeps most teams in with at least a sniff until very late in the season. Especially since there's no promotion/relegation, there's only spoon avoidance for the bottom couple.

Opinion Privileges revoked
4.9K
·
9.9K
·
over 14 years

Lonegunmen wrote:

Steve-O, I know it is income for Foxtel but I have wondered why don't they just take the top 4 teams at the end of the season and do a 1V3 & 2V4 semi then a grand final and save all the other crap.

Because long, drawn-out finals series are Aussie tradition (AFL, NRL).

Marquee
1.6K
·
5.2K
·
almost 17 years

Steve-O wrote:

Tegal wrote:

based on observation (rather than any stats) this round of playoffs is generally poorly attended throughout the league. 

It should really just be top 4.

3rd v 4th, winner plays second, winner of that plays first in the final. 

My alternative system. Top 5 into playoffs.
1st goes straight into grand final as reward for being top after 27 rounds. 2nd v 5th, 3rd v 4th. Winners of those play eachother to find second finalist.

Marquee
3.7K
·
5.8K
·
over 17 years

Buggar that under some of the systems some you are suggesting we would have missed the playoffs again.Go on go and give yourselves a smack.

Heaven knows I'm miserable now
280
·
5.2K
·
almost 16 years

sthn.jeff wrote:

You have been off line for a while Steve-O. I have missed your infectious enthusiasm.

Jeez, not allowed an opinion without the usual suspects coming out of the woodwork...

Heaven knows I'm miserable now
280
·
5.2K
·
almost 16 years

ballane wrote:

Buggar that under some of the systems some you are suggesting we would have missed the playoffs again.Go on go and give yourselves a smack.

No, we finished 4th.  None of the systems that have been suggested would've seen us miss out?

Marquee
3.7K
·
5.8K
·
over 17 years

Hopefully cheating isnt going to be an annual event,so yes we would miss them.

Legend
2.5K
·
17K
·
over 17 years

Top 6 is pretty ridiculous really. A team can afford to win 1/3rd of their games and still have a chance at winning the league.

Starting XI
510
·
2.1K
·
about 15 years

Steve-O wrote:

Tegal wrote:

based on observation (rather than any stats) this round of playoffs is generally poorly attended throughout the league. 

It should really just be top 4.

3rd v 4th, winner plays second, winner of that plays first in the final. 

My alternative system. Top 5 into playoffs.
1st goes straight into grand final as reward for being top after 27 rounds. 2nd v 5th, 3rd v 4th. Winners of those play eachother to find second finalist.

Problem with this again is the top team has too big a break before the final.

The old top 5 system from the NSWRL in the early 90s.... now there was a freaking complicated but fair system.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

How about we scrap the league portion of the season and have an extended playoff system, where each team plays each other 3 times and the team with the most points at the end are the champions?

Starting XI
480
·
3.5K
·
about 14 years

I don't like Playoffs, but think 6 teams is stupid in a 10 team league.

For me if we look at Top 4 and the FFA/Fox want 5 games then the solution would be 2-Legged Semis Home & Away (All Top 4 teams get a home playoff still) and then a final with the top 2...This also allows more opportunity to teach Andrew Mulligan about Away Goals counting double or something.

Life and death
2.4K
·
5.5K
·
about 17 years

Steve-O wrote:

SurgeQld wrote:

The Domeinator on the wireless saying he hopes/expects 30k... I'm generally optimistic with things - but not THAT optimistic!

It's worrying that Dome is so out of touch with such things. 30k at 7pm on a Sunday?! LOL.

If we dont get 30k, the Nix wont play any more playoff games in Wellington in future...
Surge
·
Can I have some lungs please miss
1.1K
·
7.5K
·
almost 17 years

He's on with the woman beater shortly - will be interesting to see if he makes another call.

Opinion Privileges revoked
4.9K
·
9.9K
·
over 14 years

As I keep saying, the reason there are so many finals with so many teams involved is that that's Australian tradition. FFA is competing with AFL and NRL who have their own overblown finals series.

First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
about 17 years

AFL and NRL aren't as bad though. The solution to me is just to expand the league to hopefully 14 teams and then the 6 team playoff series is fine. The real reason we have playoffs are because there is no promotion/relegation, highly sought after European places or an extensive list of cup competitions. 

I don't actually mind the playoff system. Probably because I'm used to it. I should point out that no team that has finished lower than 3rd has ever made a grand final.

First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
about 17 years

JonoNewton wrote:

I don't like Playoffs, but think 6 teams is stupid in a 10 team league.

For me if we look at Top 4 and the FFA/Fox want 5 games then the solution would be 2-Legged Semis Home & Away (All Top 4 teams get a home playoff still) and then a final with the top 2...This also allows more opportunity to teach Andrew Mulligan about Away Goals counting double or something.

I know they do this in England but I'm not a fan. What advantage does the team who comes first have over the 4th placed team? I think that system makes things even worse. At least under the current system the team who comes first gets a good advantage.

Tegal
·
Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
about 17 years

Yeah I think it's fine. Aside from the obvious stupidity of being able to finish in the bottom half of the table then go on to win the grand final. But that'll change once 3 more Aussie teams come in and we get kicked out. 

Marquee
3.7K
·
5.8K
·
over 17 years

Tegal wrote:

Yeah I think it's fine. Aside from the obvious stupidity of being able to finish in the bottom half of the table then go on to win the grand final. But that'll change once 3 more Aussie teams come in and we get kicked out. 

Na they will let us stay but not take part in the playoffs.LOL
WeeNix
540
·
810
·
over 10 years

I listened to David Dome with the "Wife Beater" who is a patronising R Sole.

Moar stars
2.1K
·
4.8K
·
about 12 years

whatever wrote:

I listened to David Dome with the "Wife Beater" who is a patronising R Sole.

What did he say?

WeeNix
540
·
810
·
over 10 years

He kept going on with the end is nigh if we don't get a big croud as some boss from the FFA is out here and when he sees the small croud  he will pull the plug on us.

Of course he  questioned why the it should not be shifted to Auckland. The "Wife Beater"  is pretty much in the mould of  Dekker who knew nothing about football, called it soccer and rubbished the crap out of the game at every opportunity he got.

Starting XI
510
·
2.4K
·
about 17 years

Buffon II wrote:

Top 6 is pretty ridiculous really. A team can afford to win 1/3rd of their games and still have a chance at winning the league.

No thats not quite true.  Melbourne Victory have won the league already,  they are the league champions.  The finals series is another comp all together.  Winners of league (MV) and the winners of the finals serious both get entry to ACL (unless its us of course)

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up