Crowds - The thread of Australian whining

Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
Bobobalde wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

Of course we are interested. It would be silly not to be. For me it seems like there is probably about 50odd people that join in regularly. Only oh Welly and clap clap phoenix get more people involved. Fucked if I know how we get the other 300-400 contributing more than they do.


The question is then where has everyone gone and why? 

Think it's been like that for a quite a while. Compare the zone between the 5-0 v victory and 0-5 v heart. People only seem to join in when we are doing well. So anything that is started dies off pretty quickly.
Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
over 15 years
2ndBest wrote:

Although it's seems the zone are better when the team is going well


Hmmm.
I have a hunch that there is something in that statement.  We need to develop this a bit more.  2B can you prepare a "think peice" on this concept and expand upon it?  I think some mind maps and some Kaizen brainstorming would be useful as well.

Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
over 15 years

Oh yes and at the end of this we should have a gant chart.


A big, colourful muthaf*cking gant chart.


With lots of arrows.


Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Lack of 7:30pm saturday night games probably haven't helped either.

Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Needs more songsheets.

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Needs more flares.

Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
over 15 years

Thunder sticks?


Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
Junior82 wrote:

Thunder sticks?


WSW had them last weekend........
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Capos and loudhailers too...

Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
over 15 years
2ndBest wrote:
Junior82 wrote:

Thunder sticks?


WSW had them last weekend........


And they are currently what place on the table?

Starting XI
480
·
2.6K
·
almost 17 years

We were still chanting at Newcastle even when we were 5-0 down.

I believe the missing ingredient to get the atmosphere back in the FeverZone is James Squire Cider!

WeeNix
72
·
510
·
almost 17 years

Chanting pfffft.

Needs a good full on riot.

First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
about 17 years

One thing I would say is that our away support is amazing. Sometimes we have what seems like 50 people atan away game and you can still hear "oh Wellington."

Legend
2.6K
·
17K
·
over 17 years

Away support is generally better everywhere in football.

Still Believin'
750
·
5.7K
·
over 17 years
el grapadura wrote:

Capos and loudhailers too...


And camo shorts. Don't forget the camo shorts.

Tegal Fan Club Member #1.5
200
·
2.2K
·
almost 17 years
Midfielder wrote:
Bobobalde wrote:

6000 is fair crowd. Seems to be the norm.  


FFA have in the licence agreements, that a team needs to average a certain crowd number, I think it is 12.5 K as part of the licence, along with other requirements... they used it to help get rid of Con at Newcastle and why Tony [Clive Palmer] backed off suing FFA when the kicked out the Fold Coast ...

Given FFA are chasing a 100 million plus media deal at the next media deal [negotiations should be complete in about two years]  there is an expectation at what clubs can produce ... Obviously the NZ market [ratings]  is helped by having a NZ team ... but FFA are trying to sell ground excitement ... 6K average in a 30K stadium does not look or sound great... 

Ultimate A-League  shows an average of 8 K however as discussed earlier in the thread it is the non Wellington matches that get those numbers up ..

 http://www.ultimatealeague.com/records.php?type=att


Talk about glass houses. Give us 6 games at home against teams within traveling distances for away fans and then maybe we can have this chat again.

The Mariners crowds will be around 9.5 K this year and that includes the community match .. take away the community match and the average is about 10 K ... last year 9. something...
That we have three derby teams that bolster our crowds is a fact of life ... and our home matches without the derby matches are normally around the 7 to 8.5 k...
But attacking Mariner crowds hardly argues your point ... we are under constant pressure with our owner threatening to move us unless we increase our crowds ... 
I repeat anyone who says 6K is acceptable has rocks in their head ...
Further even if we get 7 to 8 K in a 20 K stadium it looks better than 6 K in a 30K oval shaped stadium that looks like it has no roof...
There is no real danger and its all conjecture anyway .... however FFA have two different plans for the next media deal... 100 million plus and possibly two new teams...
The NRL & AFL play roughly 210 to 220 games per year ... the A-League plays 142 games ...the hoped for schedule is 12 teams i.e. 6 games per week over 33 rounds plus finals, plus Australia Cup Matches, plus ACL matches [24 min], plus senior national teams, plus W-League .... Maybe 300 games ... PS after the Asian Cup in 2015 the ACL matches will be viewed differently here .. 
A NZ team helps with the NZ ratings there is no doubt ... however the next media deal will greatly even out the codes ... 
I love the idea of your new 12 K stadium ... even 6K would look a decent crowd ... however I cannot see a 6K Wellington paying the expenses at the ROF and to say its a good figure and what we should expect IMO is way below where you need to be as the league moves forward.. 

Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Isn't it better for the TV deal if more people stay at home and watch it rather than attend in person.

Tegal Fan Club Member #1.5
200
·
2.2K
·
almost 17 years
2ndBest wrote:

Isn't it better for the TV deal if more people stay at home and watch it rather than attend in person.


You are a clever person ... I dip my hat to you ... amazing wisdom you have my huge respect .. 
Tegal
·
Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
about 17 years

The one year we had a similar season to what CCM has been enjoying lately, wiki says our average was 11500ish, including crowds of 19k and 15k. Not bad without any derbys to prop us up. Especially when you compare it to CCMs 9k average when you're consistently having seasons like that of late. 

Spare us your lectures. We're in the A league, deal with it. 

Still Believin'
750
·
5.7K
·
over 17 years

You can talk about other factors all you want but at the end of the day the football served up at Westpac this year has been crap.

- We've won 2 out of 9 games at Westpac this season.

- Our first win at Westpac didn't come until 22 Dec in Rnd 11 (but only our 4th game at Westpac).

- We've scored 10 goals in total at Westpac this season, and 5 of those came in one game. So that's 5 Phoenix goals spread over the remaining 8 home games.

- We have the worst home record in the league.

That's simply not good enough entertainment to get people through the door.


and 1 other
Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

We are the anti-phoenix. Can't win at home.

Tegal Fan Club Member #1.5
200
·
2.2K
·
almost 17 years
Tegal wrote:

The one year we had a similar season to what CCM has been enjoying lately, wiki says our average was 11500ish, including crowds of 19k and 15k. Not bad without any derbys to prop us up. Especially when you compare it to CCMs 9k average when you're consistently having seasons like that of late. 

Save us your lectures and jog on. We're in the A league, deal with it. 


Attack the messenger .... I have already said our owner is threatening to move us because of our crowds ... also find anywhere I said our crowds are great ... 
No lecture just a comment that a poster said a 6K average was acceptable ...  
YF seems to have many folk who think anyone who says something even slightly negative is HHHMMMM not sure having a go at them ... or whatever ... However if you think a 6K average is OK and the reason is a Mariner poster said it then as above I respect your great wisdom and dip my hat to a very clever person... as you said the Mariners only get 9 to 10 K and that's with derby matches ... but we could be farking moved and accept that we can't exist on these crowd numbers ... and we are building a Centre of Excellence to bolster our revenue ..
Your logic is amazing pure .... and I admire you greatly and the business like manner in which you argue your case...  makes so much sense and tis easy to see how right you are in your assessments... 
Can I make a challenge to you ... you said """ We're in the A league, deal with it"""" please find one post where I have attacked a NZ team in the A-League or where I have in any way said a NZ team should be kicked out ... please please please please please look ... what you will find is heaps of support and some warnings .... but then again if I say look tis could cause some issues that is attacking and wanting a NZ team out ... 
But you do make a decent point any post from outside insular views will be viewed as an attack .... 
So for the sake of it and in line with what must be said .... its farking great that you guys can get 6 K's to games this will surely ensure the Nix take over RU in NZ and become the biggest team in the league and in the ROF the Nix's have without doubt the best stadium in the league ...  
Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

So we all agree that crowds are lower than we want them to be. What next?

Tegal
·
Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
about 17 years
2ndBest wrote:

So we all agree that crowds are lower than we want them to be. What next?

We wait around for the new TV deal, close Phoenix HQ doors then get on with our lives apparently? 
Starting XI
480
·
3.5K
·
about 14 years
2ndBest wrote:

So we all agree that crowds are lower than we want them to be. What next?

Stage a sit in?
Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
Tegal wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

So we all agree that crowds are lower than we want them to be. What next?

We wait around for the new TV deal, close Phoenix HQ doors then get on with our lives apparently? 

Well going on the 12.5 number we'd be down to 5 clubs.

Starting XI
480
·
3.5K
·
about 14 years
2ndBest wrote:
Tegal wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

So we all agree that crowds are lower than we want them to be. What next?

We wait around for the new TV deal, close Phoenix HQ doors then get on with our lives apparently? 

Well going on the 12.5 number we'd be down to 5 clubs.

Who will play each other 8 times to ensure there are 300 games*.






*Warning numbers may be grossly exaggerated 

Tegal Fan Club Member #1.5
200
·
2.2K
·
almost 17 years

[/quote]

Well going on the 12.5 number we'd be down to 5 clubs.

[/quote]

OR tis useful if you wanta get rid of someone or take their licence away see Jets [Con] and Fold Coast [Clive] .. but does strongly indicate where and what FFA expect in the future say 5 years out ... 
Last post for a while heaps of work to do so better get on with it ...  Football in Australia is said by a number of media experts to be at a tipping point ... in so far as being accepted as a main stream sport with heaps of positive media ...
The Key KPI's are, crowds, ratings, net hits, ... on net hits we are already over the line ... if our Fox Ratings start to average 100K presently around 84 I think, crowds to a 14.5 average [meaning with finals we break tho the 2 million mark] and FTA TV on SBS to 220 to 250 K currently averaging around 90K ... 
Fox increase by roughly 9% pa over the next two years [HHHMMM possible], crowds by roughly 5% pa [very possible]... should see the pay TV and crowd numbers where the reporting of the league will be totally different to what it is today... FFA / SBS & the teams can do a lot to help the FTA ie give them the best matches with good crowds for a start and new broadcasters ... however they have a long way to go ..
In the whole scheme of things the next two media deals will change Football forever even now the ABC and fossil AM stations who call RL matches in their cross overs are getting the A-Leagues results called in...
Every team needs to lift in both quality on the park and increase their crowds as I posted earlier within 4 years FFA will have over 300 matches to sell ... In Australia this will cause a major shift in sport with the biggest looser at this stage being Rugby which is really struggling ... 
However in the grand scheme of things the ground day experience and that coming tho on the TV is very important in making the above happen..
Off for a while now ... 
Tegal Fan Club Member #1.5
200
·
2.2K
·
almost 17 years
JonoNewton wrote:
2ndBest wrote:
Tegal wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

So we all agree that crowds are lower than we want them to be. What next?

We wait around for the new TV deal, close Phoenix HQ doors then get on with our lives apparently? 

Well going on the 12.5 number we'd be down to 5 clubs.

Who will play each other 8 times to ensure there are 300 games*.






*Warning numbers may be grossly exgarrated 


Last for a while again ... now take off your shoes and start counting...

A-League ... 6 games per round [assume 12 teams] 33 rounds is 198 games plus finals is 206..

ACL matches at least 24..

Australia Cup matches 32

Senior national games, Socceroo's 9, Matilda's 10, Under 23 side 4 ... 23

 W-League 12 matches..

So lets summarise ..

A-League  206, ACL 24, Australia Cup 32, National teams 23, W-League 12 ... about 300 give or take ... 


Remember the ACL and AC matches could be increased as could the W-League... 


It's great when reason, logic and facts are used other than gut feel rants attempting to have a go at someone...""warning writing may be greatly exaggerated""" ... BTW corrected your spelling on exaggerated ... 

Jag
Not Elite enough
730
·
8K
·
about 17 years

Core crowd is around 6 - 7K. The first thing the Club should do is start pouring some resources into looking after season members, because they're the ones who are gonna be there when Johnny Casual can't be bothered. Trying to grow crowds at the expense of your most loyal supporters is a dangerous thing to do, in my humble opinion.

As for the rest of it? At the risk of stating the bleeding obvious, winning is the biggest single factor which will boost numbers through the gate, success equals bigger crowds. Actually playing at home every couple of weeks might also help! There are hordes of other options that the Club should be looking at: cheaper season tickets, greater engagement with local clubs, more and better promotion (the shambles around when the actual  KO time for yesterday's game was embarrassing), having game ticket plus....... deals (e.g. Game ticket plus cheap entry to movies, game ticket plus x% off a meal at a local eatery, for example) which would involve greater links with local businesses. Give people an incentive to buy a ticket. Not my ideas, just some of the things I've seen floating around, and I'm sure there's loads more.

As for the "I won't go to the game, or I won't get involved, cos YF are elitist" type stuff? Load of old shite. YF might, and might not, be a lot of things but it isn't elitist. It's like any other group, you have to actually make the effort to "join in". Standing in the shadows complaining about elitism is a cop out, in my opinion.

There you go, I've solved nowt and haven't said anything new. Move along now please.

 


 

Marquee
1.3K
·
5.3K
·
almost 17 years

Take all the active supporters and spread them evenly (in 10/20m grids, i.e. not more than 10/20m away from each) amongst the crowd. Then when they are chanting it may force non active fans around them to participate more.


Otherwise we go full Ultra (flares, capos, loudhailers, drums, the works). Only capos though can have their shirts off before 80min. 

Tegal Fan Club Member #1.5
200
·
2.2K
·
almost 17 years

One more time ..

Just to show how far the game is moving in Australia .. this article is from an AFL journalist ... the A-League on the weekend drew a larger crowd than the AFL in Melbourne.. 


http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/time-for-afl-to-heed-fans-anger-over-ticket-prices-20140330-zqopr.html#ixzz2xUtpKK00


Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years
2ndBest wrote:

So we all agree that crowds are lower than we want them to be. What next?

Support the idea of Auckland having a rival A-League team.

Jag
Not Elite enough
730
·
8K
·
about 17 years
Jerzy Merino wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

So we all agree that crowds are lower than we want them to be. What next?

Support the idea of Auckland having a rival A-League team.

Which helps crowds in Wellington on a weekly basis, how?

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years
Jag wrote:
Jerzy Merino wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

So we all agree that crowds are lower than we want them to be. What next?

Support the idea of Auckland having a rival A-League team.

Which helps crowds in Wellington on a weekly basis, how?

You should know from yr Scottish experience.

Jag
Not Elite enough
730
·
8K
·
about 17 years
Jerzy Merino wrote:
Jag wrote:
Jerzy Merino wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

So we all agree that crowds are lower than we want them to be. What next?

Support the idea of Auckland having a rival A-League team.

Which helps crowds in Wellington on a weekly basis, how?

You should know from yr Scottish experience.

Now I'm confused. So, if I get that right, you're saying having two rival teams in different cities with no real connection, positive or negative, apart from being in the same country, is similar to having two rival teams, in the same city, who have been hating each other for over a hundred years for reasons which are bugger all to do with football, and who still get big crowds every week even when they are in different leagues? Two NZ A League teams would only boost each other's crowds when they were playing each other. In my opinion, it would make no difference to the crowd at a Nix v Perth game, for example.

Apologies, sincere ones, if I've missed the point.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years
Jag wrote:
Jerzy Merino wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

So we all agree that crowds are lower than we want them to be. What next?

Support the idea of Auckland having a rival A-League team.

Which helps crowds in Wellington on a weekly basis, how?

Higher profile for the league in general thanks to more coverage from NZ media. Also if the derby games attract bigger crowds that raises the season average overall, and might be a way to convert more casual punters into committed fans.
Jag
Not Elite enough
730
·
8K
·
about 17 years
Jag wrote:
Jerzy Merino wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

So we all agree that crowds are lower than we want them to be. What next?

Support the idea of Auckland having a rival A-League team.

Which helps crowds in Wellington on a weekly basis, how?

Higher profile for the league in general thanks to more coverage from NZ media. Also if the derby games attract bigger crowds that raises the season average overall, and might be a way to convert more casual punters into committed fans.

 

This I probably agree with.

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years
Jag wrote:
Jag wrote:
Jerzy Merino wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

So we all agree that crowds are lower than we want them to be. What next?

Support the idea of Auckland having a rival A-League team.

Which helps crowds in Wellington on a weekly basis, how?

Higher profile for the league in general thanks to more coverage from NZ media. Also if the derby games attract bigger crowds that raises the season average overall, and might be a way to convert more casual punters into committed fans.

 

This I probably agree with.

And I did (see above). I wasn't thinking one city: Rangers v Celtic; more Edinburgh v Glasgow or Aberdeen v Glasgow, (repeat in England throughout the leagues).

Tegal
·
Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
about 17 years

Ha Jag bringing my twitter conversation to the forum. 

On thinking about it further, the only problem I can see with using local business effectively as sellers of tickets via "meal and Phoenix ticket" type packages is that ticketek wouldn't be too pleased with not getting their cut. 

Otherwise its a good idea because: 

a) more reach for potential ticket sales, more advertising for upcoming games . 

b) mutually beneficial partnerships are formed, without the need to give out free tickets - too many of which devalue the Phoenix as a product. 

And a few other reasons that I cannot recall right now. Will add as I remember/think of them. 

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up