Wellington Phoenix Men

Expanding ASB Prem

61 replies · 1,310 views
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Expanding ASB Prem
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
LINK

Who would you like to see added to the ASB Premiership?

Phoenix A (Reserves/Academy)??
Nelson??
North Shore - 3rd Auckland team
Ard Choille2011-12-07 15:45:23
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
North Shore.
 
Incidentally -
The completion format has been largely unchanged since its inaugural season in 2004 however opportunities to increase the number of participating franchise teams remain.
 
Wow.
Hard News2011-12-07 15:50:28

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
why is this bit highlighted lol
 

22 Participation Fee/Entry Fee

22.1 Each Licence Holder is required to pay an annual participation fee for participation in both

the National League and the NYL as set out at Schedule One to this Agreement. This fee is

payable in advance, in cleared funds and must be paid as directed by NZF from time to time

and at its absolute discretion.

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Perhaps because one, or maybe more, NZFC team(s) are yet to pay their bill this year.

I let my guitar speak for me

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
1) Phoenix A
2) North Shore
 
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Phoenix A is not a reality unless you can get all the franchises to agree to wave the competition rules to allow a professional team in and wave the 30 days stand down. Its failed before and rumour is the big two are not keen on it.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
Phoenix A is not a reality unless you can get all the franchises to agree to wave the competition rules to allow a professional team in and wave the 30 days stand down. Its failed before and rumour is the big two are not keen on it.



What I've heard is most clubs aren't keen on it, because they simply do not want the league to have professional elements to it. For a club like Otago United, where 70% of income comes from grant money, anything that presents the league as professional leads to difficulties with securing the grant money.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Question was: "Who would you like to see added to the ASB Premiership?".

That's why I said Phoenix A and North Shore.

Of course I agree that majority of the clubs (especially top two) wouldn't support Phoenix A, and I don't have any doubts that ASB league rules and regulations prevent  a professional team to enter in an amateur league.

On the other hand, in my humble opinion,  what would be the best for NZ young players and NZ Football is what I suggested.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It should be noted that a lot of these rules applied that restrixt this aren't NZFs but are FIFA rules and also impacts from the US NCAA rules.

These can't just be overridden for the ASB Premiership.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Whats the logic behind this North Shore rubbish? Would rather see BOP, or Ole Madrids
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Phoenix Reserves would be my preferred and only choice.
 
Local Derby's.
 
TW Ultras!
Hectik as bro.

T.E.A.M Wellington
Ole! Ole!
Stefan2011-12-09 14:32:16
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
It's a hotbed of football...

They'l just buy in players like the other lot up there. Id like to see more geographic distribution first. Nelson have a strong football community
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Expand to an uneven number of teams. Bye round = play against Phoenix A on a completely unofficial basis - thus bypassing international transfers, NCAA concerns etc. Same as last year, except with more matches and on weekend match dates.

I'd have a third Auckland team as #9. If we went so far as 11, I'd add Nelson and a fourth Auckland team.

As much as I'd love to see a Bay of Plenty team and think it would succeed in terms of support, I'd be concerned about the quality of local players available. Waikato FC is bad enough, and Hamilton actually has top-division winter clubs.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
For those who think the Phoenix A should be in the ASB prem dream on it will not ever happen. Whos to say the Nix a will be still going in two years time?
The ASB prem needs T.V. coverage before adding more average teams to the competition, if the standard of new teams are upto ACFC level then go ahead expand but we all know that no other team/club in NZ is going to be without big$$ to fund them.
Canterbury United are trying to compete with ACFC but are still along way off being that good [on the park] or having that sort of money even allowing for them paying players in one form or another.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Robb wrote:
Expand to an uneven number of teams. Bye round = play against Phoenix A on a completely unofficial basis - thus bypassing international transfers, NCAA concerns etc. Same as last year, except with more matches and on weekend match dates.

I'd have a third Auckland team as #9. If we went so far as 11, I'd add Nelson and a fourth Auckland team.

As much as I'd love to see a Bay of Plenty team and think it would succeed in terms of support, I'd be concerned about the quality of local players available. Waikato FC is bad enough, and Hamilton actually has top-division winter clubs.


yes

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The idea of a bye round and playing the Phoenix A has merit except there is a danger that teams will treat it exactly the same way as the 1st round of the White Ribbon Cup - leave the best players behind/rest/not risk injury and put out the reserves. How does that benefit the Phoenix A? I find it ironic that teams whinge that the league is broken up because of O League and they have no continuity afforded to them. Now that another competition has been found, the teams don't want to put out their best players and treat it seriously for the sake of that continuity.
 
If you are Team Wellington or Canterbury United (and those two teams are objectively the next best) are you going to risk your best players on a nothing game and getting injured when you have a potential chance of getting to O League and thus a potential chance at 500k?

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
The idea of a bye round and playing the Phoenix A has merit except there is a danger that teams will treat it exactly the same way as the 1st round of the White Ribbon Cup - leave the best players behind/rest/not risk injury and put out the reserves. How does that benefit the Phoenix A? I find it ironic that teams whinge that the league is broken up because of O League and they have no continuity afforded to them. Now that another competition has been found, the teams don't want to put out their best players and treat it seriously for the sake of that continuity.
 
If you are Team Wellington or Canterbury United (and those two teams are objectively the next best) are you going to risk your best players on a nothing game and getting injured when you have a potential chance of getting to O League and thus a potential chance at 500k?

Yet the ASB teams were still dominant ...
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Have a Tauranga side. Decklan can have Waikato and keep embarressing himself with his youth side
while Tauranga can have all the ACTUAL best players in the waibop region e.g. Michael Mayne, Steven Halloway etc...
Maybe have the NZU20s in the NZFC?
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I just wonder where the money and talent is going to come from? You would need a huge sponsor to begin with and where are bettertalented players going to come from? NZF has just started its second National Futsal League ( sponsored also by ASB) taking players already away from the NZFC plus pre-season football training starts in January with Series 2+3 ( futsal) scheduled for Feb and March in Auckland and Welington. Is there enough cash and players out there?
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
AJ13 wrote:
Whats the logic behind this North Shore rubbish? Would rather see BOP, or Ole Madrids


Personal view mate... The same logic like your behind BOP or Ole Madrids (can I say rubbish?).
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
North Shore Team, please. Will give me something to do!!!!
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Owesomexpert wrote:
AJ13 wrote:
Whats the logic behind this North Shore rubbish? Would rather see BOP, or Ole Madrids


Personal view mate... The same logic like your behind BOP or Ole Madrids (can I say rubbish?).

You thought i was serious? lulz
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
AJ13 wrote:
Owesomexpert wrote:
AJ13 wrote:
Whats the logic behind this North Shore rubbish? Would rather see BOP, or Ole Madrids


Personal view mate... The same logic like your behind BOP or Ole Madrids (can I say rubbish?).

You thought i was serious? lulz


I must admit I did.

Apologies...
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
poolmister wrote:
For those who think the Phoenix A should be in the ASB prem dream on it will not ever happen. Whos to say the Nix a will be still going in two years time?
The ASB prem needs T.V. coverage before adding more average teams to the competition, if the standard of new teams are upto ACFC level then go ahead expand but we all know that no other team/club in NZ is going to be without big$$ to fund them.
Canterbury United are trying to compete with ACFC but are still along way off being that good [on the park] or having that sort of money even allowing for them paying players in one form or another.


Cant believe you think that
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hopefully a North Shore team would help to break up the Auckland dominance.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Based on population size you should have at least 4 teams in Auckland.  You could add them without significantly increasing costs becase flying in and out of Auckland is cheap and you have the player base and population up there to support it.  If you want decent players you need to be able to offer them work outside football, and there is ar more of that in big centres.  If you do a BOP or Nelson you'll just end up with a load of local players which doesn't increase the standard and isn't particularly good for the league.  Plus the more derbies you have the more interest in the league raises a level.
 
I think geographical spread is all well and good but what you need is franchises with the ability to attract decent players.  I think you're far more likely to get that on the shore than in Nelson (for example)
james dean2011-12-30 00:50:12

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
On the other hand adding more teams add costs to other teams outside of the region.

Not a fan of the idea - yet.

Disclaimer: this is a fairly uninformed opinion.Tegal2011-12-30 00:55:53

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yes definitely increases costs - just making the point that adding travel to auckland increases costs a lot less than every team needing to travel to say Nelson, plus Nelson team having to fly away every second week (travel costs are pooled and shared equally I believe).
 
I think if you had 4 sides in Auckland as well you'd get much better visibility in the media  up there which would be good for the competition as a whole.
 
I think you need 10 teams to make this a real competition and I don't think the case for expanding to more smaller towns/cities is strong at this stage

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
You could easily make a strong BOP squad that could compete in the NZFC. They could beat Youngheart thats for sure.

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
ASUS wrote:
They could beat Youngheart thats for sure.



That's hardly an achievement.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
BOP vs Waikato would be a legit Derby. The problem is sorting which of the surrounding areas associate to which team like Rotorua, Taupo etc.. im quite certain they come under the BOP but there is so much controversy its hard to be certain about anything.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
ASUS wrote:
BOP vs Waikato would be a legit Derby. The problem is sorting which of the surrounding areas associate to which team like Rotorua, Taupo etc.. im quite certain they come under the BOP but there is so much controversy its hard to be certain about anything.


Taupo & Rotovegas = BoP
Tokoroa and Putaruru are Waikato

There is a devide in there somewhere
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Nelson and Tauranga to make it ten.

No more in Auckland, ever. Why would anyone want more than two teams in one city.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
chris.acfc wrote:
Nelson and Tauranga to make it ten.

No more in Auckland, ever. Why would anyone want more than two teams in one city.


You won't like London then.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
chris.acfc wrote:
Nelson and Tauranga to make it ten.

No more in Auckland, ever. Why would anyone want more than two teams in one city.
Because there are 1.5 million people in auckland - plus it has jobs, sponsors and the media

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
james dean wrote:
chris.acfc wrote:
Nelson and Tauranga to make it ten.

No more in Auckland, ever. Why would anyone want more than two teams in one city.
Because there are 1.5 million people in auckland - plus it has jobs, sponsors and the media
I'd also add geographical spread. If Aucklanders refused to head up to Albany for the Knights, I'd imagine the inverse may also apply - Shore JAFAs finding Kiwitea/Fred Taylor to be too distant. Same deal for South Aucklanders. Having a North Shore and/or South Auckland team may open up the ASBP to potential supporters who may otherwise find attending in person to be a hassle. After all, that "one city" used to be four - and the two of those former cities without ASBP clubs were the 2nd and 5th most populated metropolitan areas in NZ.
Permalink Permalink