I dunno about you Nux supporters, but I am beginning to see a common link between Nuxland and Perth.
The two most isolated outposts in the A-League finished the bottom two positions last season and look set to do the same next season. How can the A-League remain profitable for clubs in these cities when there is significant disadvantage of trying to compete for top quality players that seek not to move home. As Townsville and Gold Coast are added, how does Wellington and Perth compete to one day get further up the ladder then 2nd last and last. I know Perth Glory has to pay more for players, I would imagine the Nux would as well.
The continued participation of both clubs in the A-League needs significant pressure on FFA officials to recognise the competitive disadvantage Perth and Nuxland have during trade period when they compete on a level playing field with clubs who have kept an established A-League playing list since season 1.
Its time for supporters to actually look at whether the A-League is a fair playing field...
I think the case study of last season, the inability for Perth and Wellington to significantly increase the standards of their players from the season before for Version 4 deliver an indication to the FFA that something has to be done...
Otherwise fans of both clubs will continue to see a growing gap based on geography and players choosing not to move to a particular city because its to far away. Salary cap concession or some other policy to bridge the gap is needed.
Do Nux fans also believe the competition is harder to win from the isolated posts because of the competitive disadvantage we have of attracting and increasing the quality of our squad?