Wellington Phoenix Men

How can Greenacre be best utilised thread

157 replies · 1,339 views
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
How can Greenacre be best utilised thread
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Discuss. Stevo2009-10-18 00:53:56
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Shove him to the bench it'll scare the sh*t out of him and make him work for his position.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Service. Give him the ball to his feet on occasion and perhaps we will get some sort of clue as to what he can offer. for now the odd half chance at a glancing header is not working Rumney72R2009-10-18 00:55:22
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
He 'works' the hardest out of anyone. Just isn't falling for him so far - some of it his fault, some not. Think he's used to playing with a genuine target man.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Sign players than can actually give him some decent chances.
 
If this is not possible, put him on the bench.
 
At the moment, he simply isn't doing it, and whether this is his fault is neither here nor there.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Shove him to the bench it'll scare the sh*t out of him and make him work for his position.
Bench him for???
I din't think benching him would scare him, more make him lose respect for Ricki. We have no other proven striking options (G-Acre well proven in England, Ifill is not a striker). Bench him and we'll have someone else receiving a lack of service in the wrong part of the park.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
play him up front with Chen with Ifill sitting behind.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
whooooooo wrote:
play him up front with Chen with Ifill sitting behind.


No thanks.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Greenacre is one of the hardest working players on the park, the way he closes down defenders in possession in their own defensive third is an example to the rest of the team. 

When Hibs, went up, to win the Scottish Cup - I wisnae there - furfuxake!

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
clark007e wrote:
whooooooo wrote:
play him up front with Chen with Ifill sitting behind.


No thanks.


ffs, you disagree with EVERYTHING I SAY !!
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
All I can say is that he scored a goal every 3 games for Tranmere in League One (similar level to the A-League imo) and there is no reason he can't do it in the A-League but I don't think Ifill complements him at all.

whooooooo wrote:
clark007e wrote:
whooooooo wrote:
play him up front with Chen with Ifill sitting behind.


No thanks.


ffs, you disagree with EVERYTHING I SAY !!


To be fair, everyone disagrees with what you say.
valeo2009-10-18 01:06:57

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
whooooooo wrote:
clark007e wrote:
whooooooo wrote:
play him up front with Chen with Ifill sitting behind.


No thanks.


ffs, you disagree with EVERYTHING I SAY !!


Because everything you say is retarded.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
whooooooo wrote:

clark007e wrote:

whooooooo wrote:
play him up front with Chen with Ifill sitting behind.
No thanks.
ffs, you disagree with EVERYTHING I SAY !!


You should ask him if this is the 5 pound arguement or the course of ten for 15 pounds!

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
whooooooo wrote:
clark007e wrote:
whooooooo wrote:
play him up front with Chen with Ifill sitting behind.


No thanks.


ffs, you disagree with EVERYTHING I SAY !!


Because everything you say is retarded.


Now theres somethink i agree on but i guess its more about whooo.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
whooooooo wrote:
clark007e wrote:
whooooooo wrote:
play him up front with Chen with Ifill sitting behind.


No thanks.


ffs, you disagree with EVERYTHING I SAY !!


Because everything you say is retarded.


coming from you.......

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Stops now or I get Banny.

Whoooo you have been long enough to gauge what is acceptable and you still seem to struggle to fit in.  Please have a think.

The rest of you, stop baiting him.

Last Word.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
valeo wrote:

All I can say is that he scored a goal every 3 games for Tranmere in League One (similar level to the A-League imo) and there is no reason he can't do it in the A-League but I don't think Ifill complements him at all.
whooooooo wrote:

clark007e wrote:

whooooooo wrote:
play him up front with Chen with Ifill sitting behind.
No thanks.
ffs, you disagree with EVERYTHING I SAY !!
To be fair, everyone disagrees with what you say.


Scene: before next week's game.

Ifill: Hey Chris, love what you've done with your hair. nice highlights.

Greenacre: Thanks Paul - think I'll go a score a couple of goals today. have one yourself me old China!

Junior822009-10-18 01:09:41

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Rumney72R wrote:
Service. Give him the ball to his feet on occasion and perhaps we will get some sort of clue as to what he can offer. for now the odd half chance at a glancing header is not working


This.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
aitkenmike wrote:
Rumney72R wrote:
Service. Give him the ball to his feet on occasion and perhaps we will get some sort of clue as to what he can offer. for now the odd half chance at a glancing header is not working


This.


agreed, he's a small guy so why give him the 50yard long ball ?
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
Stops now or I get Banny.

Whoooo you have been long enough to gauge what is acceptable and you still seem to struggle to fit in.  Please have a think.

The rest of you, stop baiting him.

Last Word.


Ok, sorry news. I honestly don't know what Greenacre needs. I mean the ball he gets is crap but its similar to what Smeltz got last year, really shows how big the gap Smeltz left is and this is coming from someone who doesn't like Smeltz.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
clark007e wrote:
Hard News wrote:
Stops now or I get Banny.

Whoooo you have been long enough to gauge what is acceptable and you still seem to struggle to fit in.  Please have a think.

The rest of you, stop baiting him.

Last Word.


Ok, sorry news. I honestly don't know what Greenacre needs. I mean the ball he gets is crap but its similar to what Smeltz got last year, really shows how big the gap Smeltz left is and this is coming from someone who doesn't like Smeltz.


so you don't know what he needs but i tell you the answer and you say "no thanks" ??

and i can't believe you don't like Smeltz. (he's like the best striker NZ has produced)
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
whooooooo wrote:

and i can't believe you don't like Smeltz. (he's like the best striker NZ has produced)


lol. There was this bloke called Wynton Rufer, heard of him?
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Not to mention the fact that Smeltz spent many of his formative years on the Gold Coast.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

He could have scored last nite but as luck would have it it went over/past him to Brown..so positioning was good.  There were a couple of other cutbacks or crosses that went where he wasnt. 

I look at whats happening when we are attacking and too often there is a dearth of Nix bodies in the box so unless it gets to exactly where he is..and sometimes no one else is there either,  he/we just aint going to score.  Our down the line and get the cross over style of play isnt working  all the time...we need to try and score more by going up the middle which may suit him more..and get another two or three players in their more often. 
 
Im sure they ask him what he needs but as I dont see any style change I assume the answer is what he gets..which isnt working.
 
I dont think I have yet seen him take the ball 30 or so metres out and beat players and shoot.  By his own admission he is not that sort of player.
 
Maybe try one game with Costa and him up front and Ifill slightly deeper but I dont think thats the answer....and the other option of "targetman" has done its dash and they aint here..
 
 
 
 

A small town in Europe........looking to bounce straight back up....well that aint going to happen

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

I think he should be one of two strikers. in a formation like this

               Daniel
      Greenacre   Ifill

I understand that his work rate is top class, and appreciate it. But that's not really his job, to run his arse off like that and do nothing else. He should be scoring goals. Otherwise play him at CM!!

VUW AFC - Victoria University Football for life

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Id like to see one of our young players get a start, Baa baa rooos off or Row jack!
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
There was a moment in the second half of last nights game that sealed my opinion of Greenacre. Ifill made a brilliant run to the bye line, cut a perfect chest high cross across the front of goal. Greenacre never moved, he stood 6 yards out and watched it pass. The commentators made the comment that any good number 9 would have buried a chance like that.
 
So whats the story? OK he is slightly built and has little physical presence, he is average in the air, he does not hold the ball up particularly well, he is not quick, he does not take players on. You can forgive all that if he was a goal poacher like Smeltz. But I have been watching him closely in the last half a dozen games and he is often AWOL when the ball arrives in front of goal.
 
You cannot blame the service. The last 6 or 7 games the Phoenix have created many many chances. The like of Ifill, bertos and Daniel have pumped plenty of ball into the box. the problem is that Mr Greenacre never seems to be on the end of any of it. Thats his job!!!
 
The solution....start him next week against GC. If by half time he has done nothing then drag him off. Give Chen a go. You couldn't get any less playing Chen.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
zinidane wrote:
There was a moment in the second half of last nights game that sealed my opinion of Greenacre. Ifill made a brilliant run to the bye line, cut a perfect chest high cross across the front of goal. Greenacre never moved, he stood 6 yards out and watched it pass. The commentators made the comment that any good number 9 would have buried a chance like that.
 
So whats the story? OK he is slightly built and has little physical presence, he is average in the air, he does not hold the ball up particularly well, he is not quick, he does not take players on. You can forgive all that if he was a goal poacher like Smeltz. But I have been watching him closely in the last half a dozen games and he is often AWOL when the ball arrives in front of goal.
 
You cannot blame the service. The last 6 or 7 games the Phoenix have created many many chances. The like of Ifill, bertos and Daniel have pumped plenty of ball into the box. the problem is that Mr Greenacre never seems to be on the end of any of it. Thats his job!!!
 
The solution....start him next week against GC. If by half time he has done nothing then drag him off. Give Chen a go. You couldn't get any less playing Chen.
 
What an absolute crock. If you can't recongnise a player with the potential Greenacre offers, then will you ever be satisfied. Greenie wasn't there for one or two deliveries last night... big deal, SMeltz was absent for whole games in his tenre at the nix and was caught offside with his slow retiring at least twice a game. Lets not forget a good proportion of his goals were penalties!
 
Greenie is forced to work too hard outside of the box. Heck, he was blocking a cross from one of their midfielders on the edge of our box at one point!
 
As for can't hold the ball up - that's a ridiculous statement. Ifill, Bertos and him are better at that than most.
 
THe thread is supposed to be focused on how to get more from the player, not blab on with half witted critisisms.  There's one piece in the puzzle missing that could make the whole thing click for me - the target man. Without it the team sparks sporadically, but not consistently. A target man would provide Greenie with something else for him to feed off.  
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
robman75 wrote:
THe thread is supposed to be focused on how to get more from the player, not blab on with half witted critisisms. 


I'm guessing you don't pop in here after matches very often do you ?

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
clark007e wrote:

Hard News wrote:
Stops now or I get Banny.Whoooo you have been long enough to gauge what is acceptable and you still seem to struggle to fit in.� Please have a think.The rest of you, stop baiting him.Last Word.
Ok, sorry news. I honestly don't know what Greenacre needs. I mean the ball he gets is crap but its similar to what Smeltz got last year, really shows how big the gap Smeltz left is and this is coming from someone who doesn't like Smeltz.
I disagree. Last year our plan was pass to Smeltz and hope. This year it is when you are close to the box shoot it, who cares where everyone else is.

That is the approach we are taking. We give Greenacre nothing on the ground near the box, instead we go for shots outside the box when they could take the far better option of passing it. The number of times this season I have seen Bertos or Ifill go for a spectacular goal and fail horribly is shocking. What is worse is Greenacre is normally the better option.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
TBH I think he's a class above and sometimes when he makes runs where he would usually get the ball, he's not receiving it. I guarantee you, if you watched every single Nix game this year, you could count on two hands the actual number of balls that has gone to his feet. We need to get the ball into his feet near the 18 yard area, as I think personally he is a bit of a box snake and will squeeze goals out of tight situations. At the moment he is being forced to go hunting out wide and too deep for the ball.

Also I think we execute way too much stuff down the wings, sure we have fantastic wingers in leo and ifill, but we need to change things up a bit every now and then and try move the ball through centrally.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
That is the approach we are taking. We give Greenacre nothing on the ground near the box, instead we go for shots outside the box when they could take the far better option of passing it. The number of times this season I have seen Bertos or Ifill go for a spectacular goal and fail horribly is shocking. What is worse is Greenacre is normally the better option.


Bingo, I agree with this completely. Case in point, in last night's game Bertos made a nice run, beat his man and was on the edge of the box, Greenacre was screaming for it on the back post, Bertos instead took a shot (which is not his strength at all) and shanked it wide. Greenacre in the right spot, just not getting the service. I've noticed Ifill and Bertos doing that quite a lot, they are brilliant at taking the man on and getting in a great position but that final rushed shot/attempt at a wonder goal is just not the right option when you've got someone like Greenacre lurking in the box waiting for a chrisp pass to bury in the back of the net.

As for the other facets of his game, he runs his a$$ off and puts pressure on their defenders which is great, and he holds up the ball well too, a couple of occasions last night he won useful free kicks by being on the end of passes from the midfield in the attacking third.

I rate him highly and the number 9 jersey is his through and through. It's the service to him from our midfield particularly Ifill and Bertos (and to a certain degree Brown) that needs a rethink.

/rantScoobyD2009-10-18 11:23:51
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
when you have Ifill on the field, he drifts quite wide and is often the man getting the ball into Greenacre, in these cases, we need to have another player in there because we cant expect Greenacre to cover all areas of the box.  When it did happen, we scored


Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
zinidane wrote:
There was a moment in the second half of last nights game that sealed my opinion of Greenacre. Ifill made a brilliant run to the bye line, cut a perfect chest high cross across the front of goal. Greenacre never moved, he stood 6 yards out and watched it pass. The commentators made the comment that any good number 9 would have buried a chance like that.
 
So whats the story? OK he is slightly built and has little physical presence, he is average in the air, he does not hold the ball up particularly well, he is not quick, he does not take players on. You can forgive all that if he was a goal poacher like Smeltz. But I have been watching him closely in the last half a dozen games and he is often AWOL when the ball arrives in front of goal.
 
You cannot blame the service. The last 6 or 7 games the Phoenix have created many many chances. The like of Ifill, bertos and Daniel have pumped plenty of ball into the box. the problem is that Mr Greenacre never seems to be on the end of any of it. Thats his job!!!
 
The solution....start him next week against GC. If by half time he has done nothing then drag him off. Give Chen a go. You couldn't get any less playing Chen.
 
I agree, except I wouldn't start him next week. He would be best utilised carrying drink bottles.
Colvinator2009-10-18 11:31:10
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ok, if you are going to judge a striker by how many goals he does or doesnt score then surely you have to judge defenders/goalkeepers for the amount of goals they let in?
 
That means we should 100% scrap our back 4 and Paston for next weeks match as they let in a Goal!!!
 
FFS people.  Learn to watch football and dont just comment on what you see or hear commentators say!
 
Greenacre is by far one of the best Foreign players to play in the A-League and you rubbish him when he doesn't score???
 
Hope that you let him come to your school/workplace this week and let him slag you off for a few hours... 

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I disagree. Last year our plan was pass to Smeltz and hope. This year it is when you are close to the box shoot it, who cares where everyone else is.

That is the approach we are taking. We give Greenacre nothing on the ground near the box, instead we go for shots outside the box when they could take the far better option of passing it. The number of times this season I have seen Bertos or Ifill go for a spectacular goal and fail horribly is shocking. What is worse is Greenacre is normally the better option.


This is right.  Greenacre is i'm sure frustrated with himself, but he must be frustrated with others aswell.  THe number of times Bertos or Ifill will beat one man commit the second defender, and Greenacre makes a great unmarked run into the box only for a pisspoor shot to be made instead has been ridiculous.

Edited out the overzealous quoting.

aitkenmike2009-10-18 11:49:38
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Buy a targetman and play him along side G-acre. Problem solved.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
monkeyboy wrote:
TBH I think he's a class above and sometimes when he makes runs where he would usually get the ball, he's not receiving it. I guarantee you, if you watched every single Nix game this year, you could count on two hands the actual number of balls that has gone to his feet. We need to get the ball into his feet near the 18 yard area, as I think personally he is a bit of a box snake and will squeeze goals out of tight situations. At the moment he is being forced to go hunting out wide and too deep for the ball.

Also I think we execute way too much stuff down the wings, sure we have fantastic wingers in leo and ifill, but we need to change things up a bit every now and then and try move the ball through centrally.




Greenacre my lord, Greenacre
Greenacre my lord, Greenacre
Greenacre my lord, Greenacre
Oh lord, Greenacre...!!

Give him the ball to his feet inside the box and he will bury it...the tactic of firing him 30-40yard hoofs in the air are not working and certainly not playing to his strengths.  But he is holding the ball up well in difficult circumstances...

He is the hardest working forward in the league for his off the ball runs and his pressure on opposition defenses and goalkeepers when they are trying to play the ball out of their half.

A targetman would help no end, or an AM that understands his runs and positional play, and feeds the ball to him in the box.  Agree with Bertos and Ifill needing to stop firing the long range shots, they should look up and see where Greenie is....cos he's ALWAYS there, and get another player in the box to assist/support/draw defenders...al la Tim Brown who scored cos the defenders were marking Greenie!

Keep the faith.....he's all class!!




Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
robman75 wrote:
As for can't hold the ball up - that's a ridiculous statement. Ifill, Bertos and him are better at that than most.



Staying out of this debate, but had to comment on this - Greenacre doesn't hold the ball up well at all.
Permalink Permalink