Wellington Phoenix Men

John Chanter

17 replies · 870 views
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
John Chanter
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
without sl*gging him off, i think we need to tell John C our views on his comments re Daniel in the sports lift out of the dompost, it is in the sidelines section - where i think he is trying to be witty.
 
I doubt any Wellington rugby player or the Lie-ins would get that kind of attitude in any write up about them.
 
Whilst I concede that Daniel does need to stay on his feet, Chanter
 
i) shows the wrong incident for the hip injury (as far as i can tell, from the angle of the photo)
ii) he ignores the fact that Daniel went off injured
iii) and he pretends to believe that if you are injured that you would be unable to play 5 days later.
 
Basically it's a hatchet job.
 
(please note my retraint in not expressing any opinion on Chanter as a 'person'.)
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Totally Agree

It is a cheap shot. Just tapping into cliches about footballing, South Americans and theatrics. Cheap journalism. It will get a giggle out of rugbyheads and the uninformed - which he knows.

Unfortunately, he has made a habit of this and decided he running joke for the season is going to be Daniel's theatrics - and it looks like he will manufacture stories for a cheap laugh.
 
That he ignores the fact Daniel was subbed due to injury is ridiculous.
 
Poor
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The face he implies that Daniel wasnt really injured and making too much of it is crap. Especially considering Daniel has been swimming in a very col oriental bay to try and get fit for the match...not fun and shows real dedication (this was reaported by the dom post lol). John Chanter should be cut some slack as he's obviously dumb as rocks and he cant help that
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
...and Australian.


Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
What a sad little man, I thought when I read his slander this morning. 
Like a chocoholic but for booze

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I've emailed a letter to the editor, first time i've written to a paper - i doubt it'll see the light of day, but that's not really the point
 
if enough of us hassle the paper his bosses might tell Mr. Chanter to think before he writes
 
The dom has been great overall, but that piece was pretty snide.
 
I also emailed John Chanter, the more of us that email either the paper or Chanter - the less chance of that bias continuing.
 
There is no way they would have put the boot into the Wellington Lions like that .
 
Dodgy writing, dodgy attitude.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
You'll be pleased to know he's leaving the DomPost soon and going back to Oz.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago


Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
HeySeus wrote:
You'll be pleased to know he's leaving the DomPost soon and going back to Oz.
 
"Leaving"-fired
 
 "going back to Oz"-Deported.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Cue... opinion piece tomorrow on forum anonimity that only mentions Yellow Fever in  5....4....3....

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
What is Chanter's email address? I read the article but have since thrown it away...
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Heard his parents sold their family farm in South Australia for several million dingo dollars - so he's now a millionaire who can't write.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Let's avoid having a lash at Chanter the person eh guys and stick to this morning's ridiculous piece of journalism.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

yep, it has to be about the actions and not the person

ideally the message we send to the Dom is that we appreciate the coverage overall, but ill-informed and sloppy digs will not impress us as the readers

I haven't bothered with the Paul Henry discussion because i don't believe he is open to being influenced but, the Dom is much more responsive to the interests of the wellington sporting public and i do expect that they will take on the chin any criticism that is well reasoned.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
paulm wrote:
What is Chanter's email address? I read the article but have since thrown it away...
 
 
and like MariusL says, if we want to be effective we need to argue against the piece of writing not the person,
 
i reckon TV3 (and to a lesser extent TV1) have responded resonably well to numbers of Phoenix and general sports fans asking for a fair crack of the whip for the Phoenix
 
and to a bunch of emails congratulating them for lifting their game as pre-season progressed
 
the media needs punters - we are the new punters in town!
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
o.k., i'll stop talking to myself after this one!
 
just thought I'd pass on that in a reply John Chanter stated that he no longer compiles that page, so just as well that some of us slammed the writing and not the writer (though to be fair it did look like he'd written it!)
 
He forwarded my email to Johnathon Millmow, so maybe he's the one who could do with our feedback.
 
But I'm moving on, have a gud un folks!
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Well then Mr Millmow, welcome to the world of Yellow Fever
 
 
Permalink Permalink