Knock knock - just typical media bashing
At least you could claim you got injured feigning injury!
I'm listening to a replay now with the Ceo from the phoenix seems a good guy knows his footy and stuff pretty level headed,i will listen on and check out the Iriving interview
There are some inaccuracies in it, and it is getting a hammering on the yellow fever website � see here: http://www.yellowfever.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1131
I may draft a response to the author and those who printed it .
Phillip Smith
From:
Radio
Sport [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, 24
July 2007 10:50 a.m.
To: Phillip
Smith
Subject: RE: Articel
source
im not sure, i shall ask the news desk and come back to you, why do you ask?
craig
From:
Phillip
Smith [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, 24
July 2007 10:42 a.m.
To: Radio Sport
Subject: Articel
source
Can someone please tell me where this article on your website was sourced from: http://www.radiosport.co.nz/SportsNews/spsoc/Detail.aspx?id=121350
Regards,
A) Why there was no coverage of the Phoenix game
B) Why it didnt even get mentioned at all!
C) Will there be more coverage in future
If they can show the goals of the Phoenix game at Masterton vs the -20s, why didnt they bother to show the awesome win vs Sydney???
I wasnt abusive to them but stern and just sought a straight up answer (which is what I didnt get, surprise, surprise). Basically the ppl i needed to talk to were not there, and I should call back on Monday. Got a nice South African woman for TV3, who was quite interested and took my details and told me someone would call me the next day which didnt happen. TVNZ were a bit more rude and evaded the question as much as possible.
I call on u guys to give them a call and tell them what you think:
TV3: (09) 377 9730
TVNZ: (09) 916 7000
They better not screw up there chance to cover it at QE2 this fri nite!!
My reply was the following:
"Thanks for the reply Brenton,I guess you have spotted the factual error with respect to Adelaide results in the preseason cup/ league. That is fine, and is an easy mistake to make.
Some of the lads have taken issue with the tone of the article, and while we understand that it is a journalists role to find an interesting able to news, it is considered that putting a negative spin on the interview with Mr Irving (which I listened to) does not do the code, the interview or the Phoenix any justice. I also recognise that "tone" is not something that can be objectively discredited but is determined based on one�s own subjective reading of the article. I would stress however, that this merely highlights the need to ensure that criticism is also tempered with positivity.
There was certainly enough room in the article to focus on the positive comments of Mr. Irving which I heard him make during the interview. It seems odd to me that the 1st, 2nd, 5th and 6th sentences of the article are essentially paraphrases of the same single negative comment. While the only positive quote is at the start of the final paragraph, which is caveated by a negative clause. If your writer was struggling for space to make positive comments, then it�s easy to see (by condensing 1, 2 5 and 6) where the extra space could be found.
The article makes two unfounded claims about what Phoenix fans may or may not like, without any reference to comments from the fans themselves. The first line "The South American theatrics by the Brazilians playing for the Phoenix are not likely to win over the fans" is not quoted as coming from Irving, and I therefore assume it is placed in the article by the author. In fact, the yellow fever forums are full of comment from Phoenix fans, almost all of which have praised the efforts of the Brazilian import players. The theatrics were also well enjoyed by all at the game, and the crowd got behind these players when they were "rolling around on the ground".
For the benefit of the unaware, there is also a brief discussion on the forums about why Brazilian players behave the way they do. In fact, YF have some members who live in Brazil, and support the team from there. These members have offered great insight into the Brazilian sporting culture.
Perhaps it would be best to avoid speaking on behalf of the fans, or making claims about what is likely/ unlikely to win us over. It's easy to find out what we thought of the game and whether or not we are won over, all your journalists have to do is jump on the YF website, introduce themselves and ask us.
Kind Regards,"
Yeah, great stuff Phil.
Yellow Fever aka The Institute of Brazilian Cultural Studies
Here's TVNZs response to my email sent on Tuesday...(I don't think they got the point).
To: Sport
Subject: Sunday night sports
I would like to register my belated disappointment that the Sunday night sports news did not include anything regarding the Wellington Phoenix who had upset the A-Leagues glamour side Sydney FC 3-0. While I understand that it was a preseason match, the fact that it was the teams first competitive home game and their first ever win surely meant that it was deserving of a mention.
The most upsetting aspect was listening to the newsreader run through the great sports results of the weekend (rugby, netball and league) but not a word on the Phoenix.
Come on TV One. Lift your game.
Their reply:
Coverage of the Phoenix in the A-League will be on Sky as they have the rights to that competition. They did not cover that match as it was in a pre season competition.
Thanks for your email and feedback.
Kind regards
Christine Wilton
Here's TVNZs response to my email sent on Tuesday...(I don't think they got the point).
To: Sport
Subject: Sunday night sports
I would like to register my belated disappointment that the Sunday night sports news did not include anything regarding the Wellington Phoenix who had upset the A-Leagues glamour side Sydney FC 3-0. While I understand that it was a preseason match, the fact that it was the teams first competitive home game and their first ever win surely meant that it was deserving of a mention.
The most upsetting aspect was listening to the newsreader run through the great sports results of the weekend (rugby, netball and league) but not a word on the Phoenix.
Come on TV One. Lift your game.
Their reply:
Coverage of the Phoenix in the A-League will be on Sky as they have the rights to that competition. They did not cover that match as it was in a pre season competition.
Thanks for your email and feedback.
Kind regards
Christine Wilton
just cos they don't have the rights to show it doesn't make it any less newsworthy
Sent: Thursday,
26 July 2007 12:23 PM
To: 'ViewerCorrespondence'
Subject: RE: Sunday night sports
Christine,
Thanks very much for your response to my email.
Unfortunately though, I don�t think you addressed the issue.
My problem was not so much that you did not have pictures from the game. I am led to believe that Sky TV had cameras there but no-one (including Sky) have used the footage as yet.
The problem I had was that your newsreader did not even say that the Phoenix had won. Your newsreader made a comment at the end of the news about what a great sporting weekend it had been for NZ with wins to the All Blacks, Silver Ferns and Warriors. How hard would it have been to mention the Phoenix as well? Only a week earlier, when the Phoenix lost 2-0 away to the Central Coast Mariners, you felt it necessary to report the Phoenix score then. Why? What was the difference? Surely it is more newsworthy to the NZ public when we win games?
Your reply to my email mentioned that you do not have rights to the games. This suggests to me that you are unable to mention the results of a game if you don�t have the rights to broadcast them. I am confused by this I note that you don�t have the rights to broadcast the All Blacks games, yet they are reported almost constantly on the sports news.
This issue has been raised a lot this week by fans of the Wellington Phoenix, through their supporters website yellowfever.co.nz
I invite you to have a look on the forum to see the amount of animosity felt by football fans towards TVNZ and the other national news networks.
The reality is that players at the top level try to gain any competetive advantage that they can over their opponents. As the game stands at the moment, the advantages of diving outweigh the disadvantages; ie. potential for a game-deciding goal against a possible yellow card as the worst case scenario. This will remain a no-brainer unless the referees change their approach. How that can happen, I don't know.
ps. I remember that there was a footy game on old PS1, maybe FIFA 99, in which you could take dives. I remember playing in World Cup semi-final against my mate, 1-1 in extra time, when I burst into the box, took a dive, got a penalty and scored to win the game. I think my mate's still fuming about that, sorry bro...
Yes, the game is the same but the point is that you are interpreting the Brazilian concept of valorizar within the cultural norms that you grew up with and understand so of course it does not make sense to you.
To quote Cashmore (1990) in sociological terms ruling groups within many societies see value in sport because of its power "in drawing subordinate groups toward an acceptance of ideas that are fundamental to their control". Cashmore points out that this is particularly true in colonial situations where "by participating in sports, populations who came under American and British influences were taught teamwork, the value of obeying authority, courage in the face of adversity, loyalty to fellow team members (especially the captain) and, perhaps most importantly, respect for the rules".
To put it in a way which is more relevant to me and my own career Boyd (1999) points out that "America loves their black entertainers when they behave "properly" and stay in their place... These entertainers are constantly held to the expectations of a mainstream society that has no understanding for the fact that not everyone shares the same world view".
The point here is that the Brazilian concept of valorizar is neither "right" nor "wrong" it's just different.
I realise that it can be difficult to confront ones own prejudices and accept the need to change but I hope you have taken one small step on that journey today.
terminator_x2007-07-26 19:45:49
Yes, the game is the same but the point is that you are interpreting the Brazilian concept of valorizar within the cultural norms that you grew up with and understand so of course it does not make sense to you.
To quote Cashmore (1990) in sociological terms ruling groups within many societies see value in sport because of its power "in drawing subordinate groups toward an acceptance of ideas that are fundamental to their control". Cashmore points out that this is particularly true in colonial situations where "by participating in sports, populations who came under American and British influences were taught teamwork, the value of obeying authority, courage in the face of adversity, loyalty to fellow team members (especially the captain) and, perhaps most importantly, respect for the rules".
To put it in a way which is more relevant to me and my own career Boyd (1999) points out that "America loves their black entertainers when they behave "properly" and stay in their place... These entertainers are constantly held to the expectations of a mainstream society that has no understanding for the fact that not everyone shares the same world view".
The point here is that the Brazilian concept of valorizar is neither "right" nor "wrong" it's just different.
I realise that it can be difficult to confront ones own prejudices and accept the need to change but I hope you have taken one small step on that journey today.
Mmm...to quote that famous Authority on life (Denny Crane)...Postmodernism,It's just PC Poope coop.