I am led to believe that Ifill is wanting to stay here for a long time but is having some troubles working out a fear deal. with talk that fred could becoming as a marquee next year. who would you prefer to see as a marquee player for the years to come?
Permalink
Permalink
Iffy - Fred can go to NQ if he wants to be marquee... similar age players (29/30, yes?) but we've seen the difference Ifill makes to the team... to be fair Fred hasn't had the same opportunity but I'd prefer to give Fred a miss if it meant securing Ifill long term, versus not.
E + R + O
Permalink
Permalink
I'd prefer we find a way to keep both.
Permalink
Permalink
I'd prefer we find a way to keep both.
I imagine we all would HN. My point was that I don't want to lose Ifill to get Fred.
E + R + O
Permalink
Permalink
I'd prefer we find a way to keep both.
Focus on keeping Ifill first then go for the luxury signing later imo
a.haak

Permalink
Permalink
Think thats the plan I would take as well.
Permalink
Permalink
I wonder how far (If we are) we are under our salary cap? We might still be able to keep Ifill as a player and be under the cap. Otherwise Marquee him and bring fred in under his normal player place.
Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!
The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!
The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!
Permalink
Permalink
Well, we could use the Junior Marquee option and put the u23 player with the highest salary into this category. Could free up $50k-$100k? Which could go on top of Ifill's current contract or towards Fred's and then have one of them as Marquee.
Permalink
Permalink
Sack Mulli, and Diego and pay their salaries to Ifil and get Fred as marque. Could also just do the usual dodgy "non-salary" payments like free house, car, fuel, food, bills etc. Basically make any money here is paid by the club free money to spend on what ever he likes. It happens in most salary capped leagues.
Its no longer a problem.
Permalink
Permalink
Sack Mulli, and Diego and pay their salaries to Ifil and get Fred as marque. Could also just do the usual dodgy "non-salary" payments like free house, car, fuel, food, bills etc. Basically make any money here is paid by the club free money to spend on what ever he likes. It happens in most salary capped leagues.
Diego is contracted for next season. If we pay out his contract and let him go it will still count towards next seasons cap. Only if we can convince Diego to leave would it work (similar to how we picked up Caceras), which it could with a new team joining the league.
Permalink
Permalink
The issue seems more complicated than just Fred vs Ifill so I'm not going to vote.
Permalink
Permalink
I have the sauce that Fred aint coming to the Nix as DC have sorted a deal with him.
Permalink
Permalink
Yeah, seems that way - though if you're 'source' is tribalfootball then..
a.haak

Permalink
Permalink
it may not matter if fred comes or not, we still have the problem of Ifill wanting to stay but him not getting a fair offer.....
Permalink
Permalink
I reckon we fit them both under the cap and sign an amzing wingback ;p
but seriously, Ifill comes first in my book for sure.
Use family politics behind the scenes and if anyone comes in contact with his mrs or daughter, then we gotta make them feel real at home, and maybe sign them up for some groups that they enjoy so they wont want to leave. (worth a shot?)
But maybe if we can get Fred, then give him marquee for remainder of season and then at the end, if he was good enough, then we will have to sort out who gets marquee, otherwise, put him in the cap and bump Ifill up. The old switcheroo. I think if we can replace the likes of Ferrante, Mulligan, Diego (I know hes still contracted) with youth players, then its win win win situation.
1 - we get players who have potential to grow rather than ones who have no excuse for failing
2 - we wont have to go through signing new youth players every year
3 - we wont have to be paying these kids as much as Mullign/Ferrante (i assume) so the extra cash goes to Ifill to keep in the cap. Give costa youth marquee and thats more. Then sign up a Marquee, who may or may not be Fred, because I'm not sure if he is still worth the spot
but seriously, Ifill comes first in my book for sure.
Use family politics behind the scenes and if anyone comes in contact with his mrs or daughter, then we gotta make them feel real at home, and maybe sign them up for some groups that they enjoy so they wont want to leave. (worth a shot?)
But maybe if we can get Fred, then give him marquee for remainder of season and then at the end, if he was good enough, then we will have to sort out who gets marquee, otherwise, put him in the cap and bump Ifill up. The old switcheroo. I think if we can replace the likes of Ferrante, Mulligan, Diego (I know hes still contracted) with youth players, then its win win win situation.
1 - we get players who have potential to grow rather than ones who have no excuse for failing
2 - we wont have to go through signing new youth players every year
3 - we wont have to be paying these kids as much as Mullign/Ferrante (i assume) so the extra cash goes to Ifill to keep in the cap. Give costa youth marquee and thats more. Then sign up a Marquee, who may or may not be Fred, because I'm not sure if he is still worth the spot
Permalink
Permalink
ifill as marquee if need be.
what makes us believe that fred would even wanna sing for us? i though that all the talk was about him being a guest player right?
VUW AFC - Victoria University Football for life
Permalink
Permalink
No, marquee for the rest of this season and all of next season.
Permalink
Permalink
it may not matter if fred comes or not, we still have the problem of Ifill wanting to stay but him not getting a fair offer.....
Mo money is it will all be sorted, and it's a negotiation point.
Permalink
Permalink
Ifill resigned for another 2 years
NIX text
Permalink
Permalink

