Don't want to hear anyone complaining after a month of next season.
and holy shark, the part where he explains the reason behind the nickname is pretty moving.
Endorsed by HattyCW, Nelfoos, newzealandpower, Nixieboys222 and 3 others
Yea but kiwis nickname by chucking an ie/y on the end of names.
So his legal name might be chief but we will call him chiefy.
All hail the almighty Chiefy.
Endorsed by Monto, WanderingSheep, WhoStoleMySock
If he does the business in this mediocre comp then fair play. Do i think he will be an improvement? no. Time will tell.
Are you ever actually happy with anything the nix do? Surely this is a good sign that the club has the skills to develop their own coaching and recruitng people after 15+ years in the league. Who would you have preferred if not Cheify?
Personally i would've gone for a Danny Hay (who was about to be assistant of Sydney before All Whites appt). Potentially Sam Wilkinson or a Jose Figueira or some one more local. This new fellas inexperienced and i guess so are my choices but i think the Nix have missed an opportunity to connect to the wider fan base, especially the National League. If the womens side is happy to promote and develop a kiwi then why havent the men? just a thought anyway.
Christ I'm glad you're not in charge. Wouldn't want to see Danny Hay anywhere near the club
Endorsed by Bananas, Bullion, Enough said, HattyCW and 11 others
Hail to Chief!
Neither Rob Morrison nor David Dome fell off the back of a truck. They are very smart operators and will have their due diligence before making this decision.
It is the correct one.
It’s a good one. Nothing is guaranteed in football, especially with a reduction in head bandages and balls my word etc…
Think we were expecting it.
Endorsed by WhoStoleMySock
If he does the business in this mediocre comp then fair play. Do i think he will be an improvement? no. Time will tell.
Are you ever actually happy with anything the nix do? Surely this is a good sign that the club has the skills to develop their own coaching and recruitng people after 15+ years in the league. Who would you have preferred if not Cheify?
Personally i would've gone for a Danny Hay (who was about to be assistant of Sydney before All Whites appt). Potentially Sam Wilkinson or a Jose Figueira or some one more local. This new fellas inexperienced and i guess so are my choices but i think the Nix have missed an opportunity to connect to the wider fan base, especially the National League. If the womens side is happy to promote and develop a kiwi then why havent the men? just a thought anyway.
Christ I'm glad you're not in charge. Wouldn't want to see Danny Hay anywhere near the club
danny hay at the phoenix? that's a short memory you've got thare showtime.
he had a pretty filthy attitude towards the nix when we booted up. was anti wellington and in his via-the-media contract negotiations he said he would not relocate to wellington to play for us, but was open to a commute. stuck in the old NSL mentality and seemed to think he was still leeds quality.
no thanks
Endorsed by anaveragestem, ballane, Jazzy Jeff, kwlap and 8 others
Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads
Endorsed by LG, Mainland FC, Monto, newzealandpower and 1 other
How does anyone know that? His salary has not been disclosed as far as i have seen. He may well be the most expensive option.
Queenslander 3x a year.
Endorsed by LG, WhoStoleMySock
Go Chiefy!
Go Chiefy!
You've gone hard and you've gone early
I admire that
Endorsed by kwlap, Showtime Nixie, Smeltz4PM, WhoStoleMySock
Endorsed by Monto, Showtime Nixie
Seems very Sunday League for me. But hope he goes on to do good things...
Do we really want to be Champions though? I'm not sure anymore. What are we becoming....just your average joe with performances and appointments.
I don't have a lot of faith in our board either to be honest - fair play they've put money and time into the club but not sure they're exactly football minded. I don't feel like the club is going places if im honest.
however, there's no place in any business model for poor football. it does not necessarily need to be championship winning football, but poor football will never wash
1. fans won't engage
2. you'll never be able to showcase the young players you want to sell
personally, i like what CCM are doing. for a while, we were the only team who played kids (singh, cacace), we seem to have lost our way in this regard. our 'young' players are 20-21 and they rarely play.
i can see a good future for the club, where we embed a playing style that develops young players and provides them with career advancement and also provides the club with revenue. the odd run in to the top four is inevitable if this is done properly.
Endorsed by ballane, Mainland FC, Monto, Showtime Nixie
Seems very Sunday League for me. But hope he goes on to do good things...
Do we really want to be Champions though? I'm not sure anymore. What are we becoming....just your average joe with performances and appointments.
I don't have a lot of faith in our board either to be honest - fair play they've put money and time into the club but not sure they're exactly football minded. I don't feel like the club is going places if im honest.
Seriously dude back the fudge off! all I've ever done is question your motivations and poorly constructed arguements and pointed out that you constant negativity is boring as fudge!
Queenslander 3x a year.
Endorsed by anaveragestem, Antz, ballane, Bananas and 6 others
Part of me hopes the Nix just give up on top 6 hopes - our form is so poor, we’re not going anywhere anyway - and just blood young talent.
— sam smith 🇳🇿 (@mrsmiis) April 18, 2023
Karunaratne, Hughes, McKay, Beale, Sloane-Rodrigues et al all deserve a good go, and it goes against the club ethos that we haven’t already
Endorsed by Monto, Showtime Nixie
however, there's no place in any business model for poor football. it does not necessarily need to be championship winning football, but poor football will never wash
1. fans won't engage
2. you'll never be able to showcase the young players you want to sell
personally, i like what CCM are doing. for a while, we were the only team who played kids (singh, cacace), we seem to have lost our way in this regard. our 'young' players are 20-21 and they rarely play.
i can see a good future for the club, where we embed a playing style that develops young players and provides them with career advancement and also provides the club with revenue. the odd run in to the top four is inevitable if this is done properly.
Good point the CCM are a smallish club and seem to be well run and connected. I don't think it would be a bad idea for our owners to go and look at how things are operated there on a day to day.
We just seem to be lacking some spark around the place at the moment. Can't say I've been to every game this year but when i have i haven't had the excitement of years gone by. Maybe old age.
Endorsed by Monto
Queenslander 3x a year.
Endorsed by coochiee
Part of me hopes the Nix just give up on top 6 hopes - our form is so poor, we’re not going anywhere anyway - and just blood young talent.
— sam smith 🇳🇿 (@mrsmiis) April 18, 2023
Karunaratne, Hughes, McKay, Beale, Sloane-Rodrigues et al all deserve a good go, and it goes against the club ethos that we haven’t already
Bang on! I've mentioned this before and been slammed for it. Sam Smith thankyou!
Start giving kiwis a go! Let's remember the Phoenix were set up to develop kiwi players! That is what they said before first ever kick of the ball!
I hope we make the playoffs but yeah if we don't we should be playing those ones mentioned!
Talay has somewhat killed the game here for some
Endorsed by Monto
Queenslander 3x a year.
Endorsed by Mainland FC, number8, WanderingSheep, WhoStoleMySock
Good luck to this fella...he's worked hard. I hope it works.
Just doesn't have me tuning in anymore than the last flop.
Endorsed by theprof
Endorsed by reg22
re: van hattum, you cannot live off 10 minute scraps with no reserve team football. you need to really committ to young players and provided they do everything that is asked of them, you need to give them serious minutes.
also, the playing structure is very specific and if it's not going well it can be a bad place for a developing player. one of the main factors here is overloads, which we do not do well. overloads allow you to carry players as much as creating attacking opportunities. this is why we are so dependent on our starting XI and also why players like Sasse, who is erratic, become so exposed
Endorsed by ClubOranje, Monto, mrsmiis
i'd like a change. bielsa ball would be great. but you practically need to be a scientist to implement it! perhaps a watered down version, somewhere north of your stock standard 4-3-3 (4-5-1)
Endorsed by mrsmiis, Nelfoos, WhoStoleMySock
The logical alternative according to some of you lot would be to say to Italiano - "we cannot give you this opportunity, because you never had a prior opportunity at this level before... what we want is someone experienced, like Kalezic"....?
Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days
Endorsed by Bananas, LG, Oi Oi Edgecumbe, theprof and 2 others
What opportunities? Do you even watch the Phoenix?
OvH has been given barely 90 minutes in the A-League this season.
Every minute he got was either last few at the end when we have the bus parked and his instructions are “chase down their CBs” or 15ish minutes when we are already a couple goals down, the opposition have closed the game down and no one else has managed to do anything.
Pre season he got some FFA cup time. Played 90 in the first game, scored. 1 min v Melbourne after the buses had been parked, 15 mins v McAurthur when 2:0 down with McArthur closing the game down
Started the preseason game v Jets; a 3:3 draw. OvH scored 2, Bids with the other. 3:0 when they came off half time. How many did the fan favourites score second half? Then only given bit parts in other pre-season games.
Not sure why so many hate on the kid. If his name was Clegg you’d all be screaming to give him a run of games.
Oh, that’s right, UT is such a great developer of youth so he should have developed.
Perhaps go and look at the Adelaide game. How did that go for us. They played a hatful of players younger than our youngest starter, most of who EACH INDIVIDUALLY had more minutes this season than Oldie, Surman and OvH COMBINED.
Oh, but OvH came on at 4-1 down and failed to score a hat-trick to save us. Same against Victory, he had 5 minutes, why didn’t he produce anything.
Talk about fail to take your opportunities.
Endorsed by Monto
We have all worked in companies where people who are less experienced are promoted above those who are more qualified based on potential and pure talent.
Endorsed by anaveragestem, Bananas, coochiee, HattyCW and 6 others
Some of what SN writes makes me think, but much of his scribblings have the fact checking of a Trump public address.
Italiano does have coaching experience. What he lacks is any experience playing the game at a high level. But that to me shows he can coach, having to do the hard yards from the grass roots upwards. You have to work harder to earn people's respect without the leg up of a known playing career. He gives hope to all roly poly 40 year olds who never got above Cap Prem Division 4, but reckon they know the game of football.
And those stats above re the lack of young player mins at both the Nix, and ALM generally this season is interesting. The Nix gave about 7-10 ALM debuts last season to young players when stuck in Aus, in the last Covid affected campaign. Most didn't cut the mustard (for now anyways). Someone like George Ott may get a 2nd crack at it. But yeah I hope they are not becoming too complacent in the Weenix Academy with all the kudos they have received the last few years. Likes of CCM & Adelaide have done far better this season in the youth space. I'm sure Temple, Falloon, Greenacre & Co will be looking at what can they do better.
Maybe alot of current crop had their development curtailed with no proper National Leagues in 2020 & 2021 (just CL football), plus no U17 & U20 age group World Cups over those years either, ie Covid slowed their potential development
Re the ALM as a whole, for young players the new National Second Division (NSD) can't come soon enough. Hopefully some Kiwis get the chance to play in it.
Endorsed by Doloras, Monto, Oi Oi Edgecumbe, WanderingSheep and 1 other
What opportunities? Do you even watch the Phoenix?
OvH has been given barely 90 minutes in the A-League this season.
Every minute he got was either last few at the end when we have the bus parked and his instructions are “chase down their CBs” or 15ish minutes when we are already a couple goals down, the opposition have closed the game down and no one else has managed to do anything.
Pre season he got some FFA cup time. Played 90 in the first game, scored. 1 min v Melbourne after the buses had been parked, 15 mins v McAurthur when 2:0 down with McArthur closing the game down
Started the preseason game v Jets; a 3:3 draw. OvH scored 2, Bids with the other. 3:0 when they came off half time. How many did the fan favourites score second half? Then only given bit parts in other pre-season games.
Not sure why so many hate on the kid. If his name was Clegg you’d all be screaming to give him a run of games.
Oh, that’s right, UT is such a great developer of youth so he should have developed.
Perhaps go and look at the Adelaide game. How did that go for us. They played a hatful of players younger than our youngest starter, most of who EACH INDIVIDUALLY had more minutes this season than Oldie, Surman and OvH COMBINED.
Oh, but OvH came on at 4-1 down and failed to score a hat-trick to save us. Same against Victory, he had 5 minutes, why didn’t he produce anything.
Talk about fail to take your opportunities.
OVH has had the same opportunites that Sutton and Elliot have had in their time coming up through the ranks. Thye both made appearances and made an impact. I have nothing against OVH per se, just commenting on the fact that his impact has been minimal. Compare OVH to say Ben Old, when Old makes an appearance his impact is felt, sure he's a bit of a heads down player but he makes a difference - I'm yet to see anything like that from OVH.
Queenslander 3x a year.
Endorsed by LG, number8, WanderingSheep, WhoStoleMySock
Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads
Endorsed by Bananas, Mainland FC, Nelfoos, Oi Oi Edgecumbe and 1 other
however, there's no place in any business model for poor football. it does not necessarily need to be championship winning football, but poor football will never wash
1. fans won't engage
2. you'll never be able to showcase the young players you want to sell
personally, i like what CCM are doing. for a while, we were the only team who played kids (singh, cacace), we seem to have lost our way in this regard. our 'young' players are 20-21 and they rarely play.
i can see a good future for the club, where we embed a playing style that develops young players and provides them with career advancement and also provides the club with revenue. the odd run in to the top four is inevitable if this is done properly.
I agree with this, I'd love to see far more emphasis on youth minutes next season. Frankly I don't think Talay has been good at providing them at all, that needs to change if we want to be a selling club. We had Ben Wayne getting cameo minutes off the bench each week why? There's a player you want to develop even more so you can sell him for a higher rate, plus he can knock them in for us in the meantime. I also feel that young kiwis engage Nix fans far more than a bloke from Poland however much we love him on this forum.
Hopefully the board have this in mind.
Good luck to this fella...he's worked hard. I hope it works.
Just doesn't have me tuning in anymore than the last flop.
The idea that the Nix had good attendance in the early days because of a Kiwi coach and players is a load of rubbish. We had good attendance with Merrick at first and it fell off because of poor performance. Either way, I assume you just want to focus on the Ricki era, but even Ricki had shark attendance in the 12/13 season. What's the common denominator? Shark performance. Also who was the club's goalscoring superstar back then again? A Bajan. You seem to reckon the casual fans didn't care about Ifill because he wasn't a Kiwi.
And somehow you're calling Talay a flop, despite him stats-wise being the best coach we've had ever. If he's a flop, what does that make everyone else? The club's in the most stable place it's ever been, yet you still have to find something to whinge and whine about.
Endorsed by anaveragestem, Antz, HattyCW, Mainland FC and 7 others
We've been pretty middle of the pack in terms of youth minutes this season, I'd personally like to see it improve. What's more interesting, an old David Ball or a young kiwi prospect? Not saying you get rid of the old hands at all just saying more youth mins should equal greater development.
Good luck to this fella...he's worked hard. I hope it works.
Just doesn't have me tuning in anymore than the last flop.
The idea that the Nix had good attendance in the early days because of a Kiwi coach and players is a load of rubbish. We had good attendance with Merrick at first and it fell off because of poor performance. Either way, I assume you just want to focus on the Ricki era, but even Ricki had shark attendance in the 12/13 season. What's the common denominator? Shark performance. Also who was the club's goalscoring superstar back then again? A Bajan. You seem to reckon the casual fans didn't care about Ifill because he wasn't a Kiwi.
And somehow you're calling Talay a flop, despite him stats-wise being the best coach we've had ever. If he's a flop, what does that make everyone else? The club's in the most stable place it's ever been, yet you still have to find something to whinge and whine about.
There's a bit of history re-writing going on here. Under Herbert we were much more interested in signing Australian journeymen rather than playing young Kiwi's.
Endorsed by Bullion, coochiee, Doloras, HattyCW and 9 others
We've been pretty middle of the pack in terms of youth minutes this season, I'd personally like to see it improve. What's more interesting, an old David Ball or a young kiwi prospect? Not saying you get rid of the old hands at all just saying more youth mins should equal greater development.
I take us winning with experiences players over playing young untested kiwis and potentially losing.
Queenslander 3x a year.
Endorsed by Mainland FC, Marto, WanderingSheep
Endorsed by reg22
We've been pretty middle of the pack in terms of youth minutes this season, I'd personally like to see it improve. What's more interesting, an old David Ball or a young kiwi prospect? Not saying you get rid of the old hands at all just saying more youth mins should equal greater development.
I take us winning with experiences players over playing young untested kiwis and potentially losing.
Or losing with experienced players?
I get that we need the experienced guys as well for sure but we're never gonna develop youth talent by giving them five mins at the end of a game when we're already down by two, there needs to be more of a middle ground I think.
Endorsed by reg22, Showtime Nixie, theprof, WanderingSheep
Endorsed by anaveragestem, Bananas, billyspleen75, coochiee and 12 others
Endorsed by HattyCW, Monto, theprof, WhoStoleMySock
Good luck to this fella...he's worked hard. I hope it works.
Just doesn't have me tuning in anymore than the last flop.
The idea that the Nix had good attendance in the early days because of a Kiwi coach and players is a load of rubbish. We had good attendance with Merrick at first and it fell off because of poor performance. Either way, I assume you just want to focus on the Ricki era, but even Ricki had shark attendance in the 12/13 season. What's the common denominator? Shark performance. Also who was the club's goalscoring superstar back then again? A Bajan. You seem to reckon the casual fans didn't care about Ifill because he wasn't a Kiwi.
And somehow you're calling Talay a flop, despite him stats-wise being the best coach we've had ever. If he's a flop, what does that make everyone else? The club's in the most stable place it's ever been, yet you still have to find something to whinge and whine about.
There's a bit of history re-writing going on here. Under Herbert we were much more interested in signing Australian journeymen rather than playing young Kiwi's.
I should be working, but was interested to see what the stats showed.
Out of all of our coaches, Talay has given the highest proportion of total minutes to Kiwis (47%), next closest is Herbet on 41%.
Herbert fielded the most Aussie based teams (39%), this looks like it is due to several of his foreign players getting pretty limited minutes, the 2008/09 imports played a combined 1,500 minutes (by contrast, Zawada has played 1,800 this season by himself).
The data I used is on a season by season basis, so I haven't split out the caretaker periods. I've treated Dura as an Aussie, I do think that he became a kiwi at some stage, but I don't think he was one in 07/08 or 08/09 so for the stats I chose to treat him as an Aussie throughout. Given he has been on the field for 62%(!) of all the minutes that the phoenix have played this does swing things a bit, Herbert increases to 48% Kiwi if Dura's a Kiwi from day 1.
Endorsed by Bullion, Doloras, Monto, newzealandpower and 3 others










.png)
.png)
.png)

.png)