It would also be foolish to depart drastically from what has worked would it not?
I'm not sure what's so foolish or drastic about my suggestion:
* Sanchez is an attacking mid. Not a winger. He's been lost a bit since being out there, certainly not as effective. Is it foolish to want to see him deliver the good he's proven he can from a position we signed him to play in.
* Ifill has been known to, and has stated he likes to, get into wide positions and attack. Is it drastic to play him in a role that we've often successfully played him in the before?
* Brown recently has spent so much time up around the edge of the box, forcing Greenie to drop back, that all i'm saying is make it official. Maybe that's the drastic part.
* Greenie has shown that he has a deft touch, and the work-rate to play a good attacking mid. He can also defend well when called upon too. He can also interchange with Brown as necessary. I think others would agree, it wouldn't necessarily be foolish to have someone like him as an attacking mid either.
* Smith has been a great find in the defensive mid role. Massive in the air, good distribution. Admittedly, I'd prefer to see Muscat there, but i'm not sure we have a good enough RB replacement yet. We did, however, all see how drastically, foolish it was for us to play Lia at RB, I personally think it's been quite drastic playing him at LB, but what are we to do while Lochhead is out. I'm certainly not an advocate for Tsatallios or the like to start there at this crucial end of the season. That too would be foolish.
Ok, admittedly the formation may be seen as drastic, but swap Brown and Greenie around, and what's really so foolish or drastic about that? You're pretty much looking at a formation that we've put on the park before.
I guess I'd prefer to see us control, or even dominate, the game and win, as opposed to watch us scramble a lucky win where we barely managed to hold on.
Yes, 3 points is 3 points, but 'sheer luck' is not a great footballing strategy in my opinion.