Wellington Phoenix Men

Phoenix Ownership - Rob says FTFFA (Part 1)

3999 replies · 993,112 views Locked
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
You on his back would have brought him down a long time ago.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Hard News wrote:
I'm not on his back.



ive got a song that wont take long, Adelaide are rubbish.. the second verse is same as the first.. ADELAIDE ARE RUBBISH

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
TouchMe wrote:

This has gone on too lone - the nix lose money, he cant afford to lose any more money... for his own well being financially it may be in his best interests to sell the nix.

Might also get the news off his back.


He can't sell the Nix because he doesn't own the Nix, at least not in any meaningful sense (and there's certainly not an open market for A-League licences). Terry funds the Nix, and if he wants out his only option is to hand the licence back to the FFA.

The FFA will then wait to receive a call from one of the estimated half-dozen millionaires living in Wellington who are just dying to take-over, but have somehow managed to keep their names completely out of the public arena up until now.

This new funder will is also be a football lover, well-versed in what it takes to run a football club and a PR expert. They will be universally loved by the players, coaching staff and fans, somehow managing to never ever make a bad decision or do anything that anyone doesn't like.

Our new funder will have a word with Ticketek and they will become efficient.

Our new funder will also be whiter than white, with not a hint of controversy in their background, having made their millions simply by being super-nice all the time. The media will be so blinded by our new funder's sheer awesomeness that they will never again write another negative story about the Nix.

Our new funder will convince the AFC to absorb Oceania and the Nix will become eligible for the ACL. The FFA will also invite the Nix to put a team in the youth league.

And finally, the economy will magically fix itself overnight so that our new funder is never under any kind of financial pressure and can drop a cool million into the Nix whenever.

I'm convinced. Terry - it's time to step aside.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
better not increase the price of the season tickets (although ours are already booked).

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
terminator_x wrote:

The FFA will then wait to receive a call from one of the estimated half-dozen millionaires living in Wellington who are just dying to take-over, but have somehow managed to keep their names completely out of the public arena up until now.


To be fair, that's just because tpmyhill is very good at keeping a secret.

Seriously, though - can everyone please go back and read this thread from the beginning? Back to April when it really looked like the freakin' government was going to put Terry out of business? Things look pretty rosy now in comparison.


Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Junior82 wrote:
better not increase the price of the season tickets (although ours are already booked).


Of course not. Our new funder is so rich that entrance will be free from now on.

Our new funder will also build a new, boutique 15,000 capacity stadium for us. But after a short time the club is so successful that we end up having to move back to the Ring of Fire anyway. We'll all have a good laugh about that!

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
terminator_x wrote:
Junior82 wrote:
better not increase the price of the season tickets (although ours are already booked).


Of course not. Our new funder is so rich that entrance will be free from now on.

Our new funder will also build a new, boutique 15,000 capacity stadium for us. But after a short time the club is so successful that we end up having to move back to the Ring of Fire anyway. We'll all have a good laugh about that!

Excellent.  I'm half way there.
 
Throw in a season badge AND a fridge magnet ($25 store voucher optional) and I'm pretty much over the line.
 
Terry who?
 

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
terminator_x wrote:

He can't sell the Nix because he doesn't own the Nix, at least not in any meaningful sense (and there's certainly not an open market for A-League licences). Terry funds the Nix, and if he wants out his only option is to hand the licence back to the FFA.
 
God you're talking rubbish - I must have imagined this then...
 

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Doloras wrote:
As previously explained, I know nothing about finance, but exactly what are the consequences for Terry personally for these companies that are in receivership?
 
And yet you continue to lecture everyone else on this forum about Terry's business, the process of receivership, liquidation etc
 

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Doloras wrote:

terminator_x wrote:

The FFA will then wait to receive a call from one of the estimated half-dozen millionaires living in Wellington who are just dying to take-over, but have somehow managed to keep their names completely out of the public arena up until now.
To be fair, that's just because tpmyhill is very good at keeping a secret. Seriously, though - can everyone please go back and read this thread from the beginning? Back to April when it really looked like the freakin' government was going to put Terry out of business? Things look pretty rosy now in comparison.


What?!?!?!? The players werent supposedly organising a petition back then...
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
james dean wrote:
terminator_x wrote:

He can't sell the Nix because he doesn't own the Nix, at least not in any meaningful sense (and there's certainly not an open market for A-League licences). Terry funds the Nix, and if he wants out his only option is to hand the licence back to the FFA.
 
God you're talking rubbish - I must have imagined this then...
 


You might not have imagined it but you definitely didn't read it. There's nothing there that contradicts what I said.

Tell me, what exactly was Traktovenko buying in this situation? Answer: f**k all. He was providing funding to clear debt. In return he got control of Sydney FC, or more correctly the right to put in a pile of cash and hope he might make one day make a profit.

Also, this was not a "sale" on the open market and it never would have happened without FFA consent. Obviously not an issue in this case because of Lowy's involvement.

The point is that Terry can't just go out and "sell" the Nix. And what is there actually to sell? The FFA even own the Phoenix name and branding ffs!

Just because a newspaper headline writer is a bit loose with the language doesn't change the underlying substance of the transaction.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
tpmyhill wrote:
What?!?!?!? The players werent supposedly organising a petition back then...


Hang on. The only source for this is someone in Melbourne who heard from someone that might have heard from a player that they could be signing a petition to go to New Zealand football about the ownership of an Australian club...

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
terminator_x wrote:
james dean wrote:
terminator_x wrote:

He can't sell the Nix because he doesn't own the Nix, at least not in any meaningful sense (and there's certainly not an open market for A-League licences). Terry funds the Nix, and if he wants out his only option is to hand the licence back to the FFA.
 
God you're talking rubbish - I must have imagined this then...
 


You might not have imagined it but you definitely didn't read it. There's nothing there that contradicts what I said.

Tell me, what exactly was Traktovenko buying in this situation? Answer: f**k all. He was providing funding to clear debt. In return he got control of Sydney FC, or more correctly the right to put in a pile of cash and hope he might make one day make a profit.

Also, this was not a "sale" on the open market and it never would have happened without FFA consent. Obviously not an issue in this case because of Lowy's involvement.

The point is that Terry can't just go out and "sell" the Nix. And what is there actually to sell? The FFA even own the Phoenix name and branding ffs!

Just because a newspaper headline writer is a bit loose with the language doesn't change the underlying substance of the transaction.

 
Absolute garbage - so the owner of an NFL franchise, or NBA franchise, competitions organised in a very similar manner to the A-League, isn't an owner and is a funder?  And they can't "sell" their ownership even though such sales occur all the time?  Tell me what the difference is - and if you say it is because NFL clubs make money then you are wrong on 2 counts.
 
Your analysis makes absolutely no sense.  Just because the club doesn't make money now doesn't mean it has no value.  Here's a thought.  A-League clubs lose money.  In the future they may not.   There is a time value on that possible future income stream.  Therefore, depending on your analysis of the future of the league the club could have a value.
 
What do you sell?  You sell fixed assets, player contracts and most importantly you sell the right to participate in the A-League through the licence.  Yes the FFA would need to consent to any sale but just because you need FFA consent doesn't mean it can't be sold.  All 28 or whatever NFL owners need to vote on a sale but franchises are bought and sold.
 
This is absolute myth making.  First you've said Terry shouldn't go because he wasn't in trouble.  WHen is has become clear that he is, you say he shouldn't go because there is no-one else.  Now you're saying that he shouldn't go because in fact he can't sell the club. 
 
"Terry funds the Nix, and if he wants out his only option is to hand the licence back to the FFA" is just an incorrect statement.
 
For argument's sake, Sam Morgan says to Terry I will buy Wgtn Phoenix off you for $150,000.  Terry says, done, let's shake hands.  The two of thm go to the FFA, FFA says great, we agree and approve Morgan as owner, club sold to Morgan - are you telling me that situation cannot occur?

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
JD

One thing that is not clear to me is were TS funds the Nix ... or what companies have been used to fund the Nix ... and importantly how the funding has been structured...

I must confess to only having limited Knowledge of TS companies and their financial position... But what I can say for certain is this...

1} Once a company is in either receivership or under administration... then it is the receiver or adminsrator who makes the calls on were money will go..

2} Has the funding to the Nix been by way of loan from TS companies or capital injections or donations...

Two issues could occur if past funding has been by way of loans, first this this money will be called by those running TS companies ... the other is if the income making businesses are not controlled by TS how can he fund future business needs...

Sorry in advance for stating the obvious but I have no idea how TS has funded the club and what he has used as his funding vehicle...

JD ... any idea on these two issues...

Socceroo/ Mariner / Whangarei

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Just posting my weekly yawn.

Yawn.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Midfielder - unfortunately company law in New Zealand does not require companies to publish accounts publicly so we have absolutely no idea of the answers to your (important) questions.
 
It is therefore hard to speculate on how the finances of the club are arranged.
 
However I will go on and do so...as no new shares have been issued since incorporation my guess is that he has funded them through director's loans - which I expect are interest free.
 
If anyone wants to wikileak me the club accounts I would be very interested...(just joking, sort of...)

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
This thread makes the knitting circle seem like fun people
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
james dean wrote:
If anyone wants to wikileak me the club accounts I would be very interested...(just joking, sort of...)


Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
james dean wrote:
For argument's sake, Sam Morgan says to Terry I will buy Wgtn Phoenix off you for $150,000.  Terry says, done, let's shake hands.  The two of thm go to the FFA, FFA says great, we agree and approve Morgan as owner, club sold to Morgan - are you telling me that situation cannot occur?[/QUOTE]

Of course not, but I would expect that someone as smart as Sam Morgan would also be able to appreciate the reality of the situation and that he was not buying control over some very important things; such as the Wellington Phoenix brand. All we are disagreeing about here is what really defines "ownership". I think that the A-League "owners" are closer to being funders. You don't. No biggie.

[QUOTE=james dean]This is absolute myth making.  First you've said Terry shouldn't go because he wasn't in trouble.  WHen is has become clear that he is, you say he shouldn't go because there is no-one else.  Now you're saying that he shouldn't go because in fact he can't sell the club.


"Absolute myth-making"? That seems a little unfair! I'm not saying that Terry "shouldn't go because in fact he can't sell the club" at all. My point is simply that when potential investors look at the substance of "owning" an A-League franchise they may be disappointed to find out what that really means.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
james dean wrote:
terminator_x wrote:

He can't sell the Nix because he doesn't own the Nix, at least not in any meaningful sense (and there's certainly not an open market for A-League licences). Terry funds the Nix, and if he wants out his only option is to hand the licence back to the FFA.
 
God you're talking rubbish - I must have imagined this then...
 
 
Come on JD, you know better than most here that just because the headline infers that it's a "sale" doesn't make it one.
 
Terminator_x wasn't wrong in his post you quoted.  Terry doesn't "own" the Nix, there isn't (really) a market for A League licenses, and Terry doesn't have much room to move in terms of off-loading the license to any third party.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Smithy wrote:
james dean wrote:
terminator_x wrote:

He can't sell the Nix because he doesn't own the Nix, at least not in any meaningful sense (and there's certainly not an open market for A-League licences). Terry funds the Nix, and if he wants out his only option is to hand the licence back to the FFA.
 
God you're talking rubbish - I must have imagined this then...
 
 
Come on JD, you know better than most here that just because the headline infers that it's a "sale" doesn't make it one.
 
Terminator_x wasn't wrong in his post you quoted.  Terry doesn't "own" the Nix, there isn't (really) a market for A League licenses, and Terry doesn't have much room to move in terms of off-loading the license to any third party.
If someone wanted to buy it, Terry could sell the company that holds the licence. The buyer would need a-league approval but I doubt that would be unreasonably withheld.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
To be fair though, we are just arguing over use of the word "sold".
 
The point is that the Nix could change "owners" or "funders" or whetever very easily if:
 
1. there was someone willing to take them on (no evidence of this at all to date);
2. Terry wanted to let them go (which, for better or worse, he doesn't); and
3. the FFA approved (which you'd expect they would).
 
 

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
rjmiller wrote:
Smithy wrote:
james dean wrote:
terminator_x wrote:

He can't sell the Nix because he doesn't own the Nix, at least not in any meaningful sense (and there's certainly not an open market for A-League licences). Terry funds the Nix, and if he wants out his only option is to hand the licence back to the FFA.
 
God you're talking rubbish - I must have imagined this then...
 
 
Come on JD, you know better than most here that just because the headline infers that it's a "sale" doesn't make it one.
 
Terminator_x wasn't wrong in his post you quoted.  Terry doesn't "own" the Nix, there isn't (really) a market for A League licenses, and Terry doesn't have much room to move in terms of off-loading the license to any third party.
If someone wanted to buy it, Terry could sell the company that holds the licence. The buyer would need a-league approval but I doubt that would be unreasonably withheld.
 
Indeed.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
I confess to find it interesting that certain members of this forum really, really can't stand me putting a positive spin on things and looking for the bright side. Understandable if they really think that "if every member of this forum agrees that Terry is doomed and we all get really angsty about it, he will take the hint and hand over to the Mystery Man who tpmyhill keeps talking about". But I consider that superstitious nonsense.

But as for myself, do you think I like obsessively checking the news sites and this forum every morning to see whether Terry went broke or not? I certainly don't. Which is why I feel the need to keep my spirits up.

And that "players get petition together to remove Terry" story is such obvious nonsense (probably started by a rival A-League club) I can't believe that some people are falling for it.

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
well being a constant Pollyanna is just as head in the sand as being chicken Licken (for the younger generation these are fictional characters from us oldies long ago past   ). And for a long while you grumbled at the Doom Post for even considering this news whereas I'm more pragmactic and consider any major businessmen's financial problems to be news - its just that most of us dont bother to even notice articles about others
 
I don't want to see Terry go bust or even lose the Nix but if it's really going to happen then sooner than later. And personally his blind conviction that his "loan" wd come through made him look a bit stupid when so many other's had been ripped off and were still waiting for theirs
 
It's both a good thing and bad that news sometimes comes from this forum and that we supporters are seen to take a serious interest in our club/passion... I think it's just that being aware of this some of us don't want the YF to look like rats devotedly following the pied piper over a cliff because we are loyal to Terry to the point we stop using common sense
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Doloras wrote:
I confess to find it interesting that certain members of this forum really, really can't stand me putting a positive spin on things and looking for the bright side. Understandable if they really think that "if every member of this forum agrees that Terry is doomed and we all get really angsty about it, he will take the hint and hand over to the Mystery Man who tpmyhill keeps talking about". But I consider that superstitious nonsense.

But as for myself, do you think I like obsessively checking the news sites and this forum every morning to see whether Terry went broke or not? I certainly don't. Which is why I feel the need to keep my spirits up.

And that "players get petition together to remove Terry" story is such obvious nonsense (probably started by a rival A-League club) I can't believe that some people are falling for it.
 
For what it is worth, I'm with you D.
 
(This may not be a good thing - but we could be an odd couple, like Martin Lawrence and Cate Blanchett)
 
I'll load my postive-vibes gun - let's go to war!
 
 
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
The WGA thing is the only thing that really worries me about Terry's judgement. If he came out and said "I admit it, I was sucked in by a smooth grifter like several other Australasian businessmen and I've sent Cypriot hitmen after him", I'd feel much more confident.

But as HN and others have said, I really don't believe that anything we as fans can do can change the future of the Nix (apart from buying season tickets), so I deliberately decide not to face the most probable reality. If Terry does go bust then JD and others will be able to say I told you so, with full justification, but in the meantime I feel better doing things this way.

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Doloras wrote:
I confess to find it interesting that certain members of this forum really, really can't stand me putting a positive spin on things and looking for the bright side. Understandable if they really think that "if every member of this forum agrees that Terry is doomed and we all get really angsty about it, he will take the hint and hand over to the Mystery Man who tpmyhill keeps talking about". But I consider that superstitious nonsense.But as for myself, do you think I like obsessively checking the news sites and this forum every morning to see whether Terry went broke or not? I certainly don't. Which is why I feel the need to keep my spirits up.And that "players get petition together to remove Terry" story is such obvious nonsense (probably started by a rival A-League club) I can't believe that some people are falling for it.


Well said Doloras I to am sick & tired of the soothsayers/mystics and other assorted doom mechants who keep persisting with the absolute trash that seems to bounce around.

anyway lets get on to positive things like making sure people are buying season passes and looking foward to the coming season, we even get a new signing or two this week, and that came from a person who knows, not a freind of a freinds cousin from Timbuktoo.

lets get positive folks we need this thing to go foward we dont want it to fail like that other code from jaffa land lets "keep the faith"
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Doloras, I just called you Cate Blanchett, man! That's high praise you just ignored.
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
i wish i could hide both JamesDean's and Doloras' posts from this thread
 
term x + smithy + stealthkiwi = posts worth reading
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Given your avatar, Cosimo, I think it better if you don't get a swelled head. 

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Doloras wrote:
Given your avatar, Cosimo, I think it better if you don't get a swelled head. 
 
You can ride shotgun - let's clean up these streets!
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Doloras wrote:
The WGA thing is the only thing that really worries me about Terry's judgement. If he came out and said "I admit it, I was sucked in by a smooth grifter like several other Australasian businessmen and I've sent Cypriot hitmen after him", I'd feel much more confident.

But as HN and others have said, I really don't believe that anything we as fans can do can change the future of the Nix (apart from buying season tickets), so I deliberately decide not to face the most probable reality. If Terry does go bust then JD and others will be able to say I told you so, with full justification, but in the meantime I feel better doing things this way.
 
'A girl's gotta do, what a girl's gotta do ... ' (?)
 
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Because if a girl don't do what a girl's gotta do, the things that a girl's gotta do don't get done. And that'd never do.

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

*Bing Bong*

Hi dee hi Campers!
 
There are only 82 more days to go until kick-off.
 
 

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Cosimo wrote:
Doloras wrote:
Given your avatar, Cosimo, I think it better if you don't get a swelled head. 
 
You can ride shotgun - let's clean up these streets!


This the bit you like about Martin Lawrence??

"He was also arrested at Burbank Airport for carrying a loaded gun in his suitcase"
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
hepatitis wrote:
Cosimo wrote:
Doloras wrote:
Given your avatar, Cosimo, I think it better if you don't get a swelled head. 
 
You can ride shotgun - let's clean up these streets!


This the bit you like about Martin Lawrence??

"He was also arrested at Burbank Airport for carrying a loaded gun in his suitcase"
 
What's not to like?? He's like the Shakespeare of our generation
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink

This topic is locked.