WeeNix
1
·
710
·
about 17 years
WeeNix
1
·
710
·
about 17 years
I was quoted in the Sky Sport Magazine this month for an article on the Phoenix, which focused partly on Jeremy Christie as he has now been a part of all 3 franchise setups in New Zealand.
 
In the article, I mentioned that the general opinions that were canvassed from this forum suggested that Christie was signed purely as a backup for Richard Johnson, in the event that he was prosecuted for his driving incident earlier this year.
 
The interview was scheduled before any of the pre-season matches.
 
As it happens, I personally felt that Jeremy had an outstanding game against Sydney, and proved that he is a very capable player and fully deserves his place in the squad. I apologise to you Jeremy, after seeing your display for any suggestion otherwise.
 
Like anything, I think it is important to admit when you have made a mistake, or when you are wrong. As with all media, I made a call on how I felt about it at the time, so am pleased for him to have proved me wrong, and to also have proved that he is a solid asset to the Phoenix forthe season ahead (he had a solid game from all accounts last night as well).
 
If you happen to read this, send me a PM to let me know your thoughts - I owe you a beer!
 
Cheers,
Adam Brown (Cnut)
Yellow Fever
Marquee
300
·
5K
·
about 17 years
Lets hope other sections of the media can follow your lead.
Marquee
410
·
6.3K
·
almost 17 years
Phoenix Academy
0
·
340
·
about 17 years
Same too - never rated Christie at Perth, but thought he put in a strong effort ...also thought Old was on his game too....
First Team Squad
13
·
1.7K
·
about 17 years
ive been another sceptic of Christie's skill/worth...last night i personally thought he played well.....hopefully it'll carry through to the AWs :)
Phoenix Academy
0
·
190
·
about 17 years
I hold my hand up too.  I had dubious feelings about Jeremy Christie's signing for the Phoenix. I watched him play a great game against Sydney at the Ring of Fire and read that he has played well again down there in ChCh.  Good one Jeremy! Keep it up!!!!  I too have been proved wrong! But glad to be so!
Tegal Fan Club Member #3
46
·
7.8K
·
almost 17 years
I dont know what game you guys where watching, but he was shocking. Worst on there by far.
Marquee
410
·
6.3K
·
almost 17 years
CelticFC wrote:
I dont know what game you guys where watching, but he was shocking. Worst on there by far.


i thought you said Dodd was? make up your mind, sl*gger
Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
about 17 years
Cosimo wrote:
CelticFC wrote:
I dont know what game you guys where watching, but he was shocking. Worst on there by far.


i thought you said Dodd was? make up your mind, sl*gger
 
sounds like he was too busy banging pots
Marquee
2.1K
·
8.2K
·
about 17 years
Celtic, if you have some reasoning why he didn't play well let us know.  Otherwise I'll delete your post. 
Marquee
410
·
6.3K
·
almost 17 years

simply saying that someone was shocking is a wynton rufuresque level of bad analysis
Tegal Fan Club Member #3
46
·
7.8K
·
almost 17 years

the guys and i who went along thought he was crap. his defence was poor near the end where he messed up many long balls, and also saw a few funny little stunts where he thought he had the ball and ran of when he didnt.

its a matter of opinion. For me he was dreadful. to you he might of bin good.
First Team Squad
13
·
1.7K
·
about 17 years
CelticFC wrote:
I dont know what game you guys where watching, but he was shocking. Worst on there by far.


Lochead was far worse for the majority of the game... (sorry Tony, cant lie to the people...final 20 was good though)


there were a number of times where JC was playing great support to the guys upfront, his passing was decent and he seemed to be everywhere...if Daniel had stayed on his feet...the work rate of JC wouldnt have had to be so high
Tegal Fan Club Member #3
46
·
7.8K
·
almost 17 years
Feverish wrote:
Cosimo wrote:
CelticFC wrote:
I dont know what game you guys where watching, but he was shocking. Worst on there by far.


i thought you said Dodd was? make up your mind, sl*gger
 
sounds like he was too busy banging pots
 
 
 
WHen did i say that? As soon as i got home i made a post about plodder but the mods deleted it...
 
And no feverish, that was the students up near the back
Marquee
3.7K
·
5.8K
·
about 17 years
Dam are you sure you people in Christchurch were all at the same game,can understand different opinions but really some of them are that far apart its actually funny.
Tegal Fan Club Member #3
46
·
7.8K
·
almost 17 years
lol. my comments will just get classed as "wrong"  due to the mods pretty much having something against me. Ah well. The whole crew i was with thought plodder was the worst.'
 
 
 
First Team Squad
13
·
1.7K
·
about 17 years
i could understand if the mods had something against ya (not that they would be that petty...)

TBH the majority of the teams defence was shakey...im not saying JC was 100% brilliant, but at the same time i dont think any of them were...or even close to it
Marquee
410
·
6.3K
·
almost 17 years
CelticFC wrote:
Feverish wrote:
Cosimo wrote:
CelticFC wrote:
I dont know what game you guys where watching, but he was shocking. Worst on there by far.


i thought you said Dodd was? make up your mind, sl*gger
 
sounds like he was too busy banging pots
 
 
 
WHen did i say that? As soon as i got home i made a post about plodder but the mods deleted it...
 
And no feverish, that was the students up near the back


sorry dude, must have remembered it wrong
Starting XI
650
·
4.1K
·
almost 17 years
It was me that said Dodd was Doddgey, however you will have to excuse myself and others for getting our defense a bit muddled up as to who was the worst.  They all seemed to give the ball away or just thump it up to the forwards aka Knights and Kingz.  Same sh!te, different wrapper.
 
 
Marquee
410
·
6.3K
·
almost 17 years
VimFuego wrote:
It was me that said Dodd was Doddgey, however you will have to excuse myself and others for getting our defense a bit muddled up as to who was the worst.  They all seemed to give the ball away or just thump it up to the forwards aka Knights and Kingz.  Same sh!te, different wrapper.
 
 


that's strange cos against sydney they pretty much did the opposite...cleberson was guilty of it, but the other at least tried to keep it calm and use short passes and keep possession...i guess qnsld might have been more persistant on attack and rattled them more
Trialist
0
·
6
·
almost 17 years
Im with the rest, there was almost no attempt made to play any football in chch. It wasnt so much straight long ball play but a sort of muddled cross breed of medium range passes not going to feet and then if they did the receiving player would slip or lose the ball. Christie was by no means the only guilty party, Personally i didnt pick out any one player as being shocking (other than the brazilian #21) was just a disjointed team performance. 
First Team Squad
13
·
1.7K
·
about 17 years
i was a bit disapointed at how our defenders would just try and boot the ball as hard as they could,  have it go high and pray it would go in the right place...
Marquee
410
·
6.3K
·
almost 17 years
gings wrote:
i was a bit disapointed at how our defenders would just try and boot the ball as hard as they could,  have it go high and pray it would go in the right place...
 
yeah what is it with most NZ teams' defense?? same story...
First Team Squad
13
·
1.7K
·
about 17 years
im pretty sure Dodd was the worst offender of just booting the sh*t out of it and praying for success (couldnt really see it at times, apologies if ive nabbed the wrong one) it seems to be a major problem in most football ive watched in this country (that and actually having the guts to take a shot)

hopefully it was just nerves/new strategy.....i dunno, maybe we all have high standards
Phoenix Academy
0
·
240
·
almost 17 years
Hey guys, thanks for the apologie, Its all gee. Ill score against melbourne for you. Thanks Jeremy

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up