R17 v Newcastle Jets | Sat 20th Jan | 7.30pm | SS3

438 replies · 32,858 views
over 8 years ago

Italiano MOM.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
charliecfoal30kwlap
over 8 years ago

Never in Doubt

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
beBlairinhofoal30liberty_nz+2
over 8 years ago

Thank you Nix.

bling blang blah
Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Buffon II wrote:

Italiano MOM.

His best game by a mile

bling blang blah
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Bullion
over 8 years ago

FUCK YES

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Bananaspaige478
over 8 years ago

Once again Singh the standout for me. Didnt put a foot wrong!

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
bemrsmiis
over 8 years ago

Moral boosting win.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Thank you!!

A shakey finish - but bar for the final 10 minutes of the second half they did not create much which is positive.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Buffon II wrote:

Italiano MOM.

I'll take "things I could have never imagined hearing before the match" for $500, Alex


Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Buffon II
over 8 years ago

Italiano MoM. WeeMac and Roy close 2nds.

Galloway also atoned for his terrible error by playing quite well afterwards.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

3 games unbeaten

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Bananas
over 8 years ago

Haven't been a fan of Italiano, but he was good tonight.  Couldn't do anything about either goal.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Well played boys Take a bow Lewis. If only we could get that frigging defence sorted out.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

valeo wrote:

Italiano MoM. WeeMac and Roy close 2nds.

Galloway also atoned for his terrible error by playing quite well afterwards.


I don't know if you can 'atone' for a clanger that bad, but he certainly put it behind him.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Lachyloolaa wrote:

I'm Fudgeing estatic

I'm going to text my Novacastrian family and friends

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

I would have taken a draw befor the game so stoked with the win!

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Fantastic work. Now for a great home game next.

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Bananas
over 8 years ago

and one over Ernie.

A small town in Europe........looking to bounce straight back up....well that aint going to happen

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

woot!



Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Fantastic work. Now for a great home game next.

Unbeaten in 3.

Should get at least 3500 through the turnstyles

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
foal30
over 8 years ago

zonknz wrote:

Genuinely depressing reading the lack of understanding of the laws and their application.

Have a read of this  and try and understand how refs apply the laws in the context of the game

http://www.swosoa.com/index.php/en/referee-article...

You might want to take your own advice - "Fouls that do not have an impact on the ability of a player to play the ball should not be called".

There is no way Rossi putting his hand on the jets player impacted his ability to run and/or shoot.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

RichieRich wrote:

zonknz wrote:

Genuinely depressing reading the lack of understanding of the laws and their application.

Have a read of this  and try and understand how refs apply the laws in the context of the game

http://www.swosoa.com/index.php/en/referee-article...

You might want to take your own advice - "Fouls that do not have an impact on the ability of a player to play the ball should not be called".

There is no way Rossi putting his hand on the jets player impacted his ability to run and/or shoot.

Plus every single corner in every single game has worse shirt pulling than that.

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
BullionMeYogaMatt
over 8 years ago

For what it's worth the Jets fans don't seem to think it was a penalty.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

If it wasn't Rossi, say Fox who gave away the penalty I wonder if people wold jump as much? Rossi has had a lot of stick lately...

A lot of people saying he doesn't care, but you could see that was not the case today IMO. When Italiano made a save near the end, he was right there, talking to him, slowing him down - you don't take those moments when you don't give a toss!

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

A great result, but we are still bottom of the league. Can't get too excited yet. Have had 10 years of building up my hopes. 

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Outpost wrote:

RichieRich wrote:

zonknz wrote:

Genuinely depressing reading the lack of understanding of the laws and their application.

Have a read of this  and try and understand how refs apply the laws in the context of the game

http://www.swosoa.com/index.php/en/referee-article...

You might want to take your own advice - "Fouls that do not have an impact on the ability of a player to play the ball should not be called".

There is no way Rossi putting his hand on the jets player impacted his ability to run and/or shoot.

Plus every single corner in every single game has worse shirt pulling than that.

Pulling a player back by the shirt who is through on goal impacts their ability to play the ball in a significant moment of opportunity.

You do get why these are called the dark arts by players, right? Doesn't make them legal

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Outpost wrote:

MetalLegNZ wrote:

If we saw a free kick for every shirt pull - the game would never finish.

Soft penalty

Petratos pulled our guy's shirt right in front of the ref first half, ref just waved it on.

Did you notice our throw that was blown out by the wind and given as a foul throw. Then when the Jets did exactly the same thing it was a retake?

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

one worry aspect for next game is Dura and Rossi Borg getting yellows. Both must be close if not at suspension plus Fox already out

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Scotiadh wrote:

Outpost wrote:

MetalLegNZ wrote:

If we saw a free kick for every shirt pull - the game would never finish.

Soft penalty

Petratos pulled our guy's shirt right in front of the ref first half, ref just waved it on.

Did you notice our throw that was blown out by the wind and given as a foul throw. Then when the Jets did exactly the same thing it was a retake?

No, no I did not.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

one worry aspect for next game is Dura and Rossi Borg getting yellows. Both must be close if not at suspension plus Fox already out

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Ryan wrote:

Moral boosting win.

Ethics , Standards and Virtues all look better

E's Flat Ah's Flat Too

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Walsall Boy wrote:

one worry aspect for next game is Dura and Rossi Borg getting yellows. Both must be close if not at suspension plus Fox already out

All good JB?

E's Flat Ah's Flat Too

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

zonknz wrote:

Outpost wrote:

RichieRich wrote:

zonknz wrote:

Genuinely depressing reading the lack of understanding of the laws and their application.

Have a read of this  and try and understand how refs apply the laws in the context of the game

http://www.swosoa.com/index.php/en/referee-article...

You might want to take your own advice - "Fouls that do not have an impact on the ability of a player to play the ball should not be called".

There is no way Rossi putting his hand on the jets player impacted his ability to run and/or shoot.

Plus every single corner in every single game has worse shirt pulling than that.

Pulling a player back by the shirt who is through on goal impacts their ability to play the ball in a significant moment of opportunity.

You do get why these are called the dark arts by players, right? Doesn't make them legal

I'd suggest you rewatch the incident before claiming that it had an impact on the player.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

RichieRich wrote:

zonknz wrote:

Outpost wrote:

RichieRich wrote:

zonknz wrote:

Genuinely depressing reading the lack of understanding of the laws and their application.

Have a read of this  and try and understand how refs apply the laws in the context of the game

http://www.swosoa.com/index.php/en/referee-article...

You might want to take your own advice - "Fouls that do not have an impact on the ability of a player to play the ball should not be called".

There is no way Rossi putting his hand on the jets player impacted his ability to run and/or shoot.

Plus every single corner in every single game has worse shirt pulling than that.

Pulling a player back by the shirt who is through on goal impacts their ability to play the ball in a significant moment of opportunity.

You do get why these are called the dark arts by players, right? Doesn't make them legal

I'd suggest you rewatch the incident before claiming that it had an impact on the player.

Why, are you suggestibg that Rossi was trying to help him with his balance?

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

RichieRich wrote:

zonknz wrote:

Outpost wrote:

RichieRich wrote:

zonknz wrote:

Genuinely depressing reading the lack of understanding of the laws and their application.

Have a read of this  and try and understand how refs apply the laws in the context of the game

http://www.swosoa.com/index.php/en/referee-article...

You might want to take your own advice - "Fouls that do not have an impact on the ability of a player to play the ball should not be called".

There is no way Rossi putting his hand on the jets player impacted his ability to run and/or shoot.

Plus every single corner in every single game has worse shirt pulling than that.

Pulling a player back by the shirt who is through on goal impacts their ability to play the ball in a significant moment of opportunity.

You do get why these are called the dark arts by players, right? Doesn't make them legal

I'd suggest you rewatch the incident before claiming that it had an impact on the player.

Who cares? WE WON!

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Bananas
over 8 years ago

Damn happy! Krishna is now one goal away Ifill's mark of all-time leading goalscorer!


Addicted to get up 4am to watch Phoenix.

Oceania Football Center

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
BananascharliecchemiMainland FC+1
over 8 years ago · edited over 8 years ago · History

Scotiadh wrote:

Outpost wrote:

MetalLegNZ wrote:

If we saw a free kick for every shirt pull - the game would never finish.

Soft penalty

Petratos pulled our guy's shirt right in front of the ref first half, ref just waved it on.

Did you notice our throw that was blown out by the wind and given as a foul throw. Then when the Jets did exactly the same thing it was a retake?

Really confused by this comment. The position of the player, and the way in which they release the ball define a foul throw (if play is restarted). If whole ball crosses the line, play restarts. If it never crosses the line completely, play doesn't restart

The wind can't make it a foul throw

Permalink Permalink