Wellington Phoenix Men

R2 vs Sydney FC | Sun 15 Oct | 9:00pm | SS1

486 replies · 43,525 views
over 8 years ago


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Sydney play SMFC on Wednesday night, so loads of red cards please?

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

I hope we win

E's Flat Ah's Flat Too

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

We'll do our best Wednesday night to tire them out.  Lets hope we can pull off a cupset and create history

SMFC till I die!
Only one team in melbourne!
F*** Victory and Heart
Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Yeh give them a hiding Souths

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Team

1: Keegan Smith

2: Keegan Smith

3: Keegan Smith

4: Keegan Smith

5: Keegan Smith

6: Keegan Smith

7: Keegan Smith

8: Keegan Smith

9: Keegan Smith

10: Keegan Smith

11: Keegan Smith

We all dream of a team of Keegan Smith.

Express Football Special Calling At

Fratton Park - Champion Hill - Kiwitea St

And all away grounds inbetween.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Hopefully, Weemac, Gui, and Dura and Doyle will help us maybe grind out a draw.



Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Balbi wrote:

Team

1: Keegan Smith

2: Keegan Smith

3: Keegan Smith

4: Keegan Smith

5: Keegan Smith

6: Keegan Smith

7: Keegan Smith

8: Keegan Smith

9: Keegan Smith

10: Keegan Smith

11: Keegan Smith

We all dream of a team of Keegan Smith.

Please dont include all of us, because i dream of a team without him!

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Lachyloolaa wrote:

We will win 2-1. Over confident? Yes. Overly optimistic? Yes. Extremely unlikely? Yes. But we will


Stuff that why are we conceding a goal?

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Smith or Italiano?

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Italiano for me please

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Balbi wrote:

Team

1: Keegan Smith

2: Keegan Smith

3: Keegan Smith

4: Keegan Smith

5: Keegan Smith

6: Keegan Smith

7: Keegan Smith

8: Keegan Smith

9: Keegan Smith

10: Keegan Smith

11: Keegan Smith

We all dream of a team of Keegan Smith.

I presume you meant to say 

.

Team

1: Goran Paracki

2: Goran Paracki

3: Scott Galloway

4: Goran Paracki

5: Goran Paracki

6: Goran Paracki

7: Goran Paracki

8: Goran Paracki

9: Goran Paracki

10: Goran Paracki

21: Roy Krishna

Annual finals disappointment enthusiast.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Hopefully, Weemac, Gui, and Dura and Doyle will help us maybe grind out a draw.

Just Wee mac and Doyle should help.

A small town in Europe........looking to bounce straight back up....well that aint going to happen

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Boro4eva wrote:

Hopefully, Weemac, Gui, and Dura and Doyle will help us maybe grind out a draw.

Just Wee mac and Doyle should help.

I think Dura's experience and leadership should help communication in our defence. Also, think Gui would be an improvement on Rufer and will be better at the dead ball than Riddenton (Not to say Riddenton isn't good at the dead ball, just Gui is better) 



Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

I'm going over to SYD to the game at the weekend but not sure which area of the SFS to buy seats for, where are other FYers getting tickets for the game?

We ara peeple!!!
Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

steff wrote:

I'm going over to SYD to the game at the weekend but not sure which area of the SFS to buy seats for, where are other FYers getting tickets for the game?

There's a Sydney Phoenix Supporters' group on FaecesBook - maybe hit them up?

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

SFC 3 - WEL 0 sadly.

As much as I don't rate Italiano I hope he starts this game.  Smith showed some great potential but the lack of command of the box, and the slowness to react in some situations will be absolutely taken advantage of by a team as good as the Smurfs.

The artist formerly known as Homer Simpson

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

I think we are going to lose regardless of who is in goal tbh.

This being said, I think the coach needs to make up his mind quickly about what he wants to do goalkeeper-wise.

I am a fan of rotating players, but I think it's important for the GK spot to change as little as possible, barring injury, a shocking run of form by the starting keeper or outstanding performances by his understudy.


VUW AFC - Victoria University Football for life

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

What makes you think he hasn't already made up his mind NZP?  We've had one game and one keeper plus the last pre-seaon games all used that keeper.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Yeah Smith looks to be the first choice keeper until there's a compelling reason that he wouldn't be. Dropping him now would be the worst thing Kalezic could do to the kid.

Valley FC til I die?

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Nelfoos wrote:

Yeah Smith looks to be the first choice keeper until there's a compelling reason that he wouldn't be. Dropping him now would be the worst thing Kalezic could do to the kid.

Happens all the time. I know a coach they send kids home because of their body fat, just to bring them back a month later.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Hard News wrote:

What makes you think he hasn't already made up his mind NZP?  We've had one game and one keeper plus the last pre-seaon games all used that keeper.

I meant given the barrage of comments he has faced since Sunday...I hope he either sticks to his guns and keeps Smith in (my preferred choice) or if he decides the lad isn't ready yet, explain to him why and chuck someone else in with a view to make him the #1 for the foreseeable future.

I think our back line looked shaky enough without needing to add worries about who is going to keep for us week in week out.


VUW AFC - Victoria University Football for life

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago · edited over 8 years ago · History

number8 wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

Yeah Smith looks to be the first choice keeper until there's a compelling reason that he wouldn't be. Dropping him now would be the worst thing Kalezic could do to the kid.

Happens all the time. I know a coach they send kids home because of their body fat, just to bring them back a month later.

Biiiiiig difference between a physically unfit player trying to break into a national team set up and a debutante keeper thrust into the first team who could do without having his confidence shattered after a competent performance. I know you're being deliberately facetious but the situations are not similar at all beyond face value.

Also when the alternative is Italiano I'd probably prefer to dig someone out of central league...

Valley FC til I die?

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Nelfoos wrote:

number8 wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

Yeah Smith looks to be the first choice keeper until there's a compelling reason that he wouldn't be. Dropping him now would be the worst thing Kalezic could do to the kid.

Happens all the time. I know a coach they send kids home because of their body fat, just to bring them back a month later.

Biiiiiig difference between a physically unfit player trying to break into a national team set up and a debutante keeper thrust into the first team who could do without having his confidence shattered after a competent performance. I know you're being deliberately facetious but the situations are not similar at all beyond face value.

Also when the alternative is Italiano I'd probably prefer to dig someone out of central league...

as long as he chooses on what is best is to get a result and not because he doesn't want someone to have hurt feelings

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

You're right. Either way someone has hurt feelings. I can't imagine how Italiano's feelings are at the moment.

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

It'll be Smith.  And we'll have to be a lot better for it not to be Sydney. 

But I am still trying to figure how good that draw was v Adelaide. Points a point.  But based on pace of the game and quality and chances Adelaide might have taken, I'd say not too good. 

But we'll get better. 

Better enough for a result v Sydney.  Big call, but life and hope and all that.  After all, the AWs are going to beat Peru, so why not us beat Sydney?

Bring it on.  I'd be ecstatic with a 1-1.  And Smith not getting broken by some pretty agressive Sydney play on him.  You can see that coming a mile away.  Hope he's got an enforcer backing him, or he has real pointy elbows and knees.  

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

It was a positive because we are pretty underdone, more so than normal even.

We were missing Doyle, Durante, and WeeMac to international duty, we were missing Finkler due to injury, Krishna was touch and go to start and was carrying a niggle, Kaluderovic and Vidisic are both still quite far off being match fit, etc.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Very difficult to get a result against this particular team on their home patch,keepers are a worry one very young and the other a bit daft ,Durante's pace at the back a big concern as well,having said that we have a very combative midfield and strikers who know where the net is so we can live in hope! 

I would happily settle for a 0-0 draw!

The answer to life's problems are rarely found at the bottom of a beer glass - but it's always worth a look.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Kiwi Jambo wrote:

Very difficult to get a result against this particular team on their home patch,keepers are a worry one very young and the other a bit daft ,Durante's pace at the back a big concern as well,having said that we have a very combative midfield and strikers who know where the net is so we can live in hope! 

I would happily settle for a 0-0 draw!

I'll be delighted with a draw

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Hard News wrote:

What makes you think he hasn't already made up his mind NZP?  We've had one game and one keeper plus the last pre-seaon games all used that keeper.

I meant given the barrage of comments he has faced since Sunday...I hope he either sticks to his guns and keeps Smith in (my preferred choice) or if he decides the lad isn't ready yet, explain to him why and chuck someone else in with a view to make him the #1 for the foreseeable future.

I think our back line looked shaky enough without needing to add worries about who is going to keep for us week in week out.

If we have a Coach who's making team selections based on comments on social media etc, then I'll be far more concerned about that than who's wearing the GK shirt.

Smith was shakier than a flatpack bookcase from the Warehouse last weekend but it was his debut and, although he was ropey, I didn't think he actually had a bad game, as such. He was just unconvincing and nervy. I'd be very surprised if he doesn't start this week. 

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

I think the fact that he started in the first game of the season is an indication of how the coach sees the matter.

However, he is entitled to change his line up as he sees fit and I agree he shouldn't do that based on what others think.

To me the only serious problem is Smiths long-distance kicking. In the modern game you can't get away with your CB taking goal kicks as it exposes you too much. Hopefully they sorted that out with extra training this week and Smith will start in goal again come Sunday.


VUW AFC - Victoria University Football for life

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

mjp2 wrote:

It'll be Smith.  And we'll have to be a lot better for it not to be Sydney. 

But I am still trying to figure how good that draw was v Adelaide. Points a point.  But based on pace of the game and quality and chances Adelaide might have taken, I'd say not too good. 

But we'll get better. 

Better enough for a result v Sydney.  Big call, but life and hope and all that.  After all, the AWs are going to beat Peru, so why not us beat Sydney?

Bring it on.  I'd be ecstatic with a 1-1.  And Smith not getting broken by some pretty agressive Sydney play on him.  You can see that coming a mile away.  Hope he's got an enforcer backing him, or he has real pointy elbows and knees.  

I do recall him leaving Adelaide strikers strewn in his wake and complaining to the ref a couple of times. Being honest seeing how Smith goes is something I'm really looking forward to



Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago
  1. Gargamel
  2. Gargamel
  3. Gargamel
  4. Gargamel
  5. Gargamel
  6. Gargamel
  7. Gargamel
  8. Gargamel
  9. Gargamel
  10. Gargamel
  11. Gargamel

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

martinb wrote:

mjp2 wrote:

It'll be Smith.  And we'll have to be a lot better for it not to be Sydney. 

But I am still trying to figure how good that draw was v Adelaide. Points a point.  But based on pace of the game and quality and chances Adelaide might have taken, I'd say not too good. 

But we'll get better. 

Better enough for a result v Sydney.  Big call, but life and hope and all that.  After all, the AWs are going to beat Peru, so why not us beat Sydney?

Bring it on.  I'd be ecstatic with a 1-1.  And Smith not getting broken by some pretty agressive Sydney play on him.  You can see that coming a mile away.  Hope he's got an enforcer backing him, or he has real pointy elbows and knees.  

I do recall him leaving Adelaide strikers strewn in his wake and complaining to the ref a couple of times. Being honest seeing how Smith goes is something I'm really looking forward to

Yep.  He's quite a story and seems quite a character.  I quite liked his first game and, no offence to Italiano, and feeling for that guy, I hope Smith does well.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

in the modern game, why are we hoofing goal kicks into the opposite half? Who are we expecting to win us these balls, Krishna, finkler, mcglinchey,

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

mjp2 wrote:

It'll be Smith.  And we'll have to be a lot better for it not to be Sydney. 

But I am still trying to figure how good that draw was v Adelaide. Points a point.  But based on pace of the game and quality and chances Adelaide might have taken, I'd say not too good. 

But we'll get better. 

Better enough for a result v Sydney.  Big call, but life and hope and all that.  After all, the AWs are going to beat Peru, so why not us beat Sydney?

Bring it on.  I'd be ecstatic with a 1-1.  And Smith not getting broken by some pretty agressive Sydney play on him.  You can see that coming a mile away.  Hope he's got an enforcer backing him, or he has real pointy elbows and knees.  

On the pointy elbow and knees comment, there was one occasion in the game where Smith went up with his knees raised to protect himself and give the attacker second thoughts, a real positive  - I don't think he has a problem there, its probably more a timing issue for him, getting used to the pace of the game and the speed at that level by individual attackers.
Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

The Adelaide game is fish & chip wrapper now - I'm really looking forward to us playing Sydney  

COYN

                                                                        COYN    

Permalink Permalink