Wellington Phoenix Men

R4 vs Melbourne Victory | Mon 31 Oct | 9:50pm | SS2

481 replies · 36,218 views
over 9 years ago

Jerzy Merino wrote:

Surge wrote:

The morning after the night before - and the highlight for me was going to bed at half time.

As many will know I"m far from a footballing tactical genius (in other words, I'm like everyone else on here - whether some admit it or not), though I can't see what we're trying to do, or how. Our midfield has no shape, nor does our defence - whilst our "star" attackers run around waiting for the ball to land at their feet as if by magic - which it doesn't.

We have fullbacks who aren't good defenders;which is further exposed as  we haven't even close to adequately replaced Albert Riera (even last seasons version which was admittedly a downgrade on what we saw in previous seasons); Roly looks like he doesn't know whether he's coming or going; Dura is yelling a lot and looking frustrated; Vinnie is Vinnie - giving his guts but he isn't what he isn't (and nor will he ever be); WeeMac has vanished without a trace into the mists of the Scottish highlands; and Kosta can't seem to work out how to play football in a yellow (grey, or black) shirt as he does/did in a white or blue one. Roy is showing glimpses, but again he seems to be unsure or unable to play the role that he's being asked to.

It seems to me like Ernie (and I love the bloke) has continually tried to play the way he sees us playing in his head (which we saw a brief glimpse of when Burnsy was on fire); but hasn't recognised that the league has moved on (opponents have us sussed, as they did later in Burnsys golden season) and, we simply don't have the players to play that kind of game efficiently or effectively.

What's the answer? ImfudgeedifIknow - but I do know the definition of insanity, as I'm sure most of you do too.

Something must change, and it must change on Saturday night.

It can't change because the squad is just way too thin. It's screamingly obvious that there's no true competition for 1st team places, and this has been the problem for the last few years - since we made the play-offs. Ernie can only operate with what he has, so he's partly to blame by bringing in below par players. But the fault is mainly in the way the club is set up imo. Not enough ambition. Nobody willing to stump up proper dosh for real class. But hey, we got the licence extension ... and there's no relegation to worry about. So hey, no worries. Except we've turned into a bunch of losers.

we have two marquees, mature age rookie, home grown players etc. So we spend a lot of money, we are never going to be a club that spends nine million like city. It's not for lack of ambition, our owners can't throw around that sort of dough.
Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

So lets look at this with some rose coloured glasses for a moment and play a little "What if"

If Rossi plays, we don't have Fox and perhaps we stay with 11 for 90 mins and we don't concede one penalty so you perhaps come down from a 6-1 to a 4-1, maybe 3-1

You put in Doyle for Parkhouse and it may be a little tighter. Perhaps still 3-1
You disallow the goal where Berisha fouls sharkhouse but the result of that foul was away from the ball and action so was sharkhouse going to be an effect? Maybe, maybe not. Still 3-1

Going into the game, no one really expected anything more than a loss and most people predicted 3 goals. With the above (and absolutely its glossing over some things) its probably about what we expected considering.

How many chances did MV create, a couple of pens aside, while we had parity on the pitch and even for about 10-15min while we were a man down. If Doyle and Rossi played, huge hypothetical you are suggesting, maybe only 1 pen for MV and we have parity throughout the game and Berisha doesn't push Doyle off the ball - hard to see MV creating that many more chances to get 2 more goals on top of the first pen based on their performance for the first 70min. 

MV were poor, we gave them 2 goals and then if that wasn't enough we gave them a man advantage - I don't think that MV fans should be so bullish after their own teams performance for almost 70min of that game and considering all the help we, and (Nix glasses on) the ref gave them.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Jerzy Merino wrote:

Surge wrote:

The morning after the night before - and the highlight for me was going to bed at half time.

As many will know I"m far from a footballing tactical genius (in other words, I'm like everyone else on here - whether some admit it or not), though I can't see what we're trying to do, or how. Our midfield has no shape, nor does our defence - whilst our "star" attackers run around waiting for the ball to land at their feet as if by magic - which it doesn't.

We have fullbacks who aren't good defenders;which is further exposed as  we haven't even close to adequately replaced Albert Riera (even last seasons version which was admittedly a downgrade on what we saw in previous seasons); Roly looks like he doesn't know whether he's coming or going; Dura is yelling a lot and looking frustrated; Vinnie is Vinnie - giving his guts but he isn't what he isn't (and nor will he ever be); WeeMac has vanished without a trace into the mists of the Scottish highlands; and Kosta can't seem to work out how to play football in a yellow (grey, or black) shirt as he does/did in a white or blue one. Roy is showing glimpses, but again he seems to be unsure or unable to play the role that he's being asked to.

It seems to me like Ernie (and I love the bloke) has continually tried to play the way he sees us playing in his head (which we saw a brief glimpse of when Burnsy was on fire); but hasn't recognised that the league has moved on (opponents have us sussed, as they did later in Burnsys golden season) and, we simply don't have the players to play that kind of game efficiently or effectively.

What's the answer? ImfudgeedifIknow - but I do know the definition of insanity, as I'm sure most of you do too.

Something must change, and it must change on Saturday night.

It can't change because the squad is just way too thin. It's screamingly obvious that there's no true competition for 1st team places, and this has been the problem for the last few years - since we made the play-offs. Ernie can only operate with what he has, so he's partly to blame by bringing in below par players. But the fault is mainly in the way the club is set up imo. Not enough ambition. Nobody willing to stump up proper dosh for real class. But hey, we got the licence extension ... and there's no relegation to worry about. So hey, no worries. Except we've turned into a bunch of losers.

We have two marquees. Central Coast and Newcastle have none. Wanderers and Perth have one. Everyone else has two. Perth have managed to put together a very good squad with one marquee and the Wanderers also look a lot better than us. I get that our marquees probably aren't on huge money but we don't have the worst budget in the league but we appear to have the worst squad.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

It maybe old fashioned, but for me at times like this , it is almost circle the wagons and park a big arse yellow and black bus in the middle of our Penalty Area. Back four of Doyle Rossi Dura and Tratt then two Defensive Midfielders Probably Vinnie and A Rod, A Midfield of Roly, Finkler and Kosta and Roy up top.

We have tried "sexy" football and for a number of reasons, apart from half a season two seasons ago it just ain't working. Start grinding out some results. As it sits now, I would probably be happy with a Nil all draw against the Jets. God knows what will happen when we maybe without 6 against the Salty Dogs

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Bring back the long ball days.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

sthn.jeff wrote:

It maybe old fashioned, but for me at times like this , it is almost circle the wagons and park a big arse yellow and black bus in the middle of our Penalty Area. Back four of Doyle Rossi Dura and Tratt then two Defensive Midfielders Probably Vinnie and A Rod, A Midfield of Roly, Finkler and Kosta and Roy up top.

We have tried "sexy" football and for a number of reasons, apart from half a season two seasons ago it just ain't working. Start grinding out some results. As it sits now, I would probably be happy with a Nil all draw against the Jets. God knows what will happen when we maybe without 6 against the Salty Dogs

I agree with the sentiment.  Start from the back, start defending properly and keeping clean sheets then try and add the attacking gloss.  3 clean sheets in 31 games now (over this season and last) indicates that Merrick just can't get the defence right though.

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

In the press conference Ernie said that he was going to bring on a defender when we went a man down but the team asked him to bring on an attacker and that they wanted to go for it. He said he knew it was the wrong move but what did they have to loose?

I don't think parking the bus is the solution the team isn't as bad as results suggest.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Ryan wrote:

In the press conference Ernie said that he was going to bring on a defender when we went a man down but the team asked him to bring on an attacker and that they wanted to go for it. He said he knew it was the wrong move but what did they have to loose?

I don't think parking the bus is the solution the team isn't as bad as results suggest.

If we miss out on a finals spot on goal difference then we can look at this game and say what if, but at that point of the game we were doing ok and a 2-0 loss is the same as a 6-1 loss for the amount of points we get.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Ryan wrote:

In the press conference Ernie said that he was going to bring on a defender when we went a man down but the team asked him to bring on an attacker and that they wanted to go for it. He said he knew it was the wrong move but what did they have to loose?

I don't think parking the bus is the solution the team isn't as bad as results suggest.

then what are they suggesting?

I am not saying do it forever, just get some confidence. Make it difficult for teams to score.

We will always find an excuse. I mean some are blaming ref for last night.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Ryan wrote:

I don't think parking the bus is the solution the team isn't as bad as results suggest.

I think even if we play to our potential, we're still a good DM and a good fullback way from a top 6 team

I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

james dean wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

It maybe old fashioned, but for me at times like this , it is almost circle the wagons and park a big arse yellow and black bus in the middle of our Penalty Area. Back four of Doyle Rossi Dura and Tratt then two Defensive Midfielders Probably Vinnie and A Rod, A Midfield of Roly, Finkler and Kosta and Roy up top.

We have tried "sexy" football and for a number of reasons, apart from half a season two seasons ago it just ain't working. Start grinding out some results. As it sits now, I would probably be happy with a Nil all draw against the Jets. God knows what will happen when we maybe without 6 against the Salty Dogs

I agree with the sentiment.  Start from the back, start defending properly and keeping clean sheets then try and add the attacking gloss.  3 clean sheets in 31 games now (over this season and last) indicates that Merrick just can't get the defence right though.

So much this as much as some hate to admit I can't seem to many people complaining when the ROF was considered a fortress and teams hated playing here. I for one am well and truly over Ernies and Welnixs BS excuses you want crowds and people to support then give us a team that displays as much passion as your fans. It's time you guys delivered on all your BS.

GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Bullion wrote:

Ryan wrote:

In the press conference Ernie said that he was going to bring on a defender when we went a man down but the team asked him to bring on an attacker and that they wanted to go for it. He said he knew it was the wrong move but what did they have to loose?

I don't think parking the bus is the solution the team isn't as bad as results suggest.

If we miss out on a finals spot on goal difference then we can look at this game and say what if, but at that point of the game we were doing ok and a 2-0 loss is the same as a 6-1 loss for the amount of points we get.

He also took of Finkler for Ridenton who is, as best we can tell a DM. All due respect to Ridenton, he is a good kid with some potential, but that is not going to be a move that pulls something out of the fire and wins you a match against all odds.
Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

as an aside, how many competitions in any sport do 60% of the teams get into the play offs!

I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Ryan wrote:

In the press conference Ernie said that he was going to bring on a defender when we went a man down but the team asked him to bring on an attacker and that they wanted to go for it. He said he knew it was the wrong move but what did they have to loose?

What a feeble excuse.

Merrick saying "we got what we deserved", perhaps he's nonplussed about his continuing employment here.

A fan is a fan.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

james dean wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

It maybe old fashioned, but for me at times like this , it is almost circle the wagons and park a big arse yellow and black bus in the middle of our Penalty Area. Back four of Doyle Rossi Dura and Tratt then two Defensive Midfielders Probably Vinnie and A Rod, A Midfield of Roly, Finkler and Kosta and Roy up top.

We have tried "sexy" football and for a number of reasons, apart from half a season two seasons ago it just ain't working. Start grinding out some results. As it sits now, I would probably be happy with a Nil all draw against the Jets. God knows what will happen when we maybe without 6 against the Salty Dogs

I agree with the sentiment.  Start from the back, start defending properly and keeping clean sheets then try and add the attacking gloss.  3 clean sheets in 31 games now (over this season and last) indicates that Merrick just can't get the defence right though.

Yeah, we need to stop goals, you pick up points with boring 0-0 draws.

We have had 10 clean sheets in 58 games under Merrick, however 7 of them were from 2014/15 season. Only 3 since and none in last 17 games

I'm an optimistic pessimist. 
I'm positive things will go wrong.
Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Yakcall wrote:

james dean wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

It maybe old fashioned, but for me at times like this , it is almost circle the wagons and park a big arse yellow and black bus in the middle of our Penalty Area. Back four of Doyle Rossi Dura and Tratt then two Defensive Midfielders Probably Vinnie and A Rod, A Midfield of Roly, Finkler and Kosta and Roy up top.

We have tried "sexy" football and for a number of reasons, apart from half a season two seasons ago it just ain't working. Start grinding out some results. As it sits now, I would probably be happy with a Nil all draw against the Jets. God knows what will happen when we maybe without 6 against the Salty Dogs

I agree with the sentiment.  Start from the back, start defending properly and keeping clean sheets then try and add the attacking gloss.  3 clean sheets in 31 games now (over this season and last) indicates that Merrick just can't get the defence right though.

Yeah, we need to stop goals, you pick up points with boring 0-0 draws.

We have had 10 clean sheets in 58 games under Merrick, however 7 of them were from 2014/15 season. Only 3 since and none in last 17 games

wow did not realise the none in 17. That is terrible
Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Can one of you photoshop kids put Dura and Marco in this? Ta.

E + R + O

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Surge wrote:

Can one of you photoshop kids put Dura and Marco in this? Ta.

And about 5 others !

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

sthn.jeff wrote:

Yakcall wrote:

james dean wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

It maybe old fashioned, but for me at times like this , it is almost circle the wagons and park a big arse yellow and black bus in the middle of our Penalty Area. Back four of Doyle Rossi Dura and Tratt then two Defensive Midfielders Probably Vinnie and A Rod, A Midfield of Roly, Finkler and Kosta and Roy up top.

We have tried "sexy" football and for a number of reasons, apart from half a season two seasons ago it just ain't working. Start grinding out some results. As it sits now, I would probably be happy with a Nil all draw against the Jets. God knows what will happen when we maybe without 6 against the Salty Dogs

I agree with the sentiment.  Start from the back, start defending properly and keeping clean sheets then try and add the attacking gloss.  3 clean sheets in 31 games now (over this season and last) indicates that Merrick just can't get the defence right though.

Yeah, we need to stop goals, you pick up points with boring 0-0 draws.

We have had 10 clean sheets in 58 games under Merrick, however 7 of them were from 2014/15 season. Only 3 since and none in last 17 games

wow did not realise the none in 17. That is terrible

And 3 in 31.

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Ryan wrote:

In the press conference Ernie said that he was going to bring on a defender when we went a man down but the team asked him to bring on an attacker and that they wanted to go for it. He said he knew it was the wrong move but what did they have to loose?

I don't think parking the bus is the solution the team isn't as bad as results suggest.

I find this quite interesting, in what other way do you measure performance other than the score given the aim of the game is to score more goals than the opposition, something we haven't done now for a long time

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

sthn.jeff wrote:

It maybe old fashioned, but for me at times like this , it is almost circle the wagons and park a big arse yellow and black bus in the middle of our Penalty Area. Back four of Doyle Rossi Dura and Tratt then two Defensive Midfielders Probably Vinnie and A Rod, A Midfield of Roly, Finkler and Kosta and Roy up top.

We have tried "sexy" football and for a number of reasons, apart from half a season two seasons ago it just ain't working. Start grinding out some results. As it sits now, I would probably be happy with a Nil all draw against the Jets. God knows what will happen when we maybe without 6 against the Salty Dogs

The problem with your ideal line up is that is almost exactly how we have been playing. In round 2 we picked that exact same side except we had Parkhouse playing instead of Doyle and McGlinchey playing instead of A-Rod. In round 3 we picked that exact side except we had McGlinchey ahead of A-Rod. Doyle is a better player than Parkhouse but Doyle is not a top wing back for this league. Is picking A-Rod ahead of McGlinchey going to make a huge difference defensively? 

I think your line up just shows the problem with our squad. Your park the bus line up is almost identical to Merrick's sexy football line up, with a slight formation change.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

james dean wrote:

Ryan wrote:

In the press conference Ernie said that he was going to bring on a defender when we went a man down but the team asked him to bring on an attacker and that they wanted to go for it. He said he knew it was the wrong move but what did they have to loose?

I don't think parking the bus is the solution the team isn't as bad as results suggest.

I find this quite interesting, in what other way do you measure performance other than the score given the aim of the game is to score more goals than the opposition, something we haven't done now for a long time

because I have eyes and a brain and can draw my own conclusions.
Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

I liked the way we were playing when we went to 10 men for that short period before the 4 goal. Anyway bring on the Jets for some much needed points.

Mr Positive

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

james dean wrote:

Ryan wrote:

In the press conference Ernie said that he was going to bring on a defender when we went a man down but the team asked him to bring on an attacker and that they wanted to go for it. He said he knew it was the wrong move but what did they have to loose?

I don't think parking the bus is the solution the team isn't as bad as results suggest.

I find this quite interesting, in what other way do you measure performance other than the score given the aim of the game is to score more goals than the opposition, something we haven't done now for a long time

In a sample of one game that can be influenced by ref's decisions or small margins that go against you, you should look to see what your performance was like - because it is about having a repeatable process. 

You have to look to see if the process over a period of time is not getting results, then you start to question the process.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

james dean wrote:

Ryan wrote:

In the press conference Ernie said that he was going to bring on a defender when we went a man down but the team asked him to bring on an attacker and that they wanted to go for it. He said he knew it was the wrong move but what did they have to loose?

I don't think parking the bus is the solution the team isn't as bad as results suggest.

I find this quite interesting, in what other way do you measure performance other than the score given the aim of the game is to score more goals than the opposition, something we haven't done now for a long time

His point is fair enough - to an extent.

We have played the top 4 teams in the competition. We have gone to Melbourne where we hardly ever win. In round 1 we lacked our all whites, in round 2 the all whites were just coming back, in round 3 we outplayed Sydney before they struck late and, in round 4, we lose to Melbourne with a score line exacerbated by a red card and refereeing decisions. Parkhouse and Tratt were only signed late in the pre season as well.

The problem with this analysis is that we will have another 4 games this season affected by international windows. We need to gain points in those games. Furthermore, for the most part in the games we have lost we haven't looked to play any differently than we did last season (a style which has been found out). 

The truth is probably somewhere in between. We do have attacking weapons and we should score some goals at some point. I just don't think we will end up in the top 6 and that has to be the minimum requirement.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Ryan wrote:

james dean wrote:

Ryan wrote:

In the press conference Ernie said that he was going to bring on a defender when we went a man down but the team asked him to bring on an attacker and that they wanted to go for it. He said he knew it was the wrong move but what did they have to loose?

I don't think parking the bus is the solution the team isn't as bad as results suggest.

I find this quite interesting, in what other way do you measure performance other than the score given the aim of the game is to score more goals than the opposition, something we haven't done now for a long time

because I have eyes and a brain and can draw my own conclusions.

The absolute state of this comment. Have a word with yourself mate.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Ryan54 wrote:

james dean wrote:

Ryan wrote:

In the press conference Ernie said that he was going to bring on a defender when we went a man down but the team asked him to bring on an attacker and that they wanted to go for it. He said he knew it was the wrong move but what did they have to loose?

I don't think parking the bus is the solution the team isn't as bad as results suggest.

I find this quite interesting, in what other way do you measure performance other than the score given the aim of the game is to score more goals than the opposition, something we haven't done now for a long time

His point is fair enough - to an extent.

We have played the top 4 teams in the competition. We have gone to Melbourne where we hardly ever win. In round 1 we lacked our all whites, in round 2 the all whites were just coming back, in round 3 we outplayed Sydney before they struck late and, in round 4, we lose to Melbourne with a score line exacerbated by a red card and refereeing decisions. Parkhouse and Tratt were only signed late in the pre season as well.

The problem with this analysis is that we will have another 4 games this season affected by international windows. We need to gain points in those games. Furthermore, for the most part in the games we have lost we haven't looked to play any differently than we did last season (a style which has been found out). 

The truth is probably somewhere in between. We do have attacking weapons and we should score some goals at some point. I just don't think we will end up in the top 6 and that has to be the minimum requirement.

Think we need to cancel playing in Melbourne on Melbourne Cup eve.

I'm an optimistic pessimist. 
I'm positive things will go wrong.
Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Buffon II wrote:

Ryan wrote:

james dean wrote:

Ryan wrote:

In the press conference Ernie said that he was going to bring on a defender when we went a man down but the team asked him to bring on an attacker and that they wanted to go for it. He said he knew it was the wrong move but what did they have to loose?

I don't think parking the bus is the solution the team isn't as bad as results suggest.

I find this quite interesting, in what other way do you measure performance other than the score given the aim of the game is to score more goals than the opposition, something we haven't done now for a long time

because I have eyes and a brain and can draw my own conclusions.

The absolute state of this comment. Have a word with yourself mate.

whatever.
Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Play nice people. Play the ball and not the man!

I'm an optimistic pessimist. 
I'm positive things will go wrong.
Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Ryan54 wrote:

james dean wrote:

Ryan wrote:

In the press conference Ernie said that he was going to bring on a defender when we went a man down but the team asked him to bring on an attacker and that they wanted to go for it. He said he knew it was the wrong move but what did they have to loose?

I don't think parking the bus is the solution the team isn't as bad as results suggest.

I find this quite interesting, in what other way do you measure performance other than the score given the aim of the game is to score more goals than the opposition, something we haven't done now for a long time

His point is fair enough - to an extent.

We have played the top 4 teams in the competition. We have gone to Melbourne where we hardly ever win. In round 1 we lacked our all whites, in round 2 the all whites were just coming back, in round 3 we outplayed Sydney before they struck late and, in round 4, we lose to Melbourne with a score line exacerbated by a red card and refereeing decisions. Parkhouse and Tratt were only signed late in the pre season as well.

The problem with this analysis is that we will have another 4 games this season affected by international windows. We need to gain points in those games. Furthermore, for the most part in the games we have lost we haven't looked to play any differently than we did last season (a style which has been found out). 

The truth is probably somewhere in between. We do have attacking weapons and we should score some goals at some point. I just don't think we will end up in the top 6 and that has to be the minimum requirement.

We also had one very significant injury loss with Rossi.  And Fox had a 'mare as his replacement.  Plus Doyle and A-Rod out to injury were not insignificant impacts.

I still think we're mid table material with our starting line-up.  But with Lia a starter and two rookies at FB I can't see us getting much higher than that.  And, as you say, with the AWs windows (and unless we have a good run with injuries) we are not always going to start our top 11.

6th would be a reasonable result from here.  But we could surprise or die, depending entirely on who's fit, how our morale holds up and the extent that Ernie can get the midfield working better. 

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

So you are Dome/Morrison/Welnix board

You don't do over reactions

What do you do after tonights result?

Granted a sending off did not help, Rossi being injured did not help and we largely predicted a loss but its the manner in which we lost is quite worrying.

Even the diehard Fever exec that like to ignore match day angst have to admit that after the 1st couple of rounds, there is no real reason for that performance...

I think it is Roly doesn't equal Manny/Siggie/Albert. 

Roly is a star, but not a packhorse. He's the King's sword, but not the woodcutter's axe. We need a few more draught horses to pull our season along.



Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Cosimo wrote:

Someone posted an article a while back saying that for a team to be good, it is more important not to have bad players or weal links than to have "star" players. I think the Nix is a good example of this.

what I was trying to say above I think...



Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

sthn.jeff wrote:

Bullion wrote:

Ryan wrote:

In the press conference Ernie said that he was going to bring on a defender when we went a man down but the team asked him to bring on an attacker and that they wanted to go for it. He said he knew it was the wrong move but what did they have to loose?

I don't think parking the bus is the solution the team isn't as bad as results suggest.

If we miss out on a finals spot on goal difference then we can look at this game and say what if, but at that point of the game we were doing ok and a 2-0 loss is the same as a 6-1 loss for the amount of points we get.

He also took of Finkler for Ridenton who is, as best we can tell a DM. All due respect to Ridenton, he is a good kid with some potential, but that is not going to be a move that pulls something out of the fire and wins you a match against all odds.

Ridenton has scored a couple of winners for us and is at the least likely to be a livelier midfielder than Fink after 80 mins



Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Yakcall wrote:

Ryan54 wrote:

james dean wrote:

Ryan wrote:

In the press conference Ernie said that he was going to bring on a defender when we went a man down but the team asked him to bring on an attacker and that they wanted to go for it. He said he knew it was the wrong move but what did they have to loose?

I don't think parking the bus is the solution the team isn't as bad as results suggest.

I find this quite interesting, in what other way do you measure performance other than the score given the aim of the game is to score more goals than the opposition, something we haven't done now for a long time

His point is fair enough - to an extent.

We have played the top 4 teams in the competition. We have gone to Melbourne where we hardly ever win. In round 1 we lacked our all whites, in round 2 the all whites were just coming back, in round 3 we outplayed Sydney before they struck late and, in round 4, we lose to Melbourne with a score line exacerbated by a red card and refereeing decisions. Parkhouse and Tratt were only signed late in the pre season as well.

The problem with this analysis is that we will have another 4 games this season affected by international windows. We need to gain points in those games. Furthermore, for the most part in the games we have lost we haven't looked to play any differently than we did last season (a style which has been found out). 

The truth is probably somewhere in between. We do have attacking weapons and we should score some goals at some point. I just don't think we will end up in the top 6 and that has to be the minimum requirement.

Think we need to cancel playing in Melbourne on Melbourne Cup eve.

It's a stacked deck- but we know that. Which is why winning in Adelaide and moving up the table and so on is such an absolute rush



Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

martinb wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

So you are Dome/Morrison/Welnix board

You don't do over reactions

What do you do after tonights result?

Granted a sending off did not help, Rossi being injured did not help and we largely predicted a loss but its the manner in which we lost is quite worrying.

Even the diehard Fever exec that like to ignore match day angst have to admit that after the 1st couple of rounds, there is no real reason for that performance...

I think it is Roly doesn't equal Manny/Siggie/Albert. 

Roly is a star, but not a packhorse. He's the King's sword, but not the woodcutter's axe. We need a few more draught horses to pull our season along.

Roly is definitely overrated.
Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

C-Diddy wrote:

Hope everyone has lubed up. We're all getting fudgeed tonight!!!

Accurate

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Ryan wrote:

Jerzy Merino wrote:

Surge wrote:

The morning after the night before - and the highlight for me was going to bed at half time.

As many will know I"m far from a footballing tactical genius (in other words, I'm like everyone else on here - whether some admit it or not), though I can't see what we're trying to do, or how. Our midfield has no shape, nor does our defence - whilst our "star" attackers run around waiting for the ball to land at their feet as if by magic - which it doesn't.

We have fullbacks who aren't good defenders;which is further exposed as  we haven't even close to adequately replaced Albert Riera (even last seasons version which was admittedly a downgrade on what we saw in previous seasons); Roly looks like he doesn't know whether he's coming or going; Dura is yelling a lot and looking frustrated; Vinnie is Vinnie - giving his guts but he isn't what he isn't (and nor will he ever be); WeeMac has vanished without a trace into the mists of the Scottish highlands; and Kosta can't seem to work out how to play football in a yellow (grey, or black) shirt as he does/did in a white or blue one. Roy is showing glimpses, but again he seems to be unsure or unable to play the role that he's being asked to.

It seems to me like Ernie (and I love the bloke) has continually tried to play the way he sees us playing in his head (which we saw a brief glimpse of when Burnsy was on fire); but hasn't recognised that the league has moved on (opponents have us sussed, as they did later in Burnsys golden season) and, we simply don't have the players to play that kind of game efficiently or effectively.

What's the answer? ImfudgeedifIknow - but I do know the definition of insanity, as I'm sure most of you do too.

Something must change, and it must change on Saturday night.

It can't change because the squad is just way too thin. It's screamingly obvious that there's no true competition for 1st team places, and this has been the problem for the last few years - since we made the play-offs. Ernie can only operate with what he has, so he's partly to blame by bringing in below par players. But the fault is mainly in the way the club is set up imo. Not enough ambition. Nobody willing to stump up proper dosh for real class. But hey, we got the licence extension ... and there's no relegation to worry about. So hey, no worries. Except we've turned into a bunch of losers.

we have two marquees, mature age rookie, home grown players etc. So we spend a lot of money, we are never going to be a club that spends nine million like city. It's not for lack of ambition, our owners can't throw around that sort of dough.

Then it is lack of ambition isn't it?
Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Balbi wrote:

"You look at this front four, the quality they have..."

Yeah, shame there's absolutely nothing going on behind them.

Reckon

Nix will lose at least one to a red card and ship another couple. Score a consolation goal though.

WITCH!

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago · edited over 9 years ago · History

I posted a comment some time earlier, several weeks ago, which was to all purposes a pisstake - that we have "excellent players who all together form a team that cannot win (draw?) a game".  However, in light of the last three games, I would suggest some of that is true.

  • It bothers me that we seemed to have neither the speed (urgency) nor anticipation regarding movement / transition;
  • It bothers me that we seem to have poor accuracy of passing compared to MV;
  • It bothers me that in light of an inexperienced backline there was no stepping up from Roly - quite the opposite;

The last point might be remedied with time. Tratt may eventually mature into a fullback worthy of Manny Muscat's mantle, but Parkhouse and Fox were both too green to cope with Berisha and Rojas (Durante was actually not too bad in contrast).  Rossi may be good, but he cost us a loss against Sydney.  The first two items seem to be related to lack of mutual familiarity and poor supplementary coaching (the one that is not necessarily handled by Ernie in person, but which he is ultimately responsible for).

I miss Siggy, Manny, early Riera, and Boxall - for their tenacity, speed, and gumption, which we have not shown much as yet this season.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Here is a thought, maybe the top 4 teams are top because they have played us, rather than us being bottom because we have played the top 4 teams. Other teams presently licking their lips for the chance to play us

Permalink Permalink