Wellington Phoenix Men

Refereeing Decisions v Perth

51 replies · 1,735 views
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Refereeing Decisions v Perth
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
So the Inbreds from the far, far West have decided that the reason they lost was the referee.

Apparently, coveny's goal was offside from Covs
Felipe was offside for the 2nd
Both red cards weren't just


Just seen the replay, and with the aid of MySky, these are my views:

Covs is so far onside its not funny
Felipe was behind Elrich when he passed it. Onside.
Last man tackle from behind - red
Harnwell tackle - Probably harsh. A yellow I would say.

Your views?

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
100% agree with you.
 
Felipe was on, have been saying that to mates in the last 12hours,
 
i think both  tackles were straight reds IMO

ive got a song that wont take long, Adelaide are rubbish.. the second verse is same as the first.. ADELAIDE ARE RUBBISH

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I have been one to crictise refs. This time i say this ref was very good. He was consistant with his decisions, he kept up with play and his man-management of the players was very good. He dealt the shambles with Smeltz and the Perth player very well. This was a physical game and the ref could have lost control of the game quite quickly. This ref has so far been the best by far. He is head and shoulders above the rest, in fact there is daylight back to second, who ever that may be. My request, read begging, can he ref the Phoenix very week.  The cards were issued at the right time, the second may have been a bit harsh, but he was consistant. Perth tryed to get a Phoenix player sent off but the ref did not fall for their plan. GO PHOENIX !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
seemed to be in control, however i think the linesmen are always pretty late with their calls and fairly indecisive
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The forum of which they come from is amusing to read. Filled of mindless 5 year olds...

ive got a song that wont take long, Adelaide are rubbish.. the second verse is same as the first.. ADELAIDE ARE RUBBISH

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think the offside is from the pass to Smeltz to Felipe. Maybe, maybe not.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
isnt it about time that the 50-50 calls went the Phoenix way, i mean we have certainly had our fair share of rough calls and its only half way through the first season.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Pause your youtube clip at the crucial point and it's clear to me that Felipe was behind Smeltz as the final pass was made: goal.

As for the send-offs, I would've been gutted if our guys had got two straight reds like that. It was a penalty, sure, but even without the tackle from behind Coveny would have been shooting from quite a wide angle, so whether he was technically through on goal or not I'm not sure. One of you refs will be able to tell us, as I'm much too lazy to go in search of the rules.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The Felipe goal? Looked just on to me. Maybe 50/50, but I haven't seen enough replays.

1st red card. Spot on, Coveny through one on one with the keeper if he hadn't been chopped. Going wide or not, it looked like an Obvious Goalscoring Opportunity to me. Once he gave the penalty, the red card was a formality.

Harnwell tackle. I reckon he got it right again. I won't go into 'Careless, Reckless, Excessive Force' referee speak, but I think the "tackle" just about covered all 3. From behind, in the air and nowhere near the ball. Deserved to go. The only one who didn't seem to be complaining that much about the decision was Harnwell himself.

As for linesmen making late calls. The changes to the interpretation of the Offside law mean that, in a lot of cases, the Lino has to wait before flagging, even if it looks like an obvious decision.

I thought all 3 officials had a good game.

Auckland Jag2007-12-08 18:49:51

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
isnt it about time that the 50-50 calls went the Phoenix way, i mean we have certainly had our fair share of rough calls and its only half way through the first season.




Thats true.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The Felipe goal is 100% onside. I though it was Elrich that played the final ball though? Whoever passed it to Felipe is in front of Felipe, therefore Felipe has to be onside
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Auckland Jag wrote:
The Felipe goal? Looked just on to me. Maybe 50/50, but I haven't seen enough replays.

1st red card. Spot on, Coveny through one on one with the keeper if he hadn't been chopped. Going wide or not, it looked like an Obvious Goalscoring Opportunity to me. Once he gave the penalty, the red card was a formality.

Harnwell tackle. I reckon he got it right again. I won't go into 'Careless, Reckless, Excessive Force' referee speak, but I think the "tackle" just about covered all 3. From behind, in the air and nowhere near the ball. Deserved to go. The only one who didn't seem to be complaining that much about the decision was Harnwell himself.

As for linesmen making late calls. The changes to the interpretation of the Offside law mean that, in a lot of cases, the Lino has to wait before flagging, even if it looks like an obvious decision.

I thought all 3 officials had a good game.

 
Exactly how I saw it.  The Perth coach after the game said that he was disappointed with the tackle, it was unnecessary and ordinary was the vibe he gave out, he made a point of saying he he sat down with Harnwell and told him to watch it basically.  I thought it was a definite red card, the ball was ahead of where Coveny was, Harnwell comes from a horizontal line, never attempts to get the ball, is slightly in the air, it's clumsy and had danger in it for Vaughan.  Tackles where a player is not going for the ball... you leave yourself at the whim of the referee and deserve everything you get.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Wolfben wrote:
The Felipe goal is 100% onside. I though it was Elrich that played the final ball though? Whoever passed it to Felipe is in front of Felipe, therefore Felipe has to be onside
 
I think it may have been Shane Smeltz, Elrich lays it off outside the box after a good run to Smeltz, and then onto Felipe... GGGGGGGGGGGGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I haven't seen enough replays but I'm pretty sure Felipe's goal was offside. Elrish passed it to Smeltz on the right who passed it forward to Felipe who was behind every single one of the Perth players (in my view) when the ball left Smeltz' foot.

I thought the first red card was the right decision, but Harnwell only deserved a yellow.

Overall, all of the officials did well.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I haven't seen enough replays but I'm pretty sure Felipe's goal was offside. Elrish passed it to Smeltz on the right who passed it forward to Felipe who was behind every single one of the Perth players (in my view) when the ball left Smeltz' foot.
.
 
aye? you saying he was on or off?
I think Felipe was in-line or behind Smeltz

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I haven't seen enough replays but I'm pretty sure Felipe's goal was offside. Elrish passed it to Smeltz on the right who passed it forward to Felipe who was behind every single one of the Perth players (in my view) when the ball left Smeltz' foot.
I don't think being ahead of the Perth players is the issue, its was he in front of the ball?  Like they say above, watch on youtube and decide for yourself.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I've watched replays all day today, but not because I want to check if it was onside. It was onside because the ref said so.
btw the refs have been very consistent with their red cards against our opposition every week. I just hope they remain consistent!
Oi Oi Edgecumbe2007-12-08 21:13:26

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ive played it over and over again on My Sky and Ive paused it, and Felipe is definetly behind the ball when it is played.

I dont know wether them getting a player sent off is a good thing or a bad thing - we dont know how to play against 10, or even 9 men
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The Felipe goal was boardrline. Unfortunately, there is no side on replay

1st red: Replays do not show conclusively what he played first HOWEVER the referee had good position

2nd red: two footed scissor lunge around the knee that was playing past the ball... Do you need a more obvious example of a red?

The only question I have is this

Why was Smeltz carded? It wasn't a shirt pull, he didn't get in the other guys face.
Why was the other guy not sent off. Contact above the neck region not relating to the ball. Strangulation Granted he was fouled but thats OTT. Come on Tom C, tell us.......

For his very first A-League game, Streb was pretty good
Agent 472007-12-08 21:24:01
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
WHO f**kING CARES ITZ A GOAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! gloryhole had to kick off afterwards. WE WON A CRUCIAL ,CRUCIAL GAME WEVE FINALLY STARTED OUR RUN TO THE TOP FOUR!!!!!!! PHOENIX!!
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Felipe nowhere to be seen when Smeltz has played the ball



Look at where the ball is when Felipe finally gets to where Smeltz played the ball


Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Great stuff.

Go post that on the Glory forum.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I originally thought it was offside as I thought the ball was played forward to Felipe who was behind the whole of the Perth team, but I stand corrected.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Doesnt matter if the ball was played forward, its the fact that Smeltz is in front of Felipe when the ball is played.


Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
If we had lost last night I still would not have blamed the ref. I thought he handled it well, let it run yet wasn't afraid to make the big calls when required. Long overdue getting someone who pretty much got it all correct.
Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Smeltz is behind the last defender when he plays the pass (IE he is closer to the keeper than any of the defense is) therefore there is no way that Felipe can be offside, regardless of where he is.

Otherwise if you have a break and you have a 2 on 1 against the keeper you would have an offside when squaring it to your other player, but of course this doesn't happen (as the defender is behind you when you play the pass).
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Nice one Wolfben.

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Agent 47 wrote:
The Felipe goal was boardrline. Unfortunately, there is no side on replay

1st red: Replays do not show conclusively what he played first HOWEVER the referee had good position

2nd red: two footed scissor lunge around the knee that was playing past the ball... Do you need a more obvious example of a red?

The only question I have is this

Why was Smeltz carded? It wasn't a shirt pull, he didn't get in the other guys face.
Why was the other guy not sent off. Contact above the neck region not relating to the ball. Strangulation Granted he was fouled but thats OTT. Come on Tom C, tell us.......

For his very first A-League game, Streb was pretty good
 
Dunno!!! Either booked him for the initial foul, or just for his part in the "handbags" afterwards.
 
I agree that grabbing an opponent round the throat is a very easy way of getting yourself sent off. Could very easily, and correctly, have got a red for that.  I think the ref did the right thing in that instance. Book 'em both, tell them to pack it in and get on with the game.
 
 

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Agent 47 wrote:
The Felipe goal was boardrline. Unfortunately, there is no side on replay
 
You can tell that he's behind the ball, by looking at the lines that are shaded into the pitch from the lawnmower. I have paused it on MySky and whilst Felipe is ahead of the last defender, he is definitely not ahead of the ball. I think the people who keep thinking it was off, don't realise that the definition of offside is, to quote the published LotG:

� he is nearer to his opponents� goal line than both the ball and the second last opponent

It reminds me of a couple of seasons back when reffing a juniors match - a parent tried to have a go when I didn't give an offside from a throw-in

 

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
KTBW wrote:
Smeltz is behind the last defender when he plays the pass (IE he is closer to the keeper than any of the defense is) therefore there is no way that Felipe can be offside, regardless of where he is.
 
If Felipe was ahead of Smeltz then Felipe would be offside so that "no way" is not correct.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Having seen photos and comments, I stand corrected on Felipes goal.

Apologies to all.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
From that first pic you posted Wolfben, it looks like Smeltz could have had a go himself
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
From that first pic you posted Wolfben, it looks like Smeltz could have had a go himself


He could,but if you look at Velaphi's position on the 2nd pic, it would have to have been a bloody precise shot to beat him.

Took the best option IMO
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Jag wrote:
Agent 47 wrote:
The Felipe goal was boardrline. Unfortunately, there is no side on replay

1st red: Replays do not show conclusively what he played first HOWEVER the referee had good position

2nd red: two footed scissor lunge around the knee that was playing past the ball... Do you need a more obvious example of a red?

The only question I have is this

Why was Smeltz carded? It wasn't a shirt pull, he didn't get in the other guys face.
Why was the other guy not sent off. Contact above the neck region not relating to the ball. Strangulation Granted he was fouled but thats OTT. Come on Tom C, tell us.......

For his very first A-League game, Streb was pretty good
 
 
Dunno!!! Either booked him for the initial foul, or just for his part in the "handbags" afterwards.
 
I agree that grabbing an opponent round the throat is a very easy way of getting yourself sent off. Could very easily, and correctly, have got a red for that.  I think the ref did the right thing in that instance. Book 'em both, tell them to pack it in and get on with the game.
 
I haven't seen the replay, but I was watching Smeltz fom the moment he started his run: it had the feel of recklessness all over it the nearer he got to the Perth Fella. Brilliant bit of passion, I just knew when he caught up with the guy that just standing him up would have been a better option than giving him a wee kick.
 
HarryHotspur2007-12-09 19:58:09
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
At first I thought Harnwell was unlucky but on replay with a tackle from behind and feet off the ground I don't think the ref had any choice.  The guy who grabbed the ref was a bit lucky too!
Selhurst Park, 25 January 1995
What else could he have done?
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
that was Djulbic, he put his hands on the ref twice in the match, waved his finger at him numerous times (just about saving him the bother of having to pick his own nose), and on a few occassions gave the ref a right old bollocking from about 1/2 a metre and i don't think the ref did a thing

I suppose he didn't want to have them down to 8 men, but he could have at least booked him (i don't think he'd got a yellow for any of his earlier tantrums)
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Name and Fame We are always quick to hand out abuse to the bad refs, but we have just gone two pages praising a ref without mentioning his name. He was SREBRE DELOVSKI, a 32 year old  Assistant Accountant. Well done Sreb. Come again soon.

We're Forever Causing Trouble

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
true. he was certainly one of the best was good old Srebre
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
uiron wrote:
Name and Fame We are always quick to hand out abuse to the bad refs, but we have just gone two pages praising a ref without mentioning his name. He was SREBRE DELOVSKI, a 32 year old  Assistant Accountant. Well done Sreb. Come again soon.
 
What a game to make your debut in. After hearing all the rumours from other referees about how hard a venue it is to officiate in, I bet he'll have gone back with a different opinion.
 
Note to other Australian Referees. All we want is some fair and unbiased refereeing. If we break the rules, sure punish us, but the same goes for the visiting Australian teams. Fairness, consistancy, it's not hard is it really?
 
 I wish Mr Delovski a successful career as a Referee. You have set your standard, all you have to do is maintain it. No doubt you will make the odd mistake but in our game you got it pretty much correct.
Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink