SKY
Three for me, and two for them.
Permalink
Permalink
A disgrace. A f**king joke outfit. If they had any competition in this country no one would f**king bother with the c**ts anymore.
Three for me, and two for them.
Permalink
Permalink
agree - you cant treat customers like this - unless you are a monopoly of course
Permalink
Permalink
agree - you cant treat customers like this - unless you are a monopoly of course
Monopoly? I didn't get monopoly?
I didn't even get free installation...!
Oh, hang on. Nevermind, carry on...
Permalink
Permalink
Feel like going and burning down their f**king c**ting buildings in the middle of the night.
Three for me, and two for them.
Permalink
Permalink
I'd rather watch extra time in the cricket than that shit.
Permalink
Permalink
what a sh*te outfit sky are...
" If you only have a hammer you tend to see every problem as a nail" - maslow
Permalink
Permalink
while we are having a laugh about laughable stuff- plenty of it today-
What is with Fox sport stopping in the middle of a football game to show inconsequential replays or shots of players for the commentators to talk about?
Football don't stop it keeps on going. Are these guys serious about having a world cup there?
What is with Fox sport stopping in the middle of a football game to show inconsequential replays or shots of players for the commentators to talk about?
Football don't stop it keeps on going. Are these guys serious about having a world cup there?
Permalink
Permalink
while we are having a laugh about laughable stuff- plenty of it today-
What is with Fox sport stopping in the middle of a football game to show inconsequential replays or shots of players for the commentators to talk about?
Football don't stop it keeps on going. Are these guys serious about having a world cup there?
What is with Fox sport stopping in the middle of a football game to show inconsequential replays or shots of players for the commentators to talk about?
Football don't stop it keeps on going. Are these guys serious about having a world cup there?
I agree whole-heartedly. everytime they go back for a 5th replay of a missed shot I scream in anger. They have no bloody sense of timing at all with their replays either!
Permalink
Permalink
seriously boys & girls, get a grip and grow up.
I was damn annoyed that the coverage ended up being delayed, but what were sky to do?
they had no idea exactly how long the cricket was going to go for - originally it was only going to run 5 minutes over time, until it unbelievably ended up a tie.
with live open tennis, and ODI cricket, already in full swing on the other channels, they simply had no choice.
considering they had to make a decision on the fly, with a constantly changing situation, I think they made the "best" decision.
I was damn annoyed that the coverage ended up being delayed, but what were sky to do?
they had no idea exactly how long the cricket was going to go for - originally it was only going to run 5 minutes over time, until it unbelievably ended up a tie.
with live open tennis, and ODI cricket, already in full swing on the other channels, they simply had no choice.
considering they had to make a decision on the fly, with a constantly changing situation, I think they made the "best" decision.
As cultured as Che Bunce's left foot and as profilic as John Lammers
Permalink
Permalink
seriously boys & girls, get a grip and grow up.
Do one.
Three for me, and two for them.
Permalink
Permalink
seriously boys & girls, get a grip and grow up.
Do one.
Grow up Buffy, plenty of times you are willing to dish it out. Learn to take it aswell.
www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com
Permalink
Permalink
seriously boys & girls, get a grip and grow up.
Do one.
Grow up Buffy, plenty of times you are willing to dish it out. Learn to take it aswell.
You can do one too. Anyone else??
Three for me, and two for them.
Permalink
Permalink
seriously boys & girls, get a grip and grow up.
I was damn annoyed that the coverage ended up being delayed, but what were sky to do?
they had no idea exactly how long the cricket was going to go for - originally it was only going to run 5 minutes over time, until it unbelievably ended up a tie.
with live open tennis, and ODI cricket, already in full swing on the other channels, they simply had no choice.
considering they had to make a decision on the fly, with a constantly changing situation, I think they made the "best" decision.
I was damn annoyed that the coverage ended up being delayed, but what were sky to do?
they had no idea exactly how long the cricket was going to go for - originally it was only going to run 5 minutes over time, until it unbelievably ended up a tie.
with live open tennis, and ODI cricket, already in full swing on the other channels, they simply had no choice.
considering they had to make a decision on the fly, with a constantly changing situation, I think they made the "best" decision.
This my friend, is spot on.
Permalink
Permalink
seriously boys & girls, get a grip and grow up.
Do one.
�
Grow up Buffy, plenty of times you are willing to dish it out. Learn to take it aswell.
Permalink
Permalink
seriously boys & girls, get a grip and grow up.
Do one.
Bit past your bed time love.
As cultured as Che Bunce's left foot and as profilic as John Lammers
Permalink
Permalink
seriously boys & girls, get a grip and grow up.
Do one.
Bit past your bed time love.
Don't call me love you sack of sh*t.
Three for me, and two for them.
Permalink
Permalink
seriously boys & girls, get a grip and grow up.
Do one.
Bit past your bed time love.
Don't call me love you sack of sh*t.
Nice, "buffy", you appear to have expanded your vocabulary to include four letter words.
As cultured as Che Bunce's left foot and as profilic as John Lammers
Permalink
Permalink
Maybe Sky had a sneak preview of the game and decided to try and put us off watching it. Circket lovely cricket
Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet
Permalink
Permalink
seriously boys & girls, get a grip and grow up.I was damn annoyed that the coverage ended up being delayed, but what were sky to do?they had no idea exactly how long the cricket was going to go for - originally it was only going to run 5 minutes over time, until it unbelievably ended up a tie.with live open tennis, and ODI cricket, already in full swing on the other channels, they simply had no choice.considering they had to make a decision on the fly, with a constantly changing situation, I think they made the "best" decision.
Put it on SS3 during the lunch break in the cricket which blended perfectly with the end of the football, then back to SS1 when the cricket finished there. Not hard, sky do that sort of thing all the time.
Permalink
Permalink
Ok guys what if it was this scenario...
The Phoenix are in a play off game, its all even at the end of the game so extra time is to be played, hold up lets just cut this coverage cause the cricket is about to start.
Would that be fair then?
The Phoenix are in a play off game, its all even at the end of the game so extra time is to be played, hold up lets just cut this coverage cause the cricket is about to start.
Would that be fair then?
Permalink
Permalink
I think the point being made is that from 8-8.30 on SS3 was a rugby magazine show, "Rugby: Northern Exposure". One of, either the cricket or the nix could've been transferred to SS3 surely? Then no live sport would've been sacrificed at all.
Permalink
Permalink
Not everyone has Sky Sport 3 though.
Permalink
Permalink
Not everyone has Sky Sport 3 though.
If you have the sports package and are not a bar/hotel etc... you have sky sports 3.
Permalink
Permalink
Not everyone has Sky Sport 3 though.
Some people just have Sky Sports one.
Permalink
Permalink
Sky should not have, and did not, put the Phoenix over the 20/20 game. The cricket was awesome. They can't help that it ended a draw and had to go an extra half hour.
By the time they decided to delay the full coverage of the game the cricket was probably not even a draw yet. (The game was going overtime anyway). With such an important cricket game [actually 2 games - the CD/ND one too] going on they were never going to put the 'Nix on over it.
I was a bit suprised to see it not on SS3 during the break in the aussie game but once again the probably made the decision to delay it and kept it.
By the time they decided to delay the full coverage of the game the cricket was probably not even a draw yet. (The game was going overtime anyway). With such an important cricket game [actually 2 games - the CD/ND one too] going on they were never going to put the 'Nix on over it.
I was a bit suprised to see it not on SS3 during the break in the aussie game but once again the probably made the decision to delay it and kept it.
Permalink
Permalink
seriously boys & girls, get a grip and grow up.
I was damn annoyed that the coverage ended up being delayed, but what were sky to do?
they had no idea exactly how long the cricket was going to go for - originally it was only going to run 5 minutes over time, until it unbelievably ended up a tie.
with live open tennis, and ODI cricket, already in full swing on the other channels, they simply had no choice.
considering they had to make a decision on the fly, with a constantly changing situation, I think they made the "best" decision.
SS3 channel was completely free of any live sport for a good half an hour as the aussie cricket game finished at 8. There is also the option of the highlights channel At the very least an apology couldve been scrolled down the bottom of the page,that said a delayed version of the game was going to be played at the conclusion of the cricket. Instead we got NOTHING.
I was damn annoyed that the coverage ended up being delayed, but what were sky to do?
they had no idea exactly how long the cricket was going to go for - originally it was only going to run 5 minutes over time, until it unbelievably ended up a tie.
with live open tennis, and ODI cricket, already in full swing on the other channels, they simply had no choice.
considering they had to make a decision on the fly, with a constantly changing situation, I think they made the "best" decision.
I have seen them do the above before,so it is possible to switch a game to a different channel.
Allegedly
Permalink
Permalink
So if they put it on sky3 in the "lunch break of the 50over cricket" for half an hour. what do they do if the 20/20 game had gone over that time (which it did by another 5 mins) and the 50 over game had restarted, delay the restart of the one dayer or drop the tennis (which was an awesome match) or what.I was pissed off too, having to start work early a.m i was looking forward to seeing at least most of the game, looks like I saw the best half,the first.
I might delete the 2nd half though.
More calls for a football only channel ?
Signed
Not in bed with sky
I might delete the 2nd half though.
More calls for a football only channel ?
Signed
Not in bed with sky
Permalink
Permalink
Buffy are you like this in real life or do you just hide behind your computer desk thinkingyou're the man?
Anyway, where could they put the aleague on/
Their not going to cut effectively a semi final in the cricket, or the tennis or the ODI so come on bright spark where would they put it? The highlights channel? doubt it.
Get a grip.
ive got a song that wont take long, Adelaide are rubbish.. the second verse is same as the first.. ADELAIDE ARE RUBBISH
Permalink
Permalink
seriously boys & girls, get a grip and grow up.
I was damn annoyed that the coverage ended up being delayed, but what were sky to do?
they had no idea exactly how long the cricket was going to go for - originally it was only going to run 5 minutes over time, until it unbelievably ended up a tie.
with live open tennis, and ODI cricket, already in full swing on the other channels, they simply had no choice.
considering they had to make a decision on the fly, with a constantly changing situation, I think they made the "best" decision.
SS3 channel was completely free of any live sport for a good half an hour as the aussie cricket game finished at 8. There is also the option of the highlights channel At the very least an apology couldve been scrolled down the bottom of the page,that said a delayed version of the game was going to be played at the conclusion of the cricket. Instead we got NOTHING.
I was damn annoyed that the coverage ended up being delayed, but what were sky to do?
they had no idea exactly how long the cricket was going to go for - originally it was only going to run 5 minutes over time, until it unbelievably ended up a tie.
with live open tennis, and ODI cricket, already in full swing on the other channels, they simply had no choice.
considering they had to make a decision on the fly, with a constantly changing situation, I think they made the "best" decision.
I have seen them do the above before,so it is possible to switch a game to a different channel.
But the ODI came back on and the cricket was still running.. so you'd like the watch 20 mins live the miss a good 15?
Pfft.
Scottishbhoy2010-01-27 07:00:35ive got a song that wont take long, Adelaide are rubbish.. the second verse is same as the first.. ADELAIDE ARE RUBBISH
Permalink
Permalink
Buffy = Hero. Except that was a bit of an over-reaction.
Permalink
Permalink
Buffy are you like this in real life or do you just hide behind your computer desk thinkingyou're the man?
Thinking you know who i actually am and what i'm actually like
c**t.
Three for me, and two for them.
Permalink
Permalink
Buffy are you like this in real life or do you just hide behind your computer desk thinkingyou're the man?
�
Anyway, where could they put the aleague on/
�
Their not going to cut effectively a semi final in the cricket, or the tennis or the ODI so come on bright spark where would they put it? The highlights channel? doubt it.
�
Get a grip.
You miss the first 10 or 15 of the cricket. Not the end of the World. Game involving team from NZ > Game between two foreign teams. (Especially a mismatch with a sh*t Pakistani team that can't field and has no spine)
Permalink
Permalink
Can anyone explain why the cricket went into a super over anyway? The team that lost went through to the final!!! What was the point of playing it?
I let my guitar speak for me
Permalink
Permalink
seriously boys & girls, get a grip and grow up.
I was damn annoyed that the coverage ended up being delayed, but what were sky to do?
they had no idea exactly how long the cricket was going to go for - originally it was only going to run 5 minutes over time, until it unbelievably ended up a tie.
with live open tennis, and ODI cricket, already in full swing on the other channels, they simply had no choice.
considering they had to make a decision on the fly, with a constantly changing situation, I think they made the "best" decision.
I was damn annoyed that the coverage ended up being delayed, but what were sky to do?
they had no idea exactly how long the cricket was going to go for - originally it was only going to run 5 minutes over time, until it unbelievably ended up a tie.
with live open tennis, and ODI cricket, already in full swing on the other channels, they simply had no choice.
considering they had to make a decision on the fly, with a constantly changing situation, I think they made the "best" decision.
This.
Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.
Permalink
Permalink
Ok guys what if it was this scenario...
The Phoenix are in a play off game, its all even at the end of the game so extra time is to be played, hold up lets just cut this coverage cause the cricket is about to start.
Would that be fair then?
The Phoenix are in a play off game, its all even at the end of the game so extra time is to be played, hold up lets just cut this coverage cause the cricket is about to start.
Would that be fair then?
And this.
And Buffy, you get the day off.
Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.
Permalink
Permalink
seriously boys & girls, get a grip and grow up.
I was damn annoyed that the coverage ended up being delayed, but what were sky to do?
they had no idea exactly how long the cricket was going to go for - originally it was only going to run 5 minutes over time, until it unbelievably ended up a tie.
with live open tennis, and ODI cricket, already in full swing on the other channels, they simply had no choice.
considering they had to make a decision on the fly, with a constantly changing situation, I think they made the "best" decision.
I was damn annoyed that the coverage ended up being delayed, but what were sky to do?
they had no idea exactly how long the cricket was going to go for - originally it was only going to run 5 minutes over time, until it unbelievably ended up a tie.
with live open tennis, and ODI cricket, already in full swing on the other channels, they simply had no choice.
considering they had to make a decision on the fly, with a constantly changing situation, I think they made the "best" decision.
This.
You weren't even home til it started..
Founder
Permalink
Permalink