First Team Squad
170
·
1.1K
·
about 17 years
I feel I have to weigh in...
 
Originally I thought, ah well, I don't usually get to watch the other matches so not fussed they're not on live, but tonight, taking it easy at home I thought I'd flick it over for the Adelaide Perth game.  But hang on... AFL is on. f**king AFL. Are you kidding me?!
 
I pay a fair subscription to sky, and now I have to use up my modest broadband allowance on LIVE football.  For a competition in which a New Zealand team competes in.  It is absolutely ridiculous.
 
Now I don't know anything about how the rights to these games go, but surely it doesn't cost Sky much extra to have the other A-League games on live.  I mean, it must be a marginal difference between having those two or three games they're currently having to having all five.
 
And while they may have some half assed rating figures to prrove their decision, how do you measure the intangible value of increasing interest in the whole league, which could result in more subscriptions for them, or more viewers of the Phoenix games and hence more money.
 
Smacks to me of corporate favouritism, as in whoever runs the show doesn't want it so it doesn't happen.  Much like a high level GM or whatever in a Private company interested in a certain sport means the company is more likely to sponsor that chosen sport.
 
AFL?!
Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
over 17 years
Pretty sure showing more games games doesn't cost them a cent more.
'The Scoop'
30
·
6.4K
·
over 15 years
Thats what I thought too. Its so rediculous
LG
Legend
5.8K
·
24K
·
almost 17 years
Fair dues guys, there's probably 100 avid AFL fans in NZ and Sky have made it obvious that 200,000+ football participants are not a priority sport. I am not suggesting 200,000+ will watch every game but i bet there's more football fans around than AFL.
 
I also noticed Sky contradicted themselves by showing two live rugby games on on Sky sports 1 & 2 (I dont have the rugby channel so i dont know what was on there). How are avid rugby followers going to watch two channels at the same time "Live"?? Picture in picture??
First Team Squad
170
·
1.1K
·
about 17 years
The Southland Otago game was on Rugby Channel.  But thats not quite the right comparison as it's not for a rugby follower to watch both.  It's for a follower to choose.  For example last week I watched the Northland game at 7:30, while I'm sure a lot more were watching the Wellington Otago game on SS1 & Rugby Channel.
Marquee
0
·
5.8K
·
almost 17 years
Im thinking though....
Would you prefer..

AFL or Rugby?

Hmmm.Stefan2009-08-07 23:08:20
First Team Squad
170
·
1.1K
·
about 17 years
Trialist
6
·
120
·
almost 17 years
kiwigooner wrote:
Oska wrote:
Watching on justin.tv
 
When watching on the net, how byte hungary is it?? 


Last nights game on iraqgoals took up 450mb.  This included bit of pre match and half time.  I would describe the quality as equivalent to tvnz ondemand on high quality setting.  I was able to go full screen and be happy with the quality of the picture from a couple of metres away.  This is using telstraclear's inhome service with a 10mbs download speed.
Kapitinix2009-08-07 23:13:25
Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
over 17 years
Should invoice Sky for increased data usage.
First Team Squad
170
·
1.1K
·
about 17 years
Tegal
·
Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
about 17 years
Kapitinix wrote:
kiwigooner wrote:
Oska wrote:
Watching on justin.tv
 
When watching on the net, how byte hungary is it?? 


Last nights game on iraqgoals took up 450mb.  This included bit of pre match and half time.  I would describe the quality as equivalent to tvnz ondemand on high quality setting.  I was able to go full screen and be happy with the quality of the picture from a couple of metres away.  This is using telstraclear's inhome service with a 10mbs download speed.
Lets see...450mb x 3 games sky is too cool to show =1.3GB?
 
Multiplied by roughly 4 weekends a month...thats over half my internet plan...and im not the only one who uses it. Would have to upgrade to be able to safely watch A league.
 
Could always cut sky completely and up the internet to max,but then would miss out on other sport like the cricket.
 
f**k sky,surely they owe some sort of moral duty as the only major sports broadcaster in NZ to show as much live sport as they possibly can,and not just with an oval ball.
 
Tegal2009-08-08 01:13:48
Trialist
6
·
120
·
almost 17 years
Tegal wrote:
Kapitinix wrote:
kiwigooner wrote:
Oska wrote:
Watching on justin.tv
 
When watching on the net, how byte hungary is it?? 


Last nights game on iraqgoals took up 450mb.  This included bit of pre match and half time.  I would describe the quality as equivalent to tvnz ondemand on high quality setting.  I was able to go full screen and be happy with the quality of the picture from a couple of metres away.  This is using telstraclear's inhome service with a 10mbs download speed.
Lets see...450mb x 3 games sky is too cool to show =1.3GB?
 
Multiplied by roughly 4 weekends a month...thats over half my internet plan...and im not the only one who uses it. Would have to upgrade to be able to safely watch A league.
 
Could always cut sky completely and up the internet to max,but then would miss out on other sport like the cricket.
 
f**k sky,surely they owe some sort of moral duty as the only major sports broadcaster in NZ to show as much live sport as they possibly can,and not just with an oval ball.
 

That's exactly what I did Tegal, ditched the Sky and ramped up the data cap.  Cricket is also easily accessible to stream as is almost anything else you want to see.  By ditching Sky I also ditched all access to TV1 etc because reception over an aerial where I am is poor.  I now download all tv.  The main site I use is thebox.bz which is a site for uk tv shows only.  This is very closely managed and content has a keen eye kept on it for quality etc.  Premier League games are on there, usually a few hours after they have been played, cricket, rugby, Match of the Day etc etc.  One of my Sunday routines last year was download Match of the Day, watch it at lunchtime and then head for the Phoenix.  And all of this is under my scheduling control, which with two little ones you need to have.  Sorry this has gone a bit off topic but hope it is of use.
Starting XI
0
·
3.1K
·
over 17 years
Why can't sky show more live stuff on that channel 28 preview channel i'm not fussed if i miss another advert for hancock or a doco due to screen on animal planet for the sake of some live football isn't that what channel 0 is anyway   giddyup2009-08-08 09:30:39
LG
Legend
5.8K
·
24K
·
almost 17 years
Tegal wrote:
Kapitinix wrote:
kiwigooner wrote:
Oska wrote:
Watching on justin.tv
 
When watching on the net, how byte hungary is it?? 


Last nights game on iraqgoals took up 450mb.  This included bit of pre match and half time.  I would describe the quality as equivalent to tvnz ondemand on high quality setting.  I was able to go full screen and be happy with the quality of the picture from a couple of metres away.  This is using telstraclear's inhome service with a 10mbs download speed.
Lets see...450mb x 3 games sky is too cool to show =1.3GB?
 
Multiplied by roughly 4 weekends a month...thats over half my internet plan...and im not the only one who uses it. Would have to upgrade to be able to safely watch A league.
 
Could always cut sky completely and up the internet to max,but then would miss out on other sport like the Kayaking.
 
f**k sky,surely they owe some sort of moral duty as the only major sports broadcaster in NZ to show as much live sport as they possibly can,and not just with an oval ball such as the Kayaking.
 
 
Fixed.
Phoenix Academy
0
·
150
·
over 16 years
ffs, Golf highlights on sky3 instead of the live GC-Brisbane match?
Starting XI
0
·
2.4K
·
almost 17 years
Isn't it possible in the future that Sky either

A) Open up a new Sky Sports channel OR
B) Make the games avalible online (Like what TVNZ did for Olympics) with a good connection unlike iraqgoals?
Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
At least they have series link sorted for the games they are showing.
Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
over 17 years
First Team Squad
5
·
1.1K
·
over 17 years
I just submitted my complaint to Sky about not showing the Brisbane Gold Coast game tonight, not to mention stuffing up the last game that just finished. 
Starting XI
170
·
4.7K
·
about 17 years
Feverish wrote:
is this a scam or what?
yes. on the website,  they show images of TVU software which is free and what alot of p2p broadcasting sites use as a client.
First Team Squad
0
·
1.9K
·
over 15 years
WHERE CAN I WATCH THE ROAR GAME ????????

iraqgoals isn't working - it shows cricket !!
First Team Squad
5
·
1.3K
·
about 17 years
Phoenix Academy
0
·
260
·
about 16 years
What IF
sky used highlights channel as a highlights channel, except for when there was too much live sport on and then they put an extra live sport game on it. Thoughts?
Starting XI
70
·
3.7K
·
almost 17 years
Cheers Smittyz11

did you notice this audio is the production feed?
it shouldnt be live..must be a mistake...or an inside job for the feed.

RedGed2009-08-08 22:38:26
Heaven knows I'm miserable now
280
·
5.2K
·
almost 16 years
What IF
sky used highlights channel as a highlights channel, except for when there was too much live sport on and then they put an extra live sport game on it. Thoughts?
 
Far too easy, this is Sky NZ you are talking about. The same people who put golf highlights on one of their main channels instead of live sport...
WeeNix
5
·
760
·
over 17 years
I have complained to sky... here is what I wrote to them ....
 
"I think that showing Golf HIGHLIGHTS!!! over the live Brisbane Roar vs Gold Coast United game on Channel 32 tonight is disgracefuly. You really need to get your priorities sorted.
I understand if we had other live sport on channel 32...e.g. AFL etc. But Golf Highlights is just plain insulting to your paying customers.
This is very disappointing, especially for me and my family who have been Sky Subscribers for 17 years straight!"
First Team Squad
5
·
1.3K
·
about 17 years
we need another provider other than sky in this country!!!! I know we're small but there is room for another provider.. perhaps foxtel could move in. just like all the other oz companies... even just for sports.
Starting XI
170
·
4.7K
·
about 17 years
once the country goes entirely digital with its tv services and the broadband infastructure in NZ improves you will probably see better content on the subscriber services otherwise the networks will lose out to the improving quality of live streamed (pirated) broadcasts
Starting XI
170
·
4.7K
·
about 17 years
If someone at sky was reading this (-highly unlikely), they should have an idea that things are heading this way now.
Starting XI
660
·
4.1K
·
about 17 years
I have now watched 2 games online, and altho it gets the job done of me watching football, it just wasn't the same.  Perhaps another thoughtful chat between CEOs could help....  Thanks TonyP, I saw that you were watching it online last night too!
First Team Squad
5
·
1.1K
·
over 17 years
santy wrote:
I have complained to sky... here is what I wrote to them ....
 
"I think that showing Golf HIGHLIGHTS!!! over the live Brisbane Roar vs Gold Coast United game on Channel 32 tonight is disgracefuly. You really need to get your priorities sorted.
I understand if we had other live sport on channel 32...e.g. AFL etc. But Golf Highlights is just plain insulting to your paying customers.
This is very disappointing, especially for me and my family who have been Sky Subscribers for 17 years straight!"


Excellent job - I think I used the word disgrace as well. Today I might follow up with a real letter as well - you know the sort you write on paper.
First Team Squad
310
·
1.3K
·
over 17 years
Saw this on the Herald Website this morning...

CYBER-BULLIES'

Sky Television chief executive John Fellet says he is not concerned about websites that include virulent attacks against Sky sports coverage and put the blame squarely on him.

He describes the site, which looks at the resources Sky puts into its high-definition broadcasts for some sports events, as cyber-bullying.

Anti-media sites are common enough - there is even one devoted to this paper - but www.johnfellet.com does have an edge to it.

I'd be happy to have a chat to organisers about gripes - under its previous satellite arrangements Sky was sometimes mean with bandwidth. But aspects of this anonymous site do raise questions.



First Team Squad
22
·
1.8K
·
over 16 years
Dougie Rydal wrote:
Saw this on the Herald Website this morning...CYBER-BULLIES'

Sky Television chief executive John
Fellet says he is not concerned about websites that include virulent
attacks against Sky sports coverage and put the blame squarely on him.



From this article
valeo
·
Legend
4.6K
·
18K
·
over 17 years
Cyber bullying?? What is this, high school?

Sky are a huge company and you guys pay to use their service which is getting worse and worse. You have a right to complain.
LG
Legend
5.8K
·
24K
·
almost 17 years
Well they are not delivering on the $25 per month I give them for sport. Lonegunmen2009-08-10 12:54:01
Jag
Not Elite enough
730
·
8K
·
about 17 years

Might well be wrong but I'm sure they were showing the same thing (might have been some golf bollocks) on two different channels at the same time over the weekend.

Marquee
250
·
7.7K
·
over 17 years
I've noticed u don't like golf very much Jag.   And it wuz invented in Scotland.  Personally, I think it's gr8.
 
Jag
Not Elite enough
730
·
8K
·
about 17 years
You are correct, Stevo. Can't stand golf. The pitch is too big and the goals are too small.
Marquee
250
·
7.7K
·
over 17 years
The feeling of urethane compressing solidly against the club face and watching the ball sail in its intended line is a feeling that cannot be described.

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up