can anyone explain to me why the last goal by sydney was not offside? or has the rule changed recently?
Permalink
Permalink
I don't think people are over the second goal, Welly Pom. It might be a while before people look at the legitimacy of the other goals, but considering what else the officials missed, you're probably on to something!
Permalink
Permalink
Yes, I thought it was offside too! By that point I had given up any hope of a fair game......same old Sydney......
Permalink
Permalink
I think it was just onside. Brosque seemed to be level until the ball was played through.
ill upload a pic soon.
Thats just as the cameras swung around to him. But I think that it was the benefit of the doubt.
My call is. Close, but not offside.
I should be a video ref.Stefan2010-03-14 19:48:31
ill upload a pic soon.
Thats just as the cameras swung around to him. But I think that it was the benefit of the doubt.
My call is. Close, but not offside.
I should be a video ref.Stefan2010-03-14 19:48:31
Permalink
Permalink
Looking from that photo (have I got double vision??!?) he's off. Just.
ive got a song that wont take long, Adelaide are rubbish.. the second verse is same as the first.. ADELAIDE ARE RUBBISH
Permalink
Permalink
Sorry. Best quality I could get.
The ball was already played at the moment of the picture.
The ball was already played at the moment of the picture.
Permalink
Permalink
stephan = not the first pass it was the second one when they were 2 on 1 with the goalie - clearest offside ever - babylining is what they used to call it
Permalink
Permalink
Second pass to Bridge.
Cant be offside. And Bridge was behind Brosque when the ball was played in to him.
Stefan2010-03-14 20:06:24
Cant be offside. And Bridge was behind Brosque when the ball was played in to him.
Stefan2010-03-14 20:06:24
Permalink
Permalink
Yeah, wasn't offside. And the ball over the top when our defence got their line completely wrong was close - not clear offside anyway.
a.haak
Permalink
Permalink
I think it was just onside. Brosque seemed to be level until the ball was played through.
ill upload a pic soon.
Thats just as the cameras swung around to him. But I think that it was the benefit of the doubt.
My call is. Close, but not offside.
I should be a video ref.
am I pissed or tripping?ill upload a pic soon.
Thats just as the cameras swung around to him. But I think that it was the benefit of the doubt.
My call is. Close, but not offside.
I should be a video ref.
You know we belong together...
Permalink
Permalink
Youtube HD.
Not as HD as you think.
Not as HD as you think.
Permalink
Permalink
A lot of Syd fans claiming Dadi's goal was offside, but from my recollection he ran in from deep, got a pic Stef?
When Hibs, went up, to win the Scottish Cup - I wisnae there - furfuxake!
Permalink
Permalink
don't worry, got one
When Hibs, went up, to win the Scottish Cup - I wisnae there - furfuxake!
Permalink
Permalink
The pass from Brosque wasn't offside as it went backwards but I'm not at all convinced that the ball through the defence wasn't offside. That pic does nothing to argue either side considering the ball can't be seen. We only got one look at it as well at the game and it was a poor camera angle.
When Daniel played the ball to Dadi he was clearly onside but he was offside from a deflection from a Sydney defender (Stephen Keller?) but as I understand it a deflection from the other side doesn't constitute an offside does it?
Regardless of whether we were allowed a goal that shouldn't have stood theirs (Payne's secondd) was in the 30th minute and changed the whole game - Dadi's was mere consoloation.
When Daniel played the ball to Dadi he was clearly onside but he was offside from a deflection from a Sydney defender (Stephen Keller?) but as I understand it a deflection from the other side doesn't constitute an offside does it?
Regardless of whether we were allowed a goal that shouldn't have stood theirs (Payne's secondd) was in the 30th minute and changed the whole game - Dadi's was mere consoloation.
Permalink
Permalink
Dadi's definately not offside, but I'm convinced that Bridge's goal shouldn't have stood.
You know we belong together...
Permalink
Permalink
Just as a deflection off a defender wouldn't put an offside player onside. A deflection off a defender wouldn't put a attacking player, who was onside when his team-mate passed the ball, in an offside postion.
When Hibs, went up, to win the Scottish Cup - I wisnae there - furfuxake!
Permalink
Permalink
Dadi's definately not offside, but I'm convinced that Bridge's goal shouldn't have stood.
Why?
Permalink
Permalink
The offside call was so close that even if he was slightly off you can't blame the linesman for not seeing something that is so close on multiple replays on tv. But missing blatant stuff...
like say, Byun's hand ball....
like say, Byun's hand ball....
Permalink
Permalink
Byuns was quite obvious.
Matthew Breeze should have been ref.
Matthew Breeze should have been ref.
Permalink
Permalink
Matthew Breeze should have been ref.
I've been saying that for his whole career!
"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009
Permalink
Permalink
Byun should have been yellow carded for that. Then there was Payne and one other Sydney piece of trash handled as well.
And I speak not of Bolton.
loyalgunner2010-03-14 21:50:57
And I speak not of Bolton.
loyalgunner2010-03-14 21:50:57
Permalink
Permalink
Dadi's definately not offside, but I'm convinced that Bridge's goal shouldn't have stood.
They only gave us one replay of the original pass for the fourth goal, and based on that replay it looked offside to me.
Not that it made any difference in the long run.
Permalink
Permalink
glad someone mentioned Byun's hand ball, i noticed it on 'highlights' tonight.
more FFA-CSIM
Permalink
Permalink
Seemed onside to me tbh.
You are right, he was onside.
If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid
Permalink
Permalink
This thread fails big time.
Three for me, and two for them.
Permalink
Permalink
Seemed onside to me tbh.
You are right, he was onside.
Like I said, it looked offside from the one replay they showed us. But it was a bad angle, and they only gave us one look, so don't want to argue this.
Not that it made much difference anyway.
Permalink
Permalink
Time to get over this goal. It isnt clear that they were offside for the original pass, (I would be totally hacked off it it was us and we got called back), our defence got caught napping, and the last pass was definitely onside, so it is a fair goal. let it go
Permalink
Permalink
This thread fails big time.
Nah.. Seems to need more pages.
To discuss the answer.
Permalink
Permalink
Offside.,definitely, by about half his body. In practice though this is difficult for the linesman to pick especially if the defender is advancing in the opposite direction.
Permalink
Permalink
From where I was standing, and my vision was "slightly" impaired, it was offside.
Maybe I should open my other eye next time...
"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009
Permalink
Permalink
Close this thread, save the hate for the Hand of Payne!
Permalink
Permalink
Its marked on their feet anyway, right? In Stefan's image Brosque's feet are in line with the defense so its onside. My bigger question is why none of the defenders even bothered to try and chase them, though I guess with Hearfield off the park there wasn't anyone in the backline with enough pace to threaten those two. You have to admit it was a brilliant move for both of them to break the defensive line.
That's what happens when you start throwing people forward. In a finals game 4-1 is as good as 2-1 at the final whistle. We scored two goals in a finals match, and considering how outplayed we were for most of the match that ain't bad.
That's what happens when you start throwing people forward. In a finals game 4-1 is as good as 2-1 at the final whistle. We scored two goals in a finals match, and considering how outplayed we were for most of the match that ain't bad.
Permalink
Permalink
The pass from Brosque wasn't offside as it went backwards
[/QUOTE]
No it didn't, it went at least 2 metres forward... but as Stefan notes, and shows in the picture, Bridge was behind the passer, so that's not offside
[QUOTE=Stefan]Second pass to Bridge.
Cant be offside. And Bridge was behind Brosque when the ball was played in to him.
[/QUOTE]
No it didn't, it went at least 2 metres forward... but as Stefan notes, and shows in the picture, Bridge was behind the passer, so that's not offside
[QUOTE=Stefan]Second pass to Bridge.
Cant be offside. And Bridge was behind Brosque when the ball was played in to him.
Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.
Phoenix fans. We have to win them over one fan at a time.
Permalink
Permalink
Its marked on their feet anyway, right?
Feet, body or head.
Permalink
Permalink
Its marked on their feet anyway, right?
Feet, body or head.
This is correct. Feet onside, but leaning forward = offside. Basically any part of your body bar your arms.
Permalink
Permalink
If the linesmen could not see two obvious hand balls, how could we expect them to spot a close offside??
Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!
The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!
The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!
Permalink
Permalink