I accept some of that to a degree.
�
But:
1.) AW profile will increase just through being in Asia (which
has credibility, good sides and regular and meaningful
competition). Oceania is killing AW profile - they play one
meaningful home game (ie home leg of world cup play off against
Asian opp) every four years. That is ridiculous and makes building
the team's profile impossible.
2.) It is not just the opposition team that matters in terms
of drawing a crowd. It is the event and what is at
stake.��We
have already had 31,000 watch the AWs against a poky, distant,
obscure middle eastern country - Kuwait
in�October 1981. We get
into the Asian Cup and the Asian World Cup qualifying rounds - and
we will get decent crowds for all home fixtures (maybe not 35,000 -
but plenty)
Completely agree with your first point.
I think, however, there's a bit more to the second one. If
(hopefully when) we have a game at home which will go a long way to
determining whether we go to the World Cup or not, I'd say a crowd
of 25-30,000, if not more, is a distinct possibility, even if the
opponent is a low-profile team like Bahrain or Uzbekistan. But
series of home qualifying games for Asian/World Cup will be
susceptible to factors such as AW performance. Say, we play two
away Asian Cup qualifiers early on, get hammered in both, and
everyone realises that not only are we not likely to qualify, but
would in fact likely lose most of our games. How good would the
crowds be in that case?
I'm not trying to argue against your point of joining the AFC,
because that is the right move for NZF to make, but rewards of such
a move are in my view, long-term, with a decent chunk of short-term
pain (both financially and on-field) to be endured first.
By the way, I'd very happily be wrong about this...