Wellington Phoenix Men

The Big Question - Phoenix for O-League?

73 replies · 959 views
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
What's Team Wellington's position on this?
 
We hear plenty from those muppets up in Auckland so it would be good to hear TW make a statement. Even better to hear them make a "common sense" statement that reflects a desire to do what's best for the game in NZ (and in Wellington for that matter).
 
Having one or two NZFC franchises come out and say "we're prepared to get out of the way here so that the Phoenix can try and save Oceania's credibility" would be very refreshing. And I'm sure no one would mind if they followed such a magnanimous statement with "and we'd love a nice big slice of the cash as well please"!
 
I reckon a lot of the franchises would actually prefer to be budgeting based upon a consistent, evenly spread payout among the franchises rather than never quite knowing what they'll get under the current system (and that might be nothing if Blatter has his way). That assumes of course that the Phoenix can consistently get to the WCC and FIFA are happy with their performances. 
 
TW is owned by the good members of a number of Wellington clubs so why not push your club committee to push TW to come out and make a statement.
 


Considering Stu Jacob's holds positions with both the Phoenix and TW, anything from Team Welly could be seen as a conflict of interest.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I don't see any point in the Phoenix playing in the O-League. They'd (arguably) be a class above and it would probably ruin the competition for all concerned.

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
robbwatson wrote:

Considering Stu Jacob's holds positions with both the Phoenix and TW, anything from Team Welly could be seen as a conflict of interest.
 
There's no conflict. Jacobs is merely an employee of both organisations. They have independent boards and should speak for themselves. That's why it would be so refreshing to hear what TW have to say.
terminator_x2007-12-20 16:31:05

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
james dean wrote:
I don't see any point in the Phoenix playing in the O-League. They'd (arguably) be a class above and it would probably ruin the competition for all concerned.

Now we're getting somewhere! I agree that there's no point in even discussing putting the Phoenix in if you don't expect them to represent Oceania at the WCC. So what's the point in either making them play-off against the NZFC champs or even running the O-League at all?

Sure, some misty eyed clowns out there are going to say "but it's not fair, the Phoenix should earn their place, boo hoo". Bollocks. The danger with that is that once in a while they might actually get beaten by a semi-pro side who have their day as "giant killers". It happens to the best of teams. But what happens then? The amateurs go to the WCC having played the game of their lives a couple of weeks before and get their arses kicked. Back to square one.

We are looking for long run consistency in Oceania's performances at the WCC and the Phoenix are the only club in Oceania with a hope in hell of delivering that.

There should be no half measures - if we want the Phoenix in just put them in and abandon the O-League. Split the prize money as fairly as you can to at least provide some financial stability to those who will be missing out..

And long term get Oceania absorbed into Asia somehow. Sure we will lose direct entry into FIFA tournaments but all our national teams will be playing more meaningful football a lot more often and when we do qualify for tournaments we will really appreciate it and be much better prepared.
 

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Direct entry for the Phoenix may be accepted by the NZ sides, at least they still get some money out of it. But what about the rest of the oceania sides that don't get any benefit at all? Or are you suggesting that we divide the money all round? I don't see that as a viable solution...I think the Phoenix should look at being eligible for the ACL.james dean2007-12-20 16:36:11

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
james dean wrote:
Direct entry for the Phoenix may be accepted by the NZ sides, at least they still get some money out of it. But what about the rest of the oceania sides that don't get any benefit at all? Or are you suggesting that we divide the money all round? I don't see that as a viable solution...I think the Phoenix should look at being eligible for the OCL
 
None of the Pacific sides have had a cent out of the WCC so far so they wouldn't be losing anything.
 
But you're probably right. There would definitely have to some sort of compromise but driven more by politics than anything else. The Phoenix going into the O-League is probably the best way to make it happen quickly (as long as our NZFC sides pull their heads in). Even then I can see the Pacific sides saying "now we've got no chance, give us a share of the cash if you want us to agree".
 
What everyone needs to remember is that unless the Phoenix get through to the WCC then the whole debate has been a waste of time and puts Oceania at risk. So why put extra obstacles in the way of that?
 
 
 

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Phoenix to play winner of O League to qualify - if nothing else it would annoy the Auckland and Waitakere Managers. Either way hopefully Team Wellington will stuff them anyway. 
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
lol wellington beat the phoenix..???
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
NZFC teams can NOT compete in the World Club Championships. They simply aren't good enough. If, within two years, Oceania can't prove it's worth in that tournament, we will be kicked out, so it makes sense to let the Phoenix join the O-league to participate at the WCC. Some of the money the Phoenix receive would go to NZ Football, the NZFC teams, and to the club itself. So, in the long run, if the Phoenix were able to keep Oceania's place in the WCC open, NZFC clubs could receive a far greater financial boost than they could from NZFC teams representing Oceania at the next two WCC's before being kicked out.

Hope that made sense
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It did.
Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I must be the only person on YF not to know that the Phoenix are ineligible for the ACL. I'm amazed. No, make that horrified! This needs to be rectified as soon as possible. The future of this club should be tied to the A League ( and by connection Asia) with all the potential rewards that success offers ALL of the A League clubs.
 
Now if that means a long hard road through the A League and the ACL to get to the WCC then so be it: that's what football clubs do, and that's why we watch them, hoping they'll do it. It's the process of qualification, as much as the qualification itself, that provides the benefits in terms of club prestige, money and in our case a massive boost to the profile of the game in NZ. Not to mention the valuable experience gained by our NZ players in the Phoenix coming up against quality Asian opposition.
 
Going for what amounts to a back door entry to the WCC through the O League seems counter-productive to me. We lose a prime incentive for A League success; we renounce ACL participation; we make ourselves into a special case handed a WCC spot on a platter no matter where we finish in the league (and how do you think the other clubs would feel about that?). Even in a playoff situation against another NZ club team we court disaster and humiliation: these games are seldom the walkovers that people assume they will be.
 
All for the sake of what might amount to a single WCC game and a nice pay day. In the long term this seems like stagnation, not development. I don't know what the answer is to NZ's O League predicament  - I'm not even sure there is one, since it seems Fifa is currently on a crusade against the crime of "semi-professionalism'. But I'd much rather see the Phoenix stay out of the whole affair and concentrate on pressing for entry to Asia.
 
 
 
 
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
But that doesn't solve the problem of Oceania being kicked out of the CWC because of fielding weak teams! It's very circular, there is no completely right answer, I think the least worst will have to suffice...much like a lot of NZF decisions.

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Am i right in assuming the reason the Phoenix are not allowed to play in the ACL has something to do with N.Z. players being classed as foreigners in that competition?
Agree j.d no completely right answer.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Zephyr wrote:
Phoenix to play winner of O League to qualify - if nothing else it would annoy the Auckland and Waitakere Managers. Either way hopefully Team Wellington will stuff them anyway. 
 
Imagine that. Team Wellington and the Phoenix in the WCC!!!
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Maggot wrote:
Zephyr wrote:
Phoenix to play winner of O League to qualify - if nothing else it would annoy the Auckland and Waitakere Managers. Either way hopefully Team Wellington will stuff them anyway. 
 
Imagine that. Team Wellington and the Phoenix in the WCC!!!


I'm not sure who I'd cheer for!

I'd probably just shout "GO WELLINGTON" and hope for a draw

If the Phoenix played in the ACL that'd make it easier on me. WPFC in Asia, Team Welly in Oceania. Easy.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
 
sanday wrote:
Am i right in assuming the reason the Phoenix are not allowed to play in the ACL has something to do with N.Z. players being classed as foreigners in that competition?
Agree j.d no completely right answer.
 
Since when has that stopped European teams full of South Americans from playing in the UEFA Champs League? 
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The European competitions have no restrictions on imported players (some nations extend domestic conditions to sides form the nation that play in Europe - see Denmark).  The Asian Champions League has a 3 import restriction.

That isn't the reason why NZ sides are not elligible though, it's because the Aussie clubs would whine if we represented Australia.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
sanday wrote:
Am i right in assuming the reason the Phoenix are not allowed to play in the ACL has something to do with N.Z. players being classed as foreigners in that competition?
Agree j.d no completely right answer.


I think it's more with the franchise being a national representative than the players. The FFA doesn't want an NZ-based team to represent Australia, it'd be embarrassing and wouldn't help the FFA with their aim to develop the sport in Australia. It'd help us a lot, but that's NZF's problem to deal with, not theirs.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
StopOut wrote:
Going for what amounts to a back door entry to the WCC through the O League seems counter-productive to me. We lose a prime incentive for A League success; we renounce ACL participation; we make ourselves into a special case handed a WCC spot on a platter no matter where we finish in the league (and how do you think the other clubs would feel about that?). Even in a playoff situation against another NZ club team we court disaster and humiliation: these games are seldom the walkovers that people assume they will be.
 
 
I agree. Nix to compete in ACL not via playoff with OCL winner. Would be more interesting for us to watch games against Korean and Japanese sides etc and we would feel like we have earnt the privilege of reaching the WCC.
 
I simply have no answer on what to do with OCL teams though. If FIFA were to incorporate Oceania as an Asian subgroup then the costs would be crippling for us. Perhaps FIFA could absorb the costs for us in the interests of improving the game in this region?  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
on the matter of the benefits of somehow belonging to Asia ...
 
This from an article in today's Sydney Morning Herald:
 
"Given the previous World Cup campaign (2001) saw the Socceroos pull less than 3000 to some qualifiers, the surge in interest has been incredible. Already 30,000 tickets have been sold for the opening World Cup qualifier against Qatar at Telstra Dome in February. Buckley indicated the remaining 25,000 tickets would move "very quickly"."
 
ok, a bit more to it - such as the Socceroos going to the last World Cup - but still. And it also illustrates the short-sightedness of those who continue to argue the costs of belonging to Asia are prohibitve - bc the revenue opportunities are enormous.
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
People didn't turn up to Vanuatu though, would they turn up for Bahrain or Quatar?  I'd love to say yes, but really, are we sure??  I think NZ is still a pretty green football audience, unless it's got premiership written all over it a lot of people still aren't interested

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
james dean wrote:
People didn't turn up to Vanuatu though, would they turn up for Bahrain or Quatar?� I'd love to say yes, but really, are we sure??� I think NZ is still a pretty green football audience, unless it's got premiership written all over it a lot of people still aren't interested


That's absolutely right.
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
james dean wrote:
People didn't turn up to Vanuatu though, would they turn up for Bahrain or Quatar?  I'd love to say yes, but really, are we sure??  I think NZ is still a pretty green football audience, unless it's got premiership written all over it a lot of people still aren't interested


That's absolutely right.
 
Hang on. Thats exactly my point. Nobody turned up to watch AWs v Vanuatu - precisely. Similary, nobody used to watch Australia qualifiers against Oceania sides.
 
Now, 55,000 are expected to watch Australia play Quatar (and Im sure similar numbers would turn up to watch Bahrain.
 
Oceania is unmarketable. That is not the case with Asia.
 
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
james dean wrote:
People didn't turn up to Vanuatu though, would they turn up for Bahrain or Quatar?  I'd love to say yes, but really, are we sure??  I think NZ is still a pretty green football audience, unless it's got premiership written all over it a lot of people still aren't interested


That's absolutely right.
 
Hang on. Thats exactly my point. Nobody turned up to watch AWs v Vanuatu - precisely. Similary, nobody used to watch Australia qualifiers against Oceania sides.
 
Now, 55,000 are expected to watch Australia play Quatar (and Im sure similar numbers would turn up to watch Bahrain.
 
Oceania is unmarketable. That is not the case with Asia.
 


Yet another reason to join the AFC...
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yep, but would you get 20-30,000 to watch Bahrain and Qatar in NZ right now? I would think not.

The All Whites profile in New Zealand is quite low (unfortunately), and for the average pundit who knows little about international football, and of whom you'd need thousands of to turn up to get the sort of crowd that you're talking about, Bahrain isn't that much different to Vanuatu.

Having said that, I agree that Oceania is a black hole sucking life out of NZ football. But even assuming that NZF resolves all the issues over joining AFC (financial, FIFA approval, etc) and actually joins up, the crowds would I think improve, but only gradually. I think teams like Australia, Japan and South Korea would draw good crowds straight away because of their profile, but others would take time. The other factor would also be that the AWs would in all likelihood be on the losing side in most of these encounters, at least in the first few years, and with general NZ sports crowds being notorious for only turning up when things are going well (with honourable exceptions, there, a little self-serving pat on the back for myself and the rest of the Feverites), the attendance would not boom the same way it is in Australia. The crucial difference being that the Socceroos profile is at an all-time high, and they're a good side which the Australian public expect to play well and win games like these, comfortably. The AWs and the general NZ public are some way from that at the moment.
el grapadura2007-12-22 23:23:17
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Still the Vanuatu game wasn't marketed well and on a mid-week day.
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I accept some of that to a degree.
 
But:
1.) AW profile will increase just through being in Asia (which has credibility, good sides and regular and meaningful competition). Oceania is killing AW profile - they play one meaningful home game (ie home leg of world cup play off against Asian opp) every four years. That is ridiculous and makes building the team's profile impossible.
2.) It is not just the opposition team that matters in terms of drawing a crowd. It is the event and what is at stake.  We have already had 31,000 watch the AWs against a poky, distant, obscure middle eastern country - Kuwait in October 1981. We get into the Asian Cup and the Asian World Cup qualifying rounds - and we will get decent crowds for all home fixtures (maybe not 35,000 - but plenty)
Marius Lacatus2007-12-22 23:33:30
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I accept some of that to a degree.

�

But:

1.) AW profile will increase just through being in Asia (which has credibility, good sides and regular and meaningful competition). Oceania is killing AW profile - they play one meaningful home game (ie home leg of world cup play off against Asian opp) every four years. That is ridiculous and makes building the team's profile impossible.

2.) It is not just the opposition team that matters in terms of drawing a crowd. It is the event and what is at stake.��We have already had 31,000 watch the AWs against a poky, distant, obscure middle eastern country - Kuwait in�October 1981. We get into the Asian Cup and the Asian World Cup qualifying rounds - and we will get decent crowds for all home fixtures (maybe not 35,000 - but plenty)


Completely agree with your first point.

I think, however, there's a bit more to the second one. If (hopefully when) we have a game at home which will go a long way to determining whether we go to the World Cup or not, I'd say a crowd of 25-30,000, if not more, is a distinct possibility, even if the opponent is a low-profile team like Bahrain or Uzbekistan. But series of home qualifying games for Asian/World Cup will be susceptible to factors such as AW performance. Say, we play two away Asian Cup qualifiers early on, get hammered in both, and everyone realises that not only are we not likely to qualify, but would in fact likely lose most of our games. How good would the crowds be in that case?
I'm not trying to argue against your point of joining the AFC, because that is the right move for NZF to make, but rewards of such a move are in my view, long-term, with a decent chunk of short-term pain (both financially and on-field) to be endured first.

By the way, I'd very happily be wrong about this...
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think NZF needs to prove itself in Oceania before trying or thinking about joining Asia.
Only now NZF has the chance to get its youth/Aged (Men-womens)players into Qlty matches whether it be the Olympics or World Cups (U17,U20,etc). Never has a NZ football team made a impact at any international football competition. Why? because they were just not there/didn't qualifier or got thrashed due to qualifying based on luck.  
 
Why would Asia want a very limited below substandard football country to join its confed...NZF has nothing to offer where as Australia had.
NZF needs Oceania... NZF hasn't outgrown Oceania as Aus had and there for it cant complain.
When was the last time a NZ team thrashed a Island nation?
How many times has the AW,s lost to island nations buy being out classed? (yes i remember the PNG game).
 
I also remember when Aus played off against Iran (1997 W/C playoff), They had 80,000+ turn up  unexpectedly to watch the home game in Melbourne - Through the Oceania qualifying games only a handful of people showed up to the home matches.
convict2007-12-23 05:19:09
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Its not a case of NZF joining asia but Oceania joining asia. and that means the champion of that comp at what ever level representing it, be it the solomans beach soccer team or the fijian U20s
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
There's no good reason why they shouldn't be.  The National League clubs are only complaining due to the fact that the Phoenix are half decent whereas the National League aren't, so they have the fear of losing. That dooms them from the beginning. I guess they could argue that The Phoenix are technically eleigible for the Asian Champions League but that's about the only semi-credible reason I can think of.
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Sam, I think you over estimate the effect joining asia has had on the socceroos profile.  I hink it is almost exclusively down to the WC, they still  talk about it over here I'd say once a week on the news.  That match v Kuwait was in the middle of the single biggest football high in NZ history, and I think Aussie are there at the moment. 
 
I don't think joining Asia is tha panacea for our troubles, but of course I'd love to see the AWs playing as many games as possible  and Asia would definitely help with that.

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yep, but would you get 20-30,000 to watch Bahrain and Qatar in NZ right now? I would think not.

The All Whites profile in New Zealand is quite low (unfortunately), and for the average pundit who knows little about international football, and of whom you'd need thousands of to turn up to get the sort of crowd that you're talking about, Bahrain isn't that much different to Vanuatu.

Having said that, I agree that Oceania is a black hole sucking life out of NZ football. But even assuming that NZF resolves all the issues over joining AFC (financial, FIFA approval, etc) and actually joins up, the crowds would I think improve, but only gradually. I think teams like Australia, Japan and South Korea would draw good crowds straight away because of their profile, but others would take time. The other factor would also be that the AWs would in all likelihood be on the losing side in most of these encounters, at least in the first few years, and with general NZ sports crowds being notorious for only turning up when things are going well (with honourable exceptions, there, a little self-serving pat on the back for myself and the rest of the Feverites), the attendance would not boom the same way it is in Australia. The crucial difference being that the Socceroos profile is at an all-time high, and they're a good side which the Australian public expect to play well and win games like these, comfortably. The AWs and the general NZ public are some way from that at the moment.


Tommy Smyth is a very average pundit, he also knows little about football.
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Do we have to mention that imbecile with a 'Y' again on this forum folks....????????????
 
As for the NZ football audience, the Galaxy game was a good example. Full of largely women and other non-football goers, who didn't come for the football, but for an 'entertainment' reason of a different nature. The average person in NZ couldn't give a flying f**k about football. That will change, but slowly. People here don't have a clue what football culture really is and what it means to us plebs who go and watch it and discuss issues on forums like this.
 
Just keep ramming football down their throats and present it to them with a certain degree of popular appeal, and they will tune in eventually.
 
Permalink Permalink