As for shirt money ? It's helped the club find Marco Rojas, so worth every cent.
All Whites, Ferns, and other international teams
All Whites vs South Africa
441 replies
·
8,272 views
I never said anything about Ricki's abilities, or the appropriatness of him doing both jobs. You merely alleged that Wynton would do better when the overwhelming evidence is that he wouldn't.
As for shirt money ? It's helped the club find Marco Rojas, so worth every cent.
As for shirt money ? It's helped the club find Marco Rojas, so worth every cent.
Permalink
Permalink
mate they're mint collectors items already.
Improving,,on the up, a work in progress from Italiano and the Nix. Bring on the bathroom bling in '24! COYN!
Permalink
Permalink
This isnt a defence of Herbert but a reality fact. It wont matter who we have as coach, until such a time as we start to produce players with the technical ability to play at the sort of pace and intensity of international matches we will continue to lose. The place to start is with the most important coaches in the country. Those who coach the 5-12 year olds. By the time a kid is 10 you already know if they have a chance of being a decent player. We have roughly the same number of players playing the game as Croatia and they are roughly 5th in the world rankings. They coach smarter. We dont. Blaming Herbert is putting the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff.
Well said Stack - you're absolutely right!! That's why I get annoyed when NZ Football announces yet another review (no doubt costing tens of thousands of $$) of the NZFC - thus always focusing on the wrong end of the problem. They want to boost their egos by pretending they have a glamarous national league, but the problem is that the players who graduate into the league are generally crap and will forever be so, playing in a crap competition. Until NZ Football takes a long strategic view (i.e., 15-20 years out) of the game with the aim of investing in and developing football from the grass roots, the game here has no future and we will simply be a waste of time and space on the international stage. And moving out of Oceania will not help - we will simply stop winning games and start getting trashed by the Asian countries. NZ Football needs to wake up to the fact that it simply is not able to produce players who have the athleticism and technical ability to foot it on the international stage.
Permalink
Permalink
are we going to have more of the same for the Nix, again?
By guess would be that we probably will auskiwi, which will only add to the woes of football in this country.
Permalink
Permalink
I never said anything about Ricki's abilities, or the appropriatness of him doing both jobs.� You merely alleged that Wynton would do better when the overwhelming evidence is that he wouldn't.As for shirt money ?� It's helped the club find Marco Rojas, so worth every cent.
Well yes that was a very good thing with the Marco find.
You should know that Wynton had used a rotation system with the Kingz, Something that didnt work well. But as a Nation coach we may never no.
Permalink
Permalink
i hope they ban those horns for the World Cup
Founder
Permalink
Permalink
This isnt a defence of Herbert but a reality fact. It wont matter who we have as coach, until such a time as we start to produce players with the technical ability to play at the sort of pace and intensity of international matches we will continue to lose.
This is absolutely right. We simply don't have players who can compete successfully at this level.
You can rant all you want against Herbert or whoever, but it's not his fault the players on the field can't string 3 passes together and look like a bunch of schoolboys.
Whoever coaches/manages the team will struggle as long as they only have this calibre of players to choose from.
But the problem is he picks them and they didn't even play up to their even modest potential.
The first point Teza is that, with the exception of Nelsen, that's generally the best bunch of players he has available to him. The second point is that they probably did play pretty much to their potential. The reality is that, even with the likes of Nelsen in teh side, there is a huge gulf between us and the likes of Sth Africa (I don't take much notice of practice games, like the one against Italy, who if they wanted to, could post a rugby score against us).
Permalink
Permalink
(HC, just posted this somewhere, but not here as I thought. Sure you can fix it.)
Something encouraging to throw into the All White mix.
Maybe players like Rory Fallon, who's now available under the new Fifa eligibility rules, will help in the short term.
Not sure how many others we could find, but adding 2 or 3 seasoned pros before the WC qualifier, plus the return of Ryan Nelsen could work wonders.
scribbler2009-06-18 14:20:15
Permalink
Permalink
Wynton also coached a star studded North Shore (a squad that should have walked it) to one of the worst national League seasons ever.
Permalink
Permalink
�
Well said Stack - you're absolutely right!!� That's why I get annoyed when NZ Football announces yet another review (no doubt costing tens of thousands of $$) of the NZFC - thus always focusing on the wrong end of the problem.� They want to boost their egos by pretending they have a glamarous national league, but�the problem is that the players who graduate into the league are generally crap and will forever be so, playing in a crap competition.� Until NZ Football takes a long strategic view (i.e., 15-20 years out) of the game with the aim of investing in and developing football�from the grass roots, the game here has no future and we will simply be a waste of time and space on�the international stage.� And moving out of Oceania will not help - we will simply stop winning games and start getting trashed by the Asian countries.� NZ Football needs to wake up to the fact that it simply is not able to produce players who have the athleticism and technical ability to foot it on the international stage.
I believe moving out of Oceania will be good for NZ soccer:
a) we wont have the false sense of confidence that we have (even when we barely beat our pacific island neighbours) - thinking that we can take on the world
b) the standard has to improve if we play against better teams and Australia has shown the door....we just need to enter it and compete
It will be painful at the start but this needs to happen now. I also agree NZF have to get back to basics and have strategic view of the game for our 5-10 years old that are coming through!!!
I also think we need to get some of our more talented players overseas as soon as possible (and yes funding will be an issue) but the likes of Chris Woods has shown what they can achieve (by the way well done to his parents and his Waikato clubs who have supported him financially in making his dream a reality). You only need to look at the Socceroos as most of there starting players are not even in the A-League.
Something has to happen!!!!!!
Permalink
Permalink
Asia is a no brainer from our perspective. Oceania is an utter black hole - in terms of the games profile, reputation, financial opportunity and football development in this country. I think even NZF must be beggining to realise this now. The problem is the Asians dont want us.
Permalink
Permalink
NZF won't be the reason it won't happen.
FIFA, the AFC and OFC will be the reason it won't happen. We can't just say 'excuse me FIFA, we'd rather be in Asia' and expect it to change. WAY too many vested interests from other bodies.
FIFA, the AFC and OFC will be the reason it won't happen. We can't just say 'excuse me FIFA, we'd rather be in Asia' and expect it to change. WAY too many vested interests from other bodies.
Permalink
Permalink
WAY too many vested interests from other bodies.
Don't the vested interests want the OFC gone?
Permalink
Permalink
No.
FIFA don't want the Oceania votes handed to Bin Hammen and the AFC in the event of a challenge on Blatter's presidency.
AFC don't want the burden of funding the Island nations, particularly when there is no TV market return on it. Yes they would get another 0.5 of a world cup spot, but they get that from playing us anyway.
OFC members aren't about to vote themselves off the FIFA junket/gravy train.
Hard News2009-06-18 14:41:17
FIFA don't want the Oceania votes handed to Bin Hammen and the AFC in the event of a challenge on Blatter's presidency.
AFC don't want the burden of funding the Island nations, particularly when there is no TV market return on it. Yes they would get another 0.5 of a world cup spot, but they get that from playing us anyway.
OFC members aren't about to vote themselves off the FIFA junket/gravy train.
Hard News2009-06-18 14:41:17
Permalink
Permalink
Almost 40% of AFC dont want Australia in it, So How the hell could NZF ever get into AFC?.convict2009-06-18 14:47:12
Permalink
Permalink
Disgusting performance. We couldn't even get the very basics right. Never been so pissed off watching football.
a.haak

Permalink
Permalink
No.
FIFA don't want the Oceania votes handed to Bin Hammen and the AFC in the event of a challenge on Blatter's presidency.
AFC don't want the burden of funding the Island nations, particularly when there is no TV market return on it. Yes they would get another 0.5 of a world cup spot, but they get that from playing us anyway.
OFC members aren't about to vote themselves off the FIFA junket/gravy train.
FIFA don't want the Oceania votes handed to Bin Hammen and the AFC in the event of a challenge on Blatter's presidency.
AFC don't want the burden of funding the Island nations, particularly when there is no TV market return on it. Yes they would get another 0.5 of a world cup spot, but they get that from playing us anyway.
OFC members aren't about to vote themselves off the FIFA junket/gravy train.
How does the votes work for each confederation? I saw somewhere that 43 countries were in wc qual from afc and 10/11 from ofc. thats 53/54 countries in one federation if afc and ofc join which is similar to caf (53) and uefa (53). And how would the $ be any different? I can't imagine OFC rolling in it and being able to fund nations more than would be in asia and dont all nations get some $ just being part of fifa?
Permalink
Permalink
NZF won't be the reason it won't happen.
FIFA, the AFC and OFC will be the reason it won't happen. We can't just say 'excuse me FIFA, we'd rather be in Asia' and expect it to change. WAY too many vested interests from other bodies.
FIFA, the AFC and OFC will be the reason it won't happen. We can't just say 'excuse me FIFA, we'd rather be in Asia' and expect it to change. WAY too many vested interests from other bodies.
Well it will be, cos they don�t want it to
Founder
Permalink
Permalink
No.FIFA don't want the Oceania votes handed to Bin Hammen and the AFC in the event of a challenge on Blatter's presidency.AFC don't want the burden of funding the Island nations, particularly when there is no TV market return on it.� Yes they would get another 0.5 of a world cup spot, but they get that from playing us anyway.OFC members aren't about to vote themselves off the FIFA junket/gravy train.
FIFA is a 'democracy' - one association, one vote. But in reality, most conferederations sort things amongst themselves and block vote. So 11 OFC votes added to Asia strengthens the AFC and the potential candidacy of Bin Hamman against Blatter. If 11 OFC votes stay put, Blatter can pick them up a lot more easily.
As for the money, the OFC nations are among the poorest in the world. They bring nothing to the table from AFC's perspective (no big TV markets, footballing qualitiy, commercial opportunities, you name it), so it's not in AFC's interest to do diddly squat about them.
Permalink
Permalink
My understanding is each nation has 1 vote, so if Africa and Asia ganged up to oust Sepp, he'd need to align everyone else to keep himself employed and currently OFC are well behind him.
To me the $$ issues seem to be:
- FIFA give you dollars for various programs but you want to make some money to fund things, this comes from TV dollars. By adding XI nations you spread your $$ spend more thinly and get no realistic TV revenues (this is the main reason AFC welcomes Aus).
- The costs of running all tournaments increase if you have to make room for 11 (or more) more sides.
- You get a stack of expensive nations. No longer do you have an OFC qualifying campaign over two years bouncing two teams around the pacific every few months. You have a full travel Asian Cup and World Cup qualifying plan that needs 11 nations, pretty much all of whom are more expensive to fly to and from.
I've got more. Just not got my head on it right now.
To me the $$ issues seem to be:
- FIFA give you dollars for various programs but you want to make some money to fund things, this comes from TV dollars. By adding XI nations you spread your $$ spend more thinly and get no realistic TV revenues (this is the main reason AFC welcomes Aus).
- The costs of running all tournaments increase if you have to make room for 11 (or more) more sides.
- You get a stack of expensive nations. No longer do you have an OFC qualifying campaign over two years bouncing two teams around the pacific every few months. You have a full travel Asian Cup and World Cup qualifying plan that needs 11 nations, pretty much all of whom are more expensive to fly to and from.
I've got more. Just not got my head on it right now.
Permalink
Permalink
Disagree, the coach also picks the team, the Govt should stop moaning about bank mortgage rates being too high and instigate a select committee enquiry into why Mulligan starts at RB for the All Whites?.
The coach also sends the team out with a game plan (or is meant to?), if the aim was to sit deep and get players behind the ball well it was a tactical disaster. The distance between the back four and the strikers was way to big and provided a huge amount of space for an athletic and mobile SA team to play in. Compounded by the central midfield almost sitting on top of the back four. When the front two got the ball their options were scarce.
Or you could say that the players we have can't execute the game plan when placed against a speedy attacking side in a tough competetive game.
We just don't get enough exposure to that kind of play, and it will continue to haunt us until a LOT of the things change in NZ football. Herbert or no Herbert.
But personally I find all this angst against Herbert a bit ironic given the laudits he was given by many of the same people for trying to play possession football and playing 2 forwards against some of the best sides in the world.
Your points are good el grapadura.
I know that, for example, auskiwi is pretty hot about the need to get rid of Herbert immediately (from both the national team and the Phoenix), but the reality is that you could appoint, say, Spain's coach, and it would only make a difference at the margin. We would still get well beaten by the likes of Sth Africa.
Put simply, we're light years behind with respect to our athletic ability, technical ability and tactical awareness. And, Herbert (who arguably is the best coach in NZ) is just a product of the same diseased system that in general produces poorly talented players. Even if NZ Football took immediate steps to remedy things, we're probably a good generation away from being even half competitive on the international stage.
Would be interested el grap in briefly learning your views on the things that need to change in NZ Football from, as I think you said somewhere else, from top to bottom.
Permalink
Permalink
You see, This is what you get when you try to polish a turd!!! (FACT).
You can polish a turd, thanks to mythbusters they proved that.
But yeah, under the gloss its still a turd
Permalink
Permalink
Put simply it needs the NZRFU's annual budget spent on it, and NZF would be lucky to have 5% of that.
Hard News2009-06-18 15:15:22
Permalink
Permalink
news, i accept entirely the point that it is not our call. obviously, its up to FIFA, AFC and OFC somehow between them. And clearly there are a bunch of different motivations.
But, 1.) we need to make it clear we want out. we have never done that and that is a first step; 2.) the politics and motives will move around and there may be opportunities, nothing is certain and nothing is forever; 3.) please drop the financial argument about travel costs without mentioning the foregone revenues from being stuck in a Federation whose countries have no $, no population and are just deadset unmarketable. Virtually nil match revenue and nil commercial sponsorship in the OFC.
ps - if you've ever wondered who the Black Caps shirt sponsor is. its some company based in the Middle East that doesnt even do business in NZ, but worked out we play cricket on Asian TV.
Marius Lacatus2009-06-18 15:24:22
Permalink
Permalink
My financial arguments are why AFC don't want us, not why we can't afford to go Marius.
Permalink
Permalink
3.) please drop the financial argument about travel costs without mentioning the foregone revenues from being stuck in a Federation whose countries have no $, no population and are just deadset unmarketable. Virtually nil match revenue and nil commercial sponsorship in the OFC.
Why drop this argument exactly?
Smithy2009-06-18 15:25:43Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.
Permalink
Permalink
3.) please drop the financial argument travel costs without menioning the foregone revenues from being stuck in a Federation whose countries have no $, no population and are just�deadset unmarketable.
Well, yes, we are foregoing that revenue at the moment, but simply moving to Australia would not make it miraculosly appear. Australia has found it financially burdensome to compete in AFC, can you imagine what it would be like for us? And getting sponsorship money would not be easy if we could not guarantee our presence in the closing stages of tournaments and Asian championships, and regular exposure to and recognition in the big Asian markets. And we can't.
I know that for the good of NZ football this will have to happen one day, but there are very real obstacles in the way in addition to the political ones.
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink
3.) please drop the financial argument about travel costs without mentioning the foregone revenues from being stuck in a Federation whose countries have no $, no population and are just deadset unmarketable. Virtually nil match revenue and nil commercial sponsorship in the OFC.
Why drop this argument exactly?
because its flawed - i think thats implicit.
I will however permit an argument - because im feeling generous - in which News, yourself or anybody else sets out the likely costs of having to play in Asia alongside a calculation of likely revenues and makes a net assessment.
but since news wasnt talking about our costs, we may wish to move on - particualrly given our history on this debate Smithy
Permalink
Permalink
Would be interested el grap in briefly learning your views on the things that need to change in NZ Football from, as I think you said somewhere else, from top to bottom.�
�
Well. The problem is that it's easy to point the finger, but less easy to come up with solutions, particularly considering the financial state of our national body. But here a few things off the top of my head:
1. Facilities - exceptionally poor here. We need a significant investment in playing fields, especially for juniors, to enable them to start developing good technique and grasp basic principles of football. Pretty hard to do that when you're an 8-year old knee deep in mud on a cold July morning.
2. Youth coaching - we need to invest in qualified coaches to work with youth players, who can teach the tehnical and tactical aspects of the game to kids. My 8-year old nephew plays for Petone and is quite a good player for his age. But he's coached by a guy who's one of the dads, and whose knowledge of the game and ability to relate it to kids that age is not up to scratch. Good on him for getting in there, but that kind of approach doesn't take us too far.
3. Youth development - this is one of the critical areas for me, as I think this is where we are losing out big time in the international game. Our teenage players (15-18 age group) lack the development of their counterparts in developed footballing nations. While our boys go to school and maybe get 2-3 training sessions a week (with very, very few exceptions), in many other footballing countries the same age-groups are training 5 times a week, and are on verge of professional contracts. We, on the other hand, get a massive drop-out because the professional pathway is too narrow. Of the ones who do remain in the game, their development has been slower than that of their counterpartsin other countries, and they consequently tend to struggle unless exceptionally talented or prepared to make huge sacrifices in order to succeed. But you can't build a system around exceptions to the rule.
4. The lack of a good and strong domestic league is obviously significant, but it's hard to improve the standard considering the ability of players who come into it. So to raise the standard, the investment needs to go into the junior levels of the game first. The reality is that we will never have a domestic league that could rival the A-League, so the emphasis would need to be on producing players regularly who can compete at that level and beyond. This of course means we need to fight hard and lobby extensively to keep the Phoenix in the league, and hopefully get another NZ team in there at some point in the future. If the Nix get kicked out of the A-league, I can see some very dark times ahead for NZ football.
How are we going to do all this without a significant amount of money that it would require and that NZF doesn't have? I don't know. I guess we take baby steps and spend the money strategically with the long-term in mind. But that may be too much to expect from NZF.
Permalink
Permalink
You see, This is what you get when you try to polish a turd!!! (FACT).�
You can polish a turd, thanks to mythbusters they proved that.
But yeah, under the gloss its still a turd
Maybe we should ask mythbusters for help to prove we need a better coach.
Permalink
Permalink
ahh, how much of my life did i waste playing that
not as much as playing the attacking digits game ... adding to 9, the "speed barriers" - brilliant in its mind numbing and rudimentary repetitiveness. name lost on me though
Permalink
Permalink
3.) please drop the financial argument about travel costs without mentioning the foregone revenues from being stuck in a Federation whose countries have no $, no population and are just deadset unmarketable. Virtually nil match revenue and nil commercial sponsorship in the OFC.
Why drop this argument exactly?
because its flawed - i think thats implicit.
I will however permit an argument - because im feeling generous - in which News, yourself or anybody else sets out the likely costs of having to play in Asia alongside a calculation of likely revenues and makes a net assessment.
but since news wasnt talking about our costs, we may wish to move on - particualrly given our history on this debate Smithy
The point being, of course, that likely revenues are impossible to calculate and may equal zero - certainly to begin with.
Costs, however, are guaranteed to go through the roof.
The Aussies have a sugar daddy to bridge that gap. We don't.
For all our heated discussions around the fringes of the issue Bucks we're essentially in agreement. NZ would be better off in footballing terms in Asia. Unfortunately there's a real risk it would bankcrupt us AND there's no chance, politically, of it happening easily.
Agree with your point though that NZF should take a stand and clearly state that they want out of the OFC. At some stage we need to swim, or drown, in the big boys' pool.
Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.
Permalink
Permalink
Would be interested el grap in briefly learning your views on the things that need to change in NZ Football from, as I think you said somewhere else, from top to bottom.
Well. The problem is that it's easy to point the finger, but less easy to come up with solutions, particularly considering the financial state of our national body. But here a few things off the top of my head:
1. Facilities - exceptionally poor here. We need a significant investment in playing fields, especially for juniors, to enable them to start developing good technique and grasp basic principles of football. Pretty hard to do that when you're an 8-year old knee deep in mud on a cold July morning.
2. Youth coaching - we need to invest in qualified coaches to work with youth players, who can teach the tehnical and tactical aspects of the game to kids. My 8-year old nephew plays for Petone and is quite a good player for his age. But he's coached by a guy who's one of the dads, and whose knowledge of the game and ability to relate it to kids that age is not up to scratch. Good on him for getting in there, but that kind of approach doesn't take us too far.
3. Youth development - this is one of the critical areas for me, as I think this is where we are losing out big time in the international game. Our teenage players (15-18 age group) lack the development of their counterparts in developed footballing nations. While our boys go to school and maybe get 2-3 training sessions a week (with very, very few exceptions), in many other footballing countries the same age-groups are training 5 times a week, and are on verge of professional contracts. We, on the other hand, get a massive drop-out because the professional pathway is too narrow. Of the ones who do remain in the game, their development has been slower than that of their counterpartsin other countries, and they consequently tend to struggle unless exceptionally talented or prepared to make huge sacrifices in order to succeed. But you can't build a system around exceptions to the rule.
4. The lack of a good and strong domestic league is obviously significant, but it's hard to improve the standard considering the ability of players who come into it. So to raise the standard, the investment needs to go into the junior levels of the game first. The reality is that we will never have a domestic league that could rival the A-League, so the emphasis would need to be on producing players regularly who can compete at that level and beyond. This of course means we need to fight hard and lobby extensively to keep the Phoenix in the league, and hopefully get another NZ team in there at some point in the future. If the Nix get kicked out of the A-league, I can see some very dark times ahead for NZ football.
How are we going to do all this without a significant amount of money that it would require and that NZF doesn't have? I don't know. I guess we take baby steps and spend the money strategically with the long-term in mind. But that may be too much to expect from NZF.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.
Permalink
Permalink
3.) please drop the financial argument about travel costs without mentioning the foregone revenues from being stuck in a Federation whose countries have no $, no population and are just�deadset unmarketable. Virtually nil match revenue and nil commercial sponsorship in the OFC.
�
Why drop this argument exactly?
�
because its flawed - i think thats implicit.
�
I will however permit an argument - because im feeling generous - in which News, yourself or anybody else sets out the likely costs of having to play in Asia alongside a calculation of likely revenues and makes a net assessment.
�
but since news wasnt talking about our costs, we may wish to move on - particualrly given our history on this debate Smithy
OK Marius - I'll give you a scenario, and see if you want to do the maths. We've just joined AFC and NZ gets drawn with Kuwait, Indonesia and Bahrain to qualify for the AFC Cup. The U23s are in the same group to qualify for the Olympics, and U20s and U17s in the same group to qualify for their respective World Cups (all theses groups wouldn't be the same, but for argument's sake let's say they are). If the age-grade teams progress successfully from their groups, they'll have to play further matches, let's say agains Japan, North Korea and Saudi Arabia. What do you think the financial cost of all this would be, and how much do you think we'd get in return?
Permalink
Permalink
3. Youth development - this is one of the critical areas for me, as I think this is where we are losing out big time in the international game. Our teenage players (15-18 age group) lack the development of their counterparts in developed footballing nations. While our boys go to school and maybe get 2-3 training sessions a week (with very, very few exceptions), in many other footballing countries the same age-groups are training 5 times a week, and are on verge of professional contracts. We, on the other hand, get a massive drop-out because the professional pathway is too narrow.
A further problem with this is the volume of user pays forced on some of these kids. I get the distinct impression that there are a number of talented teens in this area who can't afford/justify the costs of being involved in the various elite programs. Then if they aren't involved in a NZF backed player development program they are not looked at or considered for reps and any chance of being noticed at a higher level.
On top of this you have large ethnic communities with a stack of youngsters who live for football that could be engaged in the game here more easily and then if help was at hand to keep them in the game our pool of players could be greatly increased.
With the increase of those already good enough but missing out due to costs and engaging more and more kids we have a wider pool, and with a wider pool the same percentage of successes produces more quality numbers.
Add in the sheiks other points and that percentage increases as well.
...but again, it's where the money comes from. As I said earlier, we need an NZRFU size budget and that just isn't going to happen.
Anyone know if Eric Watson has a son who plays football ?
Hard News2009-06-18 16:07:21
Permalink
Permalink
Thats BS about "Suger dadd to bridge the gap".
Since when did Frank Lowy use his own money to fund the FFA?.
Since when did Frank Lowy use his own money to fund the FFA?.
Permalink
Permalink
He doesn't, he however has a huge profile and interest in the circles that can provide funding, and no one involved in football here has anything like that clout.
Permalink
Permalink

