All Whites, Ferns, and other international teams

New Zealand Men's U-17s

4390 replies · 919,639 views
over 12 years ago
expatlady wrote:

Tamu has been at APFA for three years, APFA don't get a mention as they are a private provider.


Who did get a mention?

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

over 12 years ago

Ole got mentions and they're a private provider too. 

Kotahitanga. We are one.

over 12 years ago

Ole got mentions and they're a private provider too. 


I reckon it's a conspiracy for sure.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

over 12 years ago

Better PR, and they both do ok on that front. Lots of Chch whispers about APFA next move!

Kotahitanga. We are one.

over 12 years ago
Big Pete 65 wrote:
MetalLegNZ wrote:


And who is Tamupiwa... weird that a u17 player is unattached to even a local team.

finally, do they have any warm up games. I want to know that their money is being put to good use.

Tamupiwa is on Facebook  (but doesn't post much) - says there he lives in Australia ,so if his family only recently moved there, maybe that's why he's unattached?  Born in Zimbabwe. Is a midfielder and played in the qualifiers:

Name: Chaurura Tamupiwa Dimairo
Nationality: New Zealand
Date of Birth: March 22, 1996
Age: 17 years
Position: Midfielder

His Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/tamupiwa.dimairo

His photos: https://www.facebook.com/tamupiwa.dimairo/media_set?set=a.108565532667615.1073741825.100005425059863&type=3

All his stats in qualifying (two starts, one sub app. in NZ's matches):

http://int.soccerway.com/players/tamupiwa-dimairo/293900/

Great to see our players getting comprehensive stats on international football websites now...

Full player details for the qualifying squad (pretty much everyone named in the finals squad) - scroll down to "Squad" & click on players' names:

http://int.soccerway.com/teams/new-zealand/new-zealand-under-17/9380/

New Zealand's Tamupiwa Dimairo looks to get past Fiji captain 
Iosefo Verevou. Photo: OFC via Phototek
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Warm-up matches? -  are playing Waitakere United on Thursday 3rd at 6:00pm

-  Auckland City at Kiwitea Street at 2pm this Sunday.

+ apparently hoping to arrange some on arriving in Dubai October 8.


I played against his brother Tapfuma who was rated really highly in his age group. Him and his brother have always been spoken really highly of in a football sense within the footballing community. Never seen Tam play but his brother really did stand out.
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Smithy wrote:
Smithy wrote:

Tip: some things on Facebook aren't true.

Next you'll be telling us not to believe everything we read on the interwebby thing...


Ikr!




BTW - was just having a giggle, Tam may well have lived in Australia at some stage. I have no idea.


 

Sorry, I'm from the "Sea Monkey" generation born in the 60's and so will believe anything....


"I well remember my own Sea Monkeys and the disappointment when from the Instant Life sachet they hatched as tiny daphnia dots and not the family unit complete with crowns and smiling faces as hawked by the marketing people. Nevertheless, I still had faith and treasuring the leaflet that came with my ‘Amazing Instant Life’, I looked forward to them growing and being the sporty family as depicted on said leaflet, having a boxing bout or a game of tennis. All with their smiling humanoid faces and crowns. After a few weeks my faith became shattered.


The man responsible for such a marketing ploy was an American mail-order marketer called Harold Von Braunhut who started posting out his product in the 1960’s. The man obviously spotted a market niche of gullible adolescent sci-fi era boys because his other lines included ‘X-ray Specs’ where you were supposed to be able to see through clothes and flesh. A friend of mine sent off for these after seeing the advert at the back of a Superman comic. Von Braunhut's other wares according to Wikipedia included ‘Crazy Crabs’ which were just Hermit Crabs, and most shamelessly blatant of all Invisible Goldfish! At least with Sea Monkeys you could see something!"



Big Pete 65, Christchurch

over 12 years ago

Ha ha classic. Loved young ones too but that was a different era.

 Big Pete, you are the man for a stat I would love to know: since U17 world cups started how many south islanders/ cantabrians have been selected in squads; what % of squads do they represent, and how does that % compare to football playing population? Has there been a downward trend?

Kotahitanga. We are one.

over 12 years ago

I don't think it ever occur to South Islanders that there isn't a vast pool of undiscovered talent lurking south of Cook Strait that the evil empire of the north is just wantonly ignoring.




Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

over 12 years ago

Not vast. Just proportionate. 

Kotahitanga. We are one.

over 12 years ago

With all the different academies etc etc surely not.

Also, what about the Auckland / Nth Island lads selected who have spent time down in APFA who have being selected. Were they spotted down there for future honours or, not until they moved back up, e.g. Rufer.

APFA seems to have had a bit of success lately with young players gaining contracts, so I am sure there players are getting a once over.

over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

Not 100% sure what you're getting at Metal. I tend to think of private academies as youth finishing schools and if a player feels he wants to do that, fine - hence, Rufer, Tuiloma spent some time doing just that. All feds run FTC/NTC 'academies' up to 16; not all players are in that programme; some may or may not be in private academies.

As to Chch at 2013 U17 level; one Cantab made 2013 NZ secondary schools team to UK; a couple went to this year's Milk Cup with the Otago team; Burnley academy are not getting best quality players (only out of town kids north and south of Chch) and APFA at 2013 U17 level have only 2 Chch lads - one who missed getting a trial and one who never was going  to get one; the rest were/are in club/FTC/NTC. My point is that on a pro rata population basis - on average - you would expect 4-6 Sth Island/Chch kids in any given national squad. This year was one and last world cup was 2 (I think). Just seems a bit under-represented and doesn't seem to happen with the girls.

Kotahitanga. We are one.

over 12 years ago

Not 100% sure what you're getting at Metal. I tend to think of private academies as youth finishing schools and if a player feels he wants to do that, fine - hence, Rufer, Tuiloma spent some time doing just that. All feds run FTC/NTC 'academies' up to 16; not all players are in that programme; some may or may not be in private academies.

As to Chch at 2013 U17 level; one Cantab made 2013 NZ secondary schools team to UK; a couple went to this year's Milk Cup with the Otago team; Burnley academy are not getting best quality players (only out of town kids north and south of Chch) and APFA at 2013 U17 level have only 2 Chch lads - one who missed getting a trial and one who never was going  to get one; the rest were/are in club/FTC/NTC. My point is that on a pro rata population basis - on average - you would expect 4-6 Sth Island/Chch kids in any given national squad. This year was one and last world cup was 2 (I think). Just seems a bit under-represented and doesn't seem to happen with the girls.


Some dodgy maths there. Christchurch's population is less than 10% of the country's (~350k on ~4.5m) so in a 23 man squad you'd expect about 2 from Chch on average. This year one and last time two is probably about right.

Expanding that calculation to include the entire South Island you'd expect about 20% of the squad (5 or so players) to be southern, but there are lots of reasons that might not happen, two of which are:

- Kids in the country don't get the same football development opportunities as kids in the city, so a majority of the south island is likely to contribute very little to the legions of decent footballers.
- Once you get down to the bottom of the squad, the differences between one player and another are probably pretty small, in which case making a decision to choose one player over another based purely on his proximity to training is totally legitimate.

To flip this whole discussion on its head, I'm sure Bazeley could drop the worst two Auckland-based players from his team and pick two just-as-good Christchurch kids. But why would he do that? It would make the team's preparation more difficult and not make the team any stronger talent-wise.

There isn't some bias against kids from the South Island, it's just reality that the further you live from where a thing is the harder it is to access that thing. Which is why it's a lot more expensive to live in Auckland.

Girls is a different kettle of fish because the player pool is so small there isn't a swathe of "just-as-good" players that are interchangeable.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

Population-only figs aren't any guide. To be mathematically correct, you can only look at the football playing population. I don't have the figs, but I reckon there is a higher % of the popn. playing football in the South Island than the North Island - socio demographic and other ethno-cultural reasons - so I'll stand by my guestimate until corrected.

A better way to tip the argument on its head would be if Ceri Evans, Danny Halligan or Mike McGarry were to be the next U17 coach. How would Aucklanders feel about that?

Anyway, I think this has now become a separate issue to the thread. Maybe it will find a thread-life elsewhere.

Kotahitanga. We are one.

over 12 years ago

Population-only figs aren't any guide. To be mathematically correct, you can only look at the football playing population. I don't have the figs, but I reckon there is a higher % of the popn. playing football in the South Island than the North Island - socio demographic and other ethno-cultural reasons - so I'll stand by my guestimate until corrected.

A better way to tip the argument on its head would be if Ceri Evans, Danny Halligan or Mike McGarry were to be the next U17 coach. How would Aucklanders feel about that?

Anyway, I think this has now become a separate issue to the thread. Maybe it will find a thread-life elsewhere.


I'll let my actual figures speak for themselves against your "gut feel" (conspiracy theory).

I'd actually argue the player numbers would put you in a worse position. Rugby is so dominant in the South.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

Your actual" figures aren't actual football playing figures though, are they? One known fact that I do have Smithy is that Chch City Council grounds have declining usage of rugby fields and increasing demand for football fields; so not sure rugby is that strong down here at junior (U17) level. Even traditional bastions of rugby schools have growing football 1st and 2nd XIs. The beautiful game is stronger than you might think on the Mainland. 


Kotahitanga. We are one.

over 12 years ago

Its exactly the same in Auckland. 'Public' grounds are earmarked at 55% for rugby and 45% football of which the rugby grounds get 1 game a week vs some getting 5-6 for football. David Parker has been at the council for years to get more grounds because of the swelling player numbers but in a bankrupting city, rugby pays the bills.

If Halligan, Evans or McGarry got the gig, I would be fine with that. Halligan and McGarry are quality coaches (don't know Evans background). I seriously doubt you would see the swing you think you would EXCEPT as Smithy points out, in a like for like player situation, you would pick the local cause its easier to get them to training.

Grumpy old bastard alert

over 12 years ago

Hi all,

The U17s rolled Waitakere 2-1 at Seddon Fields this evening. Judd Baker and Michael Den Heijer on target for the youngsters, with Savern Limwhatthana replying for United.


Cheers,

JR

over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

Yay for under 17s. Lols for Temple. The laughter is ringing out from Marshalls residence.

Grumpy old bastard alert

over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:

Yay for under 17s. Lols for Temple. The laughter is ringing out from Marshalls recidence.

You coming to Kiwitea for ACFC v Under-17's 2pm Sunday, Jeff? Could be a cracker.

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

over 12 years ago

I think you may have twisted my arm.

Grumpy old bastard alert

over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

So we have (Dale has) decided we should do something for the U17s.


Chip in: givealittle.co.nz/cause/U17WorldCup

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

over 12 years ago
Smithy wrote:

So we have (Dale has) decided we should do something for the U17s.


Chip in: givealittle.co.nz/cause/U17WorldCup

 

and when they're superstars do they pay us back?

over 12 years ago
Luis Garcia wrote:
Smithy wrote:

So we have (Dale has) decided we should do something for the U17s.


Chip in: givealittle.co.nz/cause/U17WorldCup

 

and when they're superstars do they pay us back?


That's between you and them :)

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

over 12 years ago

Just a thought but if ACFC charged say a fiver at the gate, they could then donate the dosh to the Under-17 cause. Just a thought... Ivan? Cookie?

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

over 12 years ago

What a brilliant idea/gesture that would be!!!

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

over 12 years ago

are they that incapable of fundraising enough to have 2 grand each? most high school teams/groups have to raise 6-10 grand per student in order to go to europe for a week or two and they seem to keep up fine. Fire up the bbq lads and start selling.

yung thug

over 12 years ago

That's a top result, anyone there who can provide us with a little bit of a game summary??

over 12 years ago

So maybe the U20s won't be easy beats in the ASB Premiership (assuming this will be that team)

over 12 years ago
Joey Johns wrote:

are they that incapable of fundraising enough to have 2 grand each? most high school teams/groups have to raise 6-10 grand per student in order to go to europe for a week or two and they seem to keep up fine. Fire up the bbq lads and start selling.

1) They are representing our country. Not some school.
2) Would you rather see one of the kids down at a Bunnings Carpark manning a bbq, or down at the local park working on their game.
over 12 years ago
2ndBest wrote:
Joey Johns wrote:

are they that incapable of fundraising enough to have 2 grand each? most high school teams/groups have to raise 6-10 grand per student in order to go to europe for a week or two and they seem to keep up fine. Fire up the bbq lads and start selling.

1) They are representing our country. Not some school.

2) Would you rather see one of the kids down at a Bunnings Carpark manning a bbq, or down at the local park working on their game.


Boom


over 12 years ago

Increase the player levy but 100% of the money must go to player benefit not NZ F or support staff. $1 per player no one would begrudge that.  

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

over 12 years ago
2ndBest wrote:
Joey Johns wrote:

are they that incapable of fundraising enough to have 2 grand each? most high school teams/groups have to raise 6-10 grand per student in order to go to europe for a week or two and they seem to keep up fine. Fire up the bbq lads and start selling.

1) They are representing our country. Not some school.

2) Would you rather see one of the kids down at a Bunnings Carpark manning a bbq, or down at the local park working on their game.


I understand you're point, but only one of them is a professional footballer so it's not like they're going to spend all their time training at the park.
also other representative teams have to fork out to go on trips and tournaments, with the exception of rugby of course. If you can accept all the free shit that you get during the tournament, then surely one can accept the measly fee, theres no point sulking about New Zealand footballs grandios fuck up, if they really want to be there then they can show it instead of relying on the charity of others.

yung thug

over 12 years ago

Did I say all their time? How much money do you think people actually raise in a bbq?  I dropped $100 in the fund. For a kid to raise that he'd probably have to sell 100 sausages. Tell me what is better. Where is his time best spent?

Regardless of whether it changes NZF mind about their policy, it's still helping a kid raise the money he is being asked to. We know of a couple of families who are struggling to come up with the case. Especially considering the kids outside of Auckland have been commuting to attend camps. Shall we make them suck it up? Or can we group together and help these kids? 

If you think 1000 is measly, I suggest you have no clue of the real world.



over 12 years ago

the fact is they've all known about this for a number of months and are yet to act on it, its fine if you want to donate but I think some of the kids need an attitude check if they expect everything to be paid for them.

yung thug

over 12 years ago
Joey Johns wrote:

are they that incapable of fundraising enough to have 2 grand each? most high school teams/groups have to raise 6-10 grand per student in order to go to europe for a week or two and they seem to keep up fine. Fire up the bbq lads and start selling.


They leave on Tuesday...

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

over 12 years ago
Joey Johns wrote:

the fact is they've all known about this for a number of months and are yet to act on it, its fine if you want to donate but I think some of the kids need an attitude check if they expect everything to be paid for them.


I think there's a line to draw here between this current group who have had this dropped on them, and future groups who presumably will have this made clear to them much much earlier.

This is a gesture from us. That's all. If you think the kids should pay, that's all good, don't donate :)

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

over 12 years ago

Joey, any idea how much these kids sacrifice just to make it to this level? Any time not training/playing is trying to catch up on school work. They curb social lives, family holidays are organised around football camps and tournaments, parents are full time taxi drivers. Most players would be lucky to squeeze in any sort of part time job. They simply don't have hours every week to run BBQs for months on end. The players were told of selection ( and this additional World Cup tax) only a few weeks ago.

Kotahitanga. We are one.

over 12 years ago

we'll agree to disagree, im not specifically targeting your charity, if you want to donate thats fine. But its been known for a while that NZ football was possibly unable to fully fund the players, even if they had not finalized a squad it would have hurt some players of a lower economic standing to do some budgeting, whether it be them or their family.

yung thug

over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

Updated squad list with payment status...

Goalkeepers
1– Zac SPEEDY (Three Kings United) - PAID
12–Oliver SAIL (Central United) - PAID
21–Sam COPP (Forrest Hill Milford United) - PAID

Defenders
2– Riley KELLIHER (Island Bay United) - RB - PAID
3–Cory BROWN (Island Bay United)  - LB - PAID
4–Nick FORRESTER (Unattached)   - CB - PAID
5–Adam MITCHELL (Central United) - CB - PAID
13–Spiros AGATHOS (Sydney United 58 FC, AUS)   LB/RB - PAID
16–Tamupiwa DIMAIRO (Unattached)   - RB - PAID

Midfielders
6–Alex PALEZEVIC (Island Bay United)    - DM - PAID
7–Alex RUFER (Wellington Phoenix)        - AM - PAID
8–Michael DEN HEIJER (Onehunga Sports)  -DM - PAID
10–Matthew RIDENTON (Central United)     - AM - PAID
15–Andre DE JONG (Ellerslie)       - AM - PAID
17–Nick SUGDEN (Onehunga Sports)  - RM - PAID
18–Andrew BLAKE (Unattached)      - RM - PAID
20–Clayton LEWIS (Wellington Olympic)   - LM - PAID

Forwards
9–Elijah NEBLETT (Birkenhead United)  - CF - PAID
11–Monty PATTERSON (Eastern Suburbs) - LW - PAID
14–Stuart HOLTHUSEN (Onehunga Sports) - RW - PAID
19–Judd BAKER (East Coast Bays) - CF - PAID

NB: playing time will be divided evenly among all players including goalkeepers.  accordingly, substitutions and formation alterations will be made at per-determined times.  our appeal to allow two goalkeepers on the field at one time was rejected by FIFA; therefore the second goalkeeper will be deployed at centre forward in order to reduce tactical disruption.

in the event of injury or disruption the 'mount wellington' rule applies (the son of a former mount wellington player may gain extra minutes)


360footballnews.com

over 12 years ago

don't forget players who have trouble with the payment can apply to the NZ Football foundation for funding - this was a KEY point Fred raised during his interview.

What do you do if everyone applies though?  Taking away the issue of if players should pay or not there will be some players who can easily afford it and some at the other end of the scale who can't - then there will be some in the middle who just don't want to pay.

Having spoken to a former NZF staffer  - i asked him from his point of view if he thought the policy was because NZF couldn't afford to fund proper world cup/qualifying preparation or if it was a philosophical call - he indicated the former.  and he confirmed that the costs of running a team per year were roughly (100k per year with no major tournament and 300k per year with a major tournament).  excluding the main two teams of course.

I am of the opinion that if NZF really can't afford it then while this isn't the most ideal scenario then this is a required evil!