All Whites, Ferns, and other international teams

New Zealand U-23s - Quali Whites

5835 replies · 1,102,368 views
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

AlfStamp wrote:

critter wrote:

Sorry but talking from experience one can be a permanent resident without being a NZ citizen and still have a NZ passport I was born not in NZ and have been here 63 years and have a NZ passport

Things may have changed since you got a NZ passport. I came here as a baby, my parents never took out citizenship. I cannot get a NZ passport until such I time as i become a citizen. I am a permanent resident but have to get a resident re entry stamp in my passport to be allowed back in to NZ. The resident re entry stamps last for 10 years. I tried for a NZ passport back in the 80's but couldnt get one then unless I did the citizenship thing. It was simpler and cheaper to get a different passport. I checked it all out again 5 years ago. The current situation is that you cannot get a NZ passport unless you are a NZ citizen.

How's this one, my mum was born in the UK when her parents were traveling, she came to NZ less than a year old, got her education here, her drivers license, her passport, worked here for years, paid taxes, etc. - then when she applied for her firearm license they realised that she was here illegally and tried to deport her.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

So any kid that arrives here around age 5-6-7 (and lets be honest, they would have hardly any relationship to their country of birth for the most part) and may have played kids football in another country, cannot play any international football for NZ until 23??? That means a few kids can never play in an Olympics. That still just does not seem right. By the time you hit 22 you could well have lived here for 16-17 years and still be considered a foreigner.

and I thought Winston NZ First hated immigrants...

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

So any kid that arrives here around age 5-6-7 (and lets be honest, they would have hardly any relationship to their country of birth for the most part) and may have played kids football in another country, cannot play any international football for NZ until 23??? That means a few kids can never play in an Olympics. That still just does not seem right. By the time you hit 22 you could well have lived here for 16-17 years and still be considered a foreigner.

and I thought Winston NZ First hated immigrants...

From what I can see it would depend on what FIFA counts as registered Footballer, I agree it sounds ridiculous, but that appears to be the way the rule applies to those who don't have Citizenship by birth (Born here, or Parent/Grandparent), that at the point where they register as a footballer if they don't have that nationality for FIFA purposes they must be in country for 5 years after 18th birthday, it's nuts, but it's clear why the rule was made after some dodgy citizenship occurances.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

JonoNewton wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

So any kid that arrives here around age 5-6-7 (and lets be honest, they would have hardly any relationship to their country of birth for the most part) and may have played kids football in another country, cannot play any international football for NZ until 23??? That means a few kids can never play in an Olympics. That still just does not seem right. By the time you hit 22 you could well have lived here for 16-17 years and still be considered a foreigner.

and I thought Winston NZ First hated immigrants...

From what I can see it would depend on what FIFA counts as registered Footballer, I agree it sounds ridiculous, but that appears to be the way the rule applies to those who don't have Citizenship by birth (Born here, or Parent/Grandparent), that at the point where they register as a footballer if they don't have that nationality for FIFA purposes they must be in country for 5 years after 18th birthday, it's nuts, but it's clear why the rule was made after some dodgy citizenship occurances.

Rules make no mention of being registered as a footballer 

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

So any kid that arrives here around age 5-6-7 (and lets be honest, they would have hardly any relationship to their country of birth for the most part) and may have played kids football in another country, cannot play any international football for NZ until 23??? That means a few kids can never play in an Olympics. That still just does not seem right. By the time you hit 22 you could well have lived here for 16-17 years and still be considered a foreigner.

and I thought Winston NZ First hated immigrants...

but you can apply for exceptions
Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

So any kid that arrives here around age 5-6-7 (and lets be honest, they would have hardly any relationship to their country of birth for the most part) and may have played kids football in another country, cannot play any international football for NZ until 23??? That means a few kids can never play in an Olympics. That still just does not seem right. By the time you hit 22 you could well have lived here for 16-17 years and still be considered a foreigner.

and I thought Winston NZ First hated immigrants...

but you can apply for exceptions

So, did we apply for an exception for Wynn?

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

That's the key question.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Yeh, it does sound extreme that a kid moves country and then can't play till 23, but also bear in mind the contexts in which that rule change was made - certain wealthy countries were figuratively (and in some cases literally) trawling other places for talented footballers, some as young as ten, and then enticing them to move in order to boost the country's playing stocks... the kids would be taking massive risks, but driven by desperation/poverty, and sometimes with dodgy agents involved too... obviously the scenario with Deklan's migration is different (well, I assume it is...), hence why there can be exceptions granted... but that original context was real, and pernicious, and did need to be stopped as it was really immoral and problematic...  with all that in mind, the rules as they stand were designed to deter such actions in the future - and yet I kind of wonder how some of the "graduates" from the Aspire Academy end up playing for Qatar at such young ages...

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

THIS IS FUCKING DEPRESSING.   Would have been mightier pissed off if Vanuatu won the final.  Good luck to Fiji. 

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Feverish wrote:

JonoNewton wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

So any kid that arrives here around age 5-6-7 (and lets be honest, they would have hardly any relationship to their country of birth for the most part) and may have played kids football in another country, cannot play any international football for NZ until 23??? That means a few kids can never play in an Olympics. That still just does not seem right. By the time you hit 22 you could well have lived here for 16-17 years and still be considered a foreigner.

and I thought Winston NZ First hated immigrants...

From what I can see it would depend on what FIFA counts as registered Footballer, I agree it sounds ridiculous, but that appears to be the way the rule applies to those who don't have Citizenship by birth (Born here, or Parent/Grandparent), that at the point where they register as a footballer if they don't have that nationality for FIFA purposes they must be in country for 5 years after 18th birthday, it's nuts, but it's clear why the rule was made after some dodgy citizenship occurances.

Rules make no mention of being registered as a footballer 

The rules mention "Changing FIFA Nationality" - you don't have one of those til such time as you register as a Footballer from what I can tell, this is why Smith & Roux didn't need an exemption, but Wynne definitely would.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

So it may be problematic for Wynne to get exemption (if he/authorities applied).

A fan is a fan.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

I am veering drastically from conspiracy to cock-up

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Let's not forget the U17 WC qualification was played in Vanuatu, and I don' think Deklan Wynne was on the squad - so the first thing they think is whose this guy? Think NZF stuffed this one up.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

JonoNewton wrote:

Feverish wrote:

JonoNewton wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

So any kid that arrives here around age 5-6-7 (and lets be honest, they would have hardly any relationship to their country of birth for the most part) and may have played kids football in another country, cannot play any international football for NZ until 23??? That means a few kids can never play in an Olympics. That still just does not seem right. By the time you hit 22 you could well have lived here for 16-17 years and still be considered a foreigner.

and I thought Winston NZ First hated immigrants...

From what I can see it would depend on what FIFA counts as registered Footballer, I agree it sounds ridiculous, but that appears to be the way the rule applies to those who don't have Citizenship by birth (Born here, or Parent/Grandparent), that at the point where they register as a footballer if they don't have that nationality for FIFA purposes they must be in country for 5 years after 18th birthday, it's nuts, but it's clear why the rule was made after some dodgy citizenship occurances.

Rules make no mention of being registered as a footballer 

The rules mention "Changing FIFA Nationality" - you don't have one of those til such time as you register as a Footballer from what I can tell, this is why Smith & Roux didn't need an exemption, but Wynne definitely would.

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

JonoNewton wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

So any kid that arrives here around age 5-6-7 (and lets be honest, they would have hardly any relationship to their country of birth for the most part) and may have played kids football in another country, cannot play any international football for NZ until 23??? That means a few kids can never play in an Olympics. That still just does not seem right. By the time you hit 22 you could well have lived here for 16-17 years and still be considered a foreigner.

and I thought Winston NZ First hated immigrants...

From what I can see it would depend on what FIFA counts as registered Footballer, I agree it sounds ridiculous, but that appears to be the way the rule applies to those who don't have Citizenship by birth (Born here, or Parent/Grandparent), that at the point where they register as a footballer if they don't have that nationality for FIFA purposes they must be in country for 5 years after 18th birthday, it's nuts, but it's clear why the rule was made after some dodgy citizenship occurances.

According to the article (posted earlier) regarding Bernie Ibini, who moved to Australia when he was 1 and had gotten citizenship before he was 10, he had to get clearance from FIFA to represent Australia at age group level. It seems it doesn't have much to do with which country you are first registered for football.

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/ibiniisei-wins-...

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Bullion wrote:

JonoNewton wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

So any kid that arrives here around age 5-6-7 (and lets be honest, they would have hardly any relationship to their country of birth for the most part) and may have played kids football in another country, cannot play any international football for NZ until 23??? That means a few kids can never play in an Olympics. That still just does not seem right. By the time you hit 22 you could well have lived here for 16-17 years and still be considered a foreigner.

and I thought Winston NZ First hated immigrants...

From what I can see it would depend on what FIFA counts as registered Footballer, I agree it sounds ridiculous, but that appears to be the way the rule applies to those who don't have Citizenship by birth (Born here, or Parent/Grandparent), that at the point where they register as a footballer if they don't have that nationality for FIFA purposes they must be in country for 5 years after 18th birthday, it's nuts, but it's clear why the rule was made after some dodgy citizenship occurances.

According to the article (posted earlier) regarding Bernie Ibini, who moved to Australia when he was 1 and had gotten citizenship before he was 10, he had to get clearance from FIFA to represent Australia at age group level. It seems it doesn't have much to do with which country you are first registered for football.

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/ibiniisei-wins-...

Well who knows then, however the rule is, it still seems screwed up and not always applied the same then.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

james dean wrote:

I am veering drastically from conspiracy to cock-up

It's an OFC conspiracy enabled by an NZF cockup

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

james dean wrote:

I am veering drastically from conspiracy to cock-up

I am veering towards cock-up but influenced by confusing rules compounded by two different competitions being run within same setup.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

at least Roy will be stoked

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

UK_ALLWHITE wrote:

james dean wrote:

well let's see.  Something big going to happen here either way (we're seriously fudgeed and someone at head office takes the hit, or world wide eligibility changes are clarified).  Pretty certain aussie will have breached this and both Saido Berahino and Fabrice Muamba definitely breached it for England (although I think they were refugees).  

The home nations have an agreement that if a player is educated in that country for at least five years they are then eligible. Berahino was schooled in England therefore qualifies for England. Same as Rhodes for Scotland and Dormans for Wales. 

In fact going by today's rules Ryan Giggs could have played for England, where as that rule wasn't in place when he was emerging on the scene in the early 90s. 

I was under the impression that Giggs had the option to play for England and chose to play for Wales. He could have applied for all kinds of things as he grew up in Manchester, shurely?



Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

I thought we had established that there is no distiction between the rules of either competition? This is an Olympic qualifier and run under FIFA rules.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

I thought we had established that there is no distiction between the rules of either competition? This is an Olympic qualifier and run under FIFA rules.

At the very least - this cockup has nothing to do with the fact that there's two competitions going on at once. We've violated FIFA rules.


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago
Have we though - still dont know that


Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

yellowsite wrote:

So it may be problematic for Wynne to get exemption (if he/authorities applied).

It seems relatively straight forwards and happens all the time. Hopefully NZ Football did do it, as was said we were not given an opportunity to defend ourselves.

If NZF did not apply for international clearance then that is a huge cockup, I wouldn't be surprised if the likes of Antony Hudson walked over this, his entire plan hinged around the olympics, and he is only trying to get us to the worldcup to put his name in the window for a bigger job. If he doesn't think we can do it because of an admin blunder then he will go.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

I thought we had established that there is no distiction between the rules of either competition? This is an Olympic qualifier and run under FIFA rules.

If that were true Micronesia wouldnt have been able to take part as they are not a FIFA member nation. There were two competition, the Pacific nations cup and the Olympic qualifiers

Ugh, ignore the above, I understand what you are getting at.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

If NZF had an exemption, and/or we hadn't violated the rules (cocked up epically) then NZF would have come out in the media and said as much.

Instead, they've come out in the media and said they're bunkering down with some of Smithy's mates to do their best to find a loophole where OFC have cocked up in exposing/punishing NZF for their cock ups.

Even if they are successful, the fact remains that two cock ups do not excuse a cock up.

This is a cock up.

E + R + O

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

Why throw a whole team out - why not stand the player ( unbeknownst to him for being in the wrong), down for the final with a fine for NZF?

Why punish a whole team, fan base,  for a regulation error. Why did Vanuatu wait till they had lost to use the info?

We need the Lt Caffey from A Few Good Men to handle this case, sue OFC, FIFA, IOC and PG for damages.

Good luck to Fiji - and as already said - good luck Roy Krishna.

Lastly - hope Declan has some good mates and he is being looked after - he will be feeling like shark shark and more shark.

"Ufuk with the Club, Ufuk with the Country".

 If your girlfriend's got gloves, she's a keeper.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

The only thing that can save us is if FIFA had previously given Wynne clearance. If they had done so you would have expected NZF to have said so by now. Conversely, you have to wonder how Wynne got this far if he wasn't given clearance. I think we just have to see how it plays out but things don't look too good.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Even if we did mess up it seems likely OFC has done us one. They probably knew Wynne was ineligible but waited until the semis so we could be kicked out of the competition. If they did it earlier then we might have just lost 3 competition points and still went on to win the thing.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Hudson will walk .... this job is his great reputation builder and that just got demo'ed by NZF

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Ryan wrote:

yellowsite wrote:

So it may be problematic for Wynne to get exemption (if he/authorities applied).

It seems relatively straight forwards and happens all the time. Hopefully NZ Football did do it, as was said we were not given an opportunity to defend ourselves.

He was older when he emigrated than some of the other players in this situation that have been used as examples in this thread.

Others were refugees, which may be dealt with differently?

I assume he played football in SA, not long after he came here he was playing in a rep U15 team.

If he was playing football in elite teams, for his age, in his previous homeland, who knows?

A fan is a fan.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

GK wrote:

Why throw a whole team out - why not stand the player ( unbeknownst to him for being in the wrong), down for the final with a fine for NZF?

Why punish a whole team, fan base,  for a regulation error. Why did Vanuatu wait till they had lost to use the info?

We need the Lt Caffey from A Few Good Men to handle this case, sue OFC, FIFA, IOC and PG for damages.

Good luck to Fiji - and as already said - good luck Roy Krishna.

Lastly - hope Declan has some good mates and he is being looked after - he will be feeling like shark shark and more shark.

Because is against the rules. You have to play with elegible players and if you don't, then you get disqualified, simple as that. Of course is unfair for the rest of the team and Hudson himself but the rules are the rules and it seems we have broken them

Rosario Central, the All Whites, Waitakere United and the mighty Phoenix! speaker of engrish

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

I think nothing would have changed if Vanuatu used the info of Wynne before -if they even knew it by then-. We had already played him in other matches, so we would be given a forfeit in those as well, probably making NZ out of the competition

Rosario Central, the All Whites, Waitakere United and the mighty Phoenix! speaker of engrish

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago
We still dont have all the facts Back to your day jobs ppl


Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Argie96 wrote:

I think nothing would have changed if Vanuatu used the info of Wynne before -if they even knew it by then-. We had already played him in other matches, so we would be given a forfeit in those as well, probably making NZ out of the competition

I thought he had only played in one game? We would have still gone through.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

TV wrote:
We still dont have all the facts

Back to your day jobs ppl

No, but there are some very interesting whisper from people who would know the facts.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

"Pacific Games Council executive director Andrew Minogue released a statement expressing regret at any confusion which may have been caused by staging a Fifa tournament as part of the Pacific Games multi-sport event. Minogue said that the PGC would learn from the issue ... "Having the Olympic tournament here has got a lot of people talking and that's what we want."

source:  Uk Guardian : 'NZ thrown out of Olympic qualifying event....

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

"In the 2014 World Cup qualifying groups, ineligible players proved the biggest administrative problem for FIFA. Seven different African teams fielded players who did not have valid clearance, forcing FIFA to award 3-0 wins to their opponents. The penalized teams were Burkina Faso, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Liberia, Sudan and Togo.

Africa was the only one of FIFA's six continental confederations which had issues with federations failing to get proper FIFA clearance for players."

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

Ryan wrote:

Argie96 wrote:

I think nothing would have changed if Vanuatu used the info of Wynne before -if they even knew it by then-. We had already played him in other matches, so we would be given a forfeit in those as well, probably making NZ out of the competition

I thought he had only played in one game? We would have still gone through.

"Had Myanmar known the Fifa ruling on eligibility, it is understood they could have appealed their 5 1 loss to NZ  and progressed through to the knockout stage at NZ's expense."

Ben Strang writing for www.stuff.

Just gets worse. We're looking 3rd world. When are we playing them again? Hope they treat us nice....

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Does anyone really know the facts? After a whole day and a bit of journalists and fans trying to work it out, it seems like the answer still isn't clear. If that is the case, how exactly did OFC give the ruling and kick us out so quickly?

a.haak

Permalink Permalink