All Whites, Ferns, and other international teams

Vs Mexico 1st Leg Thurs 14th 9:30am SS2

1684 replies · 195,430 views
over 12 years ago
Blew.2 wrote:

Watching Hi-lights Was Moss the only player to play at his full ability.  

YES.

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:

Was not even close to handball but never let facts get in the way of scapegoating

Some irony in there somewhere.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
I was listening to Moss on radio sport. Apparently Fallon and Smith were trying to gee everyone up for the return leg which is understandable. And Ricki? Didn't say anything. Apparently he only talks the following day. Christ Ricki, you have a few more days in the job, can't you change a habit of a life time? No wonder we lost like we did.



Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

We lost the game because Ricki didn't say much immediately after the game? 

Does not compute. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
I was listening to Moss on radio sport. Apparently Fallon and Smith were trying to gee everyone up for the return leg which is understandable. And Ricki? Didn't say anything. Apparently he only talks the following day. Christ Ricki, you have a few more days in the job, can't you change a habit of a life time? No wonder we lost like we did.


wtf?

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jerzy Merino wrote:
Blew.2 wrote:

Watching Hi-lights Was Moss the only player to play at his full ability.  

YES.


and still despite the heroics- it was him coming to get the ball he didn't need to and not getting it but disrupting Durante that cost us the first goal and all that good pressure we'd been putting on the Mexicans. 


Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:

Was not even close to handball but never let facts get in the way of scapegoating


It was a clear handball and should have been a penalty JV. 
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Tegal wrote:

We lost the game because Ricki didn't say much immediately after the game? 

Does not compute. 

you completely missed the point lol.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Seb wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:

Was not even close to handball but never let facts get in the way of scapegoating


It was a clear handball and should have been a penalty JV. 

Distracted by his missus.

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Whatever is Ricki's managing style is his style. Brian Clough didn't get up from his bench before extra in one game and was called a genius, he did it later in his career and was called weak. 



Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

I'm still waiting for Doloras to come out in defence of her husband.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jerzy Merino wrote:
Seb wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:

Was not even close to handball but never let facts get in the way of scapegoating


It was a clear handball and should have been a penalty JV. 

Distracted by his missus.


I don't know how anyone could argue against it not being a penalty. Lochhead clearly swung his arm and moved the ball at least a metre. Another bullet we dodged. Had Mexico capitalized on all of their chances it could have been 8-1
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Buffon II wrote:

I'm still waiting for Doloras to come out in defence of her husband.

?

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Tegal wrote:

We lost the game because Ricki didn't say much immediately after the game? 

Does not compute. 

If you want me to spell it out for you, I will. It illustrates a manager stuck in his ways, devoid of ideas, who has not developed and made changes to his management style, tactics or for that matter team for the last four years. Compute?

Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Seb wrote:

If Brian Turner takes over I give up.


That's paranoia territory. While he may be considered(for argument's sake) as a caretaker/nightwatchman, the process will have to be bedded in to give the AW a long-term coach for the benefit of development for the future.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Tegal wrote:

So every 3rd post has been brettdale saying "Ricki is shit" without adding anything of substance. I remember now why I avoid match threads.

I thought the tactics were right and were actually working until a couple of silly errors led us to concede 2 before halftime. Even then Ricki kept up the game plan as 2-0 would have still seen us with a chance. Once we went 3-0 down he went more attacking since we desperately needed that away goal, it wasn't surprising then that we conceded a couple more . 

What you can criticise Ricki for is a squad and even a starting XI selection or two (the Christie experiment backfired a bit), the buildup and inconsistent squad and playing XI selections during the buildup. 

Also Steve Sumner is an idiot. If we had pressed all game at altitude against Mexico we would have been slaughtered. 

and 5-1 isn't a slaughter? We were just poor, we were under no pressure and continually did a Vinny Lia and passed the ball straight to the Mexicans. I wouldn' t have minded much if we had gone down fighting, but I am ashamed to be a Kiwi fan on that performance
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Tegal wrote:
valeo wrote:
. We knocked it around quite well once Chris James came on, did we not? There is a difference between parking the bus and just hoofing it upfield everytime we got the ball until we went 2-0 then 3-0 down.

Can't really argue with that too much, Christie should not have started. 

Also, in the first half there were maybe 3 or 4 times when we came out of the back down the wings, Wood made an intelligent run, and a through ball was played in that vast space between the Mexican goal and their defenders, and it looked like we might actually create a goal scoring chance. There were plenty of times too where we picked up a ball wide and deep in our own half with a bit of time and space and instead of trying to get in behind the high Mexican backline we hoofed a ball to Wood's head or chest. He might be big but he actually isn't a targetman and doesn't suit that style of play.


It's frustrating to read the debate on here about how to play like it's a choice between hit and hope and playing tika taka. Bullsh*t. We have reasonably quick skillful wingers (Rojas and Barborouses) a striker who likes to run onto the ball (Wood) and at least 2 centre mids (James and McGlinchey) who can play those passes down the flanks for those wingers to get on to. And you can't tell me that James would be any worse at defending against a small Mexican team than Christie was and he's a damn sight better with the ball at his feet. I'll accept that maybe Rojas couldn't start cos of injury etc though. And yeah, at altitude that'll tire your striker and wingers but you have subs and if you scored with it then you can go back into your shell a bit.


My point is, we could have still selected a very similar team, sat deep, defended in numbers AND played to our attackers' strengths as well.


I think if you play that completely defensively then you're setting yourself up to make dumb mistakes too, because you're giving the opposition so many chances and putting no pressure on them. On top of that once you do concede a couple your heads go down because you've committed so much to defense and they've scored anyway. 

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Tegal wrote:

We lost the game because Ricki didn't say much immediately after the game? 

Does not compute. 

If you want me to spell it out for you, I will. It illustrates a manager stuck in his ways, devoid of ideas, who has not developed and made changes to his management style, tactics or for that matter team for the last four years. Compute?

You get all that from his style being to not say much after the game? 
Still doesn't compute. 

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

2 of those 5 goals were free headers from corners (one of them was actually 2 free headers in a row).

Nothing to do with tactics or selection. Just piss poor defending.


Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
and 5-1 isn't a slaughter? We were just poor, we were under no pressure and continually did a Vinny Lia and passed the ball straight to the Mexicans. I wouldn' t have minded much if we had gone down fighting, but I am ashamed to be a Kiwi fan on that performance

Are Mexico still rubbish?

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
EL TV wrote:

Can i just say we played a far better Mexican team in 2010 with a far weaker team than now and didnt play negatively and lost 2-0.

Tactics were v v wrong and Mexico quietly went about their biz with no pressure

+1

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

A Latino friend of mine from LA thought NZ were "rubbish". Can't believe the 2010 WC results. Had to explain they were two different teams led by a top class coach and defender (Ricki was there too).

Ricki being a kidder till the end will again trot out Lochhead, Christie and maybe even Butler at Westpac. Siggy will slot in for Vicelich, but then of course he's got Aaron Scott too. We've had the Horror at Honairi, now the Agony at the Azteca. Any suggestions for Westpac?

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
terminator_x wrote:

2 of those 5 goals were free headers from corners (one of them was actually 2 free headers in a row).

Nothing to do with tactics or selection. Just piss poor defending.


Yes it was piss poor defending but I don't think you can totally remove tactics from that equation. The more you let the opposition come at you, the more chances you are creating for an error to occur in a situation where it will lead to a goal. By playing so defensively you're also reinforcing the mindset that the opposition are so much better than you, and if you're feeling under the pump from a vastly superior team you're more likely to make a crucial error than if you believe you are equal to them. We don't have any natural onfield leaders like Ryan anymore to instill that belief regardless of the match situation.

I think Ricki's first half tactics were so defensive that once Mexico scored our team just thought the inevitable hiding had started. If we'd been just a little bit more proactive (ugh I hate that word  but I can't think of a more appropriate one right now) then maybe once we went a goal or two down we still would have felt like we could get something from it. Let's not forget this Mexico team had a new coach, a bunch of players who had barely played a meaningful international before, and were playing in a stadium where they'd scored 3 goals in their last 4 games. Yeah they were better than us no doubt, but we also just let them know that and settle into the game. They knew they had nothing to fear so they could just play their game.

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Seb wrote:
Jerzy Merino wrote:
Seb wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:

Was not even close to handball but never let facts get in the way of scapegoating


It was a clear handball and should have been a penalty JV. 

Distracted by his missus.


I don't know how anyone could argue against it not being a penalty. Lochhead clearly swung his arm and moved the ball at least a metre. Another bullet we dodged. Had Mexico capitalized on all of their chances it could have been 8-1

I think the ref felt sorry for us.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
terminator_x wrote:

2 of those 5 goals were free headers from corners (one of them was actually 2 free headers in a row).

Nothing to do with tactics or selection. Just piss poor defending.


that's what pisses me off. Yes, we were playing too deep, and hoofed the ball away and technically outclassed, and all of that. But we still gave away some friggin light goals through a lack of marking and concentration and intensity? How slack were we on corners? How often did they find space or take a short corner we didn't react to. Given our squad's ability, I expected to lose, but if those guys had put in a decent shift we might only be two goals behind. And then we still would have had hope.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Well I got that wrong...I said 0-5.

Everything has just about been said...the sooner this whole fiasco is over the better. The game went as predicted. Christie was a disaster....which is 100% Herberts fault. You can't select someone to play at this level without them having some match play. Brave Ivan is too slow to play internationally as a CB. We badly missed Reid. The first half tactics were the most depressing football I have ever seen from a NZ side. There is something about Herbert and his tactics that just sucks the life out of football. On a positive note James in particular and Rojas added some spark for 15 mins in the second half before normal transmission resumed.


The really embarassing thing is that after watching NZ bumble there way through draws against low ranked clubs in their LA warmups the Mexican coach decided that a side based on a Mexican club would easily beat NZ(without their star players)...and he was 100% right.


So what now. Herbert will have to make changes for Wellington. Roux should come in as will Fallon. I would imagine James will start too. There is only one person responsible for this mess. Its Herbert...he has been the uber-fuhrer for the last 8 years. The buck has to stop with him. Thanks Ricki for the WC in SA but you should have retired after that.....


I guess after Jordan and NZ both shipping 5 goals in the first leg of their WC playoffs then there will won't be much a strong call for WC expansion to include more slots for Asia and automatic entry for Oceania

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

We need Walter White, he knows how to deal with Mexicans.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Bluemagic wrote:

Ricki being a kidder till the end will again trot out Lochhead, Christie at Westpac.

 

Can we get a bet at the TAB on this? Lochead with a start doubled with Christie for a start must be at least 1000/1

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

Until our mentality doesn't change, nothing will.

The way to go for NZ Football from here:

Start to play more offensively minded football, string some passes together and don't just defend for 90 mins.

We might still lose games, but perhaps we'll look a bit better


This is the same issue that was hotly debated in Australian football during the Pim Verbeek - Holger Osieck era.
Some pundits, notably Craig Foster, even called the defensive/cautious mindset "un-Australian".  This era seems to be ending with the wipeouts against France and Brazil, and the subsequent appointment of Ange Postecoglou as the new NT coach.
Could the Azteca Agony be our own watershed a well?  I, for one, hope so.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Seb wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:

Was not even close to handball but never let facts get in the way of scapegoating


It was a clear handball and should have been a penalty JV. 

I've just watched it on mysky right now. He tried to hit it and spun and it bounced up off the surface to hit his hand. He had zero clue what was going and it was in no way deliberate nor did he see it. Yes the ball hit his hand. No it is not handball. You should do some reading on the laws when making statements like that. If you think that is handball then every single time the ball touches the hand, its handball. Thats so not the case.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Everyone chill out. It wasnt given. All you can do is laugh about how shit lochhead is. 

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

In fact, it will be on TV again in about 25 min. I suggest you watch it again.


Edit: And when watching it, take this into account from page 119


Handling the ball involves a deliberate act of a player making contact with the ball with his hand or arm. The referee must take the following into consideration:

• the movement of the hand towards the ball (not the ball towards the hand)

• the distance between the opponent and the ball (unexpected ball)

• the position of the hand does not necessarily mean that there is an infringement

• touching the ball with an object held in the hand (clothing, shinguard, etc.) counts as an infringement

• hitting the ball with a thrown object (boot, shinguard, etc.) counts as an infringemen

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Buffon II wrote:
and 5-1 isn't a slaughter? We were just poor, we were under no pressure and continually did a Vinny Lia and passed the ball straight to the Mexicans. I wouldn' t have minded much if we had gone down fighting, but I am ashamed to be a Kiwi fan on that performance


Are Mexico still rubbish?


lol

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:

In fact, it will be on TV again in about 25 min. I suggest you watch it again.


Dafuq.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Jeff Vader wrote:
I've just watched it on mysky right now. He tried to hit it and spun and it bounced up off the surface to hit his hand. He had zero clue what was going and it was in no way deliberate nor did he see it. Yes the ball hit his hand. No it is not handball. You should do some reading on the laws when making statements like that. If you think that is handball then every single time the ball touches the hand, its handball. Thats so not the case.

I agree - I learned this lesson from countless replays of a very harsh handball call against Harry Kewell early in the first half of Australia's game against Ghana at the WC 2010. The ball hit him straight on, against a motionless arm and upper body together (that's how small the gap was between body and arm). Kewell got sent off with a red card and Ghana scored a penalty. Some argued that - while they were ordinary - Australia would have won that game with Kewell on the park, and they might have gone on to the second round, despite the awful first-up game against Germany (defensive mindset, parking the bus, etc etc).

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago


Mexico were just too damned good for us. Hopefully we can get some respect back in Welly. I thought Rory showed some leadership when he came on. Start him in Welly.

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:

In fact, it will be on TV again in about 25 min. I suggest you watch it again.


Edit: And when watching it, take this into account from page 119


Handling the ball involves a deliberate act of a player making contact with the ball with his hand or arm. The referee must take the following into consideration:

• the movement of the hand towards the ball (not the ball towards the hand)

• the distance between the opponent and the ball (unexpected ball)

• the position of the hand does not necessarily mean that there is an infringement

• touching the ball with an object held in the hand (clothing, shinguard, etc.) counts as an infringement

• hitting the ball with a thrown object (boot, shinguard, etc.) counts as an infringemen


Thank heavens it was not given, but I bet that if it had been 1-1 he would have given it.
I thought it was a pen, but had I been the ref i may not have given it.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Have also just watched it on mysky, words that come to mind: embarrassing/pathetic/inadequate/soulless/weak/abysmal..... the list goes one. A disgusting performance, sure Ricki picked the team and 7 out of the starting eleven just aren't up to it at this level. But have some self pride, there was none of that. yuck.

Permalink Permalink