WC Intercontinental Playoff vs Costa Rica | Tue 14th June (15th NZT) | 9pm (6am NZT)

Legend
11K
·
22K
·
almost 9 years
Finished 2-0 Panama. Ticos fans not happy on social media. Coach & starting keeper getting alot of criticism.

But some other perhaps more balanced comments, that CR won't have taken this game seriously. It's all about June 14th for them, plus Navas and some of the older heads coming back in will make a huge difference.

Their starting 2 fowards & 4 midfielders were aged - 22, 18, 17, 21, 21 & 21.
Then their back 5 incl keeper, were all over 30 yrs except one 26 yr old (CB Vargas).

https://www.facebook.com/fedefutbolcrc/

You think they might revert again to a back 3/5 for AWs, has been working for them of late.

Both goals in this link.
https://rpp.pe/futbol/futbol-mundial/panama-vs-costa-rica-en-vivo-como-cuando-y-donde-en-directo-partido-canales-horarios-tudn-rpc-teletica-por-fecha-1-de-liga-de-naciones-concacaf-noticia-1409163

Legend
11K
·
22K
·
almost 9 years
Match highlights. CR in white with some good chances early on.
https://www.concacaf.com/nations-league/videos/panama-v-costa-rica/

Contreras seemed lively. He could partner Campbell up front, verus AWs.

It's only 4 mins of highlights, but AWs can hopefully take some confidence from  this result. Feel that Navas is going to be hugely important for the Ticos though. His presence will give them a huge confidence lift like Wood or Reid do with the AWs.

Trialist
130
·
49
·
about 6 years
That was definitely not the approach I would have taken if I were the Costa Rica manager. A few possible considerations: they’ve had a long camp and a 14-match qualifying run, the squad know each other and their tactics. There isn’t really a need for a dry run before the playoff. Second, which was brought up in the broadcast, but a lot of teams (certainly the other CONCACAF teams) are using this window to look at a few new faces or player on the bubble of a 23/26-man roster to make a case for the Qatar squad. The thinking being if they don’t show it now, there isn’t time in September experiment. In some ways this starting lineup was Costa Rica experimenting and giving a real shot for their young attacking players (who almost all have few/no caps) to show whether they’re ready to be in the squad if they qualify. 

I would definitely start some of the players that started tonight in the playoff, but you can make an argument that this was an entirely rotated starting 11. The players not playing: Navas; Fuller, Duarte, Calvo, Lawrence; Borges, Tejada; Torres, Ruiz, Venegas; Campbell would make a reasonable starting 11. I have no idea why you would rest all of your starters in this match, but it’s possible.

In terms of back 3 or 4, I have no idea what they might do, but they have played both enough I don’t think either is going to be a surprise to the AWs. 

That was basically a first-choice Panama side. They didn’t start their captain Anibal Godoy, but he usually pairs with Carrasquilla or Martinez in the centre of the midfield. I thought together Carrasquilla and Martinez played very well and dominated Galo and Chacon for Costa Rica. I like Galo (or Chacon) to add some legs to the midfield, but their play tonight won’t hurt Tejeda’s odds of being the one to start with Celso Borges. Galo and Chacon’s passing was pretty poor. That’s not something they are called upon to do a lot when Borges is out there, but they struggled. Even defensively I thought they lost too many duels and too many second balls which is what they’re supposed to be there to do to my mind. 

Blanco and Oviedo would be my choice to start at fullback, but Blanco, the seemingly safer and more defensive option compared to the fast, more attack-minded Fuller, actually didn’t play that well defensively. He didn’t clear the ball in the sequence that led to the first goal and late on he was having trouble dealing with the fresh Panama legs on his side. I thought Oviedo held up pretty well. Quintero is Panama’s trickiest attacker and he was on his side of the pitch, along with the fullback Murillo, who is probably Panama’s best player and then Diaz (who had the first goal) was also drifting to Oviedo’s side. He had his hands full. He didn’t offer much going forward, but I thought he did well. I don’t think they’d start Lawrence at left back (who apparently, like Ruiz, has covid), but it’s possible. I still think Oviedo is the logical choice.

I didn’t think any of the attacking mids did enough to make a case to start the playoff. Mora, the debutant, probably had the best game, but Venegas was much better than any of them when he came off the bench. Aguillera had moments, but his miss (and over-reliance on only his left foot) on the cutback in the highlights coochiee posted was pretty bad. Bennette, the 17 year old, started some of the qualifiers, but had the poorest night I’ve seen from him. He didn’t look ready to make a World Cup squad. I’m not sure Aguillera did either.

I like Contreras. He didn’t get much service and still created some danger. He works really hard, presses from the front and has some skill. Plus, if you start him up top, Campbell gets to play deeper and be more involved and I think that makes Costa Rica better. I thought Contreras had a good night.

When the game got stretched, Waston and Vargas had some difficulties in space, but generally Waston was his usual solid self. I was surprised to see Vargas lose an aerial duel on the corner that led to the second goal. I think the back is Duarte and Calvo and then Waston if they want three in the back, so Vargas is unlikely to feature.

Panama scored a third fairly late that was ruled offside, but I don’t think it was. They haven’t lost at home in 12 straight matches now. Their head-to-head matches and the qualifying table disagree with me, but I still think Panama is a better side than Costa Rica… but a full strength Panama at home versus a mostly second-choice Costa Rica? This is about what you’d expect. I don’t see this result or the team they chose having any bearing on what happens in Doha next week.

We’ll see what they decide to do against Martinque on the weekend. FWIW Martinique are missing a couple of their better players, but there’s a reason they’re in Nations League A, Martinique are usually not horrible. I think Costa Rica should be fairly comfortable winners, especially at home, but it could be a competitive match.

Legend
11K
·
22K
·
almost 9 years
Some great feedback again from our Canuck CONCACAF correspondent.

Seemed a pretty poor performance by most of the younger brigade, and hopefully has added more confusion than clarity for the Ticos coach. Especially for the central midfield. Sounds a risk for them to play both of the older slower, if very experienced Borges and Tejada. But the younger combination Galo and Chacon got out played by their Panamanian opposites. Good news for Hay.

I thought our young, inexperienced midfield was maybe a weakness. But it could be the opposite. I'm sure their experienced LB Oviedo who is on the books with Stamenic at FC Copenhagen, is telling the Ticos coach, all about his clubmate and Bell at Brondby. El jefe these Kiwi midfield kids in Denmark can play.

What maybe clearer after yesterday is that Contreras will start up top for them, with Campbell in behind. Contreras does look very useful indeed.

Their 2 or 3 CBs take your pick from the experienced quartet Waston, Duarte, Calvo & Vargas. Two of Blanco, Fuller or Oviedo as the fullbacks. Navas in goal will be the best player on the park June 14th.

I imagine the hugely experienced Brian Ruiz comes onto the bench at least, as he should be over his Covid by the 14th. Borges could be a mystery, not in match day squad at all yesterday (stayed in San Jose?), and some talk of an injury.

Sounds like it's the midfield that will be causing most confusion/uncertainty in the Ticos camp. Anyway looks like yesterday's game had more negatives, than positives for the Costa Ricans. AWs look good against Peru, and CR will start to get a little anxious. They have the weight & pressure of a whole football mad country on their shoulders. Been a few revealing stories in Peru with it's similar fanatic emotive Latino football culture, that many of their players were sharkting bricks abit before the return leg in Lima in 2017. So much pressure to win.

Sure you go through a pressure cooker tough CONMEBOL or CONCACAF qualifying campaign, but a one off, winner takes all match against an a non Latino opponent you don't know well. Nervous times. And being based at home for 3-4 weeks, the Ticos players/staff will be feeling it every day.

Whole different feel to the AWs where it's almost more personal internal pressure, esp for some older guys like Reid, Smith, Barba, Boxall etc knowing it's likely their last shot at a WC. Training in low key Spain. Are there even going to be any NZ media in Doha? Has been a low level of media attention to date, given what's at stake in 11 days.
Trialist
14
·
17
·
over 4 years
https://www.facebook.com/116655838375829/posts/7608360425871962/?app=fbl

"BELIEVE AGAIN"


Trialist
1
·
3
·
almost 2 years
TheFlyingKiwis
https://www.facebook.com/116655838375829/posts/7608360425871962/?app=fbl

"BELIEVE AGAIN"


Love your work dude.  Hope your group has a fantastic and succesful time in Doha and bring home the bacon.  
Legend
11K
·
22K
·
almost 9 years
Costa Rica up 1-0 at HT in San Jose verus Martinque. They are set up with a back 4.

Lots of older heads starting this game. Calvo & Duarte as CBs.
Borges & Tejeda in midfield. Campbell lone striker up front.

Hay will probably get more out of this game than Panama re cues how Ticos may play/setup next week.

Edit - Contreas who looked good against Panama on at HT for CR.

Phoenix Academy
87
·
180
·
over 10 years
Hey there, so I am organising for The Paddington in Parnell, Auckland to be an unofficial All Whites supporters bar to show the game.

Any indication on who might be interested in watching there or are you going elsewhere?
Legend
11K
·
22K
·
almost 9 years
Costa Rica with a 2-0 win over Martinique.
Calvo CB with the 2nd goal, with an assist from the other CB Duarte.

Ticos with 64% possession which doesn't indicate a team sitting deep. Though Martinique obviously a bit of a minnow.

So the 'phoney war' is over (except for Oman behind closed doors). Both AWs & Ticos head to Doha.


Legend
11K
·
22K
·
almost 9 years
First Team Squad
3.4K
·
1.4K
·
over 6 years
Unless some players really show up or really disappoint vs Oman, I think this is pretty likely for the starting XI. Based on the Peru game I reckon we need Pijnaker’s passing/switching ability and Lewis changed the game when he came on. Not sure if Greive still starts but I’d probably still have him there for his shooting and ability to draw the foul.
DE9634B4-5CAD-43C8-AE30-613B6680E207.jpeg 412.82 KB
WeeNix
340
·
560
·
about 17 years
Id have Marko and Marco behind wood. Marko didnt do much against peru but hes calmer on the ball than Garbett (bring him off the bench). I'm not sure why Marco didnt play, but we need his experience. 
First Team Squad
3.4K
·
1.4K
·
over 6 years
Elemenop
Id have Marko and Marco behind wood. Marko didnt do much against peru but hes calmer on the ball than Garbett (bring him off the bench). I'm not sure why Marco didnt play, but we need his experience. 
I’d be happy with that
Phoenix Academy
130
·
440
·
over 16 years
 Not sure if Greive still starts but I’d probably still have him there for his shooting and ability to draw the foul.

He comes off the bench for impact for me, not a starter. Lots of endeavour but no impact in the full game. Always seems to be better for last 20. I would have Rojas or Costa ahead of him to start.

Trialist
130
·
49
·
about 6 years
I was watching the UEFA playoff so I only saw about 30 minutes of NZ-Peru and CR-Mtq. Peru is a better side than Costa Rica, so I thought that was probably a heartening performance. Seeing the time Yoshi Yotun had on the ball for Peru worried me a little. That’s exactly what I wouldn’t want to give to Borges. Garbutt started to deny his space better as the first half wore on, but Yotun had moments where he had a lot of time to pick out a good ball. You know your side much better than I, so I leave it at that. 

From what I saw Martinique was playing pretty well. They looked dangerous on the counter and their pace was causing some issues. Lawrence, the left back who maybe had covid, played in the second half so he’s healthy. Still no Bryan Ruiz. Oviedo, the starting LB was the only starter to keep his place from the match in Panama. Carlos Martinez got his third cap at right back. Neither of the other right backs have looked great, so maybe that spot is up for grabs, but I wouldn’t think a player like Martinez was seriously in consideration to start. Costa Rica did beat the US 2-0 with a bunch of kids and I am wondering if some of those kids are now being over-rated. Aguilera and Mora came off the bench again. Chacon, Martinez and Lawrence are others who have less than a handful of caps who are getting serious time in the Nations League after starting in that US win. I do think it will be a lot of the old guard that starts the playoff.
 
Keysher Fuller, the guy who filled in at right back/right wing back with Blanco’s injury, actually started and played as an inverted attacking winger on the left flank. That’s maybe a more natural role than right back, but I was surprised they played him that far up the pitch. 

No idea if this geoblocked (surely a North American VPN could fix that) but the match was on YouTube today: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fG0Sv7L_UZo 

Phoenix Academy
140
·
160
·
over 2 years
New Zealand and Martinique are similar. Both teams of mostly European based players, and both teams don't play often.
Legend
11K
·
22K
·
almost 9 years
I'm hoping Libby is going to be a real threat against CR. He was really impressive against Peru today, and seems like the right flank is problematic for the Ticos.

Scribbling this from Lima, and I agree that Peru are better than CR. Peruvians have an excellent coach in Argentinian Garcia, who is adored here. Locals will often mention the coach before any of the players. He has done a great job navigating the tough Sth American qualifying path, and replacing two Peruvian legends 37 yr old Jefferson Farfan (scored 1st goal verus AWS 2017) & his good mate the country's all time record goal scorer 38 yr old Paulo Guerrero (30 goals).

Helped him that in this cycle they picked up Italian born striker Lapadula (today's scorer) who was good enough to play a friendly for Azzuri back in 2017.

But you contrast that to everything we read about the Ticos (mostly Juneof86's great stuff), who seem a side struggling to replace their aging golden generation adequately. So you get this old slowing side with players trying to desperately get to one more World Cup, drawing on all their smarts, nous & experience from aging bodies. A heap of guys 30+ in years.

I guess crude maths in a way partly explains all this. Peru has 32M people so that must mean a deeper player talent pool, than CR with it's 5M souls. More people & football players greater chance of new quality coming through.

I note it was Borges's midfield partner Venegas who played a nice ball through to Campbell for CR's first goal today verus Martinique. He had tonnes of space between the Martinique lines to make the final pass. That stuff the AWs need to shut down.

And don't know anything really about the Ticos coach Suarez (a Colombian). But reading CR FA Facebook page, he ain't adored by the fans. And he's likely in 2 minds about a few selections, youth verus experience, blah blah.

There is reason to be hopeful & optimistic, but we can't give them 62% possession like Peru today.
https://www.concacaf.com/nations-league/videos/costa-rica-v-martinique/
valeo
·
Legend
4.6K
·
18K
·
about 17 years
Does anyone genuinely think Grieve and Garbett are better options than Rojas who's in the form of his life? 

Also think it's a bit concerning that we don't have a keeper we can rely on. I love Oli but he's no Paston 
and 1 other
First Team Squad
3.4K
·
1.4K
·
over 6 years
valeo
Does anyone genuinely think Grieve and Garbett are better options than Rojas who's in the form of his life? 

Also think it's a bit concerning that we don't have a keeper we can rely on. I love Oli but he's no Paston 
I think Rojas probably should start considering we’re missing the creativity of Singh and Thomas. I don’t think Danny will start him though.
Legend
7.2K
·
14K
·
over 16 years
valeo
Does anyone genuinely think Grieve and Garbett are better options than Rojas who's in the form of his life? 

Also think it's a bit concerning that we don't have a keeper we can rely on. I love Oli but he's no Paston 

Well, Paston showed he could be relied on, by doing it in the playoffs and WC. He had his own issues before that.

And on combinations- Marco and Woodze have definitely played before in crunch games.
WeeNix
840
·
520
·
almost 7 years
I think Rojas needs to start. 

Also, this might sounds unconventional, but if Hay is set on 5 at the back, I'd consider playing: Kirwan - Tuiloma - Boxall - Pijnaker - Cacace.

In other words, I'd drop Reid. May sound harsh but I feel like he's well past his best, and looks a shadow of his former self.
WeeNix
1.6K
·
980
·
about 3 years
martinb
valeo
Does anyone genuinely think Grieve and Garbett are better options than Rojas who's in the form of his life? 

Also think it's a bit concerning that we don't have a keeper we can rely on. I love Oli but he's no Paston 

Well, Paston showed he could be relied on, by doing it in the playoffs and WC. He had his own issues before that.

And on combinations- Marco and Woodze have definitely played before in crunch games.
 
Well, tbf, there was a keeper on the bench today who has proved himself to make big time saves in IC playoffs and Confeds.

Rojas has had a few A League seasons where he’s put up better numbers, then not done much in a white shirt (or any shirt that isn’t a navy-blue one). He has 4 goals in 45-odd caps, 3 of them being vs New Caledonia and the Solomons, so there’s genuine reasons to be sceptical of him on an international stage. He can be a bit like Piscopo in that he always tries to dribble past one more player than he should. That being said, Barbarouses did nothing today so I’d like to have seen him, but hindsight is 20/20, and we don’t see what has happened in the past week or so in Marbella. I’m sure he’ll get a chance vs Oman and it’s up to him to take it.
WeeNix
840
·
520
·
almost 7 years
Following on from this post, I'd like to see us play with 4 at the back and start another attack-minded player. I feel like we need to take the game to Costa Rica and not adopt a defensive mindset. Let's go out there, be positive, and give it a real go.
Marquee
3.9K
·
5.5K
·
almost 12 years
Maybe Hay is holding Rojas back a little... for a couple reasons.

- He's still learning his role in the team and the combinations having had the least amount of time with the squad out of anyone.

- He's likely to start against CR and Hay wants to keep his role in the team unknown. We all know we need a creative outlet which he provides, so why show our hand?

Hopefully Rojas has a great game against Oman and forces Hay's hand a little.

What was interesting was that there was no Just or McCowatt (his apparent favourites) and Payne who he calls a 'second son' started on the bench, so I don't think he can be accused of playing favourites.
Legend
11K
·
22K
·
almost 9 years
carlind
martinb
valeo
Does anyone genuinely think Grieve and Garbett are better options than Rojas who's in the form of his life? 

Also think it's a bit concerning that we don't have a keeper we can rely on. I love Oli but he's no Paston 

Well, Paston showed he could be relied on, by doing it in the playoffs and WC. He had his own issues before that.

And on combinations- Marco and Woodze have definitely played before in crunch games.
 
Well, tbf, there was a keeper on the bench today who has proved himself to make big time saves in IC playoffs and Confeds.

Rojas has had a few A League seasons where he’s put up better numbers, then not done much in a white shirt (or any shirt that isn’t a navy-blue one). He has 4 goals in 45-odd caps, 3 of them being vs New Caledonia and the Solomons, so there’s genuine reasons to be sceptical of him on an international stage. He can be a bit like Piscopo in that he always tries to dribble past one more player than he should. That being said, Barbarouses did nothing today so I’d like to have seen him, but hindsight is 20/20, and we don’t see what has happened in the past week or so in Marbella. I’m sure he’ll get a chance vs Oman and it’s up to him to take it.

I didn’t see the game but in the VUC verus Western U playoff Rojas had a bit of a stinker?? Prior that he had been in very good form, but not career best. That was years ago when he and Archie Thompson were carving it up together and Rojas won the Johnny Warren medal

Also we see a lot of the ALM so we naturally over rate it.

But yes mostly we have no idea what Rojas has shown in camp, his first AWs involvement since 2019

And you don’t drop Reid. He brings a massive calming influence on the field. Yes he made one glaring error on the byline. But he’ll be better for the game esp since he is clubless 

Starting XI
3K
·
3.1K
·
almost 7 years
Think it's strange that people are writing off Sail for a single error, despite his ability being pretty damn evident over the past season
and 5 others
Legend
7.2K
·
14K
·
over 16 years
coochiee
carlind
martinb
valeo
Does anyone genuinely think Grieve and Garbett are better options than Rojas who's in the form of his life? 

Also think it's a bit concerning that we don't have a keeper we can rely on. I love Oli but he's no Paston 

Well, Paston showed he could be relied on, by doing it in the playoffs and WC. He had his own issues before that.

And on combinations- Marco and Woodze have definitely played before in crunch games.
 
Well, tbf, there was a keeper on the bench today who has proved himself to make big time saves in IC playoffs and Confeds.

Rojas has had a few A League seasons where he’s put up better numbers, then not done much in a white shirt (or any shirt that isn’t a navy-blue one). He has 4 goals in 45-odd caps, 3 of them being vs New Caledonia and the Solomons, so there’s genuine reasons to be sceptical of him on an international stage. He can be a bit like Piscopo in that he always tries to dribble past one more player than he should. That being said, Barbarouses did nothing today so I’d like to have seen him, but hindsight is 20/20, and we don’t see what has happened in the past week or so in Marbella. I’m sure he’ll get a chance vs Oman and it’s up to him to take it.

I didn’t see the game but in the VUC verus Western U playoff Rojas had a bit of a stinker?? Prior that he had been in very good form, but not career best. That was years ago when he and Archie Thompson were carving it up together and Rojas won the Johnny Warren medal

Also we see a lot of the ALM so we naturally over rate it.

But yes mostly we have no idea what Rojas has shown in camp, his first AWs involvement since 2019

And you don’t drop Reid. He brings a massive calming influence on the field. Yes he made one glaring error on the byline. But he’ll be better for the game esp since he is clubless 


Just WU defended like they’ve done all season.  They’ve stopped a number of attacking forces this year. Everything in the A league in fact.
 
I would argue that Rojas isn’t playing much differently skill wise to how he did under a false nine setup, just that he’s playing with more defenders in front of him now.  Also that he’s surrounded by lots of players who are similar to him in skill set at the Victory and there’s some interchangeability in the way they attack. IIRC he set up one of our best chances against Peru in the playoffs? But was playing a wide forward role? 

I haven’t seen a full replay of the game, but I wonder if Garbett is capable of more defense from the front than Marco? Two of our more threatening moments had Garbett involved. Garbett certainly has much more to gain than Marco, career wise, from some great performances and the WC so maybe is hungrier. 

Good thumping hit from Greive too, though it wasn’t into the corners. Be good confidence for him after Wood trusted him enough to lay off for him.

And yeh- be happy with either Stefan or Sail starting. Both good keepers.
Legend
11K
·
22K
·
almost 9 years
AV's forgetting the cross/shot that Sail had to save. Whatever it was, it was on target.

They had another shot, that would have been on goal if Pijnaker didn't deflect it onto the post.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/128821196/credible-dress-rehearsal-should-reduce-all-whites-chances-of-stage-fright-against-costa-rica

Limiting their opponents to just eight shots was a positive sign, as was the fact that the only one on target was the gifted goal.
Getting paid to be here
700
·
970
·
over 6 years
coochiee
AV's forgetting the cross/shot that Sail had to save. Whatever it was, it was on target.

They had another shot, that would have been on goal if Pijnaker didn't deflect it onto the post.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/128821196/credible-dress-rehearsal-should-reduce-all-whites-chances-of-stage-fright-against-costa-rica

Limiting their opponents to just eight shots was a positive sign, as was the fact that the only one on target was the gifted goal.

You're right that I should have mentioned the cross that was on target, perils of relying on the stats, which didn't count it as a shot. Have added. Blocked shots however are blocked shots.
LG
Legend
5.7K
·
23K
·
almost 17 years
How can Hay say he likes attacking football when he likes 5 at the back and the emphasis is on defend, defend, defend, hit them on the break, then defend, defend, defend.
Legend
11K
·
22K
·
almost 9 years
LG
How can Hay say he likes attacking football when he likes 5 at the back and the emphasis is on defend, defend, defend, hit them on the break, then defend, defend, defend.

Nah. Hay didn't want AWs to have only 38% of the ball. He didn't want them to make all the passing errors etc they made in the first half especially. 

The way the team was setup maybe could be tinkered with.

But with this Peru game, some of the players like Stamenic, Tuiloma, Bell probably got a bit of stage fright. A massive intensity setup from friendlies & OFC teams in front of no one. Plus Peru just have better players than us, and are better drilled having had a long Sth American qualifying campaign together, in front of crowds.

As AV says in his article AWs should be a lot better prepared for CR now, with that pressure cooker outing in Barcelona. They would have learnt alot, players and coaches. I'm sure Hay did with hindsight made some mistakes selection and prep wise. That's what these games are for. Probably learnt as much from that one game, as all the other matches back to Tokyo last year combined!
Legend
8.3K
·
15K
·
over 16 years
attacking football isnt just about attack at all times, 5 at the back isnt and wasnt just defend defend defend either. When you have Cacacae and Kirwan as wingbacks who spend a lot of their time on attack. We cant expect to win 6-0 against quality teams, what we can expect is to make more of the chances we do create.
and 2 others
Marquee
3.9K
·
5.5K
·
almost 12 years
I don't see 5 at the back as overtly defensive, but can understand why we were pegged back.

Cacace is one of our better attacking options, playing a 4 - 4 - 2 or similar might take him out of the game even more as an attacking option.
and 3 others
Lawyerish
1.8K
·
4.8K
·
over 13 years
mrsmiis
Think it's strange that people are writing off Sail for a single error, despite his ability being pretty damn evident over the past season
Would you find it strange and forgive him if he did it in against Costa Rica, we lost one nil and we didn’t go to the World Cup because of it? School boy errors from a goal keeper have no place at this stage 

He was given a chance to prove he was number one and unfortunately failed. 
LG
Legend
5.7K
·
23K
·
almost 17 years
AucklandPhoenix
mrsmiis
Think it's strange that people are writing off Sail for a single error, despite his ability being pretty damn evident over the past season
Would you find it strange and forgive him if he did it in against Costa Rica, we lost one nil and we didn’t go to the World Cup because of it? School boy errors from a goal keeper have no place at this stage 

He was given a chance to prove he was number one and unfortunately failed. 

The pass back to Sail was bobbling all over the place. No wonder he struggled with it. Yet another occassion of instead of passing forwards, you pass back to allegedly play safe. Negative tactics that should be barred. 
Lawyerish
1.8K
·
4.8K
·
over 13 years
It was a pass which the majority here could have put their foot through and hacked half way down the field, without a touch (good or bad) required 
First Team Squad
3.4K
·
1.4K
·
over 6 years
Bell was open, Payne should’ve passed to him.
WeeNix
840
·
520
·
almost 7 years
It was a howler. I think we can all agree on that.

Goalkeepers tend to have a few howlers in their career. This is the first howler that I can recall from Sail, so it doesn't detract from his ability in my eyes. If it was a frequent occurrence it'd be a different story.

Definitely stick with Sail as he is our best, and most talented, keeper.
WeeNix
840
·
520
·
almost 7 years
LG
How can Hay say he likes attacking football when he likes 5 at the back and the emphasis is on defend, defend, defend, hit them on the break, then defend, defend, defend.

I know you've got a bit of stick for this comment, but I agree with you 100%. 5 at the back is too defensive - it automatically sets the tone for the match and gives the opposition space to control the game. 

We have the talent these days to go out there are try and control the game against decent opposition. Let's use our talent and not divert to the usual defensive bias.

WC Intercontinental Playoff vs Costa Rica | Tue 14th June (15th NZT) | 9pm (6am NZT)

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up