Pretty significant news out today that City has launched legal action against the Premier League, in relation to the 115 charges against them.
https://archive.is/2024.06.04-145523/https://www.thetimes.com/sport/football/article/man-city-legal-action-premier-league-hearing-7k6r5glhq#selection-2705.0-2705.156
Shamelessly stolen form reddit:
Essentially they're trying to delegitimise one of the pillars of the charges against them (that they inflated their sponsors). If they can argue that those rules were unlawful, it will help them defend the charges. [...]
Here are some hilarious excerpts from their legal claim:
https://archive.is/2024.06.04-145523/https://www.thetimes.com/sport/football/article/man-city-legal-action-premier-league-hearing-7k6r5glhq#selection-2705.0-2705.156
Shamelessly stolen form reddit:
Essentially they're trying to delegitimise one of the pillars of the charges against them (that they inflated their sponsors). If they can argue that those rules were unlawful, it will help them defend the charges. [...]
Here are some hilarious excerpts from their legal claim:
- City claim the fair market value rules are intended to be discriminatory towards clubs with ties to the Gulf region
- City argue that the Premier League have failed to provide evidence that sponsorship deals with related parties give clubs an unfair advantage or distort the league’s competitive balance
- City also say that the Premier League, as an organisation, is a direct competitor for sponsorship and therefore claim they have a conflict of interest.
- City question the independence of Nielsen Sports, the data analytics company used to determine the fair market value of sponsorship deals, because it has been retained by the Premier League for more than two years.
- City complain that FMV rules discriminate against clubs who form part of a multi-club ownership group