do you honestly believe that when he left the gunners he wasnt good enough?
that is a laugh! even from a gunner!
Sir Alex (if he buy's him) will use him in a similar role to Larsen or Blanc. experienced and quaility, but relaxed and used less.
Based on cost, performance & reliability...... I believe we're right and you're wrong.
regardless of whether he is right or wrong, your kidding yourselves if you think that if thierry henry was an arsenal player right now, he wouldnt walk into the starting line up. If u had henry last season, would u have fallen so far behind when adebayor stopped scoring? he would still be in your team
All speculation, whos to say that Henry would have even been fit during that slump, we may not have even had the good start to the season if Henry was there? Everyone said we would struggle to make the top four, yet we ended up 5 points short of winning the league, and performing better than we had the previous 2 seasons with Henry. Talisman yes. League winning striker? not anymore!
i don'tknow u tell me, was he fit at barca at this time? (all speculation ofcourse). i know you guys over achieved last season, u love to repeat it. and i thinkt he last 2 seasons have proved that the aging of Henry has brought about the end of the "league winning" stiker. Adebayor could have been, but he is not. RVP is not. to win the league now u must have midfielders who score goals, and Ronaldo is proof of this, but he is unique, Chelsea also get tons of goals from midfield. although thats not saying stikers arnt important.