News Discussion and Football Blogging

Shame on the Phoenix

45 replies · 3,049 views
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Shame on the Phoenix
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Great article, agree 100% - but of course it was said 100x better than I ever could've, I guess thats why he gets paid for it.

It also shows how Tony P was off the mark on TV3, saying how Kaka wasn't released or how we're just like Manchester United. This is about football in OUR country, and supporting New Zealand Football, which the Phoenix are a part of (sort of...). I don't think that this situation compares to Nelsen not being released for olympic duties or any other silly comparisons.

Article wrote:
what would they rather say to their grandchildren as they flick through their photo albums: "Here's me playing at the Olympic Games", or "Here's me receiving my wages from the Phoenix."?
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
That article was even worse than Maddaford's one.el grapadura2008-06-29 12:58:28
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Billy Harris is a knobend.
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

I disagree with you again el...becoming a habit haha

Thought it was great...except the last 2 points were...lets say...odd


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Billy Harris is right. It's a lazy, short-sighted decision by the Phoenix especially when only one (and maybe neither) of Smeltz and Lochead would have been picked at this stage anyway.

This is the thin end of the wedge. Next we'll see Phoenix players mysteriously getting "injuries" before legitimate FIFA windows and then amazingly being fully fit for the next club game. And look out for the Phoenix putting pressure on Ricki Herbert to also choose between club and country soon.

From NZF's point of view you can also expect them to be a lot less forgiving anytime the Phoenix genuinely want a player rested rather than being released for some meaningless international friendly that happens to be in a FIFA window.

The very fact that a significant number of people in this forum (even if it's still a minority) believe the Phoenix have got this one wrong, which has also been reflected in a lot of the press reporting, shows just what a PR cock-up this has been. NZ football is just too small to not have NZF and the Phoenix working closely together.

But some of you already have your heads inserted way up too far up Terry and Tony's backsides to work that one out for yourselves.



Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
aussienixfan wrote:

Article wrote:
what would they rather say to their grandchildren as they flick through their photo albums: "Here's me playing at the Olympic Games", or "Here's me receiving my wages from the Phoenix."?
yup that is the bit that stuck with me and i completely agree
bopman2008-06-29 15:19:32

www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
terminator_x wrote:
This is the thin end of the wedge[/QUOTE]
NZ football is just too small to not have NZF and the Phoenix working closely together.

That's a big concern for me, and many people can't see beyond this being "two essential players being kept back from a meaningless competition". As you say, I don't see NZF doing us any favours any time soon. Also, when it came up at after work drinks on Friday (ie the general public, not feverites), the view on it certainly wasn't very popular. But mostly I feel for the players.

[QUOTE=terminator_x]But some of you already have your heads inserted way up too far up Terry and Tony's backsides to work that one out for yourselves.
I don't have a response to that, I just felt it needed to be in the thread again aussienixfan2008-06-29 15:09:50
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

uh oh,Grunmpyted's upset...
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I feel the Waltons analogy is rather odd but apart from that I have to agree with him.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

The club versus country debate has already been done to death on this forum.

I will however say that I disagree that this is a PR cock-up. The reality (sad or otherwise) is bugger all people outside of hard core football supporters give a rats arse about football at the Olympics and this storm in a tea cup will pass when the Nix get off to a winning start to the season.
 
As for those who think the Nix owe NZF anything I can think of 5 million reasons NZF should give thanks for the Nix.
 
NZ football's last "day in the sun" was 26 years ago - the Nix are the best thing that has happened to NZ football since then.
 
I'm reminded of this every time I see kids running around the local park, in Nix gear, pretending to be Daniel or Smeltz or ...
 
You can't have a professional football team and  then not respect the right of those bank-rolling and managing the team to make calls in the best interest of the team.
Whitby boy2008-06-29 17:17:54
He dribbles a lot and the opposition dont like it - you can see it all over their faces. (Ron Atkinson)
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I give up.
 
This has been done to death indeed.
 
Those with one eye are unlikely to magically grow another one..

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
terminator_x wrote:
Next we'll see Phoenix players mysteriously getting "injuries" before legitimate FIFA windows and then amazingly being fully fit for the next club game. And look out for the Phoenix putting pressure on Ricki Herbert to also choose between club and country soon. From NZF's point of view you can also expect them to be a lot less forgiving anytime the Phoenix genuinely want a player rested rather than being released for some meaningless international friendly that happens to be in a FIFA window.


This is disingenious to say the least. A-league had no international windows last season, yet the Phoenix released all the players selected to play for the All Whites, even if this meant that we only had about 15 players available for the A-league games (counting injuries and suspensions as well). No-one on this forum had any problem with this, as we all agree that the World Cup and World Cup qualifying are the pinnacle of footballing world.
There is a fundamental difference between the Olympics and real international football, but some seem determined to gloss over it, for what reason I dare not to speculate.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Werent they in Fifa Windows though? So we kind of had to release them...hardly counts.
Im not saying we dont want to help NZF...just that it looks that way by not releasing Lochhead...and that you cant use the AWs game as a valid argument because those games fell into Fifa windows

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
Werent they in Fifa Windows though? So we kind of had to release them...hardly counts.





Im not saying we dont want to help NZF...just that it looks that way by not releasing Lochhead...and that you cant use the AWs game as a valid argument because those games fell into Fifa windows


No, the A-league season had no FIFA windows for Oceania qualifying last year.el grapadura2008-06-29 17:50:42
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
No,the A league didnt have weeks off when there was fifa windows last year.
 
Theres a difference...
At least im sure thats the case...will actually double check that now though...
Tegal2008-06-29 17:56:13

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yes, that' what I'm saying - there were no 'injuries' that TX suggested that there could be.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
cant claim injury then play the player on the same date anyways. So we did HAVE to release them...so you can hardly use it as an argument. As far as anyone is concerned,given the option,we wont release NZ players to help NZF in tournaments (as this is the only case where we have ever really been given an option as such). Sure we released the U23s,but again...we had to

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
cant claim injury then play the player on the same date anyways.


You'd be surprised at this...very common in Croatia when it comes to U-21 call-ups. Mario Mandzukic, Nikola Kalinic and Anas Sarbini have all done it in just the last six months. Can't play Wedenesday, but can on Saturday. Usually the clubs mention a light 'niggle' after the game that needs to be 'rested' for a few days (thereby missing the mid-week game) that is then fine for the following weekend.
There's never been any suggestion of anything like this going on a the Phoenix, and suggestions that this will happen because of the Olympic situation now I fnd distasteful.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Yeah very distasteful to suggest the phoenix would ever do that,i agree.

I thought you were more saying that you cant say we dont release players for NZF sides, because we did last season. My bad.


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
terminator_x wrote:
Billy Harris is right. It's a lazy, short-sighted decision by the Phoenix especially when only one (and maybe neither) of Smeltz and Lochead would have been picked at this stage anyway.

This is the thin end of the wedge. Next we'll see Phoenix players mysteriously getting "injuries" before legitimate FIFA windows and then amazingly being fully fit for the next club game. And look out for the Phoenix putting pressure on Ricki Herbert to also choose between club and country soon.

From NZF's point of view you can also expect them to be a lot less forgiving anytime the Phoenix genuinely want a player rested rather than being released for some meaningless international friendly that happens to be in a FIFA window.

The very fact that a significant number of people in this forum (even if it's still a minority) believe the Phoenix have got this one wrong, which has also been reflected in a lot of the press reporting, shows just what a PR cock-up this has been. NZ football is just too small to not have NZF and the Phoenix working closely together.

But some of you already have your heads inserted way up too far up Terry and Tony's backsides to work that one out for yourselves.



 
Yawn
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:

Yeah very distasteful to suggest the phoenix would ever do that,i agree.


I thought you were more saying that you cant say we dont release players for NZF sides, because we did last season. My bad.



No worries, reading back now I see that I wasn't as succinct as I'd hoped to be...anyway I'll leave this now.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yeah...someone please lock this thread....lol...please...

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

We're gonna get dicked in the Olympics. I don't see how that's gonna help raise football's profile in NZ. The Nix, however, have a chance to do well.
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Surely some exciting attacking play at the Olympics and a great goal or two for messrs Smeltz, Lochead, and Barbarouses, perhaps even turning a result (draw or win! tell 'im he's dreaming, but i'm allowed to thats sport) against Brazil

surely would be fantastic marketing for the 'Nix to a bunch of people currently outside the target market...

I mean All Whites Wales, Smeltz Brown Herbert No Fear playing style...then these guys at the 'Nix...got me interested...

Bertos skinning Cafu makes me want to see him at the 'Nix...in fact I wouldn't know who he was without that game pre world cup.

non-football people care about New Zealand sport on the biggest stage, and love players who play their hearts out for their country, especially as underdogs...which nz football surely is...


Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

that's true, but can you imagine the headlines if what normally happens happened?
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
"phoenix snub leaves youngsters with no hope as they go down to brazil" ??

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
"phoenix snub leaves youngsters with no hope as they go down to brazil" ??


um, yes, cos Smeltz and Lochead would make all the difference...
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

there seem to be two arguments here,

1. oh the poor players don't get to go to the Olympics, which is kinda dumb (who plays football for a chance to go to the Olympics?!)

 and 2. if we send Smeltz and Lochead we'd have a good chance of doing well, thus raising football's profile in NZ...which is EXTREMELY fanciful, on both counts.
Cosimo2008-06-30 08:00:06
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Cosimo wrote:

there seem to be two arguments here,

1. oh the poor players don't get to go to the Olympics, which is kinda dumb (who plays football for a chance to go to the Olympics?!)

 and 2. if we send Smeltz and Lochead we'd have a good chance of doing well, thus raising football's profile in NZ...which is EXTREMELY fanciful, on both counts.
 
Agreed. Whilst I'm sure Smeltz and Locky would enjoy goping to the Olympics and being part of the event, at the end of the day the likelyhood that them being present is going to greatly influence our chance of beating teams like Brazil is very low. Disappointong that we have to go over the whole club v country thing again, lets focus on the Nix and a tourney we can win!

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Cosimo wrote:

there seem to be two arguments here,

1. oh the poor players don't get to go to the Olympics, which is kinda dumb (who plays football for a chance to go to the Olympics?!)

 and 2. if we send Smeltz and Lochead we'd have a good chance of doing well, thus raising football's profile in NZ...which is EXTREMELY fanciful, on both counts.


1. Heck, I'd love to go to the Olympics. The sport played is irrelevant; if there is an Olympic competition for it at the highest level, then the best players deserve to go. Smeltz and Lochhead have been named the best, so they (Lochhead anyway) should get to go.

2. So should we only send the players if we are drawn against Oceanian nations?
They weren't needed during the qualifiers against Oceania.
Here they are needed and will make a difference.
The quality of the opposition NZ are drawn against at the Olympics shouldn't matter; it's the event that matters.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Old Chinese saying �Happy wife means happy life�

 

Happy players make a club unhappy players can hurt a club.

 

Also no other A-League club is holding back players ��� remember �happy wife ���..

 

Midfielder2008-07-01 02:16:55

Socceroo/ Mariner / Whangarei

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bevan wrote:
Cosimo wrote:

there seem to be two arguments here,

1. oh the poor players don't get to go to the Olympics, which is kinda dumb (who plays football for a chance to go to the Olympics?!)

 and 2. if we send Smeltz and Lochead we'd have a good chance of doing well, thus raising football's profile in NZ...which is EXTREMELY fanciful, on both counts.


1. Heck, I'd love to go to the Olympics. The sport played is irrelevant; if there is an Olympic competition for it at the highest level, then the best players deserve to go. Smeltz and Lochhead have been named the best, so they (Lochhead anyway) should get to go.

2. So should we only send the players if we are drawn against Oceanian nations?
They weren't needed during the qualifiers against Oceania.
Here they are needed and will make a difference.
The quality of the opposition NZ are drawn against at the Olympics shouldn't matter; it's the event that matters.


Oh well.


Cosimo2008-07-01 07:22:49
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Cosimo wrote:

that's true, but can you imagine the headlines if what normally happens happened?


Richie McCaw eats Sandwich, Smiles at Old People?


Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Cosimo wrote:

We're gonna get dicked in the Olympics. I don't see how that's gonna help raise football's profile in NZ. The Nix, however, have a chance to do well.
 
That's awfully negative. Sure we have no chance against Brazil, but there is a fair chance China will choke and Belgium are an unknown quantity. A loss and a couple of draws are not impossible by any means.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
SC03 wrote:
A loss and a couple of draws are not impossible by any means.


But very unlikely...and if they are going to be draws, they'll probably be 0-0 rather than 3-3 thrillers. And I can't see the NZ sporting public going 'wow' for that.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
a lot of the arguments on here seem to suggest that because olymipc football is a meaningless tournament no-one will care, not true i think. Football people wont care, but non-footballers will.
The team does well at the Olympics and it will get credibility with non-football fans

www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
bopman wrote:
a lot of the arguments on here seem to suggest that because olymipc football is a meaningless tournament no-one will care, not true i think. Football people wont care, but non-footballers will.
The team does well at the Olympics and it will get credibility with non-football fans


well i hope you're right. I think, at best, we'll score a few goals, and have a few "good defeats" like usual. And the public won't give a rats-arse about that. Actually, they will - they'll be all like "still losers..." and jizz all over the rifle shooters or swimmers or cyclists or whoever else win some medals

Cosimo = Oscar the Grouch
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
This whole thing is moot because Killen, Elliott and Nelsen are going.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink