It also shows how Tony P was off the mark on TV3, saying how Kaka wasn't released or how we're just like Manchester United. This is about football in OUR country, and supporting New Zealand Football, which the Phoenix are a part of (sort of...). I don't think that this situation compares to Nelsen not being released for olympic duties or any other silly comparisons.

Billy Harris is a knobend.
I disagree with you again el...becoming a habit haha
Thought it was great...except the last 2 points were...lets say...odd
Allegedly
This is the thin end of the wedge. Next we'll see Phoenix players mysteriously getting "injuries" before legitimate FIFA windows and then amazingly being fully fit for the next club game. And look out for the Phoenix putting pressure on Ricki Herbert to also choose between club and country soon.
From NZF's point of view you can also expect them to be a lot less forgiving anytime the Phoenix genuinely want a player rested rather than being released for some meaningless international friendly that happens to be in a FIFA window.
The very fact that a significant number of people in this forum (even if it's still a minority) believe the Phoenix have got this one wrong, which has also been reflected in a lot of the press reporting, shows just what a PR cock-up this has been. NZ football is just too small to not have NZF and the Phoenix working closely together.
But some of you already have your heads inserted way up too far up Terry and Tony's backsides to work that one out for yourselves.

www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com
That's a big concern for me, and many people can't see beyond this being "two essential players being kept back from a meaningless competition". As you say, I don't see NZF doing us any favours any time soon. Also, when it came up at after work drinks on Friday (ie the general public, not feverites), the view on it certainly wasn't very popular. But mostly I feel for the players.
[QUOTE=terminator_x]But some of you already have your heads inserted way up too far up Terry and Tony's backsides to work that one out for yourselves.
aussienixfan2008-06-29 15:09:50uh oh,Grunmpyted's upset...
The club versus country debate has already been done to death on this forum.
Allegedly
This is disingenious to say the least. A-league had no international windows last season, yet the Phoenix released all the players selected to play for the All Whites, even if this meant that we only had about 15 players available for the A-league games (counting injuries and suspensions as well). No-one on this forum had any problem with this, as we all agree that the World Cup and World Cup qualifying are the pinnacle of footballing world.
There is a fundamental difference between the Olympics and real international football, but some seem determined to gloss over it, for what reason I dare not to speculate.
Allegedly
Im not saying we dont want to help NZF...just that it looks that way by not releasing Lochhead...and that you cant use the AWs game as a valid argument because those games fell into Fifa windows
No, the A-league season had no FIFA windows for Oceania qualifying last year.el grapadura2008-06-29 17:50:42
Allegedly
Allegedly
You'd be surprised at this...very common in Croatia when it comes to U-21 call-ups. Mario Mandzukic, Nikola Kalinic and Anas Sarbini have all done it in just the last six months. Can't play Wedenesday, but can on Saturday. Usually the clubs mention a light 'niggle' after the game that needs to be 'rested' for a few days (thereby missing the mid-week game) that is then fine for the following weekend.
There's never been any suggestion of anything like this going on a the Phoenix, and suggestions that this will happen because of the Olympic situation now I fnd distasteful.
Yeah very distasteful to suggest the phoenix would ever do that,i agree.
I thought you were more saying that you cant say we dont release players for NZF sides, because we did last season. My bad.
Allegedly
This is the thin end of the wedge. Next we'll see Phoenix players mysteriously getting "injuries" before legitimate FIFA windows and then amazingly being fully fit for the next club game. And look out for the Phoenix putting pressure on Ricki Herbert to also choose between club and country soon.
From NZF's point of view you can also expect them to be a lot less forgiving anytime the Phoenix genuinely want a player rested rather than being released for some meaningless international friendly that happens to be in a FIFA window.
The very fact that a significant number of people in this forum (even if it's still a minority) believe the Phoenix have got this one wrong, which has also been reflected in a lot of the press reporting, shows just what a PR cock-up this has been. NZ football is just too small to not have NZF and the Phoenix working closely together.
But some of you already have your heads inserted way up too far up Terry and Tony's backsides to work that one out for yourselves.
Yeah very distasteful to suggest the phoenix would ever do that,i agree.
I thought you were more saying that you cant say we dont release players for NZF sides, because we did last season. My bad.
No worries, reading back now I see that I wasn't as succinct as I'd hoped to be...anyway I'll leave this now.
Allegedly
We're gonna get dicked in the Olympics. I don't see how that's gonna help raise football's profile in NZ. The Nix, however, have a chance to do well.
surely would be fantastic marketing for the 'Nix to a bunch of people currently outside the target market...
I mean All Whites Wales, Smeltz Brown Herbert No Fear playing style...then these guys at the 'Nix...got me interested...
Bertos skinning Cafu makes me want to see him at the 'Nix...in fact I wouldn't know who he was without that game pre world cup.
non-football people care about New Zealand sport on the biggest stage, and love players who play their hearts out for their country, especially as underdogs...which nz football surely is...
that's true, but can you imagine the headlines if what normally happens happened?
Allegedly
um, yes, cos Smeltz and Lochead would make all the difference...
there seem to be two arguments here,
1. oh the poor players don't get to go to the Olympics, which is kinda dumb (who plays football for a chance to go to the Olympics?!)
and 2. if we send Smeltz and Lochead we'd have a good chance of doing well, thus raising football's profile in NZ...which is EXTREMELY fanciful, on both counts.
Cosimo2008-06-30 08:00:06
there seem to be two arguments here,
1. oh the poor players don't get to go to the Olympics, which is kinda dumb (who plays football for a chance to go to the Olympics?!)
and 2. if we send Smeltz and Lochead we'd have a good chance of doing well, thus raising football's profile in NZ...which is EXTREMELY fanciful, on both counts.
Queenslander 3x a year.
there seem to be two arguments here,
1. oh the poor players don't get to go to the Olympics, which is kinda dumb (who plays football for a chance to go to the Olympics?!)
and 2. if we send Smeltz and Lochead we'd have a good chance of doing well, thus raising football's profile in NZ...which is EXTREMELY fanciful, on both counts.
1. Heck, I'd love to go to the Olympics. The sport played is irrelevant; if there is an Olympic competition for it at the highest level, then the best players deserve to go. Smeltz and Lochhead have been named the best, so they (Lochhead anyway) should get to go.
2. So should we only send the players if we are drawn against Oceanian nations?
They weren't needed during the qualifiers against Oceania.
Here they are needed and will make a difference.
The quality of the opposition NZ are drawn against at the Olympics shouldn't matter; it's the event that matters.
Old Chinese saying �Happy wife means happy life�
Happy players make a club unhappy players can hurt a club.
Also no other A-League club is holding back players ��� remember �happy wife ���..
Midfielder2008-07-01 02:16:55
Socceroo/ Mariner / Whangarei
there seem to be two arguments here,
1. oh the poor players don't get to go to the Olympics, which is kinda dumb (who plays football for a chance to go to the Olympics?!)
and 2. if we send Smeltz and Lochead we'd have a good chance of doing well, thus raising football's profile in NZ...which is EXTREMELY fanciful, on both counts.
1. Heck, I'd love to go to the Olympics. The sport played is irrelevant; if there is an Olympic competition for it at the highest level, then the best players deserve to go. Smeltz and Lochhead have been named the best, so they (Lochhead anyway) should get to go.
2. So should we only send the players if we are drawn against Oceanian nations?
They weren't needed during the qualifiers against Oceania.
Here they are needed and will make a difference.
The quality of the opposition NZ are drawn against at the Olympics shouldn't matter; it's the event that matters.
Oh well.
Cosimo2008-07-01 07:22:49
that's true, but can you imagine the headlines if what normally happens happened?
Richie McCaw eats Sandwich, Smiles at Old People?
We're gonna get dicked in the Olympics. I don't see how that's gonna help raise football's profile in NZ. The Nix, however, have a chance to do well.
But very unlikely...and if they are going to be draws, they'll probably be 0-0 rather than 3-3 thrillers. And I can't see the NZ sporting public going 'wow' for that.
www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com
well i hope you're right. I think, at best, we'll score a few goals, and have a few "good defeats" like usual. And the public won't give a rats-arse about that. Actually, they will - they'll be all like "still losers..." and jizz all over the rifle shooters or swimmers or cyclists or whoever else win some medals
Cosimo = Oscar the Grouch
a.haak
