Off Topic

cricket series in england

237 replies · 5,591 views
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/4/story.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=10518004
oh yeh vincent too...forgot about him when I was slating Bracewell for letting Fleming, Astle, McMillan, Styris et al...skip out on their careers early esp. as Astle was quoted as saying he wanted another world cup...
 
but hey Redmond, Flynn, Marshall and Elliot...


Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Result New Zealand won by 1 wicket (with 0 balls remaining)

England innings (50 overs maximum) R M B 4s 6s SR IR Bell c McCullum b Southee 46 82 56 5 1 82.14 LJ Wright c Taylor b Mills 18 38 29 2 0 62.06 KP Pietersen c Southee b Gillespie 0 4 2 0 0 0.00 RS Bopara c Oram b Gillespie 58 117 78 7 0 74.35 PD Collingwood b Southee 14 18 13 3 0 107.69 OA Shah run out (Gillespie) 63 95 71 4 2 88.73 TR Ambrose c Flynn b Oram 6 16 12 0 0 50.00 GP Swann c How b Mills 3 12 7 0 0 42.85 SCJ Broad c How b Southee 5 14 11 0 0 45.45 RJ Sidebottom not out 8 21 12 0 0 66.66 JM Anderson run out (Taylor/Gillespie) 11 12 10 2 0 110.00     Extras (lb 4, w 6, nb 3) 13     Total (all out; 49.4 overs; 219 mins) 245 (4.93 runs per over)

Fall of wickets1-41 (Wright, 8.5 ov), 2-44 (Pietersen, 9.3 ov), 3-81 (Bell, 17.5 ov), 4-101 (Collingwood, 21.6 ov), 5-176 (Bopara, 37.2 ov), 6-203 (Ambrose, 41.4 ov), 7-219 (Swann, 44.1 ov), 8-221 (Shah, 45.1 ov), 9-228 (Broad, 46.6 ov), 10-245 (Anderson, 49.4 ov)

 Bowling OM R W Econ  KD Mills 10 1 44 2 4.40 (1nb, 1w)  MR Gillespie 9.4 2 58 2 6.00 (2nb, 2w)  TG Southee 10 1 47 3 4.70 (1w)  JDP Oram 10 0 46 1 4.60  DL Vettori 8 1 34 0 4.25 (1w)  GD Elliott 2 0 12 0 6.00 (1w)

New Zealand innings (target: 246 runs from 50 overs) R M B 4s 6s SR JM How c & b Swann 37 95 61 4 0 60.65 BB McCullum c Swann b Sidebottom 1 10 5 0 0 20.00 LRPL Taylor c Broad b Sidebottom 6 22 15 1 0 40.00 SB Styris run out (Swann/Collingwood) 69 139 87 8 0 79.31 DR Flynn c Bell b Swann 12 22 17 1 0 70.58 JDP Oram c sub (AN Cook) b Anderson 38 43 30 5 0 126.66 GD Elliott run out (Bell/Pietersen) 24 40 28 2 0 85.71 DL Vettori c Bopara b Collingwood 6 7 8 1 0 75.00 KD Mills not out 25 59 27 1 1 92.59 TG Southee run out (Bell) 6 15 9 0 0 66.66 MR Gillespie not out 4 18 13 0 0 30.76     Extras (b 4, lb 3, w 11) 18     Total (9 wickets; 50 overs) 246 (4.92 runs per over)

Fall of wickets1-7 (McCullum, 2.2 ov), 2-24 (Taylor, 6.6 ov), 3-83 (How, 19.6 ov), 4-106 (Flynn, 25.6 ov), 5-173 (Oram, 34.6 ov), 6-178 (Styris, 36.5 ov), 7-189 (Vettori, 38.4 ov), 8-220 (Elliott, 43.4 ov), 9-233 (Southee, 46.4 ov)

 Bowling OM R W Econ  RJ Sidebottom 10 0 55 2 5.50 (1w)  JM Anderson 10 0 39 1 3.90 (2w)  SCJ Broad 10 0 39 0 3.90 (2w)  LJ Wright 2 0 8 0 4.00  GP Swann 10 1 49 2 4.90 (1w)  PD Collingwood 7 0 40 1 5.71 (1w)  RS Bopara 1 0 9 0 9.00

Toss New Zealand, who chose to field first
Series New Zealand led the 5-match series 2-1

Player of the match SB Styris (New Zealand)

Umpires MR Benson and SJ Davis (Australia)
TV umpire RA Kettleborough
Match referee J Srinath (India)
Reserve umpire PJ Hartley

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
43.4 Sidebottom to Elliott, OUT, all hell breaks loose here. A massive mid-pitch collision between Elliott and Sidebottom, who was closing in on the ball but running straight at the batsman, and Elliott goes down clutching his thigh. England carry on and throw down the stumps at the non-striker's end, and after a long debate, he is given out. GD Elliott run out 24 (40m 28b 2x4 0x6) SR: 85.71 A huge debate has been sparked here, and Elliott is looking utterly aggrieved. England had the chance to withdraw their appeal, but Collingwood decided that, with the match at stake, he had no option
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
YEP MADE ME ANGRY

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yeah I was angry about it too, but listened to the apologies in the post match speeches and was impressed by both captains, especially Vettori.

Apparently Colly went to the Black Caps dressing room after the game to apologize and explain his decision, a great gesture, as there were no handshakes at the match's conclusion and the Kiwis were pretty fired up on the balcony as we ran the overthrow to win it!!
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
just watched the replay, pretty bad on englands part but you can see how in the heat of the moment people would get carried away. great to hear smithy getting fired up!
but what a finish, i knew the result and i was still nervous, the english really are muppets, all run to the stumps and no-one thinks to back up. tutututut.
lets dick them on saturday and all in all the tour could be considered about even. still dissapointed with 2 capitulations in the tests but a strong odi series and the further development of southee and flynn(maybe). presumably when ryder comes back, he opens, how goes to three, you drop elliot and everyone moves down one. tough on elliot but thats still a pretty bloddy decent odi side.
 
now get a coach who can build a test team and we might be aliright

www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
yea, really poor sportsman-ship from Collingwood and Sidebottom. I saw it on the news and loked to me as Sidebottom ran to the ball and then moved to the left just as Elliot passed him. It was a bit of a no-arms tackle. The Black Caps looked pretty fired up on the balcony. And why wouldn't they. Good on them for proving that cheating doesn't always work.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Pitbull wrote:

Result New Zealand won by 1 wicket (with 0 balls remaining)

R M B 4s 6s SR IR Bell c McCullum b Southee 46 82 56 5 1 82.14 LJ Wright c Taylor b Mills 18 38 29 2 0 62.06 KP Pietersen c Southee b Gillespie 0 4 2 0 0 0.00 RS Bopara c Oram b Gillespie 58 117 78 7 0 74.35 PD Collingwood b Southee 14 18 13 3 0 107.69 OA Shah run out (Gillespie) 63 95 71 4 2 88.73 TR Ambrose c Flynn b Oram 6 16 12 0 0 50.00 GP Swann c How b Mills 3 12 7 0 0 42.85 SCJ Broad c How b Southee 5 14 11 0 0 45.45 RJ Sidebottom not out 8 21 12 0 0 66.66 JM Anderson run out (Taylor/Gillespie) 11 12 10 2 0 110.00     Extras (lb 4, w 6, nb 3) 13     Total (all out; 49.4 overs; 219 mins) 245 (4.93 runs per over)

Fall of wickets1-41 (Wright, 8.5 ov), 2-44 (Pietersen, 9.3 ov), 3-81 (Bell, 17.5 ov), 4-101 (Collingwood, 21.6 ov), 5-176 (Bopara, 37.2 ov), 6-203 (Ambrose, 41.4 ov), 7-219 (Swann, 44.1 ov), 8-221 (Shah, 45.1 ov), 9-228 (Broad, 46.6 ov), 10-245 (Anderson, 49.4 ov)

 Bowling OM R W Econ  KD Mills 10 1 44 2 4.40 (1nb, 1w)  MR Gillespie 9.4 2 58 2 6.00 (2nb, 2w)  TG Southee 10 1 47 3 4.70 (1w)  JDP Oram 10 0 46 1 4.60  DL Vettori 8 1 34 0 4.25 (1w)  GD Elliott 2 0 12 0 6.00 (1w)

New Zealand innings (target: 246 runs from 50 overs) R M B 4s 6s SR JM How c & b Swann 37 95 61 4 0 60.65 BB McCullum c Swann b Sidebottom 1 10 5 0 0 20.00 LRPL Taylor c Broad b Sidebottom 6 22 15 1 0 40.00 SB Styris run out (Swann/Collingwood) 69 139 87 8 0 79.31 DR Flynn c Bell b Swann 12 22 17 1 0 70.58 JDP Oram c sub (AN Cook) b Anderson 38 43 30 5 0 126.66 GD Elliott run out (Bell/Pietersen/Sidebottom/Collingwood and England team) 24 40 28 2 0 85.71 DL Vettori c Bopara b Collingwood 6 7 8 1 0 75.00 KD Mills not out 25 59 27 1 1 92.59 TG Southee run out (Bell) 6 15 9 0 0 66.66 MR Gillespie not out 4 18 13 0 0 30.76     Extras (b 4, lb 3, w 11) 18     Total (9 wickets; 50 overs) 246 (4.92 runs per over)

Fall of wickets1-7 (McCullum, 2.2 ov), 2-24 (Taylor, 6.6 ov), 3-83 (How, 19.6 ov), 4-106 (Flynn, 25.6 ov), 5-173 (Oram, 34.6 ov), 6-178 (Styris, 36.5 ov), 7-189 (Vettori, 38.4 ov), 8-220 (Elliott, 43.4 ov), 9-233 (Southee, 46.4 ov)

 Bowling OM R W Econ  RJ Sidebottom 10 0 55 2 5.50 (1w)  JM Anderson 10 0 39 1 3.90 (2w)  SCJ Broad 10 0 39 0 3.90 (2w)  LJ Wright 2 0 8 0 4.00  GP Swann 10 1 49 2 4.90 (1w)  PD Collingwood 7 0 40 1 5.71 (1w)  RS Bopara 1 0 9 0 9.00

Toss New Zealand, who chose to field first
Series New Zealand led the 5-match series 2-1

Player of the match SB Styris (New Zealand)

Umpires MR Benson and SJ Davis (Australia)
TV umpire RA Kettleborough
Match referee J Srinath (India)
Reserve umpire PJ Hartley

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Collingwood and Sidebottom did Nothing wrong...
 
The aim of professional Sports is to win at all costs, without cheating.
 
Thats what they did.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
bopman wrote:
just watched the replay, pretty bad on englands part but you can see how in the heat of the moment people would get carried away. great to hear smithy getting fired up!
but what a finish, i knew the result and i was still nervous, the english really are muppets, all run to the stumps and no-one thinks to back up. tutututut.
lets dick them on saturday and all in all the tour could be considered about even. still dissapointed with 2 capitulations in the tests but a strong odi series and the further development of southee and flynn(maybe). presumably when ryder comes back, he opens, how goes to three, you drop elliot and everyone moves down one. tough on elliot but thats still a pretty bloddy decent odi side.
 
now get a coach who can build a test team and we might be aliright
we've got one he's just doing fark all at the moment, John Wright.

as for the Poms i thought  Daniel Vettori's tirade, along with Brendan McCullums stick that up your ar$e arm gestures, summed up my feelings at the time completely

it was simply bad sportsmanship,it's still a gentlemans game after all
giddyup2008-06-26 20:44:54
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Not impressed
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I dont think sidebottom did anything wrong,he was just going for the ball. He had that "what are ya doing lads?!" look as the others ran elliot out.
 
He then checked to see if Elliot was ok as he was on ground injured. So fair play to him

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I just remember. Didn't we run-out Murali when he was going to congratulate Sangakkara on his century two years ago. So the Black Caps would be a touch hypocrital to complain about bad sportsmanship and not playing 'in the spirit of the game'. Still pretty annoyed at Collingwood and the English.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I just remember. Didn't we run-out Murali when he was going to congratulate Sangakkara on his century two years ago. So the Black Caps would be a touch hypocrital to complain about bad sportsmanship and not playing 'in the spirit of the game'. Still pretty annoyed at Collingwood and the English.



yip.


E + R + O

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Its all about the spirit opf the game, the Murali incident is slightly different - he has to take some responsibility for his lack of attention and making the rash decision to leave his crease when the ball is still live. AS for the cutrrent Elliot/Sidebottom incident, a man is knocked over in a no fault incident, the spirit of the game indicates that Colling wood would call Elliot back and say oops sorry, play on chap. Two separate incidents one involves a poor decision made by an opposition player and the other involves an injury!

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Have absolutely no problem with what Collingwood did. It was an accidenatal collision, tough luck for the runner, the English did nothing illegal. If that was an English batsman, I'd have been spewing if we didn't run im out, and ain't complaining about the English doing the same.
Toughen up, tough breaks happen in sport/life all the time.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
True...bowlers should always run down the pitch after the ball and accidently run into batsmen and getting them runout then. All in the name of winning right?
 
There has to be a certain degree of sportsmanship (especially in cricket which prides itself on it).
 
Elliot would have made the run easy if sidebottom hadnt got in his way...Its just the way cricket has always been played that you would call a batsman back at a time like that

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
True...bowlers should always run down the pitch after the ball and accidently run into batsmen and getting them runout then. All in the name of winning right?
 
If it's accidental I have no problem at all.
 
If It's purposeful it's against the rules and either a no ball or dead ball (can't remember but it's one of the 2)....
 
And yes. The aim of professional sport is to win. So it is all in the name of winning.
 
Good on the english - I would have done the same.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Meh a win wouldnt feel right if had won like that.
 
Id rather win,knowing id played within the the spirits of the game(and that id actually earned the win),than win like that
Tegal2008-06-27 14:59:26

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

"Spirit of the game" is one of the dumbest things in sport. If you don't want someone to not do something make a rule against it.

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Its a loophole in the rules though. How can you make a rule against something like that? Impossible.
 
Itd be like in football...best answer i can think of on the spot...a defender making a diving save with his hand in the last minute of a game...then the opposing side misses the penalty...its in the rules that its a no goal..and theres no rules against it...but you'd feel pretty pissed if you were the side denied the possibly match winning goal in this situation

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
True...bowlers should always run down the pitch after the ball and accidently run into batsmen and getting them runout then. All in the name of winning right?


Well, that doesn't make it accidental, does it? Like PG said, if it's intentional, that's covered in the laws of the game, the bowler gets reprimanded, end of story.

And if you knew as much about cricket as you profess to, you'd know it's generally accepted that it's the batsman's responsibility not to get in the way of the bowler who's in the process of retrieving the ball to try to effect a run-out. So one could argue the whole thing was Elliott's fault for getting in Sidebottom's way in the first place.... el grapadura2008-06-27 21:49:51
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
Itd be like in football...best answer i can think of on the spot...a defender making a diving save with his hand in the last minute of a game...then the opposing side misses the penalty...its in the rules that its a no goal..and theres no rules against it...but you'd feel pretty pissed if you were the side denied the possibly match winning goal in this situation


That's...ahem...a very bad comparison.

1. There are very clear rules on what happens in a situation like this - red card for the defender, penalty kick for the attacking team.

2. This situation happans fairly often (I've seen it myself a number of times, have myslef been sent off twice for the offence). No-one has ever suggested that it's contrary to the 'spirit of the game' and it's an accepted part of the game.

3. How can you say that the attacking team were denied the opportunity to win? If they miss a penalty (which is probably one of the easiest chance to score from in football), they have no-one to blame but themselves.

I fail to see the logic of this comparison.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Stats and trivia

  • England have only won four of their last ten ODI matches at Lord's, but were victorious in their last two matches against India and West Indies last year.

  • New Zealand have never faced England at Lord's in a one-dayer. They won their sole appearance against West Indies in the 2004 Champions Trophy, beating them by 107 runs.

  • England will miss Collingwood's captaincy, but moreover his runs: he is the leading run-scorer in the series with 149 at 37.25.

  • New Zealand may be leading 2-1, but only McCullum appears in the the top five run-scorers with 114 at 38.00. Perhaps predictably, his strike-rate of 121.27 is the best of any top-order batsman.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Result New Zealand won by 51 runs

New Zealand innings (50 overs maximum) R M B 4s 6s SR JM How c Bopara b Broad 22 42 26 1 1 84.61 BB McCullum c Swann b Anderson 23 82 57 1 0 40.35 LRPL Taylor c Ambrose b Broad 4 18 15 0 0 26.66 SB Styris not out 87 153 91 5 3 95.60 DR Flynn b Swann 35 49 54 3 0 64.81 JDP Oram c Broad b Swann 52 52 40 2 3 130.00 GD Elliott not out 23 29 17 1 1 135.29     Extras (lb 13, w 7) 20     Total (5 wickets; 50 overs) 266 (5.32 runs per over)

Did not bat DL Vettori, KD Mills, TG Southee, MR Gillespie

Fall of wickets1-39 (How, 9.5 ov), 2-54 (Taylor, 13.6 ov), 3-71 (McCullum, 18.2 ov), 4-124 (Flynn, 31.2 ov), 5-201 (Oram, 43.6 ov)

 Bowling OM R W Econ  RJ Sidebottom 10 0 52 0 5.20 (1w)  JM Anderson 10 0 46 1 4.60 (4w)  SCJ Broad 10 1 50 2 5.00 (2w)  LJ Wright 6 0 36 0 6.00  GP Swann 10 0 33 2 3.30  RS Bopara 1 0 6 0 6.00  OA Shah 3 0 30 0 10.00

England innings (target: 267 runs from 50 overs) R M B 4s 6s SR IR Bell lbw b Gillespie 27 46 34 5 0 79.41 AN Cook c McCullum b Southee 24 57 38 3 0 63.15 KP Pietersen c Oram b Southee 6 39 23 0 0 26.08 RS Bopara b Vettori 30 47 39 5 0 76.92 OA Shah c sub (JAH Marshall) b Southee 69 109 75 5 0 92.00 LJ Wright b Vettori 6 24 22 0 0 27.27 TR Ambrose c sub (JAH Marshall) b Vettori 2 10 11 0 0 18.18 GP Swann c McCullum b Mills 12 19 16 2 0 75.00 SCJ Broad c Flynn b Mills 5 18 12 1 0 41.66 RJ Sidebottom not out 10 23 11 1 0 90.90 JM Anderson c Oram b Gillespie 2 8 7 0 0 28.57     Extras (b 1, lb 10, w 10, nb 1) 22     Total (all out; 47.5 overs) 215 (4.49 runs per over)

Fall of wickets1-53 (Bell, 11.1 ov), 2-60 (Cook, 13.2 ov), 3-86 (Pietersen, 19.5 ov), 4-101 (Bopara, 24.4 ov), 5-130 (Wright, 32.1 ov), 6-138 (Ambrose, 34.4 ov), 7-164 (Swann, 39.1 ov), 8-186 (Broad, 43.2 ov), 9-209 (Shah, 46.1 ov), 10-215 (Anderson, 47.5 ov)

 Bowling OM R W Econ  KD Mills 9 1 55 2 6.11  MR Gillespie 9.5 2 29 2 2.94 (1nb, 1w)  JDP Oram 6 0 22 0 3.66 (1w)  TG Southee 9 0 49 3 5.44 (4w)  DL Vettori 10 1 32 3 3.20 (1w)  SB Styris 4 0 17 0 4.25 (1w)

Toss England, who chose to field first
Series New Zealand won the 5-match series 3-1

Player of the match SB Styris (New Zealand)
Player of the series TG Southee (New Zealand)

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
16.1 Anderson to McCullum, 1 run, gets across and nudges the ball to midwicket and whats this? McCullum's bat has clean broken in half as the ball struck it! I've never seen anything like that ... seriously, ball hit the middle of the bat and the blooming thing just snapped in half, and McCullum ran through for the single with nearly two pieces in his hand ... he has a laugh and calls for a new one ... they don't make 'em like they used to, do they?
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Now bring on Ireland and Scotland!!! I still can't see any point in playing these two teams, especially at the end of the tour. These should've been a warm-up game. I guess they must be warm-down games.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Black Caps 402/2, Ireland 112. Opening stand of 274 between McCullum (166) and Marshall (161). Pretty useless excuse for an ODI though
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

New Zealand innings (50 overs maximum) R B 4s 6s SR JAH Marshall c Wilson b Strydom 161 141 11 4 114.18 BB McCullum c Haire b Eaglestone 166 135 11 10 122.96 LRPL Taylor not out 59 24 5 4 245.83 DR Flynn not out 0 0 0 0 -     Extras (b 4, lb 7, w 5) 16     Total (2 wickets; 50 overs) 402 (8.04 runs per over)

Did not bat JDP Oram, MJ Mason, DL Vettori, GJ Hopkins, TG Southee, JS Patel, GD Elliott

Fall of wickets1-266 (McCullum, 42.2 ov), 2-380 (Marshall, 49.1 ov)

 Bowling OM R W Econ  P Connell 9 0 95 0 10.55 (1w)  PS Eaglestone 7 0 60 1 8.57 (3w)  R Strydom 8 0 63 1 7.87 (1w)  AC Botha 10 0 66 0 6.60  WK McCallan 8 0 55 0 6.87  GE Kidd 8 0 52 0 6.50

Ireland innings (target: 403 runs from 50 overs) R B 4s 6s SR R Strydom c Taylor b Mason 11 13 2 0 84.61 GC Wilson b Southee 21 17 4 0 123.52 PR Stirling c Hopkins b Oram 4 16 0 0 25.00 AC Botha c Hopkins b Southee 6 8 1 0 75.00 AR White c Hopkins b Mason 7 13 1 0 53.84 RS Haire b Mason 2 9 0 0 22.22 AD Poynter c Hopkins b Southee 7 16 1 0 43.75 WK McCallan c Hopkins b Patel 10 25 1 0 40.00 GE Kidd c Taylor b Elliott 15 25 2 0 60.00 P Connell not out 22 28 5 0 78.57 PS Eaglestone run out (Southee) 4 3 1 0 133.33     Extras (w 2, nb 1) 3     Total (all out; 28.4 overs) 112 (3.90 runs per over)

Fall of wickets1-28 (Strydom, 4.3 ov), 2-32 (Wilson, 5.3 ov), 3-40 (Botha, 6.6 ov), 4-48 (White, 9.5 ov), 5-53 (Haire, 11.6 ov), 6-53 (Stirling, 12.3 ov), 7-65 (Poynter, 17.3 ov), 8-71 (McCallan, 20.4 ov), 9-94 (Kidd, 25.6 ov), 10-112 (Eaglestone, 28.4 ov)

 Bowling OM R W Econ  TG Southee 6 0 22 3 3.66 (1w)  MJ Mason 7 0 35 3 5.00 (1nb)  JDP Oram 5 0 9 1 1.80  JS Patel 5.4 2 24 1 4.23  GD Elliott 5 1 22 1 4.40

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
tim southees one day stats are looking bond like, hopefully he can keep them at that level

www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

In his 9 innings before this match Marshall had only scored 89 runs

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Five stats
  • New Zealand's 290-run triumph eclipsed the previous record for the largest win (by runs) by 33 runs.
  • James Marshall and Brendon McCullum became the first opening pair to pile up 150-plus scores in the same innings. It was also the first ODI hundred for both Marshall and McCullum.
  • New Zealand's total of 402 for 2 is their best in ODIs, and the sixth ODI total over 400.
  • The 266-run stand between Marshall and McCullum is by far New Zealand's highest partnership, and the second-best opening stand in ODIs.
  • The 18 sixes hit by New Zealand equals the record for most sixes by a team in an ODI. McCullum was just two hits short of the record for most sixes in an innings by a batsman.

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
True...bowlers should always run down the pitch after the ball and accidently run into batsmen and getting them runout then. All in the name of winning right?
 
There has to be a certain degree of sportsmanship (especially in cricket which prides itself on it).
 
Elliot would have made the run easy if sidebottom hadnt got in his way...Its just the way cricket has always been played that you would call a batsman back at a time like that


Doesn't the bowler have right of way? think I read somewhere...


Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
martinb wrote:
Tegal wrote:
True...bowlers should always run down the pitch after the ball and accidently run into batsmen and getting them runout then. All in the name of winning right?
 
There has to be a certain degree of sportsmanship (especially in cricket which prides itself on it).
 
Elliot would have made the run easy if sidebottom hadnt got in his way...Its just the way cricket has always been played that you would call a batsman back at a time like that


Doesn't the bowler have right of way? think I read somewhere...
 
nope, bowlers have to make every effort to get off the pitch - as do batsmen, batsmen can hold their line it is the bowlers responsibility to move out of the way.In the situation we are disussing neither bowler nor batsmen are at fault, collisions happen. The responsibility falls on the captain, he had the option of recalling the batsmen but did not even with the umpire asking him if he wanted to.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Result New Zealand won by 8 wickets (with 212 balls remaining)

Scotland innings (50 overs maximum) R B 4s 6s SR GM Hamilton b Gillespie 6 9 1 0 66.66 RR Watson b Gillespie 0 2 0 0 0.00 MQ Sheikh b Elliott 18 43 3 0 41.86 NS Poonia c McCullum b Oram 15 35 0 0 42.85 CJO Smith c McCullum b Oram 11 19 2 0 57.89 NFI McCallum lbw b Oram 2 13 0 0 15.38 RD Berrington lbw b Elliott 7 15 1 0 46.66 JAR Blain lbw b Vettori 6 27 0 0 22.22 GA Rogers c McCullum b Elliott 0 1 0 0 0.00 G Goudie not out 17 31 2 1 54.83 JD Nel lbw b Vettori 4 5 0 0 80.00     Extras (lb 11, w 4) 15     Total (all out; 33.2 overs) 101 (3.03 runs per over)

Fall of wickets1-1 (Watson, 0.4 ov), 2-12 (Hamilton, 2.4 ov), 3-34 (Poonia, 11.1 ov), 4-54 (Smith, 15.4 ov), 5-66 (Sheikh, 18.5 ov), 6-68 (McCallum, 21.4 ov), 7-75 (Berrington, 24.1 ov), 8-75 (Rogers, 24.2 ov), 9-87 (Blain, 31.1 ov), 10-101 (Nel, 33.2 ov)

 Bowling OM R W Econ  MR Gillespie 6 1 13 2 2.16 (1w)  TG Southee 4 0 12 0 3.00 (2w)  JDP Oram 6 2 13 3 2.16  MJ Mason 4 0 18 0 4.50  GD Elliott 7 1 14 3 2.00 (1w)  DL Vettori 6.2 2 20 2 3.15

New Zealand innings (target: 102 runs from 50 overs) R B 4s 6s SR BB McCullum c Goudie b Nel 22 24 2 1 91.66 PG Fulton lbw b Blain 4 4 1 0 100.00 LRPL Taylor not out 61 41 8 2 148.78 SB Styris not out 14 19 1 0 73.68     Extras (lb 1) 1     Total (2 wickets; 14.4 overs) 102 (6.95 runs per over)

Did not bat DR Flynn, JDP Oram, DL Vettori, GD Elliott, MJ Mason, TG Southee, MR Gillespie

Fall of wickets1-4 (Fulton, 0.4 ov), 2-54 (McCullum, 7.6 ov)

 Bowling OM R W Econ  JAR Blain 5 0 40 1 8.00  JD Nel 6 0 34 1 5.66  G Goudie 3.4 0 27 0 7.36

Toss New Zealand, who chose to field first
Points New Zealand 2, Scotland 0
Series New Zealand won the 2008 Associates Tri-Series (in Scotland)

We should have batted first
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Senior New Zealand cricketer Scott Styris is facing possible censure after sending an expletive-laced late-night text to a former team-mate, Herald on Sunday columnist Mark Richardson.

The first one sarcastically thanked Richardson for the article before describing him as a "geriatric ****-head". It is then understood to have added: "We hope you die choking on your own **** that you speak."

Styris then used more expletives in a later text and abused Richardson again as a "scribe/ hack/ journo/ wannabe journo".

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

New Zealand cricket coach John Bracewell will return for a second stint at Gloucestershire as director of cricket next season.

Permalink Permalink