Off Topic

Indecision 08 - The Fever US Election

167 replies · 2,830 views
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
loyalgunner wrote:
Lol, I can't be bothered arguing this so I'll just say a couple of reasons, and if you disagree that's fine.� Basically though, Barack Obama has gotten to the position he is currently in because of his race.� If he was white I doubt he would've made it much further than Mitt Romney or Mike Huckabee, and certainly not as far as Hillary Clinton.� That's not a racist call, that is how I see it.� I reckon he is a good chap, but I would much prefer McCain who is getting a lot of support on basis of merit and not race.� McCain has been in politics for about 40 years I think, Obama has been a senator 3(?) years, and published two memoirs (and passed no laws).� That is hardly presidential material in my view.� And with Palin, she has been Governor for 2 years, but she at least has experience in leading.Please don't get the impression from that that I'm racist, because I most certainly am not.� I just don't think a great deal of his support is based on any merit he may have.That's my view, I know many people will disagree, but that's OK.

Im not going to call you racist, but your wrong and you have spent to much time listening to Sean Hannity

www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I have never heard of Sean Hannity.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
bopman wrote:
loyalgunner wrote:
Lol, I can't be bothered arguing this so I'll just say a couple of reasons, and if you disagree that's fine.  Basically though, Barack Obama has gotten to the position he is currently in because of his race.  If he was white I doubt he would've made it much further than Mitt Romney or Mike Huckabee, and certainly not as far as Hillary Clinton.  That's not a racist call, that is how I see it.  I reckon he is a good chap, but I would much prefer McCain who is getting a lot of support on basis of merit and not race.  McCain has been in politics for about 40 years I think, Obama has been a senator 3(?) years, and published two memoirs (and passed no laws).  That is hardly presidential material in my view.  And with Palin, she has been Governor for 2 years, but she at least has experience in leading.Please don't get the impression from that that I'm racist, because I most certainly am not.  I just don't think a great deal of his support is based on any merit he may have.That's my view, I know many people will disagree, but that's OK.

Im not going to call you racist, but your wrong and you have spent to much time listening to Sean Hannity
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Where is the emoticon for jaw dropping...  a Fox disciple at such a young age... I'm stunned.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago


so if John McCain was black, he'd still be the Republican candidate? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA
Cosimo2008-10-16 19:36:18
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

a Canadian take on the 3rd debate:

. . . and yet they interviewed people right after the debate who thought McCain had a better plan for healthcare because Obama wants to make it a government program. I hate people.

That's just so wacky. I ask myself, "do I think a company should turn a profit on me getting sick?" and I think, well, no. And if there shouldn't be profit in it, then the government should be running it.

I thought it was pretty funny, though, that McCain argued that with Obama's plan the US's health care would end up like Canada. I have yet to hear an American who didn't want our health care.



I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
"Sacramento County Republican leaders Tuesday took down offensive material on their official party Web site that sought to link Sen. Barack Obama to Osama bin Laden and encouraged people to "Waterboard Barack Obama" � material that offended even state GOP leaders."

We all know Obama's really a terrorist - I mean, his name sounds terroristy, so he must be...
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
There is a great Keith Olberman piece on YouTube showing Palin's links to internal terrorists like Alaskan separatists and some really serious internal US nutters.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Probably the funniest thing of the year so far

www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Arsenal... no.  Football365 is the place for those, not here.

Incidentally, the Scotch one is the only really funny one.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
f**k you Hard News!

www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
bopman wrote:
Probably the funniest thing of the year so far


Hard News lacks a sense of humour imo.

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Sorry... not suitable for the public face of the Fever.  We let alot go here, but that is too far.

I'll PM you something to make up for it.

Honestly lads, we already know parts of the media like nothing more than to decide the view of one person on here is the view of all on here, that doesn't meet any standards of acceptable content.
Hard News2008-10-16 20:46:56

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Cosimo wrote:


so if John McCain was black, he'd still be the Republican candidate? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA


In the case of Republican's probably not due to their massive southern support (slight stereotype there perhaps).  But Obama has got an overwhelming amount of support because he's black and people feel bad about America's dreadful race history.  That and the massive anti-bush sentiment (some justified, some plain ridiculous) which links McCain with Bush because they are both Republican.  Let's not forget the media-bashing of Republican's that seems unable to focus on any good that comes out of the war in Iraq and consistently focuses on the negatives (of which there are many, but a more balanced view would be appreciated).

Rest assured, HN, I don't watch Fox News.  Ol' 3 news suits me fine.
loyalgunner2008-10-16 20:24:11
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

but that is balanced out by the fact that many Americans WON'T vote for him because he is black, whether they admit it or not
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Do you support the war in Iraq?

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think more would vote for him out of guilt over the history than those who wouldn't vote for him out of racism - so in my view that doesn't balance out.  However, none of us really have anything to back our views on that up so who cares.

Arsenal, I'm kind of mixed on it in all honesty.  Something had to be done after 9/11, and if America did nothing they'd probably have received more criticism than they do now.  The Taliban were ruthless and needed to be crushed.  Also, Saddam Hussein needed to be caught and it's good they got him, however, it probably would've been better to avoid Iraq and just have stuck with Afghanistan (an offensive I did support).  Bare in mind that Bush's approval rating went up into the 80-ish % mark after the attacks so it's obvious that a lot of people supported him then.  It was only after they had invaded Afghanistan that they all changed their minds and opposed Bush's move, but he could hardly just leave could he?  Invading Iraq after that, though, especially with large public opposition, was not wise.

Hope that made sense.
loyalgunner2008-10-16 20:38:28
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
loyalgunner wrote:
That and the massive anti-bush sentiment (some justified, some plain ridiculous) which links McCain with Bush because they are both Republican.
Not true.  They are linked because McCain voted with Bush 95% of the time.  Hence they are similar.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yeah true that is part of it, but you also often hear about "American's wanting a change, the Republican party are out of touch" etc
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
loyalgunner wrote:
  Bare in mind that Bush's approval rating went up into the 80-ish % mark after the attacks so it's obvious that a lot of people supported him then.  It was only after they had invaded Afghanistan that they all changed their minds and opposed Bush's move, but he could hardly just leave could he?  Invading Iraq after that, though, especially with large public opposition, was not wise.

Hope that made sense.

No it doesn't.  you have your fact wrong.  They went into Afghanistan first after 9/11. Once they could find crap they then linked Iraq with Al Queda.  Told some lies and invaded Iraq.

 

His rating went up because of a number of factors.  Firstly, the lies they told were pretty much taken as gossip.  Not many media outlet did any investigation into whether the links were true.  The Bush administration and the republican party then outted anyone who was against the invasion as un-American and terrorist sympathiser.  Therefore everyone jumped on the bandwagon.

 

It was only until the public realised that they were lied to and their was no descent plan in Iraq that ratings went down.

2ndBest2008-10-16 20:52:06
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
loyalgunner wrote:
Yeah true that is part of it, but you also often hear about "American's wanting a change, the Republican party are out of touch" etc
Well John McCain is out of touch when he claimed not long ago that "the fundamentals of the economy are sound".  Not a good look for a presidental canditate to admit they don't understand the economy when the economy is the number one issue.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I'm pretty sure I said they invaded Afghanistan first, or at least alluded to it ("Invading Iraq after that, though,").

I'm not arguing about Iraq as I said I don't agree with that invasion.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
"It was only after they had invaded Afghanistan that they all changed their minds and opposed Bush's move, but he could hardly just leave could he"
 
I got they iMpression you meant they went to iraq first. Then Afghanistan, then the US got pissed.  Maybe I read it wrong
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

man it's lucky (for the GoPs) that she's hot - you can get away with being moronic if you're hot
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I don't think you will find many people who argued with the invasion of Afghanistan, they have just f**ked it up so monumentally since they got there. Am reading the book Bob Woodward has just released on the Bush Administration from 6 months before the mid terms through to now and how the whole strategy in Iraq was just a shambles

www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Lol at the pic.
loyalgunner2008-10-16 21:01:40
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
Some good clean Palin fun:



My gif. was better imo
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

we still you KP, just slightly less each day
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Cosimo wrote:

we still you KP, just slightly less each day


I complete you.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
"The latest newsletter by an Inland Republican women's group depicts Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama surrounded by a watermelon, ribs and a bucket of fried chicken, prompting outrage in political circles.

The October newsletter by the Chaffey Community Republican Women, Federated says if Obama is elected his image will appear on food stamps -- instead of dollar bills like other presidents. The statement is followed by an illustration of "Obama Bucks" -- a phony $10 bill featuring Obama's face on a donkey's body, labeled "United States Food Stamps."

those classy Republicans...

Cosimo2008-10-17 08:21:58
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I'll just say two things for now:

1. Do not underestimate the political power of redneck America.

2. The GOP looks like they're laying the groundwork for a legal challenge should Obama win.

Obama is by no means as red-hot a favourite the way a lot of commentators see him.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
I'll just say two things for now:

1. Do not underestimate the political power of redneck America.

2. The GOP looks like they're laying the groundwork for a legal challenge should Obama win.

Obama is by no means as red-hot a favourite the way a lot of commentators see him.
I agree about the power of redneck America and I indicated that in an earlier post. Care to enlighten us on your 2nd comment, i read and watch a lot of stuff regards this election and have not heard or read a whisper of a court challenge.

www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
bopman wrote:
el grapadura wrote:
I'll just say two things for now: 1. Do not underestimate the political power of redneck America. 2. The GOP looks like they're laying the groundwork for a legal challenge should Obama win. Obama is by no means as red-hot a favourite the way a lot of commentators see him.

I agree about the power of redneck America and I indicated that in an earlier post. Care to enlighten us on your 2nd comment, i read and watch a lot of stuff regards this election and have not heard or read a whisper of a court challenge.


Why do you think the ACORN stuff is getting so much airing at the moment?
In addition to scoring points against the 'liberals', it prepares the groundwork for a legal challenge in swing states, especially Ohio. If McCain loses some of those states, watch out.

And of course they're not going to say "hmm, we're preparing a legal challenge in case we lose". But I think that's on the cards if McCain loses, especially in the states where ACORN has been active.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think the ACORN thing is getting a lot of airing because the Republicans in crisis mode, i would be more than very surprised if it was a ground for a mainstream court challenge. Maybe some extreme whackjobs might use it but not the Replubican party as a whole

www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
What the Republicans have done well with this guy Joe the Plumber is put a face on Obama's tax plans, which is so ideologically different from the right, that Obama can be more easily portrayed as a 'nasty' socialist. Joe is right on that $250,000 bracket for increased taxes so he's perfect.
 
As for this ACORN business, I think the Supreme Court made a descision in Ohio this morning, hopefully that keeps the Republicans happy. Otherwise we could easily be in for a legal challenge, which would only delay and not help things. 10 states were announced as not yet ready to hold the elections, including three battleground states. Could turn into a nightmare.
 
And I agree, the power of redneck politics is scary. Especially with Sarah Palin floating around.  
Permalink Permalink