Its Summer! - the Fever Cricket Thread.

4313 replies · 589,601 views
over 13 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Sigh.  Why do I let them do this to me?

 

(To be fair, it was a fairly good performance, especially given the hiding we got in the first game.)

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Always crushing isn't it?

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Our batting in the second innings let us down. If we'd managed to set them more than 300, and that was eminently achievable, this could have been much, much tighter.

But a massive improvement on the first test, undoubtedly.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Series win! Who would have thunk it? (Not me).

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

 Very surprised to see the result when I woke up, I had expected a right thrashing.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Especially surprising considering it starred three of our more maligned players, Franklin, McCullum, & Oram.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Shows how much of a lottery T20 is. That's all. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:

Shows how much of a lottery T20 is. That's all. 

Yeah, I suspect you're right. But at least that fact gives us some hope for the T20 World Cup...

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Not really that surprising - we are a more than adequate limited overs side, and I don't think we have ever lost to India in a T20 game, and, as you say, T20 is a bit of a lottery in a one off game.  TAB were ludicrously paying $7 for the win, so I made a bit of cash out of it aswell.



Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Can't wait until the quarters or the semis where our opponents need 10 off the last over and we go with Franklin...... 2 balls later......

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Really good article by Martin Crowe on Cricinfo:

http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/581892.html


I have said for a long time that the Academy system in the late 90's/early 2000's ruined a generation of bowling talent  (We don't have any bowlers in their late 20's/early 30's who should really be leading the charge right now), but I didn't realise that similar had been done to our batting.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

All very fair points, but I think people need to talk more about our population. We have by far the smallest population of any major cricket playing nation (unsure of the total pop. of the West Indies), so of course it will be harder for us to produce players who make hundreds at the rate countries like India do, as they have about 300x more potential cricketers than us.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

All NZF and regional program's are based on world cup cycles how many players drop out due to this. Footballers plan your family around this. Best way to develop football on NZ

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

NZ 75/1 after 10 overs against the Bangi's. Reasonable start, need to kick on and get a big score.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

 Big hundred for McCullum.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Sure was. I don't really care much for t20 but when Baz gets going like that it sure is entertaining. Good win, should make the Super 8 now.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

"Everything going wrong for New Zealand",

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago · edited over 13 years ago · History

Why, if one opening batsman is out, do you change both opening batsmen?  Why bat your (2nd?) best batsman at 6?  Very weird.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Stupid want of a left-handed right-handed combo, I don't have the time to statistically justify this, but I'm pretty sure that it is ridiculously overrated. Surely an international bowler can face both stances....

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago
A bit of in-camp insight from Franky.  https://www.crichq.com/media/articles/650-player-diary-james-franklin

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Some interesting stuff coming out about the relationship between Hesson & Taylor. Any guesses as to how long it will be until he makes McCullum captain?

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

hlmphil wrote:

Some interesting stuff coming out about the relationship between Hesson & Taylor. Any guesses as to how long it will be until he makes McCullum captain?


Hopefully infinity plus one.  Was a ridiculous thing to say given the speculation when he took over.  The only thing to say to that question is "Ross Taylor is the captain of the New Zealand Cricket team and he has my full and unquestioning support"
Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

 Mahamarakkala Kurukulasooriya Patabendige Akila Dananjaya Perera makes his debut for Sri Lanka vs NZ

What a great name.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Looks like Sri Lanka will do this in a canter.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

T-20 might not be test cricket.  But it still craps over any other bat/ball sport.  Absolutely thrilling stuff that was.  But as usual,  NZ cricketing tears before bedtime.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Kinda shocked this morning when I saw the result. They started losing wickets when I turned on, and obviously bowled better when I went to bed. Maybe I should just stop watching them for the sake of the nation.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Yeah I went to bed when they were about 100-0 and cruising it. Surprised it went close but good on them I guess. If only we didn't bowl like a pack of cunts in the first 10 overs. 

Also surprised by the top order's effort.

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

3 things:

1) Franklin again performs, but I bet he will still be batting 6/7 against the Windies.  Was ridiculous v. SL that he came in after both Oram and N McCullum

2) McCullum should be opening and Taylor should be 3.  They are our two best batsman and in T20 cricket you need to have your best batsmen in as early as possible to give them the most opportunity to influence the game

3) When did the rule change so that knocking the bails off in your delivery stride = dead ball.  I have never heard of that in my life, and even as someone that occasionally clips the bails when bowling with my hand (the penalty is it bloody hurts!) is it something I have missed all my life or is it new?  Either way it is ludicrous.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

aitkenmike wrote:

3) When did the rule change so that knocking the bails off in your delivery stride = dead ball.  I have never heard of that in my life, and even as someone that occasionally clips the bails when bowling with my hand (the penalty is it bloody hurts!) is it something I have missed all my life or is it new?  Either way it is ludicrous.


Commentator reckons "you can't have it both ways" but that is utter bollocks. They have it both ways for a no ball and that situation should be no different.
Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Fitzy wrote:

aitkenmike wrote:

3) When did the rule change so that knocking the bails off in your delivery stride = dead ball.  I have never heard of that in my life, and even as someone that occasionally clips the bails when bowling with my hand (the penalty is it bloody hurts!) is it something I have missed all my life or is it new?  Either way it is ludicrous.


Commentator reckons "you can't have it both ways" but that is utter bollocks. They have it both ways for a no ball and that situation should be no different.

I just don't understand why it isn't just play on.  No no ball, no dead ball, just part of the game. 
Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

aitkenmike wrote:

Fitzy wrote:

aitkenmike wrote:

3) When did the rule change so that knocking the bails off in your delivery stride = dead ball.  I have never heard of that in my life, and even as someone that occasionally clips the bails when bowling with my hand (the penalty is it bloody hurts!) is it something I have missed all my life or is it new?  Either way it is ludicrous.


Commentator reckons "you can't have it both ways" but that is utter bollocks. They have it both ways for a no ball and that situation should be no different.

I just don't understand why it isn't just play on.  No no ball, no dead ball, just part of the game. 
As long as I can remember it has been called dead ball. Mainly because you need the bails on in case of a run out.
Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

aitkenmike wrote:

Fitzy wrote:

aitkenmike wrote:

3) When did the rule change so that knocking the bails off in your delivery stride = dead ball.  I have never heard of that in my life, and even as someone that occasionally clips the bails when bowling with my hand (the penalty is it bloody hurts!) is it something I have missed all my life or is it new?  Either way it is ludicrous.


Commentator reckons "you can't have it both ways" but that is utter bollocks. They have it both ways for a no ball and that situation should be no different.

I just don't understand why it isn't just play on.  No no ball, no dead ball, just part of the game. 
As long as I can remember it has been called dead ball. Mainly because you need the bails on in case of a run out.

Nope, you just need to pull the stump out with the ball in hand if the wicket is broken.
Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

This  is what I can find on it.  So it appears to be a special rule just for Finn because he does it so often.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Todd Astle called up to the test squad, maybe we should just admit we have no good spinners at all and just play 4 seamers every test.

For some reason Rob Nicol has been recalled to the test squad, why I have no idea, while Kruger keeps his spot ahead of Watling, who arguably should be ahead of both Nicol and Van Wyk. But never mind, I'd much rather have him available for ND.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Kruger>Watling.  Not sure what Nethula has done wrong.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Probably getting smacked around by India A while having precisely no control, like all New Zealand leggies. But I'm not sure Astle is that much of an upgrade apart from his batting

Permalink Permalink