Regional Football - powered by Park Life

Capital Three 2010

626 replies · 16,486 views
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
pizda wrote:

so once you go up, you are part of new team untill you go back down. when you go back down you and 2 others from THAT team are allowed to be regraded in one week. so the way i understand it if 4 came down from 1 team thats CHEATING! unless 1 came from another higher team which in my interpretation of regulations is ok. so are you cheating?

 
You are right, IF 4 went down that would be against the rules, HOWEVER L/Hutt didnt do this so there is no problem. I dont see why L/Hutt are being portrayed as cheats when they were not cheating. If people cant handle that L/Hutt have played within the rules and won then they should take up another sport like chess!!!
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
same old bogans - always cheating.
Bet George Barbarouses was playing too

Founder

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
nothing wrong with my timeline, i was only replying to what YOU stated about 4 players playing against the 2nds the week before. you said it not i. you obviously fire of the hip frequently and don't recall what you have said. me thinks that's called alzhiemers disease, something i think you need to diagnose smartly before you forget!
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
nightz wrote:
Mr Blobby could be right Sweepa. There could have been 4 that played their 1st last  Sat that had played against their 2nds the previous week. Lower Hutts 2nds got spanked the week before and also had injuries so some players were promoted from the 3rds to the 2nds were they not? Maybe Mr Blobby doesnt think players should get promoted up the grades if they are doing well![/QUOTE]
 
 
 
pizda wrote:
so once you go up, you are part of new team untill you go back down. when you go back down you and 2 others from THAT team are allowed to be regraded in one week. so the way i understand it if 4 came down from 1 team thats CHEATING! unless 1 came from another higher team which in my interpretation of regulations is ok. so are you cheating?
 
4 players play for Lower Hutts 3rds against Upper Hutts 2nds and than the next week play for Lower Hutts 2nds against Upper Hutts 1st team. As the players are going up and not down the grades there is no "cheating" involved, get your facts right.
 
[QUOTE=pizda]nothing wrong with my timeline, i was only replying to what YOU stated about 4 players playing against the 2nds the week before. you said it not i. you obviously fire of the hip frequently and don't recall what you have said. me thinks that's called alzhiemers disease, something i think you need to diagnose smartly before you forget!
 
 
You werent replying to what I stated but a reading problem possibly created by the tears in your eyes casused by being such a bad loser. Now stoping making such a dickhead of yourself.
 

A dog with a bone :)

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
so now that i've learned how to decipher gibberish from the master himself ,i have to ask, are those 4 players coming back down this week ? ie cheating because LH are reknown for it.  or will you be playing your assumed weakened line-up. as for "bad loser", no we kicked your ass when we played; as for" dickhead" didn't your mama teach you any respect while you were having an incestuous affair with her..... reep the seed you sow nightingale
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
pizda wrote:
so now that i've learned how to decipher gibberish from the master himself ,i have to ask, are those 4 players coming back down this week ? ie cheating because LH are reknown for it.  or will you be playing your assumed weakened line-up. as for "bad loser", no we kicked your ass when we played; as for" dickhead" didn't your mama teach you any respect while you were having an incestuous affair with her..... reep the seed you sow nightingale
 
 
You didnt kick my arse at all, I play for Petone not Lower Hutt. Thanks for the apology.

A dog with a bone :)

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
ding ding... end of round one...
 
and what a round it was..
 
biff biff baff smack...
 
a few good shots fired in that round..
hope there isnt any hair pulling or ear biting in this round...
 
lets get back to the action...
 
ding ding...
 
round 2
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
nightz wrote:
pizda wrote:
so now that i've learned how to decipher gibberish from the master himself ,i have to ask, are those 4 players coming back down this week ? ie cheating because LH are reknown for it.  or will you be playing your assumed weakened line-up. as for "bad loser", no we kicked your ass when we played; as for" dickhead" didn't your mama teach you any respect while you were having an incestuous affair with her..... reep the seed you sow nightingale
 
 
You didnt kick my arse at all, I play for Petone not Lower Hutt. Thanks for the apology.
 
so why are you always banging on about LH?

Founder

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
bang on the money feverish,seems odd he always comments on a team from a players perspective, as if he's there. I can only assume while playing for petone (next to LH every week), that he stands there watching the game next door, much to his team mates frustration. unless he's the water boy ( "you can do it" ), similar actions are commonly associated with 7th grade players. so tell me nightz, do you dig for worms as well as throw mud-pies at other kidz.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Still having a problem reading than pizda, I have never commented on Lower Hutt from a players perspective. Being from Upper Hutt I guess you have trouble seeing past that hand protruding from your forehead.

A dog with a bone :)

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I can say for sure that Nightz does not play for L/Hutts 3rd team, those who know him will know how he gets his info.
Pizda, if you are from U/Hutt, yes you did beat us the first time you played us, 4-0 or 4-1, what ever it was you should know this,
1. it was the first game of the season
2. it was L/Hutts first time together (you get that being a third team)
then there was your goals,  an own goal, a penalty, a keeper/player mixup (gift) and your other goal was only 2m off side.
But, yes you did beat us, it doesnt matter how the goals go in, and it aint your fault your a second team playing a third team,
However, did you see L/Hutt on here bleating about the result?? NO
I think you should stop whinging, spend less time on here and more on your practice and maybe next time you will beat us.
 
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I'm pretty sure anyone who has seen Nightz knows he does not play anywhere near Cap 3. Kinda wierd he cares about a random team not from his club though.

Founder

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Same could be said about a guy from Karori commenting on it Feverish.
Heck I comment on the Nix/Central league/Prem League but I dont play in those either.
 
At least I can sort of get the facts right when commenting rather than random rants about certain teams/clubs cheating when you have no proof and it turns out in fact hey arent cheating but you continue to accuse them of it anyway, pizda.

A dog with a bone :)

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
SO ALL ALONG YOUR REPORTS WERE BASED ON HEARSAY, WHICH WOULDN'T STAND UP IN A COURT OF LAW,BECAUSE YOU CAN CONVENIANTLY "sort of get the facts right". YOU'RE A FLIPPIN COMEDIAN. YOU'RE LIKE THE POLITICIAN TOWING THE PARTY LINE, VEHEMENTLY DEFENDING WHAT YOUR SOURCE HAS INFORMED YOU BASED ON HIS BIASED REPORT. NO PRIZES FOR GUESSING YOUR CO-CONSPIRATORS,  SWEEPA AND THAT HAIRY-ARSED BANDIT. THE CROWN SHOULDA GOT YOU ALL ON THE STAND AGAINST BAIN, THEY WOULD'VE THROWN AWAY THE KEYS BASED ON YOUR FACTS, OR RATHER, SORT OF.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Pizda, in the internet world caps are considered the height of rudeness... while I have no problem with being rude to nightz, please refrain from using all upper case characters.

Cheers
News.
Hard News2009-06-12 23:31:45

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

just making a bold statement

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
pizda,  Where nightz gets his info is from the source. I suggest you drop this crusade against L/Hutt as they have done nothing wrog once again and you are starting to look rather stupid. If U/Hutt thought L/Hutt were playing outside the rules they would lay a complaint with cap football, But once again it is other people going on hearsay/ misinformation and wrongly accusing L/Hutt of cheating. Please make sure you have all the FACTS before accusing people of wrong doing.
Ohh and by the way bain is guilty in my opinion, i hear they had kfc at the after party and he murdered a family pack
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
pizda wrote:
SO ALL ALONG YOUR REPORTS WERE BASED ON HEARSAY, WHICH WOULDN'T STAND UP IN A COURT OF LAW,BECAUSE YOU CAN CONVENIANTLY "sort of get the facts right". YOU'RE A FLIPPIN COMEDIAN. YOU'RE LIKE THE POLITICIAN TOWING THE PARTY LINE, VEHEMENTLY DEFENDING WHAT YOUR SOURCE HAS INFORMED YOU BASED ON HIS BIASED REPORT. NO PRIZES FOR GUESSING YOUR CO-CONSPIRATORS,  SWEEPA AND THAT HAIRY-ARSED BANDIT. THE CROWN SHOULDA GOT YOU ALL ON THE STAND AGAINST BAIN, THEY WOULD'VE THROWN AWAY THE KEYS BASED ON YOUR FACTS, OR RATHER, SORT OF.
 
I hope you're not refering to me Pizda. I spend alot of time grooming those cheeks.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
well thanks 4 confirming yourself as co-conspirator and why he had his "sourced" facts wrong all season, oh yeah, i forgot, sort of....  although the old faggot now has the opportunity to actually witness a game due to the geriatric grade being rubbed out . as for you and your team, i've witnessed your brutal efforts personally and tell you this , theres no hiding from the truth sweepa. you yourself are the best cheat alongside your fellow centre back on the field. the only one distorting facts is you. the only team being accussed of dirty play & cheating since page 1 is your team. you and your mates are one-eyed cheats that deserve the foot of the table and as soon as you lose your talented youths to other teams you will be . the only one looking stupid is you for contradicting yourself, by constantly challenging others to get there facts right when you can't yourself. anywayz, you getting a bit soft in that fat gut of yours in your old age ,you seem to be easily baited these days. i've had to put up with you lot "looking rather stupid" all season ,and you can't put up with a rebuttal from a new user!!! by the way good joke but that's it (didn't think you had a sense of humour).
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
pizda....


think its about time you just grew up and got over this whole thing..... if you haven't noticed, nobody cares
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
pizda wrote:
well thanks 4 confirming yourself as co-conspirator and why he had his "sourced" facts wrong all season, oh yeah, i forgot, sort of....  although the old faggot now has the opportunity to actually witness a game due to the geriatric grade being rubbed out . as for you and your team, i've witnessed your brutal efforts personally and tell you this , theres no hiding from the truth sweepa. you yourself are the best cheat alongside your fellow centre back on the field. the only one distorting facts is you. the only team being accussed of dirty play & cheating since page 1 is your team. you and your mates are one-eyed cheats that deserve the foot of the table and as soon as you lose your talented youths to other teams you will be . the only one looking stupid is you for contradicting yourself, by constantly challenging others to get there facts right when you can't yourself. anywayz, you getting a bit soft in that fat gut of yours in your old age ,you seem to be easily baited these days. i've had to put up with you lot "looking rather stupid" all season ,and you can't put up with a rebuttal from a new user!!! by the way good joke but that's it (didn't think you had a sense of humour).
 
Now now dont get personal, you obviously know who i am so please show yourself to me. please tell me these wrong facts that you are speakig of?? there is none so SHUT IT. Where am i contradicting myself. if you want to talk any further on this please pm me as others dnt really need to read you personally attacking me. if you want any questions answered i will happily do it for you via pm.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
sweet as , i suppose that's why you're replying cos you don't care!
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
pizda wrote:
sweet as , i suppose that's why you're replying cos you don't care!


I'm replying because your making a complete fool out of yourself..

...just let it go
swandry2009-06-13 10:08:41
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
knock yourself out swanie
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
pizda wrote:
SO ALL ALONG YOUR REPORTS WERE BASED ON HEARSAY, WHICH WOULDN'T STAND UP IN A COURT OF LAW,BECAUSE YOU CAN CONVENIANTLY "sort of get the facts right". YOU'RE A FLIPPIN COMEDIAN. YOU'RE LIKE THE POLITICIAN TOWING THE PARTY LINE, VEHEMENTLY DEFENDING WHAT YOUR SOURCE HAS INFORMED YOU BASED ON HIS BIASED REPORT. NO PRIZES FOR GUESSING YOUR CO-CONSPIRATORS,  SWEEPA AND THAT HAIRY-ARSED BANDIT. THE CROWN SHOULDA GOT YOU ALL ON THE STAND AGAINST BAIN, THEY WOULD'VE THROWN AWAY THE KEYS BASED ON YOUR FACTS, OR RATHER, SORT OF.
 
Once again you make an arse of yourself pizda.
 
Where did I say I was told the info that makes it hearsay? Hhighlight my post that says that. I was at the games you muppet.

A dog with a bone :)

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
how did LH go today
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
they got beat 3-1 by a team that played better.
 
Question, what happens to the scorte that we give the ref each week??? the reason i ask is if we both coaches give the ref a 3 does he get called up and give a report on his perfomance?? get any coaching?? go down the grades etc??
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Wairarapa United      1    Upper Hutt City       1
Lower Hutt City       1    North Wellington      3
Tawa                  1    Kapiti Coast United   3
Island Bay Magic      1    Brooklyn Northern     4
Karori Cougars        3    Waikanae              2
                       
                       P  W  D  L  GF  GA  Pt
Tawa                  11  9  0  2  24  16  27
Kapiti Coast United   11  7  4  0  27   9  25
Upper Hutt City       11  7  2  2  25   9  23
North Wellington      11  4  4  3  18  14  16
Island Bay Magic      11  4  2  5  20  20  14
Karori Cougars        11  4  0  7  17  25  12
Lower Hutt City       11  4  0  7  16  27  12
Waikanae              11  3  2  6  17  24  11
Brooklyn Northern     11  2  3  6  12  19   9
Wairarapa United      11  1  3  7  10  23   6

Founder

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
sweepa wrote:
they got beat 3-1 by a team that played better.
 
Question, what happens to the scorte that we give the ref each week??? the reason i ask is if we both coaches give the ref a 3 does he get called up and give a report on his perfomance?? get any coaching?? go down the grades etc??
don't know, have been asking that for moons. sounds like you got another lemon what was his ID#?  how bout the KCU kicking tawa! two in a row old bastard! what's up wit dat? giz a round up old boy.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
shock result for kapiti knocking over tawa.

played upper hutt today in Carterton. We started well went close twice in the first ten minutes then got dominated for the rest of the first half but held out. Second half we came out firing and slotted one, pretty nicely. Upper Hutt came back, pretty even for the rest of the game although they got an equaliser, chipped me sadly. Pretty good game though played in good spirit, shame steve got sent cos wasnt a spitefull game. Ref had an issue with our supporters though, banished them from the sidelines, placing an incident report. Power hungry i say
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
so steelo, were you able to field a full strength team at home? ie you said previously something to the effect of players  dropping off like flies lately. speaking of which it must be hard maintaining enthusiasm while not producing results, and having to travel long distances every other week. does that have a negative impact on the club in general. obviously the passionate one's get used to it but it must take its toll on many, especially if they have young families. you also stated ages ago you all pay subs, do the club help with petrol or is it always a shared van.seems like a very high cost ,commitment wise, to be able to compete at a half decent level in the amatuer game, one wouldn't be blamed for considering a move to the big smoke ,which is probably another factor of player attrition in your region. give us an insight into footy life in the wops. sounds like the refs are "flavour of the weekend " at all venues today. could never understand refs telling spectators to leave the field for giving them lip service.  how would they handle a game in the big leagues overseas.imagine them sending  half of the  emirates stadium home each time they chanted against him or the linos...lol. i always tell them i'm a ratepayer and entitled to be there on a public ground. I watched and listened to a ref warn a player 3 times for the same beligerant tackle each time, then he booked him for swearing. in contrast a sub came on just before a restart 5min to go,after a goal had been scored, and got booked at half-way without the ball being kicked-off. just when i thought i'd seen it all.....LMAO.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
by the way there were 10+ cards and 1 was a double resulting in red. the" TAXMEN IN BLACK" were in fine form today.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
"Question, what happens to the scorte that we give the ref each week??? the reason i ask is if we both coaches give the ref a 3 does he get called up and give a report on his perfomance?? get any coaching?? go down the grades etc??"

Nothing really. The points go towards their popularity competition. Nothing comes of any consistently low scores as far as I know.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Pidaza, on the subject of travel we have a van supplied by one of the sponsors to ferry boys over the hill, I live in wellington myself so travel back for home games. Had close to a full strength side today, missing a couple but managed to perform as a team. Hasnt been too hard maintaining moral team is a mixture of young guys playing at a higher level and training in a quality environment if they train with the top side, and also some older guys who i guess enjoy the higher level of competition than Wairarapa provides.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Interesting round of results to tighten the league up a bit.  The Tawa/Kapiti game was always going to be a battle with Kapiti still unbeaten, but it seems like the Tawa boys have lost their mojo with 2 losses in a row after their start.  Can they bounce back next week?  What's happening there oldbastard? 
 
But the strangest result of the round has to be the Rapa earning a point against Upper Hutt.  Were there a few first team guys playing given they had a bye?  If so,  it has to be said that the Hutt have a been very unlucky with regard to that, some would say robbed of 5 points (referring to Lower Hutt game) that would have them in first place.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
we had one first teamer
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The Rapa only had one player from the 1st team and he only came on at half time, I think everyone involved will agree that we started with the weaker team ,a few players stepped up this week and the defence inparticular was on form, 
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

the likes of swandry,  kezzah, oranje, neilwgtn, old bastard have been pretty quite lately?   whats going on i wonder....

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
huttboy wrote:
, some would say robbed of 5 points (referring to Lower Hutt game) that would have them in first place.
Huttboy I asked (on 3/6) you which 1st team players from LH played in this fixture but you still havent replied yet you still say UH were robbed of the points.

A dog with a bone :)

Permalink Permalink