Regional Football - powered by Park Life

Grant Williams

200 replies · 15,601 views
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Grant Williams
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
.petone12009-10-13 10:25:34
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
bit wierd how it says he left because of 'declining sponsorship'

Founder

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Old news but still a wake up call for Clubs. Anyone out there do police checks on their junior coaches? Just takes 1 bad apple.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Have you done one on me Rightstr?
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Hadn't occured to me until now. Do I want to start getting them as a matter of course? No. But do I want to take the risk of that bad apple being there? Equally no. Will have to take advice on this one.

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
When I worked childcare for I had to get police checks done on me. I don't see there being any difference on it done on sports coaches and have no problem with it, even if just to put parents minds at ease.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
When I was coaching in England I had to have an Enhanced Disclosure CRB check done before I was allowed on the pitch.  That involved giving up every address I had lived at for the last 7 years.  They contacted the various agencies in every country.  Took months.  Fair enough though.
 
Australia is similarly demanding about such things.
 
New Zealand very (maybe too) trusting by comparison.
 

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
By the way I have edited the thread title to be a bit more descriptive and a little less emotive.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
2ndBest wrote:
Have you done one on me Rightstr?
 

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Was Stick one of his victims?
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
While a police check might seem like a good idea. It is only as good as the paper it is written on, ie no previus convictions no record to check.

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
fuah69 wrote:
While a police check might seem like a good idea. It is only as good as the paper it is written on, ie no previus convictions no record to check.

 
Agreed.  If there is no previous conviction then  nothing will show up.  In essence, it's playing catch up.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I personally disagree, for two reasons:

1. It's better than nothing. It's impossible to predict what a coach may do, but it's easy to find out what they have done. If parents want that reassurance then they deserve it, even if it is only as good as the paper it's written on.

2. For the clubs own protection. Cases like these could damage a team's reputation. With this new out, some parents may be less likely to sign their kids up for Petone, or worse, football.


Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I don't disagree with you at all Robb.  I too think it is a good idea.  But it is by no means full proof.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
My bad, I read into fuah69's comments as disagreement of the idea of police checks not being useful at all, but upon re-reading I see he just said they weren't 100%. Which I don't disagree with either. Guess I need another coffee
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
robbwatson wrote:
My bad, I read into fuah69's comments as disagreement of the idea of police checks not being useful at all, but upon re-reading I see he just said they weren't 100%. Which I don't disagree with either. Guess I need another coffee


I too, think we should be moving in this direction.

However, I'm currently waiting on one to renew my practicing certificate for teaching.  I understand the waiting time is around six weeks if you have been overseas for longer than 6 months in the last 10 years.  Imagine the waiting time if football started doing them on all junior coaches, when all our new coaches arrive in March....And then rugby starts doing them, and then hockey, etc...

The current New Zealand system is not time effective, and what do the clubs (and schools) do until they arrive. Delay teams playing????


Crazy-Horse2009-05-31 14:17:47
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
No, they just box on and do the best they can.

The fact it takes a long time is hardly a reason not to do it, is it?


Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Anyone with issues with the person named can contact me lbsutherland@clear.net.nz I can advise you on who to contact if you so desire.....kia Kaha..Laurie
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I attended the Court this week and the pre depositions hearing was postponed because of new charges being laid.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Grant Williams now has to appear in Court at Lower Hutt  on July 9th at 10am  for a Pre Depositions hearing to face a total of 17 charges. This information is a matter of Public Information and is available from the Lower Hutt Court .
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
smithy, do p.checks cost $, and if so, surely the club Could be further burdened financially( thus flowing on as an increase in subs),when most coaches are the parents themselves. surely a more "trusting kiwi" approach from clubs would be to enforce a 2-coach  policy up to u19 level for example.   In all contact with youth ,2 have to be present allways. if one cant make it & dont have a replacement ie. another parent, no training or game.  whether its 1 coach and 1 parent, or 2 coaches, its gotta be a sick pairing for both to get up to no good. To simple? maybe 3 or more are required?
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
pizda wrote:
smithy, do p.checks cost $, and if so, surely the club Could be further burdened financially( thus flowing on as an increase in subs),when most coaches are the parents themselves. surely a more "trusting kiwi" approach from clubs would be to enforce a 2-coach  policy up to u19 level for example.   In all contact with youth ,2 have to be present allways. if one cant make it & dont have a replacement ie. another parent, no training or game.  whether its 1 coach and 1 parent, or 2 coaches, its gotta be a sick pairing for both to get up to no good. To simple? maybe 3 or more are required?
 
Good luck with that.  For say under 10's  it would be fine as most parent hang around and watch.
 
But what about the 10-19 yo when parents don't want to hang round and would rather drop their kids off and pick them up later.  It's hard enough getting one coach, let alone two.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
hence, i did suggest another parent, surely 1 parent will come watch their child in any grade . and if not ,....no game or training! sounds extreme....yes. safer.....yes. less hassle than getting p.check...yes. look as long as there's 2 , the 2nd dosen't have to be involved, but they'd be a lot warmer if they did. you could even roster the 2nd person, 2nd best. good way to develop parent coaching ability if they all take part at least once. no?
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

I don't know if they are free or not but who cares? If a baddie is out there in your club and gets uncovered after doing some mischief, what sane administrator would want a call from the police or even worse, a parent, saying the baddie could have been found by a simple police check? They are standard practice in hospitals, schools, child care centres, FIFA World cup tournaments, so why not junior football?

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
pizda wrote:
hence, i did suggest another parent, surely 1 parent will come watch their child in any grade . and if not ,....no game or training! sounds extreme....yes. safer.....yes. less hassle than getting p.check...yes. look as long as there's 2 , the 2nd dosen't have to be involved, but they'd be a lot warmer if they did. you could even roster the 2nd person, 2nd best. good way to develop parent coaching ability if they all take part at least once. no?
 
Games it wouldn't be a problem.
 
Practice is another story.  Can't see many parents wanting to watch their 14 yo kid train in the wind and rain for 90 mins.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
ok i see you feel strongly about that , good on ya, what about the suggestion in the interim, cos clubs have to be forced to comply by nzfa regs and they dont get changed overnite pizda2009-06-19 17:24:31
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I don't know the ins and outs of current allegetions, but I would suggest in most of these sport's related offences that the acts would have taken place after practice and not during it.  Perhaps offering to pick up or drop off players back home.  It would be the one-on-one situation where the most risk is. 2ndBest2009-06-19 17:29:33
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
 
 
Games it wouldn't be a problem.
 
Practice is another story.  Can't see many parents wanting to watch their 14 yo kid train in the wind and rain for 90 mins.
[/QUOTE]
 
at 14 playing for college i assume ? well then the college would have to enforce it with a teacher ,who by the way sounds like he/she has a p.check already.
 
look my point is the kids here. its not supposed to be about the parents or the coaches,its not meant to be easy.  but if you ain't got any coaches cos the only one's interested fail a p.check cos they smoked a bit of hooch when they were young or whatever unrelated misdemeanour, you'll be worse off i fear.
 
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
you're not wrong! had a classic "pedo" at **********when i was in late teens. would always  show interest in your injuries then take you to changing-rooms so he could diagnose & massage. obviously he got up to no good or at least tried to. i was not impressed with where  he was going and told him so. his response was always defensive saying it was all part of it in some way. this guy was not even my coach, he was an assistant to another team. he preyed on the niave young footballer that would feel like he had to comply to foot it in the big leagues. i think he was a teacher..... he had police checks.... he is still involved today in COLLEGE football !!!!!!  do you want his name OR do you want him to have someone else with him to deter the old pedo?
 
 sorry got a bit hot on that no offence
 
 
**I HAVE edited this - taking out the club and year detail. Think thats best - Greenie
Feverish2009-06-20 21:45:41
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Firstly, I don't think it is wise to publicly publish name.
 
Secondly, i think your example is the kind of example we are trying to prevent.  As i mentioned before, it is about eliminating the situations where there are one-on-one situations between coaches and a player.  Such as your example or giving kids rides to and from practice.
 
I doubt any offenses occurs during practice when there are other players around.  Hence why i wasn't convinced of your solution.
 
Police checks are one way to weed out the bad eggs but will no means eliminate the problem.  Maybe there needs to be a directive from clubs to parents and coaches that non-parents coaches (like myself) must not put themselves in a position where they are alone with a player.  I know this is mentioned during the small-whites courses but can imagine this can be easily be ignored.
 
Overall, its a tricky situation.  The solution is not so easy.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Just a reminder that this is a very sensitive topic of discussion.  Please tread carefully.

Tks.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
dont want to name him on forum, never intended to. spose i'm trying to highlight the need to do something pro-active  in the interim,and to further encourage the end goal ,by process .hey its a very sensitive PC world we live in nowdays. whether you're a creche worker or a mega pop-star, you're placed under huge scrutiny when you deal with kids. there is no quick-fix solution, and  whilst i strongly agree with having guidelines put in place , i have to reserve my decision on having to comply with obtaining police approval. A WEED will always slip through the crack. pizda2009-06-20 00:03:41
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
If what pizda is hintng at is true then surely pizda has an obligation to take the matter further?
Profile pic. Should you be interested. Lakhsen, on the right, lost touch with him.
Mohammed, on the left, I'm still in touch with. He's now living in Agadez, Niger. More focused on his animals now as tourism has dried up. Is active with a co-op promoting local goods, leather work and bijouterie, into Europe. 
20/5/20

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
.petone12009-10-13 10:26:25
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I have been getting a lot of response from this posting, some good, some bad and a lot bagging of the Petone Club, well bearing in mind there has been no conviction yet, I think I can inform eveyone, the accused  was involved with at least two other  Hutt valley Clubs and was also a Rep Coach and not all of the complainants were involved with Petone.   
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Once his name and history is out in the open it is a matter of public record. Forums must be careful of not breaching court restrictions and slander so posting say a news article is ok but commenting on it could get the forum in hot water.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
 
 
petone12009-06-22 11:41:05
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
petone1 wrote:
His name is out in the public as it was printed in the dompost with a photo of him as well.
 
Petone1 they were talking about someone else other than Grant Williams.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
.petone12009-10-13 10:27:22
Permalink Permalink