Regional Football - powered by Park Life

Kick racism out of Football

179 replies · 33,601 views
over 12 years ago

Capital Football's stance - 

"Hi All

Thank you to all those who have submitted responses over the last couple of weeks to our email asking for other instances of discrimination that you feel Capital Football needs to be aware of. We are in the process of collating and reviewing these.

Capital Football does not condone any form of abuse, on or off the field.

We have reiterated to our referees to be vigilant and deal with any verbal abuse on the field, including any discriminatory comments. As many of our grades do not have an independent referee, we ask that everyone helps us address any unacceptable behaviour.

This is a community issue, not just a football or sport issue, and it will take the community to address this. "

and continues...
Profile pic. Should you be interested. Lakhsen, on the right, lost touch with him.
Mohammed, on the left, I'm still in touch with. He's now living in Agadez, Niger. More focused on his animals now as tourism has dried up. Is active with a co-op promoting local goods, leather work and bijouterie, into Europe. 
20/5/20

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Carefree wrote:
Tegal wrote:

Are you sure that was the standard of proof required? Seems a little harsh to be found guilty of racism (a crime) based on balance of probabilities. Beyond reasonable doubt seems more appropriate for such an accusation. 

I'm not sure what "standard of proof" is actually required, and from reading the decision it doesn't seem like the Committee knew either. The standards they chose to adopt (and then apply slightly inconsistently) was as I have quoted.

Beyond reasonable doubt is the criminal justice system standard of proof, on the balance of probabilities is the civil standard. So this would of been the blance of probabilities a reasonably low threshold.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Ah ok. Kind of like how John Terry was found guilty by the FA but not guilty by the courts I guess. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
UHnix wrote:

Is calling someone a Pomme git or a Pomme B--st--d I've heard these before, so presumably these are racial slurs ??????


They are. Why wouldn't they be?
Profile pic. Should you be interested. Lakhsen, on the right, lost touch with him.
Mohammed, on the left, I'm still in touch with. He's now living in Agadez, Niger. More focused on his animals now as tourism has dried up. Is active with a co-op promoting local goods, leather work and bijouterie, into Europe. 
20/5/20

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Tricky.  Most of us are the same race as the English.  It's a derogatory term for a nationality more than a race isn't it?

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Hard News wrote:

Tricky.  Most of us are the same race as the English.  It's a derogatory term for a nationality more than a race isn't it?


This could be where we get down to things like defining race and ethnicity. I've seen race expressed as 'being those of a common descent'. 
Nationality could be simply being part of a particular nation without regard to race.

In the case and context above it is clearly a slur based on your origins. Simply prejudice?

Profile pic. Should you be interested. Lakhsen, on the right, lost touch with him.
Mohammed, on the left, I'm still in touch with. He's now living in Agadez, Niger. More focused on his animals now as tourism has dried up. Is active with a co-op promoting local goods, leather work and bijouterie, into Europe. 
20/5/20

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Does it matter? This campaign should be focused on getting rid of, or at least reducing, all forms of abusive behaviour from football. Whether its racism, homophobia or just being a massive bell-end.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
terminator_x wrote:

Does it matter? This campaign should be focused on getting rid of, or at least reducing, all forms of abusive behaviour from football. Whether its racism, homophobia or just being a massive bell-end.


Absolutely.
Profile pic. Should you be interested. Lakhsen, on the right, lost touch with him.
Mohammed, on the left, I'm still in touch with. He's now living in Agadez, Niger. More focused on his animals now as tourism has dried up. Is active with a co-op promoting local goods, leather work and bijouterie, into Europe. 
20/5/20

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

I would happily wear a t-shirt for the "Kick bell-ends out of football" campaign.


"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Now you're just showing prejudice toward bell-ends. nightz would be offended. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Carefree wrote:
Tegal wrote:

Are you sure that was the standard of proof required? Seems a little harsh to be found guilty of racism (a crime) based on balance of probabilities. Beyond reasonable doubt seems more appropriate for such an accusation. 

I'm not sure what "standard of proof" is actually required, and from reading the decision it doesn't seem like the Committee knew either. The standards they chose to adopt (and then apply slightly inconsistently) was as I have quoted.

Beyond reasonable doubt is the criminal justice system standard of proof, on the balance of probabilities is the civil standard. So this would of been the blance of probabilities a reasonably low threshold.


Yes, I'm well aware of the difference between criminal and civil law standards of proof.

What I mean is, if you read the decision, the Committee themselves didn't know what was the appropriate standard, and after adopting the civil standard proceeded to apply it inconsistently.

Anyway, some bullshit from the Seatoun coach in the Dom Post this morning: http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/9005189/Racist-abuse-did-happen-but-offender-is-unknown

If an adjournment was actually requested and denied we can expect an appeal to NZF. Ha, I doubt it.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Tegal wrote:

Now you're just showing prejudice toward bell-ends. nightz would be offended. 

I'm not offended, I would take that as a term of endearment thanks.

 

A dog with a bone :)

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Carefree wrote:

Anyway, some bullshit from the Seatoun coach in the Dom Post this morning: http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/9005189/Racist-abuse-did-happen-but-offender-is-unknown

If an adjournment was actually requested and denied we can expect an appeal to NZF. Ha, I doubt it.

This quote is soooo misleading "We were left with the disquieting feeling . . . that he had no further interest in pursuing the matter."

 

This is the actual quote

"FJ did not attend the hearing and no request for an adjournment was made. We were left with the disquieting feeling that his statement had served its purpose in the original red card hearing reducing his suspension to two weeks and that he had no further interest in pursuing the matter"

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

I wouldn't consider that misleading. If anything, the actual quote makes the player concerned look worse.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Which is my point.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago


Ahhhh, now I'm with you.

If anything, the headline for the article is the worst.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Agree. Nowhere in the article or the report does it say that racial abuse 'did happen'.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Where do we go from here?

This is a community issue, not just a football or sport issue, and it will take the community to address this.

That means it is up to us, as individuals, as teammates and as clubs to take responsibility and not tolerate racist behaviour. Where players and club officials see and hear it happening in their club, first and foremost they should deal with it and call the offender to account. Disapproval from mates and internal club discipline processes should be the first response. The victims of the abuse are, of course, encouraged to lodge a complaint and referees must be vigilant but we look to Clubs to take responsibility for their members and not to just leave it to the ‘authorities’.

..and any form of abusive behaviour.

Profile pic. Should you be interested. Lakhsen, on the right, lost touch with him.
Mohammed, on the left, I'm still in touch with. He's now living in Agadez, Niger. More focused on his animals now as tourism has dried up. Is active with a co-op promoting local goods, leather work and bijouterie, into Europe. 
20/5/20

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
dairyflat wrote:

..and any form of abusive behaviour.



Including nutmegging players and then yelling 'nuts'- despicable

Salmon swim upstream

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Salmon07 wrote:
dairyflat wrote:

..and any form of abusive behaviour.



Including nutmegging players and then yelling 'nuts'- despicable

for a nutmeg to truely count, the word "nuts" has to be yelled before the ball goes between the legs.

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

Yeah, reading the report only confirms my view that the real issue here is a wider culture of abusive behaviour rather than racism specifically. In saying that I'm not trying to minimise the racist element in this at all but racism rears it's ugly head in all sorts of shapes and sizes and like any problem it's important to diagnose it correctly so that you can put the right treatment in place.


In this case whatever words were actually said I'm reasonably confident they didn't come from a deeply held belief that people of African descent are actually inferior, although that possibility can't be completely excluded. Rather, I think they were probably said in the heat of moment with the specific intention of just being cruel and hurtful. Of course, the motivation makes no difference at all to the recipient of the insults, but it's a crucial consideration when deciding what to do about it. After all, if you're trying to fix someone you think is racist when the bigger problem is that they have an anger management problem, it's not really going to work is it?


This campaign really needs to look at the issue of why we get so heated on the football pitch in the first place and why we think that justifies being vile to each other. 

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago


Kick nuttmegging out of football

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Frankie Mac wrote:
Salmon07 wrote:
dairyflat wrote:

..and any form of abusive behaviour.



Including nutmegging players and then yelling 'nuts'- despicable

for a nutmeg to truely count, the word "nuts" has to be yelled before the ball goes between the legs.

I think 'megs' is also acceptable these days

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

the key word is "before"

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Frankie Mac wrote:

the key word is "before"


And it must be "complete" in that your team must retain possession. Passing it through the legs but losing the ball counts for nothing.

The "perfect megs" is putting it through and recovering it yourself on the other side. That's the dream.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Can you lose the ridiculous scotch egg pic btw

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

can you fuck off?

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Frankie Mac wrote:

can you fuck off?

Is it cos I is white?

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

no, it is because you do not appreciate quality scotch eggs.

Back on topic, personally I think that a proper nuts should be collected by the person who knocked the ball through the legs (having called "nuts" or "megs" before hand), meaning that a teammate collecting the ball is not sufficient, although maybe that is just the traditionalist in me (not literally).  Probably worth devoting a whole podcast to the topic.

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

couple weeks back played a through ball between the refs legs and he called it... whats that worth?

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
kakky wrote:

couple weeks back played a through ball between the refs legs and he called it... whats that worth?

a yellow card?

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
kakky wrote:

couple weeks back played a through ball between the refs legs and he called it... whats that worth?

 

Putting anything between the refs legs could be an indication of very serious corruption

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

"one witness did not attend the hearing because it was scheduled during Ramadan"


Awww, bull feathers. Unless the hearing required the witness to eat, drink, smoke or have sex, Ramadan observance is completely irrelevant. And if it did, that just raises even more questions.


Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Frankie Mac wrote:

no, it is because you do not appreciate quality scotch eggs.

Back on topic, personally I think that a proper nuts should be collected by the person who knocked the ball through the legs (having called "nuts" or "megs" before hand), meaning that a teammate collecting the ball is not sufficient, although maybe that is just the traditionalist in me (not literally).  Probably worth devoting a whole podcast to the topic.



I agree. A proper nutmeg has to be collected by the same player surely?

Also, does the nutmeg have to be "clean" i.e.it doesn't touch the nutmegee's legs, or can it glance off the nutmegee's legs on the way through as long as the nutmegger still gets the ball on the other side?

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

I think we should be more pro-active and come down harshly on those who show intention to nut or meg, regardless of if they actually succeed or not or if it is clean or collected by the same person.

Zero tolerance.  We'll clean up the game in no time at all.


"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

I love it.... we have a group earnestly discussing the whys and wherefores of racism in the beautiful game, at the same time running through them all is a small band debating the intricacies of the nutmeg. This is the essence of Yellow Fever, an island of sanity in the middle of a surging river. Personally I don't get the whole nutmeg thing but that doesn't stop me from shouting it out whenever I witness one.  

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

I always like adding a pinch of nutmeg on my porridge personally. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
If it's only a 'real nutmeg' when you regain the ball, what do you call it when you intentionally score a goal through an opponent's legs?

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

The best nutmegs should never be called by the nutmegger.


Permalink Permalink