Regional Football - powered by Park Life

Mainland Premier League

6590 replies · 3,099,222 views Locked
over 8 years ago

Genuinely curious as to who everyone would like to see win the league of the remaining two...

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

VimFuego wrote:
How many Selwyn games you seen this year Foal?

8 or 7.5

13th Grade Girls was a highlight. 

E's Flat Ah's Flat Too

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

With the win tonight Cashmere Technical became the sixth club to rack up 300 MPL points.

Technical became the fastest club to reach the milestone in their 126th game.

Nelson Suburbs achived their 300th points in 164 games, Western 173, Bays 179, Nomads 187 and Halswell 200.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

FootyFan1903 wrote:

Genuinely curious as to who everyone would like to see win the league of the remaining two...

`

Easy question. Bays.

I let my guitar speak for me

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

foal30 wrote:

VimFuego wrote:
How many Selwyn games you seen this year Foal?

8 or 7.5

13th Grade Girls was a highlight. 

I was talking about their top team. How can you say they will add to it when (I'm guessing....) you haven't seen them play?

I let my guitar speak for me

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

VimFuego wrote:

foal30 wrote:

VimFuego wrote:
How many Selwyn games you seen this year Foal?

8 or 7.5

13th Grade Girls was a highlight. 

I was talking about their top team. How can you say they will add to it when (I'm guessing....) you haven't seen them play?

Yes I have and no I'm not sure the 'top team' was the only criteria I was using to evaluate the Clubs merits. 

E's Flat Ah's Flat Too

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

FootyFan1903 wrote:

Genuinely curious as to who everyone would like to see win the league of the remaining two...

I'm picking a draw ........

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

foal30 wrote:

VimFuego wrote:

foal30 wrote:

VimFuego wrote:
How many Selwyn games you seen this year Foal?

8 or 7.5

13th Grade Girls was a highlight. 

I was talking about their top team. How can you say they will add to it when (I'm guessing....) you haven't seen them play?

Yes I have and no I'm not sure the 'top team' was the only criteria I was using to evaluate the Clubs merits. 

It's never about the footy, it's all about the random tosspots who post outrageous rubbish on here :) In which case it will be sad to see Ray Parkes depart to the CCL forum however Selwyn appear to have a few of their own so bring it on.

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Men's - Final Round

Nelson Suburbs 0 Coastal Spirit 1 (Gulliermo Schuhmacher - pen) HT 0 - 0

Universities 1 (Jordan Belton) Nomads 2 (Jacob Anderson, Luke Petrie) HT 0 - 1

Western 0 Ferrymead Bays 4 (Nikolai Molijn 2, Cairan Aherne, Sho Mathieson HT 0 - 2

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Final Table:

Team P W D L F A GD Pts
Ferrymead Bays 21 17 2 2 45 16 29 53
Cashmere Technical 21 17 1 3 78 15 63 52
Coastal Spirit 21 12 3 6 41 24 17 39
Nelson Suburbs 21 10 4 7 39 23 16 34
FC Twenty11 21 7 3 11 28 41 -13 24
Nomads 21 7 2 12 24 43 -19 23
Universities 21 2 3 16 16 62 -46 9
Western 21 2 2 17 12 59 -47 8

Bays win title - first to win 5 titles with Western relegated for the first time

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

AllWhites82 wrote:

Final Table:

Team P W D L F A GD Pts
Ferrymead Bays 21 17 2 2 45 16 29 53
Cashmere Technical 21 17 1 3 78 15 63 52
Coastal Spirit 21 12 3 6 41 24 17 39
Nelson Suburbs 21 10 4 7 39 23 16 34
FC Twenty11 21 7 3 11 28 41 -13 24
Nomads 21 7 2 12 24 43 -19 23
Universities 21 2 3 16 16 62 -46 9
Western 21 2 2 17 12 59 -47 8

Bays win title - first to win 5 titles with Western relegated for the first time

So how did the ineligible player sagas affect the final result AW?

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Ronaldoknow wrote:

AllWhites82 wrote:

Final Table:

Team P W D L F A GD Pts
Ferrymead Bays 21 17 2 2 45 16 29 53
Cashmere Technical 21 17 1 3 78 15 63 52
Coastal Spirit 21 12 3 6 41 24 17 39
Nelson Suburbs 21 10 4 7 39 23 16 34
FC Twenty11 21 7 3 11 28 41 -13 24
Nomads 21 7 2 12 24 43 -19 23
Universities 21 2 3 16 16 62 -46 9
Western 21 2 2 17 12 59 -47 8

Bays win title - first to win 5 titles with Western relegated for the first time

So how did the ineligible player sagas affect the final result AW?

Didn't affect relegation, but gave Bays the title; they would have finished runners-up on GD otherwise
Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Ronaldoknow wrote:

AllWhites82 wrote:

Final Table:

Team P W D L F A GD Pts
Ferrymead Bays 21 17 2 2 45 16 29 53
Cashmere Technical 21 17 1 3 78 15 63 52
Coastal Spirit 21 12 3 6 41 24 17 39
Nelson Suburbs 21 10 4 7 39 23 16 34
FC Twenty11 21 7 3 11 28 41 -13 24
Nomads 21 7 2 12 24 43 -19 23
Universities 21 2 3 16 16 62 -46 9
Western 21 2 2 17 12 59 -47 8

Bays win title - first to win 5 titles with Western relegated for the first time

So how did the ineligible player sagas affect the final result AW?

Only the top two placings would have altered with Tech winning the title on goal difference 

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Yay Bays! 

You can ascertain what your opponent is afraid of by observing the means by which he attempts to frighten you



Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago
......So the Mainland Premier League was decided on an administration error?
Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

congrats Bays 

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

They say the stats do not lie - table showing number of times scored, clean sheets and failed to score

Team Scored Clean Sheets Failed  To Score
Ferrymead Bays 19 12 2
Cashmere Technical 18 11 3
Coastal Spirit 19 7 2
Nelson Suburbs 14 7 7
FC Twenty11 12 6 9
Nomads 14 5 7
Universities 11 2 10
Western 8 3 13
Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago · edited over 8 years ago · History

Western the oldest club in Canterbury (that have never had a name change) relegated today for the first time since the MPL commenced in 2002, 318 games in total, 137 wins, 61 draws and 120 losses, goals for 519 and 488 against and 472 points. 

They finished second in 2014 but then 6th, 7th and finally 8th.

Of the 137 wins 85 win the first nine season's from 2002 to 2010 and the next 52 wins in the next seven season's with just 12 of the 52 in the last three season's.

On the flip side just 46 losses from 2002 to 2010 and the next 74 losses in the next 7 with 45 of the 74 coming in the last three season's and not suprising Western currently sitting on both their worst losing run of 9 games and longest winless run of 16 games.

From 2002 to 2014 averaged a shade over 33 points, but averaged just 14 from 2015 to 2017, so they have been on a slippery slope since 2014.

Two Chatham Cups wins, runner-up 7 times and 27 wins in the English Cup. 

Will they be able to bounce back?

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

......So the Mainland Premier League was decided on an administration error?

A good MPL administrator is vital for clubs..teams get caught out every season..

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

AllWhites82 wrote:

Western the oldest club in Canterbury (that have never had a name change) relegated today for the first time since the MPL commenced in 2002, 318 games in total, 137 wins, 61 draws and 120 losses, goals for 519 and 488 against and 472 points. 

They finished second in 2014 but then 6th, 7th and finally 8th.

Of the 137 wins 85 win the first nine season's from 2002 to 2010 and the next 52 wins in the next seven season's with just 12 of the 52 in the last three season's.

On the flip side just 46 losses from 2002 to 2010 and the next 74 losses in the next 7 with 45 of the 74 coming in the last three season's and not suprising Western currently sitting on both their worst losing run of 9 games and longest winless run of 16 games.

From 2002 to 2014 averaged a shade over 33 points, but averaged just 14 from 2015 to 2017, so they have been on a slippery slope since 2014.

Two Chatham Cups win, runner-up 7 times and 27 wins in the English Cup. 

Will they be able to bounce back?

Short answer, no

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

howzat wrote:

......So the Mainland Premier League was decided on an administration error?

A good MPL administrator is vital for clubs..teams get caught out every season..

A valid question is: Why did it take Mainland 7 rounds to discover the ineligible player. Nearly $1m in salaries and we get gross incompetence. The delay compromised the integrity of its Premier competition.
Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Shouldn't team cards be checked in the week following a game so that these issues do not happen more than once?

Yes I know the staff have other things on too, but shouldn't it be in a persons description to do this.

Also doing it weekly makes it a lot quicker than waiting weeks to check all team cards 

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Steptoe wrote:

howzat wrote:

......So the Mainland Premier League was decided on an administration error?

A good MPL administrator is vital for clubs..teams get caught out every season..

A valid question is: Why did it take Mainland 7 rounds to discover the ineligible player. Nearly $1m in salaries and we get gross incompetence. The delay compromised the integrity of its Premier competition.

Mainland don't 'discover' anything (that would be proactive). Player eligibility is left upto clubs to administer/police with Mainland only 'investigating' when prompted. A club may be aware of ineligibility and sit on that knowledge, allowing it to continue as many games as possible. 

Mainland's role to sort out system and process, allowing clubs to focus on the football and winning leagues on the grass. 

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Stallion wrote:

Steptoe wrote:

howzat wrote:

......So the Mainland Premier League was decided on an administration error?

A good MPL administrator is vital for clubs..teams get caught out every season..

A valid question is: Why did it take Mainland 7 rounds to discover the ineligible player. Nearly $1m in salaries and we get gross incompetence. The delay compromised the integrity of its Premier competition.

Mainland don't 'discover' anything (that would be proactive). Player eligibility is left upto clubs to administer/police with Mainland only 'investigating' when prompted. A club may be aware of ineligibility and sit on that knowledge, allowing it to continue as many games as possible. 

Mainland's role to sort out system and process, allowing clubs to focus on the football and winning leagues on the grass. 

Mainland discovered that the player was ineligible after he was booked in Round 7
Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

......So the Mainland Premier League was decided on an administration error?

No it wasn't. After 21 games Bays had the most points. 

E's Flat Ah's Flat Too

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

AllWhites82 wrote:

Western the oldest club in Canterbury (that have never had a name change) relegated today for the first time since the MPL commenced in 2002, 318 games in total, 137 wins, 61 draws and 120 losses, goals for 519 and 488 against and 472 points. 

They finished second in 2014 but then 6th, 7th and finally 8th.

Of the 137 wins 85 win the first nine season's from 2002 to 2010 and the next 52 wins in the next seven season's with just 12 of the 52 in the last three season's.

On the flip side just 46 losses from 2002 to 2010 and the next 74 losses in the next 7 with 45 of the 74 coming in the last three season's and not suprising Western currently sitting on both their worst losing run of 9 games and longest winless run of 16 games.

From 2002 to 2014 averaged a shade over 33 points, but averaged just 14 from 2015 to 2017, so they have been on a slippery slope since 2014.

Two Chatham Cups wins, runner-up 7 times and 27 wins in the English Cup. 

Will they be able to bounce back?

Short answer : Not soon. 

E's Flat Ah's Flat Too

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

BenchWarmer wrote:

Shouldn't team cards be checked in the week following a game so that these issues do not happen more than once?

Yes I know the staff have other things on too, but shouldn't it be in a persons description to do this.

Also doing it weekly makes it a lot quicker than waiting weeks to check all team cards 

It's the clubs responsibility to only field eligible players

It's Mainlands responsibility to clarify and/or enforce legality 

I understand Mainland can/could be at fault but surely 95% the club has chosen to field a player they shouldn't off. 

E's Flat Ah's Flat Too

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

foal30 wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

Shouldn't team cards be checked in the week following a game so that these issues do not happen more than once?

Yes I know the staff have other things on too, but shouldn't it be in a persons description to do this.

Also doing it weekly makes it a lot quicker than waiting weeks to check all team cards 

It's the clubs responsibility to only field eligible players

It's Mainlands responsibility to clarify and/or enforce legality 

I understand Mainland can/could be at fault but surely 95% the club has chosen to field a player they shouldn't off. 

Hmmm so prior to the season starting clubs send in an outrageous sum of money to participate in an amateur competition. They also send in a list of players in their squad - why? Then when Mainland accidentally uncover an irregularity in the squad names/eligibility of the players they suddenly spring into action and enforce a rule that they refuse to enforce or administer until such incident. If you take that to an extreme you would import some lying South American who was a bit handy and get him to sign up with whoever you didn't want to win the league, let it run for 21 games and then casually mention he's still registered with some club from the Guatemalan 19th division and Bingo they lose all points and have a minus 63 goal difference. Brilliant. The incident that cost FC the points was a simple mistake with no intent to deceive and benefited nobody except Bays who won the title because of it. And that's not right. 

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Totally agree. Clubs provide player registration via goalnet which Mainland should have to verify but they don't until there is a potential problem. A player can appear multiple times in Goalnet, e.g. You have to have a separate identity for Futsal. And for Futsal you don't require an international clearance. And so the problems begin. Mainland being proactive would require that they check each and every dual registration on this system as the clubs provide them. But they don't do that and choose to penalise clubs once they identity issues from team cards or referee reports. Clubs and players are penalised when the "professional body" that runs our game remains unaccountable.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Another way around things is that you do not require International Transfers to play Sunday League (CSSL) and then once you've played there for a season or 2 (sometimes not even that long) you can transfer to a Saturday Club with no issue.

Certainly for the MPL, WPL & CCL Mainland need to have someone check the team cards on a weekly basis to officially approve results before the next round of games.

As you say Gaffa, everyone is in Goalnet, it shouldn't be that hard! Currently there are 20 teams in these 3 divisions. Fair enough if they checked every grade and every game, but the key leagues should all be checked regularly.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Agree 100% with you both Ronaldoknow & Gaffa - when clubs file their squad lists with Mainland & they should then be signed off by Mainland prior to the season starting & the same process applies for any new players who arrive during the season & they must then be verified by Mainland before they can play. Once signed off by Mainland after doing their due diligence that should it be it - no right of appeal or protest. As has been said in earlier posts if you become aware of a breach by an opposition club why say anything before the season end when you can potentially strip another club of all their points to the advantage of your own club.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

South Island Football Championship now back on: Caversham verses Ferrymead Bays 9th September 12:30pmat the Caly in Dunedin.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Is it just me that finds it odd that 6 days after Mainland's premier competition (the MPL) has concluded, Mainland still haven't updated their website. Still got the article on Ferrymead being one win away scrolling across the bottom of their website. You'd think a wee congrats to Ferrymead might be in order.

Wonder if it would have been updated if Cashtech had won.......

"You cannot say that you are happy when you don't win"

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Is it just me that finds it odd that 6 days after Mainland's premier competition (the MPL) has concluded, Mainland still haven't updated their website. Still got the article on Ferrymead being one win away scrolling across the bottom of their website. You'd think a wee congrats to Ferrymead might be in order.

Wonder if it would have been updated if Cashtech had won.......

Probably checking team sheets. 

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

I'm still shaking my head that 9 points was enough to stay up.

Everything else is a secondary concern lol

E's Flat Ah's Flat Too

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

fc69 wrote:

Is it just me that finds it odd that 6 days after Mainland's premier competition (the MPL) has concluded, Mainland still haven't updated their website. Still got the article on Ferrymead being one win away scrolling across the bottom of their website. You'd think a wee congrats to Ferrymead might be in order.

Wonder if it would have been updated if Cashtech had won.......

Probably checking team sheets. 

Only if someone was booked....

"You cannot say that you are happy when you don't win"

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Always very quick to put Cash Tech photos up on site as well..can't use the excuse they haven't got any photos because plenty have been sent to them..

Permalink Permalink

This topic is locked.