FFA Governance

794 replies · 181,328 views
almost 7 years ago · edited almost 7 years ago · History
A-League: Fox Football expert Mark Bosnich has made a desperate plea to state football federations across the country, warning 'time is not on our side' to save the A-League.

https://www.foxsports.com.au/video/football/a-league/bozzas-a-league-plea!731887?fbclid=IwAR0apHh33m5K9zU0BZakFn4RPsFg2GhkkgKoGQEXNsDbalSIld1KeYqQ6O4

I'm an optimistic pessimist. 
I'm positive things will go wrong.
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Blew.2
almost 7 years ago

A classic Bozza rant which no one will take notice of

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
liberty_nz
almost 7 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

What’s to stop the A League clubs breaking away from FFA and running the competition themselves. Plenty of precedence for that type of move in Aussie sport.

Where's the money gonna come from for that?

negotiate a television contract, same as now.

What's the incentive for Fox to break a deal with the FFA worth c. $350m, open themselves to legal action, and negotiate a new deal with a brand new group, whose very survival depends on Fox wanting to engage with them in the very first place? I'll tell you what it is - 0. 

Especially in the current environment where Fox have told the NLWG that the they cannot operate on the assumption that the next TV deal for the league will be better than the current one, and that it may not even be as good as the current one. I imagine that the Fox stance is making the negotiations around the new league structure even more difficult than they originally would have been.

You’re not totally correct here. I’m not saying it is an easy deal but without the clubs, FFA has no A League and Fox has nothing to televise. Fox is not the only broadcaster in town now either, that’s landscape has change (Spark being an example). The situation is not as cut and dry and you are stating. 
Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago · edited almost 7 years ago · History

el grapadura wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

What’s to stop the A League clubs breaking away from FFA and running the competition themselves. Plenty of precedence for that type of move in Aussie sport.

Where's the money gonna come from for that?

negotiate a television contract, same as now.

What's the incentive for Fox to break a deal with the FFA worth c. $350m, open themselves to legal action, and negotiate a new deal with a brand new group, whose very survival depends on Fox wanting to engage with them in the very first place? I'll tell you what it is - 0. 

Especially in the current environment where Fox have told the NLWG that the they cannot operate on the assumption that the next TV deal for the league will be better than the current one, and that it may not even be as good as the current one. I imagine that the Fox stance is making the negotiations around the new league structure even more difficult than they originally would have been.

You’re not totally correct here. I’m not saying it is an easy deal but without the clubs, FFA has no A League and Fox has nothing to televise. Fox is not the only broadcaster in town now either, that’s landscape has change (Spark being an example). The situation is not as cut and dry and you are stating. 

The FFA still has the Socceroos, and the World Cups and AFC Champs which will bring $$$ in. For Fox, there's a lot of other sport they can fill air time with for smaller production and broadcasting cost. As I've said, Fox have already said that the value of the A-league product has fallen dramatically for them, which has made a number of people across the ditch shark their pants.

And it's well and good saying there are others who cam take over from Fox - well, who are they? Why has no-one else in Australia even shown interest in pushing Fox out of the market? Because there is no-one else with enough clout to take on the production and rights costs, especially given the increasingly paltry return on the investment. 

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
aitkenmike
almost 7 years ago

Optus.

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Ryan wrote:

Optus.

They thought about the idea for about 30 seconds in 2016 before realizing what the actual production costs were going to be, and how difficult it would be for them to provide the sort of coverage at even the Fox standard. So yeah, that's not happening any time soon.

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

Ryan wrote:

Optus.

They thought about the idea for about 30 seconds in 2016 before realizing what the actual production costs were going to be, and how difficult it would be for them to provide the sort of coverage at even the Fox standard. So yeah, that's not happening any time soon.

Says you, nothing factual. Optus has money and isn't in dept like Foxtel.

Mr Positive

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago · edited almost 7 years ago · History

Royz wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Ryan wrote:

Optus.

They thought about the idea for about 30 seconds in 2016 before realizing what the actual production costs were going to be, and how difficult it would be for them to provide the sort of coverage at even the Fox standard. So yeah, that's not happening any time soon.

Says you, nothing factual. Optus has money and isn't in dept like Foxtel.

Of course it's factual, it was reported at the time. Optus don't produce content, they just buy it. Producing content brings a whole new layer of cost, with things like equipment, labour, compliance, etc.  Not to mention that if you don't have experience in doing it, potential for things to go wrong increase manifestly.

But yeah, Fox isn't in great shape at the moment, and that's not good news for the league.

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

Royz wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Ryan wrote:

Optus.

They thought about the idea for about 30 seconds in 2016 before realizing what the actual production costs were going to be, and how difficult it would be for them to provide the sort of coverage at even the Fox standard. So yeah, that's not happening any time soon.

Says you, nothing factual. Optus has money and isn't in dept like Foxtel.

Of course it's factual, it was reported at the time. Optus don't produce content, they just buy it. Producing content brings a whole new layer of cost, with things like equipment, labour, compliance, etc.  Not to mention that if you don't have experience in doing it, potential for things to go wrong increase manifestly.

But yeah, Fox isn't in great shape at the moment, and that's not good news for the league.

Things change though, spark produces content and they didn't use to.

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Ryan wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Royz wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Ryan wrote:

Optus.

They thought about the idea for about 30 seconds in 2016 before realizing what the actual production costs were going to be, and how difficult it would be for them to provide the sort of coverage at even the Fox standard. So yeah, that's not happening any time soon.

Says you, nothing factual. Optus has money and isn't in dept like Foxtel.

Of course it's factual, it was reported at the time. Optus don't produce content, they just buy it. Producing content brings a whole new layer of cost, with things like equipment, labour, compliance, etc.  Not to mention that if you don't have experience in doing it, potential for things to go wrong increase manifestly.

But yeah, Fox isn't in great shape at the moment, and that's not good news for the league.

Things change though, spark produces content and they didn't use to.

True, things do change. But expecting that change right now, at least as far as A-league goes, is not realistic. Optus assessed that pursuing A-league rights wasn't worth it in 2016 when the league was on a high, which also led to Fox probably overpaying for the rights in 2017 (although that statement comes with a lot of hindsight). The league is in a much, much worse shape now, and is not a very attractive product right now. And that's causing a lot of consternation in Aus, rightfully so.

And it's led to a bizarre situation where everyone's freaked about the money and how to ensure that their needs are looked after in that environment that they're wasting a lot of time arguing about it and not moving towards a solution, and of course the on-going uncertainty and squabbling then just further devalue the product and lead to another round of freaking out and squabbling, and so on.

Absolute madness. 

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Bozza in his rant says FOX have spent 2 billion to date for the A-league.

Thats a huge amount of Burgers and chips to make at a volunteer run private league.

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago · edited almost 7 years ago · History

As an aside, I’ve been enjoying watching Australian football that produces its own content (albeit with lower production values), namely the Victorian and NSW state premier leagues. I wonder if an amped up, packaged, coordinated version of this model could become viable. 

Kotahitanga. We are one.

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

What’s to stop the A League clubs breaking away from FFA and running the competition themselves. Plenty of precedence for that type of move in Aussie sport.

Where's the money gonna come from for that?

negotiate a television contract, same as now.

What's the incentive for Fox to break a deal with the FFA worth c. $350m, open themselves to legal action, and negotiate a new deal with a brand new group, whose very survival depends on Fox wanting to engage with them in the very first place? I'll tell you what it is - 0. 

Especially in the current environment where Fox have told the NLWG that the they cannot operate on the assumption that the next TV deal for the league will be better than the current one, and that it may not even be as good as the current one. I imagine that the Fox stance is making the negotiations around the new league structure even more difficult than they originally would have been.

You’re not totally correct here. I’m not saying it is an easy deal but without the clubs, FFA has no A League and Fox has nothing to televise. Fox is not the only broadcaster in town now either, that’s landscape has change (Spark being an example). The situation is not as cut and dry and you are stating. 

The FFA still has the Socceroos, and the World Cups and AFC Champs which will bring $$$ in. For Fox, there's a lot of other sport they can fill air time with for smaller production and broadcasting cost. As I've said, Fox have already said that the value of the A-league product has fallen dramatically for them, which has made a number of people across the ditch shark their pants.

And it's well and good saying there are others who cam take over from Fox - well, who are they? Why has no-one else in Australia even shown interest in pushing Fox out of the market? Because there is no-one else with enough clout to take on the production and rights costs, especially given the increasingly paltry return on the investment. 

And who would of thought Spark would leap out of nowhere and get the Rugby World Cup? Look I’m not saying it can happen but I think you’re too quick to simply say it’s not possible.
Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

Royz wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Ryan wrote:

Optus.

They thought about the idea for about 30 seconds in 2016 before realizing what the actual production costs were going to be, and how difficult it would be for them to provide the sort of coverage at even the Fox standard. So yeah, that's not happening any time soon.

Says you, nothing factual. Optus has money and isn't in dept like Foxtel.

Of course it's factual, it was reported at the time. Optus don't produce content, they just buy it. Producing content brings a whole new layer of cost, with things like equipment, labour, compliance, etc.  Not to mention that if you don't have experience in doing it, potential for things to go wrong increase manifestly.

But yeah, Fox isn't in great shape at the moment, and that's not good news for the league.

Not only was it stated recently by someone but production is done by independents who contract to the likes of SKy and Fox. An old mate of mine in Australia owns his own broadcast truck and cameras and he covers sport for whoever pays him to. Has been doing it for over 20 years.
Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

What’s to stop the A League clubs breaking away from FFA and running the competition themselves. Plenty of precedence for that type of move in Aussie sport.

Where's the money gonna come from for that?

negotiate a television contract, same as now.

What's the incentive for Fox to break a deal with the FFA worth c. $350m, open themselves to legal action, and negotiate a new deal with a brand new group, whose very survival depends on Fox wanting to engage with them in the very first place? I'll tell you what it is - 0. 

Especially in the current environment where Fox have told the NLWG that the they cannot operate on the assumption that the next TV deal for the league will be better than the current one, and that it may not even be as good as the current one. I imagine that the Fox stance is making the negotiations around the new league structure even more difficult than they originally would have been.

You’re not totally correct here. I’m not saying it is an easy deal but without the clubs, FFA has no A League and Fox has nothing to televise. Fox is not the only broadcaster in town now either, that’s landscape has change (Spark being an example). The situation is not as cut and dry and you are stating. 

The FFA still has the Socceroos, and the World Cups and AFC Champs which will bring $$$ in. For Fox, there's a lot of other sport they can fill air time with for smaller production and broadcasting cost. As I've said, Fox have already said that the value of the A-league product has fallen dramatically for them, which has made a number of people across the ditch shark their pants.

And it's well and good saying there are others who cam take over from Fox - well, who are they? Why has no-one else in Australia even shown interest in pushing Fox out of the market? Because there is no-one else with enough clout to take on the production and rights costs, especially given the increasingly paltry return on the investment. 

And who would of thought Spark would leap out of nowhere and get the Rugby World Cup? Look I’m not saying it can happen but I think you’re too quick to simply say it’s not possible.

I'm not saying it's impossible. What I'm saying is that there is zero interest outside of Fox for it, and even Fox is not prepared - it seems - to keep paying as much as they have. 

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Napier Phoenix
almost 7 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

(---)

True, things do change. But expecting that change right now, at least as far as A-league goes, is not realistic. Optus assessed that pursuing A-league rights wasn't worth it in 2016 when the league was on a high, which also led to Fox probably overpaying for the rights in 2017 (although that statement comes with a lot of hindsight). The league is in a much, much worse shape now, and is not a very attractive product right now. And that's causing a lot of consternation in Aus, rightfully so.

And it's led to a bizarre situation where everyone's freaked about the money and how to ensure that their needs are looked after in that environment that they're wasting a lot of time arguing about it and not moving towards a solution, and of course the on-going uncertainty and squabbling then just further devalue the product and lead to another round of freaking out and squabbling, and so on.

Absolute madness. 

It is perfectly possible this will just go on and on because of the entrenched attitudes and unwillingness to compromise. Not very different to Brexit negotiations. 



Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Mainland FC wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

(---)

True, things do change. But expecting that change right now, at least as far as A-league goes, is not realistic. Optus assessed that pursuing A-league rights wasn't worth it in 2016 when the league was on a high, which also led to Fox probably overpaying for the rights in 2017 (although that statement comes with a lot of hindsight). The league is in a much, much worse shape now, and is not a very attractive product right now. And that's causing a lot of consternation in Aus, rightfully so.

And it's led to a bizarre situation where everyone's freaked about the money and how to ensure that their needs are looked after in that environment that they're wasting a lot of time arguing about it and not moving towards a solution, and of course the on-going uncertainty and squabbling then just further devalue the product and lead to another round of freaking out and squabbling, and so on.

Absolute madness. 

It is perfectly possible this will just go on and on because of the entrenched attitudes and unwillingness to compromise. Not very different to Brexit negotiations. 

And Wellington will be long gone after it sorted.

Mr Positive

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Royz wrote:

Mainland FC wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

(---)

True, things do change. But expecting that change right now, at least as far as A-league goes, is not realistic. Optus assessed that pursuing A-league rights wasn't worth it in 2016 when the league was on a high, which also led to Fox probably overpaying for the rights in 2017 (although that statement comes with a lot of hindsight). The league is in a much, much worse shape now, and is not a very attractive product right now. And that's causing a lot of consternation in Aus, rightfully so.

And it's led to a bizarre situation where everyone's freaked about the money and how to ensure that their needs are looked after in that environment that they're wasting a lot of time arguing about it and not moving towards a solution, and of course the on-going uncertainty and squabbling then just further devalue the product and lead to another round of freaking out and squabbling, and so on.

Absolute madness. 

It is perfectly possible this will just go on and on because of the entrenched attitudes and unwillingness to compromise. Not very different to Brexit negotiations. 

And Wellington will be long gone after it sorted.

So are we Scotland?

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

The Hyundai A-League 2019/20 Season will start on Friday 11 October 2019 with the Hyundai A-League 2020 Grand Final to be held on the weekend 16/17 May.

FFA Head of Leagues, Greg O’Rourke, said the entry of Western United FC into the Hyundai A-League for the first time, combined with the scheduling of the AFC U-23 Championship 2020 in January, which also serves as the qualifying tournament for the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games, meant that a unique mix of challenges needed to be accommodated for the upcoming season.

Key Points for the Hyundai A-League 2019/20 Season
  • 11 Clubs
  • 29 Rounds (13 Home/Away matches per club - 3 Byes per club)
  • Round One 11-13 October 2019
  • Round 29: 24-26 April 2020
  • No break for FIFA International dates
  • No Split Rounds (Bye preference for 3 clubs participating in the AFC Champions League 2020)
  • Hyundai A-League 2020 Finals Series structure remains the same (Elimination Finals (3v6 & 4v5), Semi Finals (1 v lowest ranked winner from Elimination Finals, 2 v highest ranked winner from Elimination Finals,) and the Grand Final)
  • Hyundai A-League 2020 Grand Final – weekend of 16/17 May 2020                                                                                                                                     Opponent Match-up Weightings – Methodology
    • Due to the uneven number of Rounds for Season 2019/20 (e.g. 29 Rounds / 26 matches per Club), each Club will play a minimum of two matches against each other Club.
    • Select “third” opponent match-ups will be determined according to agreed methodology.
    Key Principles
    • Priority 1: Maximise Hyundai A League broadcast metrics
    • Priority 2: Fairness and competition integrity for all clubs
    • Priority 3: Maximise Hyundai A-League attendance metrics and other commercial priorities                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           (#2 is a laugh_
    • Draw to be made in July

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Frigging hate bye rounds!
Also I thought the league just this season decided to stop for Fifa International windows?


VUW AFC - Victoria University Football for life

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LG
almost 7 years ago

Frigging hate bye rounds!
Also I thought the league just this season decided to stop for Fifa International windows?

They did, but Fox doesn't like it. Fox also doesn't like having every team play each other the same number of times.  What Fox wants, they get.

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Sanday wrote:

Royz wrote:

Mainland FC wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

(---)

True, things do change. But expecting that change right now, at least as far as A-league goes, is not realistic. Optus assessed that pursuing A-league rights wasn't worth it in 2016 when the league was on a high, which also led to Fox probably overpaying for the rights in 2017 (although that statement comes with a lot of hindsight). The league is in a much, much worse shape now, and is not a very attractive product right now. And that's causing a lot of consternation in Aus, rightfully so.

And it's led to a bizarre situation where everyone's freaked about the money and how to ensure that their needs are looked after in that environment that they're wasting a lot of time arguing about it and not moving towards a solution, and of course the on-going uncertainty and squabbling then just further devalue the product and lead to another round of freaking out and squabbling, and so on.

Absolute madness. 

It is perfectly possible this will just go on and on because of the entrenched attitudes and unwillingness to compromise. Not very different to Brexit negotiations. 

And Wellington will be long gone after it sorted.

So are we Scotland?

Nah, more chance of us leaving the union then them.

Supporter of the world's best football teams: Waikato..., Kingz FC, NZ Knights, The Nix, The Argyle & of course the All Whites

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Frigging hate bye rounds!
Also I thought the league just this season decided to stop for Fifa International windows?

Given the All Whites have retired from playing football, it shouldn’t affect us anyway ?

Supporter of the world's best football teams: Waikato..., Kingz FC, NZ Knights, The Nix, The Argyle & of course the All Whites

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Marto wrote:

Frigging hate bye rounds!
Also I thought the league just this season decided to stop for Fifa International windows?

Given the All Whites have retired from playing football, it shouldn’t affect us anyway ?

We have a game in november agaisnt Ireland
Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

This paragraph shows the FFA's colours

There is one month left until the June 30 deadline for the A-League’s independence from the FFA to be settled. What it looks like or whether that deadline is met remains to be seen. The Herald understands there is some reticence from FFA about full independence because it may give Fox Sports a legal opening to renegotiate the A-League’s broadcast deal.

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Bullion wrote:

Imagine what could be done with $1 million dollars. Krishna stays? A prize draw each game of ~$75k? How much advertising? 

Basically so many things that would benefit the club and the league, but no it goes to pay the FFA.

none of which is relevant, the FFA set the metrics at a level we were always going to miss. Keeping Krishna was always going to be tough with Asian money flying around - I don't see how this $1m is even connected to losing Krishna.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

theprof wrote:

Bullion wrote:

Imagine what could be done with $1 million dollars. Krishna stays? A prize draw each game of ~$75k? How much advertising? 

Basically so many things that would benefit the club and the league, but no it goes to pay the FFA.

none of which is relevant, the FFA set the metrics at a level we were always going to miss. Keeping Krishna was always going to be tough with Asian money flying around - I don't see how this $1m is even connected to losing Krishna.

And it is a million less for the base cap wage payment. So FFA just retain it from the wage payment they make anually - we don't pay them we have to fund players or pay less. 

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago · edited almost 7 years ago · History

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Wow, this is a cluster fudge caused by the FFA board. I mean, it seems he wasn't doing much wrong. The FFA board elected to terminate and move in another direction so close to the world cup. 

Add to this Stajcic has been getting slaughtered for it by the Heather Reid.

Well, that's pretty much what I'm making of the situation.

I really hope he get's a whole bunch of coin from FFA for his troubles and welcomed back in to the fold after key personnel changes. I'm sure he would have loved to lead the team to the world cup and he's pretty much been robbed of that. 

I thought NZF was terrible in their handling of Figueira/Temple/U17's a few years back but this is a shocker on another level by FFA.

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LGSascribbler
almost 7 years ago

Sounds like the apology to Alen Stajcic  is the end of the matter.

Better Man than many in the Australian Game.

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

The entire FFA board should fall on the sword for this alone but they wont. They'll give themselves a bonus, probably from the money from the Nix.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Blew.2scribbler
almost 7 years ago

Big payout won’t fix the loss of reputation!

Timing of the Phoenix being invoiced did not deflect enough attention to #NixOut

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Blew.2 wrote:

Sounds like the apology to Alen Stajcic  is the end of the matter.

Better Man than many in the Australian Game.

No

Kotahitanga. We are one.

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

An hour long interview, with Greg O'Rourke, he talks expansion, second division, active support, Wellington Phoenix, independent A-league etc


https://www.pscp.tv/w/1zqKVaNwddYxB

Say’s obstacles are being removed for active support, says he foresees WP being in the league and that their metrics are up, mentions that the next expansion areas will be in identified spots, is comfortable with WU stadium progress, mentions 2-3 state clubs being able to step up to a nation division, SM is obviously one he’s talking about. 

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Hyundai A-League

  • An immediate lift in the Salary Cap to $3.2 million (Ex Western United FC) up from $3.063 million in 2018/19) which is a 4.5% increase ($137,000)
  • Base player payments of $2.88 million which is a 4.3% ($123,300) increase in 2019/20.
  • Western United FC Maximum Player Payments of $3.6million
  • $200k cap on Loyalty Player payments and Homegrown Player payments outside of the salary cap have been removed
  • Maximum number of scholarship players increased from six (6) to nine (9).

https://www.a-league.com.au/news/ffa-and-pfa-announce-extension-collective-bargaining-agreements-westfield-w-league-and-hyundai

I'm an optimistic pessimist. 
I'm positive things will go wrong.
Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Removal of the cap on Homegrown is really good for us, below is what it used to be before the caps now been removed.

  • Homegrown Players – A Club can spend up to a collective $200,000 on 4 Australian Players aged 23 or younger that have come through the Club’s youth system. Any payments to such Players above the $200,000 allowance are included in the Club’s Salary Cap;
I'm an optimistic pessimist. 
I'm positive things will go wrong.
Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Yakcall wrote:

Removal of the cap on Homegrown is really good for us, below is what it used to be before the caps now been removed.

  • Homegrown Players – A Club can spend up to a collective $200,000 on 4 Australian Players aged 23 or younger that have come through the Club’s youth system. Any payments to such Players above the $200,000 allowance are included in the Club’s Salary Cap;

Would that include Stensness (if he did sign) and Elliott? What is the definition of come through the club's youth system?

Permalink Permalink