Closed for new posts
RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
35K
·
about 16 years

Ryan54 wrote:

valeo wrote:

Ryan54 wrote:

Tegal wrote:

they just need to change them to being called designated players and relax the rules on who can be signed as one (make it anyone can be). 

The main advantage of a marquee isn't usually the player itself, but that it significantly raises the average wage of every other player being fitted under the cap. Giving clubs the ability to place any player as their designated player gives that advantage to all clubs rather than just those who can afford big name marquees - it effectively raises the salary cap, while still allowing teams to sign big name players. 

Isn't that exactly how it works at the moment? Eugene Galekovic was a marquee as an example. All teams can make any player in their squad a marquee. I have never heard of a marquee being denied because they weren't enough of a big name.

This ^

Don't think i've heard of a case where the 'marquee' rules were actually enforced? We made McKain marquee didn't we?

For the Australian marquee slot, all you need is an Australian Cap. Hence McKain, Thwaite etc being accounting marquees

Huh, interesting. I'm guessing almost every team had a player with at least 1 Australian cap anyway? For the international marquee slot, can you sign anyone you want?

No, you need the FFA to approve your international marquees. But it might not be a very high bar they set, they allowed Ricardinho to be one!
Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years

Ryan54 wrote:

Sackofspuds wrote:

Pretty sure Domey confirmed that Burns was our Aussie marquee last season.

He said he was a marquee player. A marquee player can just mean a star player and doesn't necessarily mean he was an offical marquee. If he was officially our marquee it seems strange that he wasn't marketed at such.

Rob Morrison said that they paid for Burns outside of the cap as an example of the Phoenix doing things for Australian football.
First Team Squad
330
·
1.7K
·
almost 12 years
First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
over 17 years

Ryan wrote:

Ryan54 wrote:

Sackofspuds wrote:

Pretty sure Domey confirmed that Burns was our Aussie marquee last season.

He said he was a marquee player. A marquee player can just mean a star player and doesn't necessarily mean he was an offical marquee. If he was officially our marquee it seems strange that he wasn't marketed at such.

Rob Morrison said that they paid for Burns outside of the cap as an example of the Phoenix doing things for Australian football.

Can you provide a quote?

This is the quote I have been working off:

Q: It’s said you are against the idea of bringing marquee players to Wellington - is that correct?

A: We aren’t against marquees - we have a marquee player, Nathan Burns, and he was voted as Player of the Year by the Australian media just recently - am I missing something?

Nowhere in there does he explicitly state that the salary of Burns is paid for outside the cap. He just says exactly what I said he said: that Burns is a marquee player. As I said in my post that you quoted there are various definitions of what a marquee player was. I think Morrison was probably just saying that they brought a really good player to Wellington in Nathan Burns who is good enough to be a marquee player. I tend to believe this because he said Burns was a marquee player because of his achievements on the field.

Now in this thread, a user called Ryan M said (and I have no idea whether this is you): 

No Burns is the Marquee player for the Phoenix, his wage does not come from the FFA grant. They said last year that they were at the cap, and this year they said they have spent more on players, so you can assume that Burns was the marquee, at least for financial reasons and outside the cap.

Do you have any sources for the above (if it was indeed you)? Given that we lost Hernandez and Huysegems who seemed to be on good money as well as Bertos, I think it is reasonable to assume that last year's squad did not cost much more than the previous year's. Supposition isn't proof so I don't buy this particular argument.

It was reported, that Burns would only stay if he was given marquee status.

Appiah without the pace
6.8K
·
19K
·
about 17 years

He was definitely given marquee status to ensure we were below the cap. Which basically means he wasnt on massive marquee money. Just used as an accounting trick.

Marquee
1.4K
·
5.3K
·
about 17 years

2ndBest wrote:

He was definitely given marquee status to ensure we were below the cap. Which basically means he wasnt on massive marquee money. Just used as an accounting trick.

we probably have some players on contracts where they have some match day/performance payments. To not fall foul of the salary cap and not knowing exactly what our end of season salary total will be (at a min under the cap, estimated max over it) we put one player outside the cap and gives us some wiggle room.
Marquee
1.5K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/70715946/Wel...

Interesting: "

Merrick said the reserve team has been a real success and indicated that the Phoenix are set to promote two 17-year-old players to fulltime professional contracts - most likely forward Logan Rogerson and midfielder James McGarry - and he said it was key for the club to keep developing young New Zealand talent."

Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years

Ryan54 wrote:

Ryan wrote:

Ryan54 wrote:

Sackofspuds wrote:

Pretty sure Domey confirmed that Burns was our Aussie marquee last season.

He said he was a marquee player. A marquee player can just mean a star player and doesn't necessarily mean he was an offical marquee. If he was officially our marquee it seems strange that he wasn't marketed at such.

Rob Morrison said that they paid for Burns outside of the cap as an example of the Phoenix doing things for Australian football.

Can you provide a quote?

This is the quote I have been working off:

Q: It’s said you are against the idea of bringing marquee players to Wellington - is that correct?

A: We aren’t against marquees - we have a marquee player, Nathan Burns, and he was voted as Player of the Year by the Australian media just recently - am I missing something?

Nowhere in there does he explicitly state that the salary of Burns is paid for outside the cap. He just says exactly what I said he said: that Burns is a marquee player. As I said in my post that you quoted there are various definitions of what a marquee player was. I think Morrison was probably just saying that they brought a really good player to Wellington in Nathan Burns who is good enough to be a marquee player. I tend to believe this because he said Burns was a marquee player because of his achievements on the field.

Now in this thread, a user called Ryan M said (and I have no idea whether this is you): 

Burns is the Marquee player for the Phoenix, his wage does not come from the FFA grant. They said last year that they were at the cap, and this year they said they have spent more on players, so you can assume that Burns was the marquee, at least for financial reasons and outside the cap.

Do you have any sources for the above (if it was indeed you)? Given that we lost Hernandez and Huysegems who seemed to be on good money as well as Bertos, I think it is reasonable to assume that last year's squad did not cost much more than the previous year's. Supposition isn't proof so I don't buy this particular argument.

It was reported, that Burns would only stay if he was given marquee status.

He says that the Phoenix pays for Nathan Burns implying that he doesn't come from the subsidy, he goes on to say he's marquee.

http://m.foxsports.com.au/football/a-league/wellington-phoenix-chairman-rob-morrison-talks-to-fox-sports-simon-hill-about-the-clubs-future/story-e6frf4gl-1227337263974

The rumors that say that burns would only stay if he was on marque wages are odd considering he was already contracted. The fact that he is a marquee also doesn't necessarily mean he is on marquee wages.

Marquee
4.5K
·
5.8K
·
about 12 years

bwtcf wrote:

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/70715946/Wel...

Interesting: "

Merrick said the reserve team has been a real success and indicated that the Phoenix are set to promote two 17-year-old players to fulltime professional contracts - most likely forward Logan Rogerson and midfielder James McGarry - and he said it was key for the club to keep developing young New Zealand talent."

Both players have been impressing, particularly McGarry. Ridenton and Rufer falling further back down hte pecking order? Singh would have to be the other outside player.

Marquee
1.2K
·
5.5K
·
almost 14 years
Is it correct we can only have 3 players on youth contract at any given time?
RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
35K
·
about 16 years

Global Game wrote:
Is it correct we can only have 3 players on youth contract at any given time?
We have the 3 Wee Nix contracts outside the 23 senior contracts. Atm Oli Sail has one, so we have two free. I would expect McGarry and Rogerson to fill the other two.
Marquee
1.5K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

With the progress he made during the ASB Premiership season, and the way he played against the top teams in particular, and combined with the club's desperate need for full backs, I hope DiMairo doesn't slip through the cracks.

valeo
·
Legend
4.7K
·
18K
·
over 17 years

I'd say he would've already been brought in if Ernie thought he was up to it, considering our lack of FB's?

RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
35K
·
about 16 years

Defender Deklan Wynne is trialling with the Vancouver Whitecaps, along with fellow Kiwi defender Sam Brotherton.

Wouldn't say no to either of them at the Nix, tho I thought Brotherton had committed to a US College?

Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years

so according to that stuff article a few days ago, despite having an increased budget we haven't been able to sign a burns replacement,  every player we've targeted has wanted a mill.We could be entering the season with either Powell or Apiah starting with Krishna.

.

One in a million
4.4K
·
9.6K
·
over 17 years

Ryan wrote:

so according to that stuff article a few days ago, despite having an increased budget we haven't been able to sign a burns replacement,  every player we've targeted has wanted a mill.We could be entering the season with either Powell or Apiah starting with Krishna.

.

Doom and gloom

RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
35K
·
about 16 years

Ryan wrote:

so according to that stuff article a few days ago, despite having an increased budget we haven't been able to sign a burns replacement,  every player we've targeted has wanted a mill.We could be entering the season with either Powell or Apiah starting with Krishna.

.

We lost our accounting marquee in Burns and have no other player we can nominate, maybe if this marquee rule change goes thru we might be able to pick up one of these million dollar strikers?
Trialist
14
·
90
·
almost 17 years

valeo wrote:

I'd say he would've already been brought in if Ernie thought he was up to it, considering our lack of FB's?

Yeah he's only been played in the back 3 in the preseason games I've seen.  Not even getting a run at wing back.

Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years

Ryan wrote:

so according to that stuff article a few days ago, despite having an increased budget we haven't been able to sign a burns replacement,  every player we've targeted has wanted a mill.We could be entering the season with either Powell or Apiah starting with Krishna.

.

We lost our accounting marquee in Burns and have no other player we can nominate, maybe if this marquee rule change goes thru we might be able to pick up one of these million dollar strikers?

how much we can pay depends on how much we sold Burns for,I doubt we will pay a million for any player.
Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years
Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years

I wonder how Joel's rehab is coming along? Are we stil assisting him?

Starting XI
290
·
4.7K
·
over 17 years

Oh we do have a no dickheads policy ...

\but but but we signed Joel..

"Merrick showed last year with Burns, and previously with Robbie Kruse at the Melbourne Victory, that he is capable of turning a winger with the right attributes into a deadly striker but he said another key part of the profile was making sure any potential new recruit meets their "no dickheads policy."

Early retirement
3.2K
·
34K
·
over 17 years

Allegedly way less of a cock off field than on.

Always a cod to me.

valeo
·
Legend
4.7K
·
18K
·
over 17 years

Hard News wrote:

Allegedly way less of a cock off field than on.

Always a cod to me.

I'm sure most people are less of a dick off the field. I turn into a bit of an angry idiot when I play football; not surprising that professionals are the same.

Unless their name is Griffin McMaster, of course, who is apparently worse off the field.

Starting XI
1.1K
·
2.3K
·
over 12 years
The closest McMaster got to 'on the field' at the nix was a white deck chair, so we've got no reference point for his on field: off field douchebag ratio.
Phoenix Academy
56
·
230
·
almost 10 years

Kiwi Burns scored this morning in Frankfurt against Eintracht. 50000 croud, Germans came from 0-2 down to win 3-2

Live on Frankfurt FC TV, tuned in for second half only to find both Tokyo scorers subbed off. ?

I've tried to edit croud 3 times beats me.

Starting XI
2.5K
·
3.2K
·
about 12 years

Wotsup wrote:

Kiwi Burns scored this morning in Frankfurt against Eintracht. 50000 croud, Germans came from 0-2 down to win 3-2

Live on Frankfurt FC TV, tuned in for second half only to find both Tokyo scorers subbed off. ?

I've tried to edit croud 3 times beats me.

Here the Highlights:

http://tv.eintracht.de/de/saison/testspiele/150802_fra_fra_tok_hl/page/1880---91-.html

Surge
·
Can I have some lungs please miss
1.1K
·
7.5K
·
almost 17 years

number8 wrote:

Wotsup wrote:

Kiwi Burns scored this morning in Frankfurt against Eintracht. 50000 croud, Germans came from 0-2 down to win 3-2

Live on Frankfurt FC TV, tuned in for second half only to find both Tokyo scorers subbed off. ?

I've tried to edit croud 3 times beats me.

Here the Highlights:

http://tv.eintracht.de/de/saison/testspiele/150802_fra_fra_tok_hl/page/1880---91-.html

This is a piss poor example of transfer speculation.
Marquee
1.4K
·
5.3K
·
about 17 years

Getting things back on track

From 442:

  • pat_m_9 wrote:
     World Cup Winner Christian Zaccardo has allegedly received an offer from Australia. Reported in the Gazzetta.
  • Troisi?
valeo
·
Legend
4.7K
·
18K
·
over 17 years

Would need to pay marquee money if we wanted Troisi, which we won't do.

First Team Squad
160
·
1.8K
·
almost 17 years

Sad state of affairs:

WELLINGTON PHOENIX


IN: Blake Powell (APIA Leichhardt)


OUT: Michael Boxall (SuperSport United), Tyler Boyd (Vitoria Guimaraes), Nathan Burns (FC Tokyo), Josh Brindell-South (released), Kenny Cunningham (released), Joel Griffiths (released), Jason Hicks (released)

Overlay that with no license renewal.

Headocunt
460
·
990
·
about 10 years

Whitby boy wrote:

Sad state of affairs:

WELLINGTON PHOENIX


IN: Blake Powell (APIA Leichhardt)


OUT: Michael Boxall (SuperSport United), Tyler Boyd (Vitoria Guimaraes), Nathan Burns (FC Tokyo), Josh Brindell-South (released), Kenny Cunningham (released), Joel Griffiths (released), Jason Hicks (released)

Overlay that with no license renewal.

Very but maybe they are going to make a super announcement when they announce the kit. Im looking for positives here!!

First Team Squad
200
·
1.9K
·
almost 17 years

RoriM6 wrote:

Whitby boy wrote:

Sad state of affairs:

WELLINGTON PHOENIX


IN: Blake Powell (APIA Leichhardt)


OUT: Michael Boxall (SuperSport United), Tyler Boyd (Vitoria Guimaraes), Nathan Burns (FC Tokyo), Josh Brindell-South (released), Kenny Cunningham (released), Joel Griffiths (released), Jason Hicks (released)

Overlay that with no license renewal.

Very but maybe they are going to make a super announcement when they announce the kit. Im looking for positives here!!

yeah but shirt will probably only be a variation of stripes, im with whitby Boy...sad state of affairs

Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years

Yep, by far the worst transfer of any team and that includes Perth which had all the good players jump ship.

I'm hoping Ernie was just playing things down when he said that they still looking for someone:

http://www.fourfourtwo.com/au/news/league-squad-ch...

Makes for depressing reading.

WeeNix
170
·
550
·
over 11 years

still 60 days to bag a goodie.  

First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
over 17 years

I guess I'm in the wait and see camp. Cunningham, Burns (marquee), Boxall and even Brockie leaving must have freed up some money. If we haven't made any signings that would indicate that the owners don't want to spend money. It would seem bizarre if they don't want to spend any money after making Burns marquee last season. I'm convinced that signings must be coming.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

Whitby boy wrote:

Sad state of affairs:

WELLINGTON PHOENIX


IN: Blake Powell (APIA Leichhardt)


OUT: Michael Boxall (SuperSport United), Tyler Boyd (Vitoria Guimaraes), Nathan Burns (FC Tokyo), Josh Brindell-South (released), Kenny Cunningham (released), Joel Griffiths (released), Jason Hicks (released)

Overlay that with no license renewal.

Although only one of those we lost was a regular first teamer. I rate Boxall but he spent most of his time benchwarming or playing out of position when he was on the pitch. Griffiths was only at the club for a handful of games before he busted his knee. JBS was just taking up a squad spot. Boyd packed a sad and clearly had a falling out with the club or coach, although he played well when he did get the chance last year. Kenny was a fringe player last season and was taking up an import slot. Hicks was injured a lot and only made a handful of appearances.

I'm assuming the club is holding off signing young kiwis to contracts while they see what happens with the rest of the squad but I'm sure there's enough talent in the WeeNix to take up the squad spots that the likes of JBS and Hicks left.

Only one player from our first choice 11 is gone and that's Burns and I think it's fair enough to take a while finding a replacement for him. If anything I think that post shows that the core of our team is actually really stable.

What is annoying/concerning is how long this license BS is dragging out for. You wonder if that's making it harder to negotiate contracts or to market the club to foreign players/agents. 

Jag
Not Elite enough
730
·
8K
·
over 17 years

Even though the majority of those weren't regular 1st team starters, it meant we had guys on the bench like Cunningham, Boxall, Griffiths (and Boyd) who we could rely on to do a job and that gave us some depth in the squad. On the face of it at least.

Agree with the starting 11 still being relatively stable, but it's what happens when suspensions, injuries etc kick in that worries me. 

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

Jag wrote:

Even though the majority of those weren't regular 1st team starters, it meant we had guys on the bench like Cunningham, Boxall, Griffiths (and Boyd) who we could rely on to do a job and that gave us some depth in the squad. On the face of it at least.

Agree with the starting 11 still being relatively stable, but it's what happens when suspensions, injuries etc kick in that worries me. 

Yeah fair enough - I guess it comes down to whether you want to put your faith in the young guys to step up if needed. I don't know what the deal with Ridenton is but Rufer looked decent at the U20 WC.  Blake has impressed me when I've seen him too, I wouldn't mind if he got a contract. We also added Appiah near the end of last season, and we just brough in Powell.

A 3rd CB is really a necessity, especially if we are playing with back 3. Given that we've only got one import slot and that'll probably go to a striker, I don't really know who will take that position - Eagar? Musa? Tzimopolous? A random Aussie? Are there any decent Aussie CBs off contract at the moment?

Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years

Ryan54 wrote:

I guess I'm in the wait and see camp. Cunningham, Burns (marquee), Boxall and even Brockie leaving must have freed up some money. If we haven't made any signings that would indicate that the owners don't want to spend money. It would seem bizarre if they don't want to spend any money after making Burns marquee last season. I'm convinced that signings must be coming.

Merick has said that the owners are investing all the money from the sale of Burns back into that position, so he should have more money to spend than before.

As said above the real loss is of depth. Cunningham came on a couple of times last season and rescued the team, as did Boyd and Hicks. Even Boxall scored.

I looked at the Ultimate A-League website and the players we've lost scored 28 goals last season.

We should be getting more goals out of Bonevacia who has had a year in his new position, Rodriguez who has had a year in a first team environment, and hopefully Fenton who won't be quite so far back if he's playing as more of a winger, but still. There's a lot of goals to replace.

Closed for new posts