In D's defence, I do think that aspects of Ernie's performance are at least worthy of discussion.
People defending Ernie have created this narrative where Ernie is doing his best to change playing style with a limited group of players and needs to be given time. There are at least a few potential problems with that:
1. Ernie is not the only coach in the world who can change our style to something more attacking/entertaining. Is there possibly another coach who could do the same job but better?
2. How much time does Ernie actually need? Surely even in a transition year it's reasonable to expect at least a few wins?
3. Ernie's recruitment so far has been average. There may be some big money tied up in the contracts of some longer serving players which will help next season but it appears he will still face the same recruitment issues that Ricki did - attracting players to Wellington while keeping the entire squad within the cap. I don't necessarily expect our recruitment to suddenly shift up a gear just because Vinnie Lia moves on.
Personally, I think he's doing a good job and I'm still a million miles away from saying he should go. However, I don't think he should be completely immune from criticism either. Some of the questions being asked are reasonable to ask.
Ah - a far more reasoned comment.
1: I agree we could well have a different coach doing the same thing or better. I suggest to you though, they either did not apply or make is through the interview process. There is scope for discussion in that though but you have to work on the assumption that the best man won through.
2: If we look at what we started with - a bottom of the table team that was ass, swap out about a 3rd of those players of whom most of the replacements are 'projects' at best then I think the question is that you would at least give him the opportunity to swap out another 3rd so the squad is mainly his. Realistically, he gets 2 years. I would say during the middle of next season, we would have a fair idea of how its all going so revisit this in 1 calendar years time. I do agree that players will not suddenly flock to us. Its the same when we were the Kingz and the Knights. That's where hopefully he has some contacts that may be of benefit.
3: Ernies recruitment has been average... Subjective depending on the view point you hold. He has bought in players for the future and given us a younger fresher look but then a few of those players are not able to contribute today (and invariably, only few young players are). By the same token, Riera was a panic signing because no other player wanted to come here and the alternative, was Matt Thompson. I picked Cunningham to be a stud and I have egg all over my face (mjp2) because of it. Did many people pick him as a bust? We all went 'International playing for Costa Rica - seems legit'. I think at some point we needed to get some youth and future into this team because both CBs are 31 and aging so if you don't start getting replacements in now to acclimatise, when do you? He has started that.
I think where he does get some hits is keeping on with some folk. He ditched Caira which I have no real issue with but was he the worst performing? Brockie is certainly worse than him right now. Will he be dropped? He bloody should be. Stein looks like he does a better job in the role we bought Carlos in to do. Sigmund is trying to be a footballer at the wrong time in the game and gifting mistakes to the opponents. Boxall needs to get a run. If you do the same thing you have always done, you will get what you have always got previously. That's where I think he takes a hit because we are now 10/27 games and hoping it comes right by throwing the same team out each is mad.
To suggest that its all his fault is simply ridiculous. Stein does not get coached to take pens like that. Brockie does not get coached to miss two open goals. Sigmund does not get coached to chest a ball down for an opponent deep in the box. That is not coaching at all and especially experienced pros like that. These are not rookie mistakes.