
So you think Celtic and Rangers would struggle over here?
lol celtic would destroy, any free kick anywhere near the box would be a goal for shunsuke Nakaumura!
a.haak

Regulations Governing the Application of Statutes
Chapter VIII. Nationality of Players
Art. 18
1. Any player who is a naturalised citizen of a country in virtue of that country's laws shall be eligible to play for a national or representative team of that country.
2. If a player has been included in a national or representative team of a country for which he is eligible to play pursuant to �1, he shall not be permitted to take part in an international match for another country. Accordingly, any player who is qualified to play for more than one national association (i.e. who has dual nationality) will be deemed to have committed himself to one association only when he plays his first international match in an official competition (at any level) for that association.
3. The only players exempt from this provision are those whose nationality has been changed not voluntarily but as the result of an international decree either granting independence to a region or ceding part of one country to another.
Just as an FYI
Maybe the powers that be could fast track it .... like the time it took Harry Duynhoven to get regularised
I agree, i think bar Rangers and Celtic. We would be able to beat the others in the league or at least be at the same level. I remember when Dumfermline came over here, they looked rubbish and a patchy AW's side beat them 4- 1. I think they came 4th that year in the SPL?? Correct me someone if im wrong?
The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!
So you think Celtic and Rangers would struggle over here?
No the ugly sisters (Celtic and Rangers) would simply control the FA and run the league with dodgey refs as they always have!!
The answer to life's problems are rarely found at the bottom of a beer glass - but it's always worth a look.
Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.
"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Mid league try hards at best in the EPL !
The answer to life's problems are rarely found at the bottom of a beer glass - but it's always worth a look.
from DIA
- Been present in New Zealand for a total of at least 1,350 days during the 5 years immediately before you make your application; and
- Been present in New Zealand for a total of at least 240 days in each of those 5 years, with a Permanent Resident Permit issued by the New Zealand Immigration Service; and
- Fully met any conditions imposed by the New Zealand Immigration Service in regard to your Permanent Resident Permit.
from DIA
- Been present in New Zealand for a total of at least 1,350 days during the 5 years immediately before you make your application; and
- Been present in New Zealand for a total of at least 240 days in each of those 5 years, with a Permanent Resident Permit issued by the New Zealand Immigration Service; and
- Fully met any conditions imposed by the New Zealand Immigration Service in regard to your Permanent Resident Permit.
Excellent that means i can play for the All Whites!!(have they got a Masters team?)
The answer to life's problems are rarely found at the bottom of a beer glass - but it's always worth a look.
might be just enough time to enter if you can find 10 others willing to join you :)
As I've said a number of times before, Eduardo is a completely different story than the Phoenix lads - he came to Croatia as a 14-15 year old, and has represented Croatia at age group levels as well as the full national side now. Not sure about the guy who used to play for Japan though, think his name was Alex or something like that.
By the way, I'm pretty sure Felipe's not married.
Excellent that means i can play for the All Whites!!(have they got a Masters team?)

Uhm, lies?
There was a big article on Daniel in the Dompost. Before pre-season. Look it up. Not wikipedia.
Regulations Governing the Application of Statutes
Chapter VIII. Nationality of Players
Art. 18
1. Any player who is a naturalised citizen of a country in virtue of that country's laws shall be eligible to play for a national or representative team of that country.
2. If a player has been included in a national or representative team of a country for which he is eligible to play pursuant to �1, he shall not be permitted to take part in an international match for another country. Accordingly, any player who is qualified to play for more than one national association (i.e. who has dual nationality) will be deemed to have committed himself to one association only when he plays his first international match in an official competition (at any level) for that association.
3. The only players exempt from this provision are those whose nationality has been changed not voluntarily but as the result of an international decree either granting independence to a region or ceding part of one country to another.
Just as an FYI
a) the player was born on the territory of
the relevant Association;
b) his biological mother or biological father was born on the
territory of the relevant Association;
c) his grandmother or grandfather was born on the territory of the
relevant Association;
d) he has lived continuously for at least two years on the
territory of the relevant Association.
These conditions ensure that a player has a clear connection with the country in question. As the cases are similar from a factual point of view, the Emergency Committee has applied the same conditions that govern the eligibility of players who are theoretically eligible to play for several Association teams on account of their nationality."
Its funny you say that because I have heard through a pretty good source that the reason Keryn Jordan didn't sign for the Knights is because time out the country affected his nationality claim. If he had signed for them, I believed it added another 9 months onto the time he had to serve in NZ until he could apply. Mind you that sounds out of context with what Daniel and Felipe are doing so don't take above as gospel as I might have that a bit muddled in my own head.
Yeah, the wording in the circular includes the sentence: