Wellington Phoenix Men

How's this helping NZ football?

522 replies · 3,922 views
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hey I thought someone might point out that we had three Kiwis on the field before the game, I was sort of disappointed that it was mention after the game instead. But its all temporary measure.

To compare one or two games in the three seasons of a lack of Kiwis in the team of which the Nix has no second team with clubs like ManU that has about 100 seasons with a youth team and reserve team and governs plenty of community youth and local league teams is a laugh.

You also say that the hard slog was done by the previous NZ team. To some little degree it is, but after the first two seasons of the Kingz and then removing Rufer, that was the end of it. Having sub standard lower league overseas players that couldn't cope was a response to the badly performed New Zealand players in the Kingz or Knights teams. The problem of those coaches is being out of touch with the overseas connections and with the league level as well as lack of financial support in getting the players that the coach needs.

Understandable response of any club in the world but because of being only NZ club in an OZ league and the hope of the NZ football public. Both Kingz & Knights had their time to develop the youth football but owners and their funding was getting lower and lower and lost touch with the community.

The Nix had a great response to the needs of NZ football than the Kingz and Knights. I started and leave it at 10 below points ( or else I can go on for ages as other here will tell you);

1. They have a strong owner in Terry S that has established sport connections and investment in the local scene rather than the Kingz/Knights owners that has offshore investment, therefore a bit more stable.

2.A coach and CEO that communicates better with the football community because they are given the freedom to by the owner unlike Turner and Rufer who shut off by the Kingz/Knights board whenever they tried.

3. Players having more community oriented activities with the public. Leading to better crowd numbers.

4. Ring of fire has better crowd access and updated facilities and more well seen stadium that stand out near the City hub.

5. The Nix players have better national media coverage than Kingz/Knight.

6. The benefit of having the Nix coach who is also the AW coach. I have to admit that it was more beneficial than first thought of.

7. More Wellington football community backing for the Nix compared to the jealous and divided Auckland football community attitude to Kingz/Knight.

8. Ricki having shown greater resolve in turning last years season around with the players from a bad beginning run to a decent run towards the end in nearly gaining into the playoffs. Therefore gaining the confidence of the public that the club has the potential to do better.

9. Having the undefeated home streak and acquiring suitable player imports that fits the dynamic style of skillful play and team concept. Making football exciting to watch than stale team formations on the backfoot (beside Kingz first two season)

10. The Nix having to continuously trial NZFC players each season, unlike what the later Kingz and Knights had done as well as giving some non-Nix players training time with the club players for the AW squad.

10 points better for NZ football development by the Nix than the previous NZ clubs.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bluemagic wrote:
      So my point is - don't make the same mistake as the Kingz and think you can buy success with too much reliance on imports. Success comes from the roots up, with quality additions.�


Just say that then you muppet. Leave your Auckland superiority complex at the door and try not be such a blatant troll and maybe people will listen a bit more.

That's a fair point, but I think that is exactly what the Nix have done. 3 kiwis on the park + the usual Siggie (if he hadn't got suspended) + the injured Paston= a solid base of 5 homegrown players. Costa and Rojas are being groomed for the future when they can step up at this level. I really don't get what you're complaining about? The fact there's no Auckland City heroes in the side?
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
My argument is simple. How can it be a bad thing? Nothing bad can come from having the phoenix play in the A league,it gives more potential for players to come through,it has given players like smeltz a lifeline,and it has generated public interest in football (particularly in wellington).
 
So there were only 3 NZ players in the squad...it still isnt a negative thing for NZF...its only bringing positives overall.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
However I share your little fear of losing Ricki and the possible shut off of local talent. But that is not happening as it seems that there is more long term prospect that he will stick around even if a season goes pear-shape.

I have confidence in Terry, Tony and Ricki to continue to make the club competitive and capable as the next A-League club. The ongoing transitional seasonal player transfers has players and fans confidence higher than Kingz and Knights. Really Kingz and Knights just rolled over and died. As long we perform competitively on the field with the ongoing support in the management infrastructure and fan crowds that is just behind Melbourne Victory and maybe Sydney FC in the League, we should have a good future.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Can I also ask why it is the Phoenix's responsibility to develop NZ talent, but not Auckland City's?  I hope you're down at your own club asking them to get rid of the foreigners and play more kiwis...

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
He won't be back until after the next Auckland City home game.  Where after the match a little group of them will whine about the Phoenix getting media coverage ahead of City, and how unfair it is that they only get 500 to matches and someone will say 'you should go on yellow fever and post that, they won't like the truth'.

Of course neglecting to actually research if it is the truth.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Without the Phoenix, I doubt that Costa/Rojas would be playing professionally. They're not world beaters, but the best we have here in NZ. Giving these guys a professional contract exposes them to the sort of environment that can only help them grow their game...and that can only be good for NZF...
Rising_Phoenix2010-01-11 23:44:43
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The original topic isn't worth talking about.

Though this thread does make one wonder if it might be time to retire, "Same old Aussies, always cheating."
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bluemagic wrote:
    . So forgive me my cynicism because now I listen to so-called die-hard fans, who turn out once to the Cake Tin to see the All Whites nick one game, telling me how Herbert and the boys are going to take the World Cup by storm. Yes folks, I watch a lot of international football and a reality check is in store.
 


Who said that we will be taking the World Cup by storm?
We are just thrilled to be there after 27 years !!!!!
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bluemagic wrote:
Good luck to Dadi for a great introduction to the Phoenix, but how is the fact that only three new Zealanders were on the pitch helping local football. The Phoenix seem to be far too over-loaded with Aussie sloggers like Vince Lia when exciting young Kiwi talent can't get a look in as far as Herbert's concerned. Now with Dadi on board young Costas can forget about much game time and Rojas may as well leave and go back to the NZFC. It looks like Siggy is on the outer now as well, with only Paston another possible Kiwi starter. Jason Haynes and Chad Coombes would make great players for the Phoenix and proved their worth for Auckland City against the African champions TP Mazembe, but Herbert isn't interested. The Aussie players are only at the Phoenix because they couldn't get contracts for Australian A-League clubs. All due respect to Windy City, but they ain't there for the ambience, they're only there for a pay cheque and that isn't going to win you any silverware. The Phoenix should field the most exciting talent in NZ (plus a few good imports) and there are question marks over whether either Tim Brown or Tony Lockhead fall into that catagory. The Phoenix is virtually an Aussie team with a few Kiwis attached.
 
I don't want to feed this comment as it sounds like a cheap shot at trouble on here, but maybe the Phoenix have recognised (like the Auckland-based NRL and NBL teams) that they play in an Australian competition and as such use players to suit.
 
If Dadi and Ifill clean up for WPFC then I doubt the true supporters would care. Similarly Melbourne fans don't bag Carlos Hernandez (or Fred back in the day) when they score because they're foreign.
 
Almost a cheap back-door form of racism the post above, but from what I can read its a journo causing trouble. Hey journo, you want something to talk about, message me mate, I'll give you plenty to report on.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
W.A.NIXFAN wrote:
Blue magic I believe your topic is valid and good on ya for having your say, but i think  its quite clear that most people around here embrace everything positive about New Zealand Football and that includes Auckland City!


Agreed.  Although a number of your comments referred to Vince Lia in a way that suggested his is average at best.  To be honest I'd prefer him as a DM ahead of most other DM's in this league.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I would rather be winning without NZers than losing with. Would you be content with losing knowing that we were playing with a team of Kiwis? No.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bluemagic wrote:
I merely asked - how is this helping local football?[/QUOTE]

el oh el. Youre only suggesting Hayne and Coombes because you saw them on the TV, you probably never knew who they were before the World Club Cup. And just because Siggy has missed the last few weeks because of a ban, youre saying hes on the cusp of making the side...? The Nix also need to have youth players, its a requirement for the A-league. This is pretty much the only reason Costa and Rojas are in the squad. And also dont forget its an Australian League, which is why there is always going to be a number of Aussies in the squad, and rightly so.

And give the Nix a break, its not like theyre a club thats been around for decades like Manchester or Chelsea (who are using imports like theyre going out of fashion), theyre still very much finding their feet and the priority at this stage is to just do well. Its been how many years of failed NSL/A-league seasons by a kiwi based side...? Exactly. We just want to see football in NZ, and we want to see it do well.

[QUOTE=Stripes]The original topic isn't worth talking about.

Though this thread does make one wonder if it might be time to retire, "Same old Aussies, always cheating."

Yeah thats the one chant i dont get in on.
AJ132010-01-12 07:11:18
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Not forgetting the comparative size of the "market"  Each person through the Nix gate is worth 5 from Auckland.
 
 
2ndBest wrote:
Bluemagic wrote:
  
    Anyway where are all these so called fans and their white t-shirts at other times?  The Phoenix are doing no better at crowds than the Kingz did in their heyday, and you have a much more high profile league. I watched a Phoenix game several weeks ago and there wouldn't have been many more than 5,000 at the stadium. Get it wrong and your fans will evaporate as fast as El Tel's millions.


You talk sh*t

Kingz/knights attendance
Season  
Average   High  
2006/2007
3,009 7,304
2005/2006
3,989 9,827
2003/2004
1,273 4,083
2002/2003
2,613 3,682
2001/2002
3,874 8,121
2000/2001
6,620 13,111

vs Nix
2007/2008 Ave=11,683, High =18,345
2008/2009 Ave= 7193, High = 10, 516
2009/2010 Ave = 7523, High = 10024
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
decent effort for an auckland troll - got five pages and he bailed by page 3.5.....


Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
Needs 99/00 and it should be noted that the largest two crowds (including 13,111) were here.
 

This better.  Provided average for all home games, and home game that were in Auckland (for Kingz/knights), and wellington (Phoenix)

1999/2000

2001/2

2002/3

2003/4

2005/6

2006/7

2007/8

2008/9

2009/10

Kingz

Kingz

Kingz

Kingz

Knights

Knights

Phoenix

Phoenix

Phoenix

1

8200

4366

2999

2304

9827

7304

14421

10516

10024

2

4500

5182

3282

1245

4938

4100

11478

6110

7523

3

4500

6975

2804

1271

3558

2071

12127

6928

9713

4

4186 (Chch)

6605

3682 (Ham)

1662

4182

2764

10127

6729

6769

5

2284

5559

2908

1410

2583

1632

10562

6543

4115

6

3572

8120

2753

1121

2561

2357

8062

5500

6571

7

2512

11622 (Wgtn)

1057

1054

1922

2675

18345

7953

6930

8

2512

3030

2354

1176 (Ham)

4212

2139

8039

6362

8206

9

4692

5988

2570 (N.P)

1175

3024

2039

9384

6722

6936 (P.N)

10

3878

4554 (Chch)

3148

1013 (Ham)

3079

1963

14288

7520

8125

11

3687

13111 (Wgtn)

2535

892

4136

8241

12

8000 (Wgtn)

4891

1262

950

13

3762

6941

14

3562

3616

15

4323

8738

16

4877

17

5143

18

5628

Average - �Home�

             4,434

            6,620

              2,613

             1,273

             3,989

             3,016

           11,683

             7,193

             7,491

Average � Actual Home

             4,227

            5,834

              2,510

             1,308

             3,989

             3,016

           11,683

             7,193

             7,553

Highest - �Home�

             8,200

          12,311

              3,682

             2,304

             9,827

             7,304

           18,345

           10,516

           10,024

Highest - Actual Home

             8,200

            8,738

              3,282

             2,304

             9,827

             7,304

           18,345

           10,516

           10,024

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
lets lock this. Bluemagic is a tool with no brains.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I get the feeling he's achieved what he set out to do when he started the thread.

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
whooooooo wrote:
lets lock this. Bluemagic is a tool with no brains.


You two have a lot in common then.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

A bit of reality here. The Kingz had much less media exposure, a much smaller budget and played in a lower profile (ethnic club) competition in Aussie. They did bloody well to attract the crowds they did in their first two seasons with essentially a local team playing the likes of Marconi and Melbourne Knights.  Also Siggy was good at City but no stand-out. If he can make it at the Phoenix others can too if given the chance. That's all I've been saying. This isn't a forum, it's more like a clobbering machine for anyone who dares to raise anything real. A bit more humour and a bit less abuse wouldn't go amiss fellas. Happy Ted blows you all a kiss.

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bluemagic wrote:
Also Siggy was good at City but no stand-out.


Not true. He was head and shoulders above the rest of the league and anyone at City the season before the Nix snapped him up.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bluemagic wrote:

This isn't a forum, it's more like a clobbering machine for anyone who dares to raise anything real. A bit more humour and a bit less abuse wouldn't go amiss fellas.

[/QUOTE]

Funny, the last time Bluemagic was here he said:

[quote]Oh well, it was worth a try. I thought you guys would bite back a bit more.


Make up your mind, mate, do you want people to yell at you or not?

(Aucklander here who's a big fan of both the Nix and ACFC and will actually be in Welly on 12 Feb, so you may see me at the Mariners game...)Doloras2010-01-12 10:24:16

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
You're in the majority Doloras, it's just the minority are more vocal.
 
Any yet the minority get to decide what's "real" and then moan that people disagree with them.  What a specious argument.

14/11/09

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bluemagic wrote:

A bit of reality here. The Kingz had much less media exposure, a much smaller budget and played in a lower profile (ethnic club) competition in Aussie. They did bloody well to attract the crowds they did in their first two seasons with essentially a local team playing the likes of Marconi and Melbourne Knights.� Also Siggy was good at City but no stand-out. If he can make it at the Phoenix others can too if given the chance. That's all I've been saying. This isn't a forum, it's more like a clobbering machine for anyone who dares to raise anything real. A bit more humour and a bit less abuse wouldn't go amiss fellas. Happy Ted blows you all a kiss.



See, this is where you lose credibility. Siggy was easily the best player in the NZFC, by a long way, before he came here. He was always going to get the opportunity (just like the likes of Krishna and Corrales, but they failed to make the cut) to play for the Phoenix.

And then you berate Ricky for not giving the opportunity to Brockie, who was absolute pants in the NZFC. Most people have tried to reason and argue why your views are bit misguided. And you had to expect some heat, especially since your argument aren't particularly well founded.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Quality thread this. Haven't read it all, but some of the questions do have to be asked.

First we wouldn't want a team getting humiliated just to give NZ players a go. You want NZ players to earn their starting spot.
 
Second- look at players like Smeltz and Draper. I think the time at the 'Nix has helped both of them improve their game. Costa has done well to get the game time he has this year, but just hasn't been able to put the ball in the back of the net enough.
 
Rojas wasn't even getting starts at Waikato all the time, but has had some game time for the Phoenix, and hopefully has benefited from his year.
 
If there is anyone good enough to be in the squad name them and let's see them trial. The Aussie players in the starting team are in on merit. End of. No one demonstrates this more than Manny.
 


Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bluemagic wrote:
I too would play Durante and McKain, plus love Ifill, and think Dadi is the business. But I also think the likes of Haynes, Coombes and Feneridis could step up to a professional standard if given a chance at the Phoenix. I know they'd play their hearts out for you. Look at Brockie, he was rejected by Herbert and is doing well at the Fury.
 
Herbert also rejected McBreen.
 
edit: I think it is good to see something solid for football in NZ. The 'Nix are well run, have a great organisation as a club and on the park.
 
I think seeing a kiwi coach running the team has been important as well, despite his conservative approach he rewards good performances, gives promising players opportunities and has no time for players who don't want to be there.
 
If you think your players deserve a shot they have to keep putting in performances.
martinb2010-01-12 12:28:28


Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Buffon II wrote:
whooooooo wrote:
lets lock this. Bluemagic is a tool with no brains.


You two have a lot in common then.


whatever I did to you I'm sorry. Just stop putting me down.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It's a valid issue throughout the game, do you invest in developing local players or throw money at imports. It's a huge issue in the Premiership at the moment and Fifa's even talking of quotas for local players. I've been a loyal fan of City from the outset and I can assure you Siggy wasn't the best player in the NZFC. I talked to him when he was trying to get a trial at the Phoenix and it was his sheer determination that finally got Herbert to relent but boy he had to work at it. Costa and Rojas are only there because of regulations. But don't tell me that Costa doesn't get the biggest cheer when he runs out as substitute. Krishna's finishing isn't good enough, even though he has good skills. Haynes and Coombes could do a good job for the Phoenix. BUT unless they get the chance, and that means proper game time because there's no reserve team, how can you say they're not good enough. Likewise Rojas. Maybe economic realities next season will allow cheaper local players more of a chance and I think that would be a good thing.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bollocks. Siggy stood out like a beacon in the NZFC. Coombes isn't good enough for this level. He doesn't need to play in the A-league for everyone to realise he's not up to it. Haynes worth a look, but so is Barron.

Like we keep saying, best players from the NZFC have always had the opportunity to impress and get signed by the Phoenix. Some took the opportunity, others didn't. There's no reason to think that these opportunities won't keep coming, so I don't really see what your problem is.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Well if you want to have a whip around for us and get your mates not to block it we could have a reserve team either in Aussie or in NZFC.
 
If Siggie wasn't the best player where are these better players hiding? Most people I know agree Siggie was, as has been stated on here head and shoulders above the league.
 
Would love a Nix reserve team. I am one of those who wouldn't mind seeing Mulligan get a second chance to press his claim- which it seems like he almost did earlier in the season, but Diego got the nod.
 
Dadi is able to come to us in good form because of the reserve team. 
 
None of the players you mentioned have demanded contracts with their performances yet though Hayne maybe close.


Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Having seen Coombes and Hayne and asked around (so not just my one sided one eyed view) I would say that with Hayne he has the ability to be an A League player and what is helping him is that he moving away from the one dimensional wing man that he was. Plus Miron said so.... (obvious troll) Coombes too has A League talent. Very fit and competitive with skill on both feet alround the park. Its just he is a headcase on the pitch. Sorts that out and he would be there.

 
I would think that from the NZFC only Barron, Haynes and Coombes have the potential to realise a step to the next level (I've left out Christie due to his A League experience). As Siggy said, it took him 3 months to adjust to trainings, speed, 1 touch football and fitness.
Jeff Vader2010-01-12 12:43:24

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bluemagic wrote:
It's a valid issue throughout the game, do you invest in developing local players or throw money at imports. It's a huge issue in the Premiership at the moment and Fifa's even talking of quotas for local players. I've been a loyal fan of City from the outset and I can assure you Siggy wasn't the best player in the NZFC. I talked to him when he was trying to get a trial at the Phoenix and it was his sheer determination that finally got Herbert to relent but boy he had to work at it. Costa and Rojas are only there because of regulations. But don't tell me that Costa doesn't get the biggest cheer when he runs out as substitute. Krishna's finishing isn't good enough, even though he has good skills. Haynes and Coombes could do a good job for the Phoenix. BUT unless they get the chance, and that means proper game time because there's no reserve team, how can you say they're not good enough. Likewise Rojas. Maybe economic realities next season will allow cheaper local players more of a chance and I think that would be a good thing.


I dont think we can compare the Premiership with New Zealand football. Football in England is way popular than it is here.

If we were to play a team with majority of them being Kiwis and end up at the bottom of the table again - what good will that achieve for the game of football in New Zealand as whole?
No one will want to invest in a loosing team and no one will want to play for one either - - You make it sound as if the Nix have nothing to offer - they are the ONLY professional team in the country! This will indirectly help in developing local talent. You have to be patient - this is only the third season for the team!



Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
Bollocks. Siggy stood out like a beacon in the NZFC. Coombes isn't good enough for this level. He doesn't need to play in the A-league for everyone to realise he's not up to it. Haynes worth a look, but so is Barron.

Like we keep saying, best players from the NZFC have always had the opportunity to impress and get signed by the Phoenix. Some took the opportunity, others didn't. There's no reason to think that these opportunities won't keep coming, so I don't really see what your problem is.
 
Spot on.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
There is a debate in some countries about not enough local players playing in their teams. This is sometimes a legit debate. The circumstances are obviously very different in New Zealand / for the Phoenix than the debate you refer to. But by coming here and posting incorrect facts and rubbish accusations that half our players are only here for money / have no commitment, that was hardly going to address the 'valid issue' you talk of.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Check out this piece which he (Bluemagic) sent to the Herald and then posted on the Auckland City Forum...can't say i agree with that!

"Now while I don't begrudge the All Whites their nomination for Westpac Sports Team of the Year nomination in the 2009 Halberg Awards, as local football receives precious little recognition in this country, I do wish to point out one very notable omission in the Team of the Year nominees.

Auckland City FC, a team of part-timers in the New Zealand Football Championship, qualified for the prestigious Club World Cup and then defied all odds to beat the (fully professional) champions of the UAE, Al Ahli, 2-0 and even more sensationally the powerful African champions TP Mazembe 3-2 with a fantastic last-minute goal.

No sporting achievement by a NZ team this year comes close to this David and Goliath triumph in the world's most popular game. All due respect to NZ's ice hockey team, the basketball Tall Blacks, softball's Black Sox, even the All Blacks, none of their efforts compare to what this amazing team achieved in coming fifth in the Club World Cup last week.

Led by All Whites hero Ivan Vicelich and coached by Paul Posa, Auckland City FC has some of the most exciting young NZ talent in the game and they were the sensation of a major international football tournament watched by hundreds of millions around the world. Respect where respect is due please!"


"You can never get a bloody tradesman at Easter, it's a wonder Jesus got crucified" - Karl Pilkington

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It's hyperbolic of course, but he's a city fan so not unexpected.  Plenty of us on here see things through rose-tinted specs at times and City's efforts were respectable.

I don't think they would have made a finalist spot but if they weren't even nominated that is disappointing (assuming there wasn't a timeframe that excluded them).

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

wonder why no other team in the world has picked up Coombes or Haynes if they are such legends.

Founder

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Stripes wrote:
The original topic isn't worth talking about.

Though this thread does make one wonder if it might be time to retire, "Same old Aussies, always cheating."


Yep. I thought the same last season when I had a good laugh at the ROF over the irony. I think it was Van Dijk who chopped Troy Hearfield and the "same old Aussies always cheating chant" went up. I realised a dutchman had chopped our Aussie....
Permalink Permalink