Allegedly
Allegedly
Im not disagreeing with you,im just lol'ing at your way of trying to prove it statistically
Allegedly
I did not use this example in earlier seasons, Paston conceded less goals in less games but lets not start that up again...

Allegedly
I did not use this example in earlier seasons, Paston conceded less goals in less games but lets not start that up again...
Back that up.. I'd be interested. He is clearly the best keeper for us but seriously your stats are pretty ridiculous. It doesn't take into account who we played, or how many goals we scored in those games, as well as saves made and shots on target etc. Just plenty of things that make them unreliable.
Paston 12 Goals conceded in 12 games. 1 goal per game. 3 Wins, 7 Draws, 2 Losses. 1.58 points per game.
Crowther 7 Goals conceded in 4 games. 1.75 goals per game. 1 Win, 1 Draw, 2 Losses. 1 Point per games.
Quite clearly shows Pastons is far better for the team and his presence and organisational skills are worth .58 points per game more then Crowther which is HUGE.
Stats mean far less in football compared to in other sports (say cricket).
There could be any reason for the above. We could have played with 4 blind defenders when Crowther conceded but that type of stat wouldn't reveal it.
Having said all that, I shall continue to use stats when they suit me.
wellyphoenixfan, on behalf of all goalkeepers, you are a f**king idiot.
Paston 12 Goals conceded in 12 games. 1 goal per game. 3 Wins, 7 Draws, 2 Losses. 1.58 points per game.
Crowther 7 Goals conceded in 4 games. 1.75 goals per game. 1 Win, 1 Draw, 2 Losses. 1 Point per games.
Quite clearly shows Pastons is far better for the team and his presence and organisational skills are worth .58 points per game more then Crowther which is HUGE.
Without wanting to go too deep back into stats land, I cut the numbers as follows:
With Paston in goal (12 data points), WPX get 53% of their maximum points, with a margin of error of 14%.
With Crowther in goal (4 data points), WPX get 33% of their maximum points, with a margin of error of 24%.
There is some probability that you're right, but it's not clear-cut.
(edit: This kind of thing is why statisticians don't have to say silly things about hypothetical one-match stints by Casillas and the like.)
Stripes2009-12-01 00:41:03
Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.
"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003
THE KEEPER IS THE LEAST RESPONSIBLE!
A goalkeeper is mearly the first line of attack. The strikers are the first line of defence. I say blame Greenacre and Ifil for us conceeding 4 
Its no longer a problem.
Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.
"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009
Superb.
Will have to do a rendition of it on Friday night if Paston's playing.
A goalkeeper is mearly the first line of attack. The strikers are the first line of defence. I say blame Greenacre and Ifil for us conceeding 4 
Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.
A goalkeeper is mearly the first line of attack. The strikers are the first line of defence. I say blame Greenacre and Ifil for us conceeding 4 

Its no longer a problem.
Because Paston organises...erm, I'll stop there.
No good last game, but who was?
Thread got better when it changed to sundaes
He's the reserve keeper ffs. He's not supposed to be awesome.
14/11/09
My point is goals conceded is the best stat you can use to justify how good a keeper is. I know there are plenty of reasons why or why not a keeper conceded the amount of goals they did but both keepers face relatively the same circumstances so I think it is a fair comparison. Of course you have to have a bigger sample than one game.

rojas, so special
The (fourth?) goal, the one that went through his legs he should have ran out to narrow the angle. Instead he stood there, looking like a jerk. Maybe he was worried that if he ran out Dodd could cut it back to someone who could knock it in, but we all know Dodd is useless so that's a fail as far as I'm concerned.
Second goal, he slipped, tough, could have done better, but slips a slip.
Second goal, he slipped, tough, could have done better, but slips a slip.
14/11/09
Goal 2 - aim to make yourself big he managed with the slip to be as small as possible, unfortunate but co-ordination does seem to be a problem with him
Goal 3 - Should have clear sight of shot and that was his side to cover, never even got near it
Goal 4 - totally exposed by defence
Should he be happy with that display? No Should you expect better from a back-up keeper? Yes
Not beating up on him he was simply poor, not alone on that score though.
He looks really unco and whats up with the stuff(i think its tape)around his ankles and wrists.looks wierd.
He looks really unco and whats up with the stuff(i think its tape)around his ankles and wrists.looks wierd.
I think he just isn't very Photogenic myself.

rojas, so special
My point is goals conceded is the best stat you can use to justify how good a keeper is. I know there are plenty of reasons why or why not a keeper conceded the amount of goals they did but both keepers face relatively the same circumstances so I think it is a fair comparison. Of course you have to have a bigger sample than one game.
Bollocks, bollocks, bollocks and more bollocks. f**k me, what a load of bollocks.
Ben Foster playing for Watford during the 2006/2007 season, Watford come 20th in the English Premier League and get relegated, yet Ben Foster wins both the Fans' and Club Player of the Year Award.
DKP222009-12-01 20:38:37
Another one of WPF's stupid statements.
What do you mean both keepers face the same circumstances?
If you mean that they both stay in their goal box and wear gloves. you are right.
Back up all the statements you made in that.
My point is goals conceded is the best stat you can use to justify how good a keeper is. I know there are plenty of reasons why or why not a keeper conceded the amount of goals they did but both keepers face relatively the same circumstances so I think it is a fair comparison. Of course you have to have a bigger sample than one game.
Epic fail. Football is not a sport where stats can explain performance/quality. Cricket and baseball yes. But Football. Not a chance.
Another one of WPF's stupid statements.
What do you mean both keepers face the same circumstances?
If you mean that they both stay in their goal box and wear gloves. you are right.
Back up all the statements you made in that.
Please delete that out of your initial comment before WPF reads that as I do suspect he will try to back all his statements up and that will enrage me so.

